Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico;
Revision to Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets in Bernalillo County, New
Mexico Carbon Monoxide Air Quality Maintenance Plan Using MOBILE6
[Federal Register: October 9, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 196)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 58276-58281]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09oc03-8]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[NM-46-1-7615a; FRL-7571-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico;
Revision to Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets in Bernalillo County, New
Mexico Carbon Monoxide Air Quality Maintenance Plan Using MOBILE6
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is taking direct final action approving the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions for Bernalillo County, New Mexico,
which is a carbon monoxide maintenance area. This SIP revision was
submitted to EPA by the Governor of New Mexico on May 15, 2003. More
specifically, EPA is approving the county's revised Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budget (MVEB) for carbon monoxide (CO) for 1996, 1999, 2002,
2005 and 2006. This budget was developed using EPA's latest emissions
[[Page 58277]]
modeling program, MOBILE6. This submittal updates the maintenance plan
by establishing new transportation conformity MVEBs for use by the Mid-
Region Council of Governments, the area's Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO). These budgets will continue to maintain the total
on-road mobile source emissions for the area at or below the attainment
level for the CO National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).
DATES: This rule is effective on November 24, 2003 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by November 10, 2003. If
EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this action should be addressed to Mr.
Thomas H. Diggs, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-L), at the EPA Region
6 office listed below. Electronic comments should be sent either to
Diggs.Thomas@epa.gov or to http://www.regulations.gov,
which is an alternative method for submitting electronic comments to EPA.
To submit comments, please follow the detailed instructions described in
the Final Action part of this document. Copies of the State's submittal
and other documents relevant to this action are available for public
inspection during normal business hours at the following locations.
Anyone wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment
with the appropriate office at least two working days in advance.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas, 75202-2733.
City of Albuquerque Environmental Health Department, 1 Civic Plaza,
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103. Telephone 505-768-2600.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Peggy Wade, Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Dallas, Texas, 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-7247 or Wade.Peggy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we'',
``us'', or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
Outline
I. Background
II. What Is MOBILE6?
III. Analysis of the State's Submittal
A. Why Were Updated Carbon Monoxide Budgets Established?
B. Recalculating the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget with MOBILE6
IV. Final Action
A. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related
Information?
B. How and To Whom Do I Submit Comments?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
In 1990, the City of Albuquerque/Bernalillo County (Albuquerque) in
New Mexico had a CO design value of 11.1 parts per million, exceeding
the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) of 9 parts per
million (8-hour average basis). Consequently, Albuquerque was
classified as a moderate nonattainment area for CO under the Clean Air
Act (the Act). As required by the Act, on November 5, 1992, New Mexico
submitted for EPA approval a revision to the SIP to address
Albuquerque's CO nonattainment.
Different parts of the November 1992 SIP submittal were approved at
different times, with approval of all aspects completed in June of
1996.
Air quality data in the Albuquerque area showed no violations of
the CO NAAQS between 1992 and 1995, meeting the first criterion for
redesignation. On April 14, 1995, New Mexico submitted a request that
Albuquerque be redesignated to attainment for CO. EPA proposed approval
of this request on February 16, 1996. This approval was made effective
on July 15, 1996.
The Act also requires a periodic inventory of all emissions from
area, mobile, and stationary sources. The 1993 emission inventory found
the following CO emissions levels, in tons per day: Stationary sources,
3.18; area sources, 111.60; On-road mobile sources, 274.16; and nonroad
mobile sources, 45.74. Total CO emissions were 434.69 tons per day.
This inventory was further updated in 1996. This updated inventory
reflected the following CO emissions levels, in tons per day: On-road
mobile sources, 266.99; nonroad mobile sources, 50.90; area sources,
67.19; and stationary sources, 3.92. Total CO emissions were
inventoried at 389.0 tons per day.
The Albuquerque/Bernalillo County area submitted further revisions
to its maintenance plan emissions budgets on February 4, 1999, using
the MOBILE5 emission factor modeling program. These revisions, for
years 1996-2006, increased the budgets for mobile and stationary source
emissions but decreased the budget for area source emissions, resulting
in an overall decrease in budgeted emissions. These revisions also
established a 2010 emissions budget. A direct final rule approving
these revisions was published December 20, 1999. However, adverse
comments were received and the direct final approval was withdrawn.
