Table of Contents
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration
62. Rear
Convex Cross-View Mirrors
64. Upgrade
Door Retention Performance
66. 5th
Percentile Dummy Belted Barrier Crash Test Requirements -- Standard 208
67. Side
Impact Protection Upgrade - FMVSS No. 214
68. Reforming
the Automobile Fuel Economy Standards Program
69. Reduced
Stopping Distance Requirements for Truck Tractors
70. Light
Truck Average Fuel Economy Standards, Model Year 2008 and possibly beyond
71. Electronic
Stability Control (ESC)
72. Motorcyclist
Safety Grant Program
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
62. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Convex Mirrors |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AG41 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: This
rulemaking would upgrade the rearward visibility of commercial straight
trucks. The agency believes that requiring a rear detection system will
reduce fatalities, injuries, and property damage by giving truck operators
the ability to detect objects behind the truck. Various possible
counter-measures are being examined now in follow-up testing, including
visual and non-visual object detection systems. A Final Rule was scheduled to
be published on |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
63. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Roof Crush Resistance |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AG51 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Request for Comments: Publication Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
Mitigation of rollover fatal and serious injuries is one of the agency's
highest priorities. Rollover crashes constitute about 3% of passenger vehicle
crashes, but about 1/3 of the fatalities. Since light trucks are more prone
to rollover, and as their percentage of the |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
64. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Retention Performance |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AH34 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
As part of the agency's comprehensive approach to rollover, and to harmonize
with the first global technical regulation, this rulemaking would upgrade the
door retention requirements, add test requirements for sliding doors, add
secondary latch requirements for doors other than hinged side doors and back
doors, and provide a new test procedure for assessing inertial forces. This
rulemaking would also respond to the requirements mandated in Title X,
Subtitle C, Sec. 10301, section 30128 (c) (2) of the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005: Legacy for Users
(SAFETEA-LU). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
65. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Event Data Recorders |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AI72 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Request for Comments: Publication Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
In the past several years, there has been considerable interest from the
safety community in establishing requirements for event data recorders (EDRs). The agency is considering what role NHTSA should
take in implementing EDRs in motor vehicles. This
rulemaking would establish requirements for EDRs in
new vehicles if an EDR is in the vehicle. The requirement would include a
minimum set of data to be collected and enhanced survivability in crashes.
This rule is significant because of public interest. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
66. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: 5th Percentile Dummy Belted Barrier |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AI98 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final
Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would amend NHTSA's occupant
protection standard, FMVSS No. 208, to improve high speed crash protection to
belted occupants of small stature who may sit in the full forward seat
position. Current crash test requirements for the 5th percentile adult female
dummy include a 0-48 km/h belted rigid barrier crash test. The agency is
considering increasing the maximum crash test speed from 48 km/h to 56 km/h
to be consistent with the 50th percentile adult male requirements that will
take effect according to the second phase of the FMVSS No. 208 Advanced Air
Bag Final Rule (65 FR 30680). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
67. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Side Impact Protection Upgrade |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
Two Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS) -- No. 201, "Occupant
Protection in Interior Impact" and No. 214, "Side Impact
Protection" -- specify requirements for side impact protection. At
present, FMVSS No. 214 specifies a moving deformable barrier (MDB) test
addressing mainly the chest injury problem. The head injury reduction is
partially addressed in FMVSS No. 201. This rulemaking would require in FMVSS
No. 214 a vehicle-to-pole oblique impact test to reduce the number of fatal
and serious head injuries, which are not addressed in FMVSS No. 201. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
68. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Reforming CAFE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ17 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: ANPRM: Publication Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: Through
this action, the agency intends to begin a public discussion on potential
ways, within current statutory authority, to update the Corporate Average
Fuel Economy (CAFE) Program and to make it more consistent with our public
policy objectives. The agency will seek comments on a number of possible
concepts and measures, and invite the public to present additional concepts
not presented here. The discussion is not intended to address the stringency
of proposed CAFE standards in the future, but rather the basic structure of
the CAFE program. The agency is interested in any suggestions towards
revamping the CAFE program in such a way as to enhance overall fuel economy
while protecting occupant safety and American jobs. The potential changes
range from modest changes to existing definitions separating passenger cars
from light trucks (i.e., vans, pickup trucks and SUVs) to more significant
structural changes to light truck fuel economy standards. The definitional
changes could potentially expand the definition of light truck to include
larger SUV's that are not currently subject to fuel economy standards, add
criteria to existing definitions of light trucks and ensure that vehicles
subject to the lower fuel economy standards applicable to trucks have sufficient
functionality to be properly classified as trucks. The advance notice also
requests comment on changing the existing approach to setting light truck
fuel economy standards from one of setting a fixed standard applicable to all
sizes of trucks in the light truck fleet to one of setting a standard that
changes in relationship to a selected attribute of trucks in the fleet. Under
such an attribute-based standard, the required fuel economy would change in
relationship to either the weight of the vehicle, the size of the vehicle, or
both. This action is being addressed via rulemaking 2127-AJ61 and will be
removed from next month’s report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
69. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Reduced Stopping Distance for Truck Tractors |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ37 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: This
rulemaking would reduce stopping distance requirements for truck tractors
equipped with air brake systems. Advances in heavy vehicle braking systems
show that improved stopping performance is attainable for these vehicles.
Such improvements would reduce the stopping distance disparity with light
vehicles, and would result in fewer deaths and injuries and reduce property
damage due to fewer crashes between truck tractors and light vehicles. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: 70 FR 74270 |
70. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Light Truck Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ61 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would address Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards
for light trucks for model year 2008 and possibly beyond, as appropriate. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: 71 FR 17566 |
71. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Electronic Stability Control SAFETEA-LU |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ77 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would establish a new Federal motor vehicle safety standard
to require electronic stability control (ESC) systems on all newly-manufactured
passenger cars and light trucks. The vast majority of rollovers occur in
single-vehicle crashes involving loss of control. Crash data studies by NHTSA
and other organizations worldwide show that ESC causes a dramatic reduction
in single-vehicle crashes by assisting drivers in maintaining control in
critical driving situations. NHTSA studies show a reduction in single-vehicle
crashes of 35% to 67% and a reduction in single-vehicle crashes with rollover
of over 70%. The requirement of ESC on cars and trucks could save thousands
of lives annually. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
72. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ86 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage:
Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract:
This rulemaking would propose implementing regulations for the Section 2010
program. Section 2010 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), Pub. L. 109-59, authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to make
grants to States that adopt and implement effective programs to reduce the
number of single- and multi-vehicle crashes involving motorcyclists. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |