Table of Contents
Federal Aviation
Administration
4. Revisions
to Digital Flight Data Recorder Regulations for B-737 Airplanes and for Part
125 Operators
Federal Highway
Administration
Federal
35. Limitations
on the Issuance of Commercial Driver Licenses with a Hazardous Materials
Endorsement
Federal Railroad
Administration
Federal Transit
Administration
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration
Office of the Secretary
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Air Tour Safety |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AF07 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 10/22/03; End of Comment Period 01/20/04;
Extension of Comment Period 01/16/04; End of Extended Comment Period
04/19/04; Extension of Comment Period/2 04/20/04; End of Extended Comment
Period/2 06/18/04. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking will consider new regulations for air tour and sightseeing
operations that are currently allowed to operate under less stringent
regulations than those applied to other types of commercial operations. Hot
air balloons and gliders would not be included in this amendment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 04/25/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
2. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Flight Crewmember Duty Time |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AF63 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 12/20/1995; End of Comment Period 03/19/1996;
Comment Period Extended 3/20/1996; End of Extended Comment Period 6/19/1996. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend the regulations on duty period limitations,
flight time limitations, and rest requirements for flight crewmembers engaged
in air transportation. The FAA proposes additional changes in response to
comments received on the NPRM. The changes are necessary to ensure that the
rules will continue to provide the minimum level of safety. This rulemaking
responds to public and congressional interest in regulating flight crewmember
rest requirements, NTSB Safety Recommendations, petitions for rulemaking, and
scientific data. This action is considered significant because of substantial
public interest. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 11/28/1995 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
3. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Licensing Space Launches |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AG37 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 10/25/2000; End of Comment Period 2/22/2001.
SNPRM: Publication Date 07/30/2002; End of Comment Period 10/28/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This action would establish requirements for licensing the conduct of a
launch from a non-Federal launch site. The law requires anyone who proposes
to conduct a launch within the United States, or a U.S. citizen proposing to
conduct a launch from a site outside the United States, to obtain a license
from DOT. This action would govern obtaining a license to conduct such a
launch. Currently, commercial rocket launches take place from Federal
Government installations operated by the Department of Defense and NASA. This
action would also establish safety standards for launches from federal launch
ranges and non-federal launch sites. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 01/17/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
4. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Digital Flight Data Recorder/B-737 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AG87 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 11/18/1999; End of Comment Period 12/20/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend the digital flight data recorder (DFDR)
regulations for transport category airplanes to add a requirement for all
Boeing 737 (B-737) series airplanes to record additional flight data
parameters. It is based on safety recommendations issued by the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) following the investigation of the 1994
USAir FLight 427 accident. This rulemaking is
significant because of substantial public interest. A final rule had been
scheduled for August 11, 2000. Since publication of the NPRM, the FAA has
mandated significant changes to the rudder system on 737s. Accordingly, the
proposed rule would apply to a different set of airplanes than originally
anticipated. The FAA is requesting comment on this change in applicability
and is requesting updated economic information about the installation of the
proposed monitoring equipment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 02/15/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for SNPRM: None |
5. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Transponder Continuous Operation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AH67 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 1/14/2003; End of Comment Period 3/17/2003;
Extension of Comment Period 3/18/2003; End of Extended Comment Period
4/18/2003. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend the instrument and equipment requirements for
airplanes operated in domestic, flag, and supplemental operations.
Specifically, the rulemaking would require affected airplanes to have the
capability to help assure immediate activation of the designated air traffic
control (ATC) hijack alert code, and continuous transmission of that code to
ATC during a hijack situation. This action would respond to the heightened
threat to U.S. civil aviation. The FAA believed that this capability would
help provide ATC personnel with more time to initiate a national security
response to a potential airplane hijack situation. However, following a
review of the comments, the FAA is considering withdrawing the NPRM because
of uncertainty about whether it is justified. The FAA had previously
scheduled a withdrawal for publication on October 14, 2003. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 10/01/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
6. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Cockpit Voice Recorder |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AH88 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 02/28/2005; End of Comment Period 04/29/2005;
Extension of Comment Period 06/28/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and digital
flight data recorder (DFDR) regulations for certain air carriers, operators,
and aircraft manufacturers. It would increase the duration of CVR and flight
data recorder (FDR) recordings; increase the data recording rate of certain
DFDR parameters; require physical separation of the DFDR and CVR; improve the
reliability of the power supply to both the CVR and DFDR; and, if data-link
communication equipment is installed, require that all data-link
communications received by an aircraft be recorded. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/30/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
7. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: ETOPS |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI03 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 11/17/03; End of Comment Period 1/13/04;
Extension of Comment Period 01/15/04; End of Extension of Comment Period
3/15/04. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would govern the design, maintenance, and operation of
airplanes and engines for flights that go certain long distances beyond an
adequate airport. This rulemaking would extend some requirements that
previously applied only to two-engine airplanes to airplanes with more than
two engines. This rulemaking would implement existing best practices and
policy, industry recommendations and international standards to assure that long-range
flight will operate safely. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
8. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Aging Aircraft Widespread Fatigue |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI05 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would require incorporation of a program to preclude
widespread fatigue damage into the FAA-approved maintenance program of each
operator of large transport category airplanes. This action is the result of
concern for the continued operational safety of airplanes that are
approaching or have exceeded their design service goal. This rulemaking would
require a limit of validity in flight cycles or hours of the structural
maintenance program, where the operator must incorporate added inspections
and/or modification/replacement actions into its maintenance program to allow
continued operation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 06/15/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: 71 FR 38540 |
9. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Crew Monitoring |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI16 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 09/21/2005; End of Comment Period 11/21/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would require passenger-carrying transport category airplanes
used in domestic, flag, and supplemental operations to have a means to allow
the flightcrew to visually monitor the door area
outside the flightdeck. This would allow the flightcrew to identify persons requesting entry into the flightdeck, and to detect suspicious behavior or
potential threats. In addition, operations requiring the presence of flight
attendants, the rulemaking would require that the flight attendants have a
means to discreetly notify the flightcrew of
suspicious activity or security breaches in the cabin. The rulemaking would
address standards adopted by the International Civil Aviation Organization
following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: International Agreement |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/22/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
10. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: DC Flight Rules |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI17 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date: 08/04/2005; End of Comment Period 11/02/2005;
Publication Date for Extension of Comment Period 11/07/2005; End of Extended
Comment Period 02/06/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would codify restrictions for certain aircraft operations in
the Washington, DC Metropolitan Area. This action is necessary because of the
ongoing threat of terrorist attacks. The FAA intends by this action to help
the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense protect
