|
|
|
Updated 8:00 AM EST, April 15, 2008
Highway-Rail Intersections Under Electronic Surveillance
2004 National SummaryNumber of Metropolitan Areas Surveyed / Returned Survey | Metropolitan Areas with Highway-Rail Intersections Under Electronic Surveillance | Number of Highway-Rail Intersections |
---|
Under Electronic Surveillance | Total | Percent |
---|
107 / 106 | 36 | 640 | 14227 | 4% |
2004 Metropolitan Summary
Metropolitan Area | State | Number of Agencies Surveyed / Returned Survey | Agencies with Highway-Rail Intersections Under Electronic Surveillance | Number of Highway-Rail Intersections |
---|
Under Electronic Surveillance | Total | Percent |
---|
Albany, Schenectady, Troy | NY | 5 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 297 | 0% | Albuquerque | NM | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 0% | Allentown, Bethlehem, Easton | PA | 2 / 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | Asheville | NC | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Atlanta | GA | 10 / 10 | 1 | 19 | 1300 | 1% | Austin | TX | 1 / 1 | 1 | 125 | 125 | 100% | Bakersfield | CA | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Baltimore | MD | 5 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0% | Baton Rouge | LA | 3 / 3 | 1 | 20 | 265 | 8% | Beaumont-Port Arthur | TX | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Bellingham | WA | 2 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0% | Birmingham | AL | 3 / 3 | 1 | 2 | 481 | 0% | Boise City | ID | 1 / 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 100% | Boston, Lawrence, Salem | MA | 13 / 11 | 1 | 50 | 351 | 14% | Buffalo, Niagara Falls | NY | 6 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 175 | 0% | Charleston | SC | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0% | Charlotte, Gastonia, Rock Hill | NC | 3 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Chattanooga | TN | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0% | Chicago, Gary, Lake County | IL | 25 / 24 | 6 | 14 | 1379 | 1% | Cincinnati, Hamilton | OH | 8 / 8 | 0 | 0 | 175 | 0% | Cleveland, Akron, Lorain | OH | 18 / 18 | 1 | 1 | 193 | 1% | Columbia | SC | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0% | Columbus | OH | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 115 | 0% | Dallas, Fort Worth | TX | 13 / 13 | 4 | 22 | 413 | 5% | Dayton, Springfield | OH | 8 / 8 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 0% | Daytona Beach | FL | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 0% | Denver, Boulder | CO | 14 / 14 | 2 | 8 | 219 | 4% | Des Moines | IA | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 0% | Detroit, Ann Arbor | MI | 12 / 12 | 3 | 51 | 988 | 5% | El Paso | TX | 2 / 2 | 1 | 11 | 13 | 85% | Eugene | OR | 4 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 88 | 0% | Fort Myers | FL | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0% | Fort Wayne | IN | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Fresno | CA | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0% | Grand Rapids | MI | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0% | Greensboro, Winston-Salem, High Point | NC | 7 / 7 | 1 | 13 | 104 | 13% | Greenville | NC | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0% | Greenville, Spartanburg | SC | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 605 | 0% | Hampton Roads | VA | 7 / 7 | 0 | 0 | 71 | 0% | Harrisburg, Lebanon, Carlisle | PA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Hartford, New Britain, Middletown | CT | 6 / 5 | 1 | 1 | 165 | 1% | Honolulu | HI | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Houston, Galveston, Brazoria | TX | 8 / 8 | 0 | 0 | 96 | 0% | Huntsville | AL | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0% | Indianapolis | IN | 4 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 0% | Jackson | MS | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 0% | Jacksonville | FL | 4 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 130 | 0% | Janesville-Beloit | WI | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0% | Kansas City | MO | 6 / 6 | 1 | 3 | 124 | 2% | Knoxville | TN | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 74 | 0% | Lancaster | PA | 1 / 0 | 0 | N/R* | N/R* | N/R* | Las Vegas | NV | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0% | Little Rock, North Little Rock | AR | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0% | Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside | CA | 17 / 17 | 6 | 77 | 938 | 8% | Louisville | KY | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0% | McAllen | TX | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 694 | 0% | Memphis | TN | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0% | Miami, Fort Lauderdale | FL | 2 / 2 | 2 | 53 | 76 | 70% | Milwaukee, Racine | WI | 10 / 10 | 0 | 0 | 88 | 0% | Minneapolis, St. Paul | MN | 12 / 12 | 2 | 59 | 232 | 25% | Modesto | CA | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0% | Montgomery | AL | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0% | Nashville | TN | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0% | New Haven, Meriden | CT | 5 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 0% | New London | CT | 3 / 3 | 1 | 11 | 24 | 46% | New Orleans | LA | 5 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 213 | 0% | New York, Northern New Jersey, Southwestern Connecticut | NY | 43 / 40 | 3 | 22 | 953 | 2% | Oklahoma City | OK | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 279 | 0% | Omaha | NE | 4 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 115 | 0% | Orlando | FL | 4 / 4 | 1 | 7 | 71 | 10% | Pensacola | FL | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 72 | 0% | Philadelphia, Wilmington, Trenton | PA | 15 / 15 | 1 | 1 | 107 | 1% | Phoenix | AZ | 10 / 10 | 1 | 5 | 34 | 15% | Pittsburgh, Beaver Valley | PA | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Portland, Vancouver | OR | 7 / 6 | 2 | 12 | 106 | 11% | Providence, Pawtucket, Fall River | RI | 7 / 7 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0% | Provo - Orem | UT | 3 / 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 20% | Raleigh-Durham | NC | 5 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Reno | NV | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0% | Richmond, Petersburg | VA | 4 / 3 | 1 | 5 | 47 | 11% | Roanoke | VA | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0% | Rochester | NY | 1 / 1 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 6% | Sacramento | CA | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 0% | Salinas | CA | 4 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 0% | Salt Lake City, Ogden | UT | 6 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0% | San Antonio | TX | 2 / 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 100% | San Diego | CA | 7 / 7 | 1 | 12 | 51 | 24% | San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose | CA | 7 / 7 | 1 | 5 | 57 | 9% | San Luis Obispo | CA | 3 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0% | Santa Barbara | CA | 4 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0% | Sarasota-Bradenton | FL | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0% | Scranton, Wilkes-Barre | PA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0% | Seattle, Tacoma | WA | 11 / 11 | 1 | 2 | 132 | 2% | Spokane | WA | 3 / 3 | 1 | 5 | 178 | 3% | Springfield | MA | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0% | Springfield(MO) | MO | 3 / 3 | 1 | 3 | 102 | 3% | St. Louis | MO | 8 / 8 | 0 | 0 | 260 | 0% | Stockton | CA | 4 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 77 | 0% | Syracuse | NY | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0% | Tampa, St. Petersburg, Clearwater | FL | 7 / 7 | 0 | 0 | 97 | 0% | Toledo | OH | 4 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 0% | Tucson | AZ | 3 / 3 | 1 | 6 | 47 | 13% | Tulsa | OK | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0% | Washington | DC | 7 / 6 | 1 | 1 | 35 | 3% | West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Delray | FL | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 68 | 0% | Wichita | KS | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Youngstown, Warren | OH | 5 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 0% | 107 Metropolitan Areas * N/R = No response |
|
|
| |