|
|
 |
|
Updated 8:00 AM EST, April 15, 2008
 Participation in Regional Coordination of Traffic Signal Timing Plans
2004 National Summary
| Number of Metropolitan Areas | Number of Agencies |
|---|
| 77 of 107 surveyed | 208 of 546 surveyed |
2004 Metropolitan Summary
| Metropolitan Area | State | Number of Agencies | Participates |
|---|
| Albany, Schenectady, Troy | NY | 2 of 5 surveyed | Yes | | Albuquerque | NM | 1 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Allentown, Bethlehem, Easton | PA | 0 of 2 surveyed | No | | Asheville | NC | 1 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Atlanta | GA | 8 of 10 surveyed | Yes | | Austin | TX | 1 of 1 surveyed | Yes | | Bakersfield | CA | 0 of 2 surveyed | No | | Baltimore | MD | 3 of 5 surveyed | Yes | | Baton Rouge | LA | 0 of 3 surveyed | No | | Beaumont-Port Arthur | TX | 1 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Bellingham | WA | 1 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Birmingham | AL | 1 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Boise City | ID | 0 of 1 surveyed | No | | Boston, Lawrence, Salem | MA | 0 of 13 surveyed | No | | Buffalo, Niagara Falls | NY | 1 of 6 surveyed | Yes | | Charleston | SC | 0 of 3 surveyed | No | | Charlotte, Gastonia, Rock Hill | NC | 0 of 3 surveyed | N/R* | | Chattanooga | TN | 0 of 2 surveyed | No | | Chicago, Gary, Lake County | IL | 6 of 25 surveyed | Yes | | Cincinnati, Hamilton | OH | 4 of 8 surveyed | Yes | | Cleveland, Akron, Lorain | OH | 1 of 18 surveyed | Yes | | Columbia | SC | 0 of 2 surveyed | No | | Columbus | OH | 2 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Dallas, Fort Worth | TX | 10 of 13 surveyed | Yes | | Dayton, Springfield | OH | 4 of 8 surveyed | Yes | | Daytona Beach | FL | 0 of 2 surveyed | No | | Denver, Boulder | CO | 14 of 14 surveyed | Yes | | Des Moines | IA | 0 of 2 surveyed | No | | Detroit, Ann Arbor | MI | 6 of 12 surveyed | Yes | | El Paso | TX | 1 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Eugene | OR | 0 of 4 surveyed | No | | Fort Myers | FL | 2 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Fort Wayne | IN | 0 of 2 surveyed | No | | Fresno | CA | 2 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Grand Rapids | MI | 2 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Greensboro, Winston-Salem, High Point | NC | 1 of 7 surveyed | Yes | | Greenville | NC | 1 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Greenville, Spartanburg | SC | 3 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Hampton Roads | VA | 4 of 7 surveyed | Yes | | Harrisburg, Lebanon, Carlisle | PA | 0 of 1 surveyed | No | | Hartford, New Britain, Middletown | CT | 0 of 6 surveyed | No | | Honolulu | HI | 1 of 1 surveyed | Yes | | Houston, Galveston, Brazoria | TX | 4 of 8 surveyed | Yes | | Huntsville | AL | 0 of 2 surveyed | No | | Indianapolis | IN | 1 of 4 surveyed | Yes | | Jackson | MS | 0 of 3 surveyed | No | | Jacksonville | FL | 2 of 4 surveyed | Yes | | Janesville-Beloit | WI | 0 of 3 surveyed | No | | Kansas City | MO | 5 of 6 surveyed | Yes | | Knoxville | TN | 1 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Lancaster | PA | 0 of 1 surveyed | N/R* | | Las Vegas | NV | 1 of 1 surveyed | Yes | | Little Rock, North Little Rock | AR | 1 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside | CA | 12 of 17 surveyed | Yes | | Louisville | KY | 1 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | McAllen | TX | 2 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Memphis | TN | 1 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Miami, Fort Lauderdale | FL | 2 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Milwaukee, Racine | WI | 2 of 10 surveyed | Yes | | Minneapolis, St. Paul | MN | 5 of 12 surveyed | Yes | | Modesto | CA | 1 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Montgomery | AL | 1 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Nashville | TN | 1 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | New Haven, Meriden | CT | 1 of 5 surveyed | Yes | | New London | CT | 1 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | New Orleans | LA | 1 of 5 surveyed | Yes | | New York, Northern New Jersey, Southwestern Connecticut | NY | 6 of 43 surveyed | Yes | | Oklahoma City | OK | 0 of 3 surveyed | No | | Omaha | NE | 2 of 4 surveyed | Yes | | Orlando | FL | 1 of 4 surveyed | Yes | | Pensacola | FL | 0 of 3 surveyed | No | | Philadelphia, Wilmington, Trenton | PA | 3 of 15 surveyed | Yes | | Phoenix | AZ | 9 of 10 surveyed | Yes | | Pittsburgh, Beaver Valley | PA | 0 of 3 surveyed | No | | Portland, Vancouver | OR | 6 of 7 surveyed | Yes | | Providence, Pawtucket, Fall River | RI | 0 of 7 surveyed | No | | Provo - Orem | UT | 2 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Raleigh-Durham | NC | 0 of 5 surveyed | No | | Reno | NV | 2 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Richmond, Petersburg | VA | 2 of 4 surveyed | Yes | | Roanoke | VA | 1 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Rochester | NY | 1 of 1 surveyed | Yes | | Sacramento | CA | 2 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Salinas | CA | 1 of 4 surveyed | Yes | | Salt Lake City, Ogden | UT | 3 of 6 surveyed | Yes | | San Antonio | TX | 0 of 2 surveyed | No | | San Diego | CA | 3 of 7 surveyed | Yes | | San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose | CA | 4 of 7 surveyed | Yes | | San Luis Obispo | CA | 0 of 3 surveyed | No | | Santa Barbara | CA | 2 of 4 surveyed | Yes | | Sarasota-Bradenton | FL | 1 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Scranton, Wilkes-Barre | PA | 0 of 1 surveyed | No | | Seattle, Tacoma | WA | 4 of 11 surveyed | Yes | | Spokane | WA | 2 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Springfield | MA | 0 of 2 surveyed | No | | Springfield(MO) | MO | 2 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | St. Louis | MO | 2 of 8 surveyed | Yes | | Stockton | CA | 2 of 4 surveyed | Yes | | Syracuse | NY | 2 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Tampa, St. Petersburg, Clearwater | FL | 4 of 7 surveyed | Yes | | Toledo | OH | 1 of 4 surveyed | Yes | | Tucson | AZ | 2 of 3 surveyed | Yes | | Tulsa | OK | 0 of 3 surveyed | No | | Washington | DC | 4 of 7 surveyed | Yes | | West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Delray | FL | 1 of 2 surveyed | Yes | | Wichita | KS | 0 of 2 surveyed | No | | Youngstown, Warren | OH | 1 of 5 surveyed | Yes | | 107 Metropolitan Areas * N/R = No response |
|
|
|  |