national assets in the National Capital region. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/18/2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
11. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Fuel Tank Flammability/Inerting |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI23 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 11/23/2006; End of Comment Period 3/23/2006;
Extension of Comment Period 3/21/2006; End of Extended Comment Period
5/08/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking will require that flammability reduction means be
incorporated into existing airplanes, newly manufactured airplanes, and new
designs. It establishes new design standards for future and pending
applications for type certification as well as new operating rules for
retrofitting existing airplanes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 02/17/2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
12. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: EAPAS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI31 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 10/6/2005; End of Comment Period 2/3/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would change wiring system and fuel tank system requirements
for transport category airplanes. It would organize and clarify design
requirements for wire systems, by moving existing regulatory references to
wiring into a single section of the regulations specifically for wiring and
adding new certification rules to address aging issues in wire systems. This
rulemaking would require holders of type certificates for certain transport
category airplanes to conduct analyses and make necessary changes to the
existing Instruction for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) to improve maintenance
procedures for wire systems. It would require operators to incorporate those
ICA for wiring into their maintenance or inspection programs. It would also
clarify requirements of certain existing operational rules for operators to
incorporate ICA for fuel tank systems into their maintenance or inspection
programs. The intent of this rule is to help ensure the continued safety of
commercial airplanes by improving the design, installation, and maintenance
of their electrical wiring systems as well as by aligning those requirements
as closely as possible with the requirements for fuel tank system safety. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 05/28/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
13. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Drug Enf Assistance |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI43 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rule would amend airmen certification and aircraft registration
requirements. Two years after the final rule becomes effective, paper pilot
certificates may no longer be used to exercise piloting privileges. Five
years after the final rule becomes effective, certain other paper airmen
certificates, such as those of flight engineers and mechanics, may no longer
be used to exercise the privileges authorized by those certificates. To
exercise the privileges after those respective dates, the airmen would have
to hold upgraded, counterfeit-resistant plastic certificates. Student pilots
would not be affected. In addition, those who transfer ownership of
U.S.-registered aircraft would have five days from the transaction to notify
the FAA Aircraft Registry. Those who apply for aircraft registration would
have to include their printed or typed name with their signature. These
changes are responsive to concerns raised in the FAA Drug Enforcement Assistance
Act. The purpose of the changes is to upgrade the quality of data and
documents to assist Federal, State, and local agencies to enforce the
Nation's drug laws. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/06/2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
14. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: O'Hare Airport |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI51 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 03/25/2005; End of Comment Period 05/24/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking will create operational limits on the number of peak hour
arrivals at O'Hare International Airport (ORD) as an interim measure to
manage congestion and delays. This rulemaking replaces the Administrator's
August 2004 order with slightly different requirements. The rulemaking will
alter and extend the limitations on arrivals into O'Hare while we continue to
consider various market-based mechanisms to allocate capacity and evaluate
the impact of the O'Hare modernization plan (OMP) and its goal of increasing
capacity. The rulemaking is intended to be temporary and sunset on October
31, 2008. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 09/08/2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
15. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Part 145 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI53 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking will amend the regulations for repair stations by revising
the system of ratings and requiring repair stations to establish a quality
program. This rulemaking will add changes critical to maintaining safety.
These include: requiring a repair station to maintain a capability list;
requiring a repair station to designate a chief inspector; requiring
permanent housing for all repair stations for their facilities, equipment,
materials, and personnel; and identifying reasons for denying a repair
station certificate, especially when a previously held certificate has been
revoked. In addition, the rulemaking will clarify recent revisions to the
repair station regulations. This action is necessary to reflect changes in
aviation technology and repair station business practices. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 09/18/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
16. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Reusable Launch Vehicles |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI56 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 03/14/2006; End of Comment Period 05/30/2006 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking will define the process and standards for the issuance and
maintenance of an Experimental Permit. An experimental permit will authorize
the launch of developmental reusable suborbital rockets. The purpose of an
experimental permit is to allow launches of developmental reusable suborbital
rockets with less regulatory burden on the launch operator than would
otherwise be the case with a traditional license. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 01/25/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
17. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Human Space Flight |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI57 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 12/29/2005; End of Comment Period 2/27/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would establish requirements for crew qualifications,
training, and notification. It also would establish training and informed
consent requirements for space flight participants. The requirements are
designed to provide an acceptable level of safety to the general public and
to notify individuals on board of the risks associated with a launch or
reentry. The rulemaking also would modify existing financial responsibility
and waiver of liability requirements to account for the FAA's new authority
to regulate space flight participants and crew, and to issue experimental
permits. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 01/25/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
18. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Special Training for DC ADIZ |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI63 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would establish training requirements for any pilot who flies
under visual flight rules within 100 nautical miles of Ronald Reagan
Washington National Airport's omni-directional
range/distance measuring equipment. The training primarily focuses on the
procedures for flying in and around Washington, DC's Special Flight Rules
Area and Flight Restricted Zone. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: 71 FR 38118 |
19. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Security Considerations |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI66 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would implement certain security related requirements
governing the design of transport category airplanes. The requirements would
provide improved airplane design features and greater protection of the
cabin, flightdeck, and cargo compartments from the
detonation of explosive or incendiary devices, penetration by projectiles,
and intrusion by unauthorized persons. The FAA would also require operators
to establish a "least risk bomb location" on all affected airplanes
and to incorporate certain information into relevant operator's manuals. This
rule would adopt several International Civil Aviation Organization standards
and harmonize FAA and international regulations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 06/04/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
20. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: LaGuardia Airport |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI70 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would propose a new rule to address the potential for
increased congestion and delay at New York's LaGuardia Airport (Laguardia) when the High Density Rule (HDR) expires there
on January 1, 2007. The rulemaking, if adopted, would establish an
operational limit on the number of aircraft landing and taking off at the
airport. To offset the effect of this limit, the proposed rule would increase
utilization of the airport by encouraging the use of larger aircraft through
implementing an airport-wide, average aircraft size requirement designed to
increase the number of passengers that may use the airport within the overall
proposed operational limits. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/04/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
21. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Filtered Flight Data |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AI79 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend the digital flight data recorder (DFDR)
regulations by prohibiting certain types of signal filtering for a set of
specified recorded parameters. This rulemaking is based on recommendations
issued by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). The rulemaking is intended
to improve the accuracy and quality of the data recorded on DFDRs and used during accident and incident
investigations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 05/24/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
22. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Retroreflectivity of Road Signs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2125-AE98 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 07/30/2004; End of Comment Period 10/28/2004;
Extension of Comment Period 10/22/2004; End of Extended Comment Period
02/01/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This action would update the standards for retroreflectivity
of traffic signs. Section 406(a) of the Department of Transportation and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1993, requires the Secretary of
Transportation to revise the MUTCD to include a standard for a minimum level
of retroreflectivity that must be maintained for
traffic signs. The FHWA is interested in establishing standards for nighttime
visibility of traffic signs. The FHWA will develop these standards by
considering the results of research, engineering practices and comments
received in response to this notice of proposed amendments. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 05/07/2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for SNPRM: 71 FR 26711 |
23. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Tolling |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2125-AF07 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
Pursuant to SAFETEA-LU, this rulemaking would establish requirements,
standards, or performance specifications for automated toll collection
systems implemented under the Express Lanes Demonstration Project. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
24. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: PNRS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2125-AF08 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would, pursuant to SAFETEA-LU, establish the manner in which
the Secretary will evaluate and rate the transportation infrastructure
projects based on the results of preliminary engineering, project
justification, and the degree of non-Federal financial commitment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: 71 FR 41478 |
25. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Planning |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2125-AF09 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would, pursuant to SAFETEA-LU, set standards for the annual
listing of projects for which Federal funds have been obligated in the preceeding year and to specify the types of data to be
included in such list, including sufficient information about each project to
identify its type, location, and amount obligated. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: 71 FR 33510 |
26. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Design-Build |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2125-AF12 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
Pursuant to SAFETEA-LU, this rulemaking would eliminate the prohibition on
States issuing requests for proposals, proceeding with awards of design-build
contracts, or issuing notices to proceed with preliminary design work under
design-build contracts prior to compliance with section 102 of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and requiring State Departments of
Transportation or local transportation agencies to receive approval from the
Secretary of Transportation before carrying out such activity. This
rulemaking would also preclude a design-build contractor from proceeding with
final design or construction of any permanent improvement prior to completion
of the section 102 NEPA process. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: 71 FR 30100 |
27. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Project Pilot Program |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2125-AF13 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 04/05/2006;End of Comment Period 06/05/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would establish requirements relating to information required
to be contained in any application of a State to participate in the Surface
Transportation Project Delivery Pilot Program. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
28. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: 4(f) Parks |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2125-AF14 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This FHWA/FTA joint rulemaking would clarify the factors to be considered and
the standards to be applied in determining the prudence and feasability of alternatives under section 4(f) (138 of
title 23, U.S. Code, and section 303 of title 49, U.S. Code). Section 4(f)
properties include certain parks, recreation areas, wildlife and waterfowl
refuges, and historic sites described in section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-670). Section 4(f) generally prohibits
the use of such properties for transportation projects unless the Secretary
of Transportation finds there is no feasible and prudent alternative and all
possible planning to minimize the harm is undertaken. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: 71 FR 42611 |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
29. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Medical CDL |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: ANPRM: Publication Date 7/15/94; End of Comment Period 11/14/94. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would provide for Federal medical certification as part of
the commercial driver's license (CDL), as required by Section 215 of the
Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act. Incorporating medical certification
status information from the medical examiner's certificate into the
State-administered CDLIS driver recordkeeping processes would improve highway
safety by preventing medically uncertified individuals from obtaining or
retaining a CDL, and enable detection of uncertified drivers as part of
enforcement. It would also eliminate the requirement for CDL operators to
carry their medical examiner's certificate in addition to their CDL. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 07/15/1993 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
30. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: URS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA22 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: ANPRM: Publication Date 8/26/96; End of Comment Period 10/25/96.
NPRM: Publication Date 05/19/2005;End of Comment Period 08/17/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would replace three current identification and registration
systems: the US DOT number identification system, the commercial registration
system, and the financial responsibility system, with an online Federal
unified registration system. This system would serve as a clearinghouse and
depository of information on, and identification of, brokers, freight
forwarders, and others required to register with the Department of
Transportation. The Agency is revising this rulemaking to address amendments
directed by SAFETEA-LU. The replacement system for the Single State
Registration System, which the ICC Termination Act originally directed be
merged under URS, will be addressed separately. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 01/01/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for SNPRM: None |
31. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA34 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 05/03/2001; End of Comment Period 07/02/2001.
Interim Final Rule: Publication Date 03/19/2002; End of Comment Period
04/18/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking changes FMCSA regulations to govern applications by Mexican
carriers to operate beyond municipalities and commercial zones at the United
State-Mexico border. It also revises the application form, OP-1MX, to be
filed by these Mexican motor carriers. The revised form requires additional
information about the applicant's business and operating practices to allow
the FMCSA to determine if the applicant can meet the safety standards
established for operating in interstate commerce in the United States.
Carriers that had previously submitted an application would have to submit
the updated form. These changes are needed to implement part of the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). On January 16, 2003, the Ninth Circuit
Court remanded this rule, along with two other NAFTA-related rules, to the
agency, requiring a full environmental impact statement and an analysis
required by the Clean Air Act. On June 7, 2004, the Supreme Court reversed
the Ninth Circuit and remanded the case, holding that FMCSA is not required
to prepare the environmental documents as ruled by the Ninth Circuit. FMCSA
is waiting for Interim Final Rule experience after the border opens before
deciding what to do next on this rulemaking. FMCSA originally planned to
publish a final rule by November 20, 2003. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: International Agreement |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 02/07/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
32. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Safety Monitoring |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA35 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 05/03/2001; End of Comment Period 07/02/2001.
Interim Final Rule: Publication Date 03/19/2002; End of Comment Period
04/18/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rule would implement a safety monitoring system and compliance
initiative designed to evaluate the continuing safety fitness of all
Mexico-domiciled carriers within 18 months after receiving a provisional
Certificate of Registration or provisional authority to operate in the United
States. It also would establish suspension and revocation procedures for
provisional Certificates of Registration and operating authority, and
incorporate criteria to be used by FMCSA in evaluating whether
Mexico-domiciled carriers exercise basic safety management controls. The
interim rule included requirements that were not proposed in the NPRM but
which are necessary to comply with the FY-2002 DOT Appropriations Act. On
January 16, 2003, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals remanded this rule,
along with two other NAFTA-related rules, to the agency, requiring a full
environmental impact statement and an analysis required by the Clean Air Act.