After addressing the comments received, the EPA gave final approval to
the budget revisions for 1996-2010 on May 24, 2000 (65 FR 33455). The
revised MVEBs are as follows, in tons of CO emissions per day: 1996,
266.99; 1999, 229.09; 2002, 209.1; 2005, 205.67; 2006, 205.86; and
2010, 222.46.
II. What Is MOBILE6?
MOBILE6 is the latest in a series of EPA emissions factor models
for estimating pollution from on-road motor vehicles in states outside
of California and represents the first major update of the preexisting
MOBILE model since 1993. The release of this model was announced in a
Federal Register notice published on January 29, 2002 (67 FR 4254).
This date marks the beginning of the two-year grace period, after which
all areas must use MOBILE6 for emissions factor modeling for
transportation conformity purposes. MOBILE6 calculates emissions of
carbon monoxide and other pollutants from passenger cars, motorcycles,
buses, and light-duty and heavy-duty trucks. The model accounts for the
emission impacts of factors such as changes in vehicle emissions
standards, changes in vehicle populations, and variation in local
conditions such as temperature, humidity, fuel quality, and air quality
programs.
MOBILE6 is used to calculate current and future inventories of
motor vehicle emissions at the national and local level. These
inventories are used to make decisions about air pollution policies and
programs at the local, state and national level. Inventories based on
MOBILE6 are also used to meet the federal Clean Air Act's SIP and
transportation conformity requirements.
The MOBILE model was first developed in 1978 and MOBILE6 is the
first major update of the model since 1993. It has been updated many
times to reflect changes in vehicle fleet composition and fuels, to
incorporate EPA's growing understanding of vehicle emissions, and to
cover new emissions regulations and modeling needs.
III. Analysis of the State's Submittal
A. Why Were Updated Carbon Monoxide Budgets Established?
The existing MVEBs for CO were last modified through a SIP revision
approved and made effective by EPA on May 24, 2000 (65 FR 33455).
To address and accommodate the release of MOBILE6 as the latest
EPA-approved emissions factor model, the
[[Page 58278]]
governor of New Mexico submitted a SIP revision to EPA on May 15, 2003.
The MVEBs contained in the current CO maintenance plan were calculated
with a previous emissions factor model, MOBILE5a. This submittal
revises the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for the years 1996, 1999,
2002, 2005 and 2006 using MOBILE6. Note that only the MVEBs are being
revised using the MOBILE6 model; budgets for the other source
categories will remain unchanged as the MOBILE6 model does not affect
these categories. However, changes in the estimated amount of CO
produced by the on-road mobile source category will affect the CO
baseline level and the CO totals by year. Therefore, the baseline level
and amounts of total CO by year will be revised in response to the
MOBILE6 analysis.
The EPA guidance document, Policy Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6
for SIP Development and Transportation Conformity, issued by John Seitz
on January 18, 2002 (``MOBILE6 Guidance''), states that nonattainment
and maintenance areas may forgo the requirement to update all planning
assumptions when updating the MVEBs with MOBILE6, if the area can
demonstrate that these assumptions have not changed since the last
budget revision. For CO, population is the most important assumption
underlying the CO forecasts as it has a direct impact on the number of
miles driven. Comparing the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County population
figure for the year 2000 used in the last SIP revision (556,248) to the
population for the same area recorded in the 2000 Census (556,678)
results in a difference of 0.077%, less than 1%. Because the estimated
figure matches so closely with the actual census count, the requirement
that the latest planning assumptions continue to be valid is met and
this SIP revision continues to use these estimates. Additionally, work
has already begun on the required second ten-year maintenance plan, due
to EPA in June of 2004. With this expected submission, the MPO will
update the emissions inventory in its entirety with the latest planning
assumptions and demographic data.