On June 7, 2004, the Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit and remanded
the case, holding that FMCSA is not required to prepare the environmental
documents. FMCSA is waiting for Interim Final Rule experience after the
border opens before deciding what to do next on this rulemaking. FMCSA
originally planned to publish a final rule by November 28, 2003. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: International Agreement |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 02/07/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
33. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: New Entrant |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA59 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Interim Final Rule: Publication Date 05/13/2002; End of Comment
Period 7/12/2002; IFR Effective Date 01/01/2003. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would change the New Entrant Safety Assurance Process by
raising the standard of compliance for passing the new entrant safety audit.
It also would make clarifying changes to some of the existing new entrant
regulations. The rule also proposes a separate application procedure and
safety oversight system for non-North America-domiciled motor carriers. The
proposed rule would improve the agency's ability to identify at-risk new
entrant carriers and would ensure deficiencies in basic safety management
controls are corrected before the new entrant is granted permanent
registration. These changes would not impose additional operational
requirements on any new entrant carrier. All new entrants would continue to
receive educational information on how to comply with the safety regulations
and be given an opportunity to correct any deficiencies found. FMCSA
recognizes many new entrants are small businesses that are unaware of these
requirements and continue to need our assistance. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 12/09/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
34. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Safety Auditors Certification |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA64 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Interim Final Rule: Publication Date 03/19/2002; End of Comment
Period 05/20/2002; Extension of Compliance 06/17/02; End of Extended
Compliance 07/17/02. IFR Extension of Statutory Compliance Date: Publication
Date 7/28/2003. Notice of Environmental Assessment: Publication Date
10/02/2003; End of Comment Period 11/03/2003. Notice of Statutory Compliance
Date: Publication Date 12/23/2003; Compliance Date 1/01/2004. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking requires that any safety inspection, audit, or review be
conducted by a certified investigator. It specifically gives FMCSA authority
to decertify an investigator, including a third-party investigator, for
failure to meet the prescribed certification standards. It is required by
section 211 of the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act. Based on comments to
the IFR, the agency will issue an NPRM that addresses issues not clarified in
the IFR. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 12/09/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
35. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: USA PATRIOT Act Rule |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA70 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Interim Final Rule/4 |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Interim Final Rule: Publication Date 05/05/2003; End of Comment
Period 07/07/2003. IFR Delay of Compliance Date: Publication Date 11/07/2003;
End of Comment Period 01/06/2004. IFR Delay of Compliance Date: Publication
Date 08/19/2004; Interim Final Rule/3: Publication Date 08/19/2004. |
|||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would prohibit States from issuing, renewing, transferring or
upgrading a commercial driver's license (CDL) with a hazardous materials
endorsement, unless the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has
first conducted a background check on the applicant and determined the
applicant does not pose a security risk warranting denial of the hazardous
materials endorsement. FMCSA and TSA simultaneously published interim final
rules. FMCSA has published another IFR corresponding to TSA's
extension of compliance date. This action is considered significant because
of substantial public and congressional interest, and national security. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 10/26/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates for Interim Final Rule/4:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Interim Final Rule/4: 70 FR 22268 |
36. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: CVSA decals |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA72 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend part 396 of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs) to incorporate requirements, as codified
in parts 365 and 385, that all CMVs operated by
Mexico-domiciled motor carriers holding authority to transport property or
passengers beyond the commercial zones of U.S. municipalities on the United
States-Mexico border must display a Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA)
decal issued by a certified inspector. Adding this requirement to part 396
will enable FMCSA to assess civil penalties against Mexico-domiciled
long-haul motor carriers that operate vehicles without the necessary CVSA
decal. This rulemaking would also clarify that carriers will be required to
obtain the necessary inspection decal before proceeding beyond border ports
of entry or the nearby CMV safety inspection facility. By providing for more
effective enforcement of the inspection decal requirements, this rule will
help ensure that these motor carriers operate safe vehicles in the United
States. This rulemaking is being redrafted to reflect changes made by recent
reauthorization legislation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 02/09/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
37. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Supporting Documents |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA76 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 4/20/1998; End of Comment Period 6/19/1998.
SNPRM: Publication Date 11/03/2004; End of Comment Period 01/03/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend the hours-of-service recordkeeping requirements
to clarify what supporting documents motor carriers must have to validate
hours of service records. It will clarify: That the duty of motor carriers is
to verify the accuracy of drivers' hours of service (HOS) and records of duty
status (RODS) if including automatic on-board records; that the driver's duty
is to collect and submit to the motor carrier all supporting documents with
the RODS; that carriers are required to maintain supporting documents with
the RODS; and that a supporting document based on a self-monitoring system is
required to be the primary method for ensuring compliance with the HOS
regulations. It would allow the use of electronic documents as a supplement
to, and in certain instances in lieu of, paper supporting documents in
recognition of developing technologies. It would clarify the definitions of
"supporting documents," "employee," and
"driver," and the current requirement that each motor carrier use a
self-monitoring system to verify HOS and RODS. This rulemaking is considered
significant because of substantial industry interest and safety. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/26/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
38. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Operating Authority Enforcement |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA78 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Interim Final Rule: Publication Date 08/28/2002; End of Comment
Period 10/28/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would require that a motor carrier who is subject to
authority requirements at 49 U.S.C. 13902 may not operate a CMV in interstate
commerce unless it has applied for and been granted operating authority by
FMCSA. It also would prohibit motor carriers from operating beyond the scope
of their authorization. Moreover, if vehicles are discovered operating in
violation of such authority requirements, they would be placed out of
service, and the carrier may be subject to additional penalties. This action
makes State enforcement of authority requirements a condition of MCSAP
eligibility. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 07/29/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
39. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Household Goods Brokers |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA84 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: ANPRM: Publication Date 12/22/2004; End of Comment Period 02/22/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would address the American Moving and Storage Association's
petition for rulemaking and implement certain provisions of Subtitle B of
SAFETEA-LU. FMCSA will determine in this rulemaking whether 49 CFR part 371
needs to be amended to protect consumers against unscrupulous brokers of
household goods. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 05/12/2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
40. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Intermodal Container Chassis |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA86 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would require entities that offer intermodal
container chassis for transportation in interstate commerce to: file a Motor
Carrier Identification Report (Form MCS-150); display a USDOT identification
number on each chassis offered for such transportation; establish a systematic
inspection, repair and maintenance program to ensure the safe operating
condition of each chassis offered for transportation and maintain
documentation of the program; and provide a means for effectively responding
to driver and motor carrier complaints about the condition of intermodal container chassis. The rulemaking is
considered significant because of substantial industry and congressional
interest and because it involves other departmental modes. This rulemaking
was redrafted to reflect changes made by recent reauthorization legislation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 01/26/2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
41. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Electronic On-Board Recorders |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA89 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: ANPRM: Publication Date 9/01/2004; End of Comment Period 11/30/2004. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend FMCSA regulations concerning the use of
electronic on-board recording devices as a way to document compliance with
the Federal hours-of-service rules. The agency is seeking information on
issues to be considered in the development of improved performance
specifications for these recording devices. This will help ensure that future
requirements for the use of on-board recorders are appropriate when applied
to emerging technologies. This action is considered significant because of
substantial industry and public interest and its importance in responding to
a recent court decision. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Court Action |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/09/2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
42. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Surge Brakes |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA91 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 10/07/2005; End of Comment Period 12/06/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) to allow the use of automatic hydraulic inertia
brake systems (surge brakes) on trailers operated in interstate commerce, in
response to a petition for rulemaking from the Surge Brake Coalition.
Currently, surge brakes are not considered by FMCSA to comply with the
requirements that all brakes on a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) be capable
of operating at all times, and that a single valve (or brake application
control mechanism) apply the brakes on the towing unit and trailer,
simultaneously. The intent of this rulemaking is to adopt performance-based
brake system requirements to allow the use of surge brakes on certain
combinations of CMVs, based upon engineering test
data submitted by the Surge Brake Coalition. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/27/2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
43. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Diabetes Standard |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA95 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
ANPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking action would amend FMCSA's medical
qualifications standards to allow drivers with insulin-treated diabetes
mellitus to operate commercial motor vehicles in interstate commerce, without
seeking an exemption from the FMCSRs. This action
is in response to Section 4129 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible and
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for ANPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for ANPRM: 71FR13801 |
44. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: National Registry |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA97 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would establish training, testing and certification standards
for medical examiners responsible for certifying that interstate commercial
motor vehicle drivers meet the applicable physical qualifications standards;
provide a database (or National Registry) of medical examiners that meet the
prescribed standards for use by motor carriers, drivers, and Federal and
State enforcement personnel in determining whether a medical examiner is
qualified to conduct examinations of interstate truck and bus drivers;
require medical examiners to transmit electronically to FMCSA the name of
drivers and a numerical identifier for each driver that is examined; and
require medical examiners to transmit electronically the medical certificate
for each CDL-holder that operates in interstate commerce to the State that
issued the CDL. The rulemaking would also establish the process by which
medical examiners that fail to meet or maintain the minimum standards would
be removed from the National Registry. This action is in response to section
4116 of SAFETEA-LU. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
45. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Interstate Van Operations |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA98 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would make the requirements concerning driver qualifications;
driving of CMVs; parts and accessories necessary
for safe operations; hours of service; and inspection, repair, and
maintenance applicable to the operation of vehicles designed or used to transport
between 9 and 15 passengers (including the driver) for direct compensation,
in interstate commerce, regardless of the distance traveled. Currently the
safety regulations apply to such vans when the vehicle is operated beyond a
75 air-mile radius of the driver's work reporting location. This action is in
response to SAFETEA-LU. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
46. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Revocation of Operating Authority |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA99 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would enable FMCSA to suspend the registration of a for-hire
motor carrier, a freight forwarder, or a broker for failure to comply with
certain regulations. In addition, this rule would enable FMCSA to revoke
registration of a for-hire motor carrier that has been prohibited from
operating in interstate commerce for failure to comply with the safety
fitness requirements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
47. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Patterns of Safety Violations |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AB00 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would enable FMCSA to suspend, amend, or revoke the
registration of a for-hire motor carrier if any of its officers has engaged
in a pattern or practice of avoiding compliance or concealing non-compliance
with Federal standards. In addition, this rule would allow FMCSA to deny an
application of a for-hire motor carrier if any of the company's officers has
a history of engaging in a pattern of non-compliance. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
Federal Railroad Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Railroad Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
48. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Locomotive Crashworthiness |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2130-AB23 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 11/02/2004; End of Comment Period 01/03/2005;
Extension of Comment Period 01/12/2005; End of Extended of Comment Period
02/03/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking will address the crashworthiness of locomotives pursuant to
the Rail Safety Enforcement and Review Act of (1992). FRA investigated
locomotive crashworthiness, as well as a variety of locomotive working
conditions (See RIN 2130-AA89) and reported its finding to Congress. This
rulemaking will establish comprehensive, minimum standards for locomotive
crashworthiness. Locomotive crashworthiness protection is necessary because
locomotive collisions can result in crew injuries and fatalities. These
performance standards are intended to help protect locomotive cab occupants
in the event of a locomotive collision. Examples of locomotive collision
scenarios considered include collisions with another locomotive, the rear of
another train, a piece of on-track equipment, a shifted load on a freight car
on an adjacent parallel track, or a highway vehicle at a rail-highway grade
crossing. These crashworthiness standards must be met by demonstrating
compliance with either the rule's performance standards or a FRA-approved
design standard. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 01/27/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
49. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Occupational Noise |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2130-AB56 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 06/23/2004; End of Comment Period 09/21/2004. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking amends FRA's occupational noise
standards for railroad employees whose predominant noise exposure occurs in
the locomotive cab. FRA's previous standard limited
cab employee noise exposure to certain levels based on the duration of
employee exposure. This rulemaking modifies that standard and also sets out
additional requirements. The rulemaking requires railroads to conduct noise
monitoring and to implement a hearing conservation program, which includes
hearing tests (audiograms), training, and monitoring. The rulemaking also
establishes design, build, and maintenance standards for new locomotives and
maintenance requirements for existing locomotives. FRA expects that this
rulemaking will reduce the likelihood of noise-induced hearing loss for
railroad operating employees. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 06/24/1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
50. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Pressurized Tank Cars |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2130-AB69 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend the existing design standards for pressurized
tank cars pursuant to section 9005 of SAFETEA-LU. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
51. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Passenger Train Emergency Systems |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2130-AB72 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would promote the safety of passengers and crew members in
passenger train emergencies by enhancing FRA's
regulations for passenger train emergency systems. The rulemaking will
address passenger train emergency communication systems (public address and
intercom systems), emergency evacuation systems (doors, emergency window
exits, rescue access windows, and emergency roof access locations), and
marking signage systems. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/26/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
52. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Whistle Bans/Train Horn |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2130-AB73 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Reconsideration of Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend the final rule on the Use of Locomotive Horns at
Highway-Rail Grade Crossings, in response to petitions for reconsideration
that have been submitted by the Association of American Railroads, BNSF
Railway Company, GE Transportation - Rail and Qwick
Kurb, Inc. FRA also intends to make clarifying
amendments to various provisions of the final rule. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 11/02/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Reconsideration of Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Reconsideration of Final Rule: None |
53. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Rail Relocation and Improvement |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2130-AB74 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would address the establishment of a grant program
authorizing the Secretary to provide financial assistance to States for local
rail line relocation and improvement projects. This rulemaking would create a
new part to title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations; establish
regulations governing financial assistance under Part 261, including the
project selection criteria; and solicit applications for Capital Grants for
Rail Line Relocation Projects. This rulemaking is required by Section 9002 of
the Safe Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Act: A legacy for
Users (SAFETEA-LU). Section 9002 authorizes, but does not appropriate, $350,000,000
per year for each of the fiscal years (FY) 2006 through 2009 for the purpose
of funding a grant program to provide financial assistance for local rail
line relocation and improvement projects. Congress has not appropriated any
funding for the program for FY 2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
54. |
|
||||||||
Popular Title: Northeast Corridor Infrastructure Fees |
|||||||||
RIN 2130-AB75 |
|||||||||
Stage:
Interim Final Rule |
|||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would govern the assessment and collection of fees from each
commuter rail authority that operates over the Northeast Corridor, which
reflect that rail authority's use of the corridor and its share of
maintenance and capital improvements. Any fees assessed will, however, be
offset by any direct annual contributions that have already been made by that
rail authority for Northeast Corridor capital and maintenance expenses.