B. Recalculating the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget With MOBILE6
Because of the significant difference in modeling results between
the previous version of the emissions factor model, MOBILE5a, and the
updated version, MOBILE6, the on-road mobile source category in the
emissions inventory was recalculated for all years represented in the
ten-year maintenance time frame of the SIP using MOBILE6. This
inventory provides the basis for determining the MVEBs for CO. The
MVEBs are the same as the total estimated CO, in tons per day, for the
on-road mobile source category in the emissions inventory. For all
years beyond 2006 (the last modeled year), the MVEB will be held at the
2006 level.
The table below compares the existing MVEBs with the revised MVEBs
submitted with this SIP revision.
Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Existing Proposed
Year (CO in (CO in Change
tpd) tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996................................... 266.90 416.31 149.32
1999................................... 229.09 373.05 143.96
2002................................... 209.01 369.53 160.52
2005................................... 205.67 367.28 161.61
2006................................... 205.86 312.65 106.79
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For all budget years, MOBILE6 estimates a greater production of CO
than MOBILE5a. Although the MOBILE6 emissions are estimated to be
higher than that previously predicted by MOBILE5a, the model still
demonstrates greater relative emissions reductions benefits. Recall
that only the budget estimates for on-road mobile source emissions (the
MVEBs) are being revised with the MOBILE6 model. Changes in the MVEBs
will, however, affect the overall CO budgets and CO baseline level even
though the amount of CO in the other source categories (nonroad mobile,
area, and stationary) will remain unchanged. The MOBILE6 Guidance
provides that nonattainment and maintenance areas may revise the on-
road mobile emissions inventory and MVEBs without revising the entire
SIP and other emission inventory categories, if the SIP continues to
demonstrate maintenance of the standard when the MOBILE5a-based on-road
mobile source inventories are replaced with MOBILE6 inventories. To
demonstrate this, the following table shows the entire emission
inventory, with the on-road mobile source category replaced with the
resultant MOBILE6-derived estimates. The revised MVEBs are shown, along
with the currently approved inventories from the other source
categories. These inventories were approved in a revision to the CO
maintenance plan on May 24, 2000 (65 FR 33455).
Inventory Source Category
[CO in tpd]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Off-road Revised
Year MOBILE6 mobile Area Stationary total
MVEBs sources sources sources inventory
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996........................................... 416.31 50.90 67.19 3.92 538.32
1999........................................... 373.05 52.68 69.87 27.40 523.00
2002........................................... 369.53 54.46 72.60 27.54 524.13
2005........................................... 367.28 56.25 75.25 27.68 526.46
2006........................................... 312.65 56.84 76.09 27.72 473.30
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 1996 figure found in the revised total column, 538.32 tpd, is
the new CO baseline level as calculated with MOBILE6. The original
baseline level, as approved on May 24, 2000, was 389.0 tpd. This level
represents the amount of CO, in tons per day, which may be emitted by
all sources and still allow the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County area to
be in attainment of the NAAQS. Essentially, this baseline represents
the ``cap'' of emissions from all sources. The results of MOBILE6
modeling, which raises the baseline level, indicates that the initial
CO baseline, as determined using MOBILE5a, was set too low. This new
analysis indicates that the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County area actually
had a larger amount of CO in the airshed in 1996, yet still met the
NAAQS. The following table illustrates the relative gain in emissions
reductions when comparing the MOBILE5a-derived estimates with those of
MOBILE6.
[[Page 58279]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cap under Cap under
Year MOBILE5a MOBILE6 (in Difference
(in tpd) tpd) (in tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996.......................... 389.0 538.32 164
2006.......................... 366.51 473.30 106.79
Decrease in CO Emissions (in -22.49 -65.02
tpd).........................
Percent Reduction............. 5.78 12.08
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The greater decline in emissions seen with MOBILE6 between 1996 and
2006 can be attributed to the sensitivity of the model to local
parameters incorporated into MOBILE6 and the control programs in place
in Albuquerque/Bernalillo County. So, although the emissions cap is
higher with MOBILE6, that difference is due to the sensitivity of the
newer model.
MOBILE6 offers a more robust and accurate estimate of emissions
than prior versions of the model. Comparing just the MOBILE5a and
MOBILE6 on-road mobile source estimates indicates that MOBILE6 shows a
relative reduction in CO emissions that is approximately twice as much
as that seen with MOBILE5a.