Revenues from collected fees will then be merged with the capital
appropriation and will be provided to, and spent by, Amtrak for capital
investment. |
|||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 11/30/2005 |
|||||||||
Dates for Interim Final Rule:
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Interim Final Rule: None |
Federal Transit Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Transit Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
55. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: New/Small Starts |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2132-AA81 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: ANPRM: Publication Date 01/30/2006; End of Comment Period 03/10/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would establish a simplified evaulation
process for projects seeking less than $75 million in New Starts funds. The
rule will set out FTA's evaluation and rating
process for proposed projects based on the results of project justification
and local financial commitment. This action is mandated by SAFETEA-LU. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
56. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Metropolitan Planning |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2132-AA82 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This joint rulemaking with FHWA would set standards for the annual listing of
projects for which Federal funds have been obligated in the preceeding year and specify the types of data to be
included in the listing, including sufficient information about each project
to identify its type, location, and amounts obligated. This rulemaking is
mandated by SAFETEA-LU. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: 71 FR 33510 |
57. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: 4(f) Parks |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2132-AA83 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This FTA/FHWA joint rulemaking would clarify the factors to be considered and
the standards to be applied in determining the prudence and feasability of alternatives under section 4(f) (138 of
title 23, U.S. Code, and section 303 of title 49, U.S. Code). Section 4(f) properties
include certain parks, recreation areas, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and
historic sites described in section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation
Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-670). Section 4(f) generally prohibits the use of such
properties for transportation projects unless the Secretary of Transportation
finds there is no feasible and prudent alternative and all possible planning
to minimize the harm is undertaken. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
58. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Security Grants |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2132-AA84 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would establish a security grant program for public
transportation systems. The rule will address funding priorities, eligible
activities, methods for awarding grants, and limitations on administrative
expenses. The grant program will be funded by DHS with DOT providing
technical assistance with develoing the application
and eligiblity process. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
59. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Charter Bus |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2132-AA85 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would implement SAFETEA-LU requirements and statements in the
Conference Report for SAFETEA-LU that FTA conduct a negotiated rulemaking on:
(1) potential limited conditions under which public transit agencies can
provide community-based charter services directly to local governments and
private non-profit agencies that would not otherwise be served in a
cost-effective manner by private operators; (2) how the administration and
enforcement of charter bus provisions can be better communicated to the
public, including use of internet technology; (3) improvement of the
enforcement of violations of the charter bus regulations; (4) improvement of
the charter complaint and administrative appeals process; (5) a potential new
exception for emergency services such as evacuation and training for
emergencies; (6) a new process for determining if there are private charter
bus companies willing and able to provide service that would utilize
electronic notification and response within 72 hours; (7) a new exception for
transportation of government employees, elected officials, and members of the
transit industry to examine local transit operations, facilities, and public
works; and (8) any other charter service issues the negotiated rulemaking
committee decides to explore. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
60. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Convex Mirrors |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AG41 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 09/12/2005; End of Comment Period 11/14/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would upgrade the rearward visibility of commercial straight
trucks. The agency believes that requiring a rear detection system will
reduce fatalities, injuries, and property damage by giving truck operators
the ability to detect objects behind the truck. Various possible
counter-measures are being examined now in follow-up testing, including
visual and non-visual object detection systems. A Final Rule was scheduled to
be published on 11/30/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 06/28/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates for Withdrawal:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Withdrawal: None |
61. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Roof Crush Resistance |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AG51 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Request for Comments: Publication Date 10/22/01; End of Comment
Period 12/06/01. NPRM: Publication Date 8/23/05; End of Comment Period
11/21/05. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
Mitigation of rollover fatal and serious injuries is one of the agency's
highest priorities. Rollover crashes constitute about 3% of passenger vehicle
crashes, but about 1/3 of the fatalities. Since light trucks are more prone
to rollover, and as their percentage of the U.S. fleet continues to increase,
this crash mode continues to constitute a disproportionate segment of the
Nation's highway safety problem. As part of the agency's comprehensive
approach to rollover, the agency is considering whether an upgrade to the
roof crush requirements is warranted. This rulemaking is significant because
of public interest in vehicle safety. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 07/13/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
62. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Retention Performance |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AH34 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 12/15/2004; End of Comment Period 02/14/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
As part of the agency's comprehensive approach to rollover, and to harmonize
with the first global technical regulation, this rulemaking would upgrade the
door retention requirements, add test requirements for sliding doors, add
secondary latch requirements for doors other than hinged side doors and back
doors, and provide a new test procedure for assessing inertial forces. This
rulemaking would also respond to the requirements mandated in Title X,
Subtitle C, Sec. 10301, section 30128 (c) (2) of the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005: Legacy for Users
(SAFETEA-LU). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 07/07/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
63. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Event Data Recorders |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AI72 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Request for Comments: Publication Date 10/11/2002; End of Comment
Period 01/09/2003. NPRM: Publication Date 06/14/2004; End of Comment Period
08/13/2004. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
In the past several years, there has been considerable interest from the
safety community in establishing requirements for event data recorders (EDRs). The agency is considering what role NHTSA should
take in implementing EDRs in motor vehicles. This
rulemaking would establish requirements for EDRs in
new vehicles if an EDR is in the vehicle. The requirement would include a
minimum set of data to be collected and enhanced survivability in crashes.
This rule is significant because of public interest. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 01/17/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
64. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: 5th Percentile Dummy Belted Barrier |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AI98 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 08/06/03; End of Comment Period 10/05/03. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend NHTSA's occupant
protection standard, FMVSS No. 208, to improve high speed crash protection to
belted occupants of small stature who may sit in the full forward seat
position. Current crash test requirements for the 5th percentile adult female
dummy include a 0-48 km/h belted rigid barrier crash test. The agency is
considering increasing the maximum crash test speed from 48 km/h to 56 km/h
to be consistent with the 50th percentile adult male requirements that will
take effect according to the second phase of the FMVSS No. 208 Advanced Air
Bag Final Rule (65 FR 30680). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 12/16/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
65. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Side Impact Protection Upgrade |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 5/17/2004; End of Comment Period 10/14/2004;
Reopening of Comment Period 1/2005; End of Reopened Comment Period 4/12/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
Two Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS) -- No. 201, "Occupant
Protection in Interior Impact" and No. 214, "Side Impact
Protection" -- specify requirements for side impact protection. At
present, FMVSS No. 214 specifies a moving deformable barrier (MDB) test
addressing mainly the chest injury problem. The head injury reduction is
partially addressed in FMVSS No. 201. This rulemaking would require in FMVSS
No. 214 a vehicle-to-pole oblique impact test to reduce the number of fatal
and serious head injuries, which are not addressed in FMVSS No. 201. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 05/05/2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
66. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Reduced Stopping Distance for Truck Tractors |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ37 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date: 12/15/2005; End of Comment Period 4/14/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would reduce stopping distance requirements for truck
tractors equipped with air brake systems. Advances in heavy vehicle braking
systems show that improved stopping performance is attainable for these
vehicles. Such improvements would reduce the stopping distance disparity with
light vehicles, and would result in fewer deaths and injuries and reduce
property damage due to fewer crashes between truck tractors and light
vehicles. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 04/02/2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
67. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Electronic Stability Control SAFETEA-LU |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ77 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would establish a new Federal motor vehicle safety standard
to require electronic stability control (ESC) systems on all
newly-manufactured passenger cars and light trucks. The vast majority of
rollovers occur in single-vehicle crashes involving loss of control. Crash
data studies by NHTSA and other organizations worldwide show that ESC causes
a dramatic reduction in single-vehicle crashes by assisting drivers in maintaining
control in critical driving situations. NHTSA studies show a reduction in
single-vehicle crashes of 35% to 67% and a reduction in single-vehicle
crashes with rollover of over 70%. The requirement of ESC on cars and trucks
could save thousands of lives annually. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 10/20/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
68. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Motorcyclist Safety Grant Program |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ86 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 05/24/2006; End of Comment Period 06/23/2006.
Final Rule 07/19/06, 71 FR 40891 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would implement regulations for the Section 2010 program.
Section 2010 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), Pub. L. 109-59, authorizes the
Secretary of Transportation to make grants to States that adopt and implement
effective programs to reduce the number of single- and multi-vehicle crashes
involving motorcyclists. OMB has agreed that this rulemaking should be
classified as nonsignificant. This rulemaking will
not show up on next month's report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 01/24/2006 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: 71 FR 40891 |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
69. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Accessibility-passenger vessels |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2105-AB87 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: ANPRM: Publication Date 11/29/2004;End of Comment Period
03/28/2005;Publication Date for Extension of Comment Period 03/28/2005;End of
Extended Comment Period 07/28/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
The Department's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) final rule, published
September 6, 1991, reserved portions of the rule concerning passenger
vessels. The ADA covers passenger vessels, but issuing accessibility
requirements for vessels involves complex issues unlike those affecting land
transportation. This rulemaking would address these issues and propose
feasible requirements to make passenger vessels accessible to, and usable by,
individuals with disabilities. Timing of this rulemaking is dependent on
action by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board
(Access Board) to adopt accessibility guidelines for passenger vessels. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 07/26/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
70. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Oxygen by Air Carrier Passengers |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2105-AC29 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 09/07/2005;End of Comment Period
11/07/2005;Extension of Comment Period 10/21/2005 ; End of Extended Comment
Period 01/30/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would address the carriage and use of certain respiratory
devices (i.e., ventilators, respirators, continuous positive airway pressure
(CPAP) machines and certain portable oxygen concentrators) by passengers
aboard commercial aircraft. It would also address difficulties experienced by
passengers needing supplemental oxygen on airline flights, including costs
associated with in-flight medical oxygen. OST originally attempted to
schedule the publishing of a final rule by 9/30/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 07/01/2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
71. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Aviation Data |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2105-AC71 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: ANPRM: Publication Date 07/15/1998; End of Comment Period 09/14/1998;
End of Reply Comment Period 10/13/1998. NPRM: Publication Date 02/17/2005;End
of Comment Period 04/18/2005;Extension of Comment Period Publication Date
07/18/2005; End of Extended Comment Period 9/18/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking requested public comments from reporting carriers and
aviation data users on the nature, scope, source, and means for collecting,
processing, and distributing airline traffic, fare, and financial data.
Specifically, it invited comments on whether existing airline traffic, fare,
and financial data should be amended, supplemented, or replaced; whether
selected forms and reports should be retained, modified, or eliminated;
whether the Department should require all aviation data to be filed
electronically; and how the aviation data system should be reengineered to
enhance efficiency and to reduce costs for both the Department and the
airline industry. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 04/15/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
72. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: ACAA - Foreign Carriers |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2105-AC97 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 11/04/2004; End of Comment Period 02/02/2005;
Extension of Comment Period Publication Date 01/13/2005; End of Extended
Comment Period 03/04/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would add coverage under the Air Carrier Access Act to
foreign air carriers and comprehensively update and revise 14 CFR Part 382.
It would also clarify or propose new provisions in such areas as movable
aisle armrests, preboarding announcements, and
accessibility of carrier web sites. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 04/05/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
73. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Actual Control |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2105-AD25 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: ANPRM: Publication Date 7/30/2003; End of Comment Period 9/29/2003.