IV. Final Action
We have evaluated the State's submittal and have determined that it
meets the applicable requirements of the Act and EPA regulations, and
is consistent with EPA policy. Therefore, we are approving
Albuquerque's request to revise the MVEBs in its carbon monoxide
maintenance SIP using MOBILE6, EPA's latest emission factor modeling
program.
The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because we
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments
are received. This rule will be effective on November 24, 2003 without
further notice unless we receive adverse comment by November 10, 2003.
If we receive adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in
the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take
effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so
at this time. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
A. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information?
1. The Regional Office has established an official public
rulemaking file available for inspection at the Regional Office. The
EPA has established an official public rulemaking file for this action
under NM-46-1-7615. The official public file consists of the documents
specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received,
and other information related to this action. Although a part of the
official record, the public rulemaking file does not include
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public rulemaking
file is the collection of materials that is available for public
viewing at the Air Planning Section, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Dallas, Texas, 75202. The EPA requests that, if at all possible, you
contact the rulemaking contact listed as the Further Information
Contact to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30 excluding
Federal holidays.
2. Copies of the State submittal are also available for public
inspection during official business hours, by appointment at the local
air agency. City of Albuquerque Environmental Health Department, 1
Civic Plaza, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103. Telephone 505-768-2600.
3. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the Regulations.gov Web site located at http://
www.regulations.gov where you can find, review, and submit
comments on Federal rules that have been published in the Federal
Register, the Government's legal newspaper, which are open for comment.
The EPA's policy on public comments indicates that, whether
submitted electronically or in paper, all comments will be made
available for public viewing at the EPA Regional Office, as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing
copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in
the version of the comment that is placed in the official public
rulemaking file. The entire printed comment, included the copyrighted
material, will be available at the Regional Office for public
inspection.
B. How and To Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the
appropriate rulemaking identification number, NM-46-1-7615, in the
subject line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure your
comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments
received after the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.''
EPA is not required to consider these late comments.
1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as
prescribed below, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing
address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in the body
of your comment. Also include this contact information on the outside
of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying
the disk or CD ROM. This ensures you can be identified as the source of
the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on
the substance of your comment. The EPA's policy is that EPA will not
edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information provided
in the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public file, and made available in EPA's
electronic public record. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider you comment.
i. Electronic Mail (e-mail). Comments may be sent by e-mail to
Thomas Diggs (Diggs.Thomas@epa.gov). The EPA's e-
[[Page 58280]]
mail system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an e-
mail comment directly without going through Regulations.gov, EPA's e-
mail system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail
addresses that are automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
file, and made available in EPA's electronic public record.
ii. Regulations.gov. Your use of Regulations.gov is an alternative
method of submitting electronic comments to EPA. Go directly to
Regulations.gov at http://www.regulations.gov, then select EPA
at the top of the page and to ``Go'' button. The list of current EPA
actions available for comment will be listed. Please follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. The system is an ``anonymous
access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail
address, or other contact information unless you provide it in the body
of your comment.
iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM
that you mail to mailing address identified in Section 2, directly
below. These electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect,
Word, or ASCII file format. Avoid the use of special characters and any
form of encryption.
iv. By Mail. Send your comments to Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD-L), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas, 75202-2733,
Attention: NM-46-1-7615.
v. By Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: Mr.
Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-L), 1445 Ross Avenue,
Dallas, Texas, 75202-2733. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30
excluding Federal holidays.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 8, 2003. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 30, 2003.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
? 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
? 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart GG--New Mexico
? 2. In Sec. 52.1620, the table in paragraph (e) entitled ``EPA approved
nonregulatory provisions and quasi-regulatory measures in the New
Mexico SIP'' is amended by adding one new entry to the end of the table
to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1620 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 58281]]
EPA Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the New Mexico SIP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable geographic or
Name of SIP provision nonattainment area State submittal/effective date EPA approval date Explanation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Maintenance plan for carbon Bernalillo County................ February 12, 2003................ [October 9, 2003 and ...........
monoxide--Albuquerque/Bernalillo FR page citation].
County, New Mexico: Update of
carbon monoxide budgets using
MOBILE6.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 03-25543 Filed 10-8-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P