NPRM: Publication Date 11/07/2005;End of Comment Period 01/07/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would clarify policies that may be used during initial and
continuing fitness reviews of U.S. carriers when citizenship is at issue. It
would add a new section to 14 CFR Part 399 that clarifies how the Department
will interpret actual control of a U.S. air carrier during fitness reviews.
It would also affect how we interpret the circumstances influencing a
determination of actual control, allowing easier access to international
capital markets. The rulemaking would also make minor amendments to 14 CFR
Part 204 to update existing language in Part 204. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 02/13/2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for SNPRM: 71 FR 26425 |
74. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Deaf, Hard of Hearing |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2105-AD41 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication DAte 2/23/2006; End of
Comment Period 4/24/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would expand accomodations provided
to deaf, hard of hearing, and deaf-blind air travelers under the Air Carrier
Access Act. The purpose of this rulemaking would be to improve access for air
travelers who are deaf, hard of hearing and deaf-blind during all phases of
air travel, from the airport to the flight itself. This rule would apply to
certain foreign and domestic air carriers. It responds to a petition for
rulemaking and was upgraded to significant on March 24, 2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 05/11/2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
75. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Price Advertising |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN 2105-AD56 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 12/14/2005;End of Comment Period 02/13/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This document withdraws the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that sought
comments on whether and, if so, how the Department should amend 14 CFR
399.84, its air transportation price-advertising rule. As a matter of
enforcement policy, the Department has long allowed limited exceptions to the
strict terms of the rule. The NPRM called for comments on several options:
maintain the current practice with or without codifiying
all of its elements in the rule; enforce the rule as written; revise the rule
to eliminate most or all requirements for airfare advertisments
but to specify that consumers must be told the total price before any
purchase is made; eliminate the rule altogether. The Department has decided
based on the comments that the public interet will
best be served by maintaing the status quo. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 09/13/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates for Withdrawal:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Withdrawal: None |
76. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: SSI-TSA |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2105-AD59 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Interim Final Rule: Publication Date 05/18/2004; End of Comment
Period 07/19/2004. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would publish a Final Rule addressing the May 2004 Interim
Final Rule and respond to any comments. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 09/02/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
77. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Oxygen Cylinders and Generators |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2137-AD33 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 05/06/2004; End of Comment Period 08/13/2004;
End of Extended Comment Period 12/31/2004. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would require oxygen cylinders and oxygen generators, when
transported aboard aircraft, to be packed in an outer packaging that meets
prescribed thermal and heat resistance requirements. These requirements would
increase the level of safety associated with transportation of oxidizing
gases by air. This rule has no impact on the use of passenger-owned oxygen
cylinders. This rule is significant due to public interest. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 03/01/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
78. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Wetlines Rule |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN 2137-AD36 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: ANPRM: Publication Date 02/10/2003; End of Comment Period 06/10/2003.
NPRM: Publication Date 12/30/2004; End of Comment Period 03/01/2005;
Extension of Comment Period 02/10/2005; End of Extended Comment Period
04/28/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would have addressed the risks associated with the retention
of flammable liquid in unprotected product piping on a cargo tank motor
vehicle during transportation (wetlines). However,
the costs associated with regulatory action outweigh the benefits that would
be associated with such action. PHMSA is withdrawing the notice of proposed
rulemaking and closing the docket pending development of more definitive data
to support rulemaking or alternative technologies or strategies to address
the problem. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 01/19/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates for Withdrawal:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Withdrawal: 71 FR 32909 |
79. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Lithium Batteries |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2137-AD48 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 4/02/2002; End of Comment Period 6/02/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would revise requirements applicable to lithium batteries for
consistency with international requirements. This rulemaking also responds to
NTSB recommendations. After reviewing comments received, PHMSA prepared and
published for public comment an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA) in order to determine the impact of its proposal on small entities. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 04/02/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
80. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Petroleum Gathering Lines and Low Stress Lines |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2137-AD98 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This Rulemaking would establish limited safety rules for certain rural
petroleum gathering lines that could affect high consequence areas, including
populated areas, navigable waterways, and areas unusually sensitive to
pipeline spills. Because rural petroleum gathering lines and low stress lines
are now exempt from all pipeline safety rules, except in Gulf of Mexico
inlets, the rulemaking would improve public confidence in the safety of these
pipelines. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 02/04/2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
81. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Rail routing rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2137-AE02 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Request for Comments: Publication Date 08/16/04; End of Comment
Period 10/18/04. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), in
consultation with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) would revise the
current requirements in the Hazardous Materials Regulations applicable to the
safe and secure transportation of hazardous materials transported in commerce
by rail. Specifically, we would require rail carriers to compile annual data
on certain shipments of hazardous materials, use the data to analyze safety
and security risks along rail transportation routes where those materials are
transported, assess alternative routing options, and make routing decisions
based on those assessments. We would also clarify the current security plan
requirements to address en route storage and delays in transit. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 05/01/2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
82. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Primary Lithium Battery Ban |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2137-AE05 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Interim Final Rule: Publication Date 12/15/2004; End of Comment
Period 02/15/2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would prohibit the offering for transportation and
transportation of primary lithium batteries and cells as cargo aboard
passenger-carrying aircraft. The rule would apply to both foreign and
domestic passenger-carrying aircraft entering, leaving, or operating in the
United States. In addition, the rule would amend the Hazardous Materials
Regulations to require that, when offered for transport in other modes,
shipments of primary lithium batteries and cells must be marked to indicate
that they are forbidden from transport aboard passenger-carrying aircraft.
PHMSA had scheduled a final rule for 7/13/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 10/01/2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for SNPRM: None |
83. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Storage of Explosives |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2137-AE06 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: ANPRM: Publication Date 11/16/2005;End of Comment Period 02/14/2006. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would address the current safety and security risks
associated with the storage of explosives during transportation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 01/01/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
84. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Package Inspection Authority |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2137-AE13 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
Pursuant to a mandate in SAFETEA-LU (section 7118 of P.L. 109-59), this
rulemaking would establish procedural regulations to implement authority
provided to DOT to open packages believed to contain hazardous materials,
remove such packages from transportation, gather information, order the
package transported to a facility for examination and analysis, obtain
assistance from qualified persons, and issue emergency restrictions,
prohibitions, recalls, or out-of-service orders to abate an imminent hazard. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/10/2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |