National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
62. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Convex Mirrors | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AG41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: This rulemaking would upgrade the rearward visibility of commercial straight trucks. The agency believes that requiring a rear detection system will reduce fatalities, injuries, and property damage by giving truck operators the ability to detect objects behind the truck. Two possible counter-measures are being considered: cross-view mirror systems or camera systems. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 06/28/1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
63. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Roof Crush Resistance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AG51 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Request for Comments: Publication Date 10/22/01; End of Comment Period 12/06/01. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: Mitigation of rollover fatal and serious injuries is one of the agency's highest priorities. Rollover crashes constitute about 3% of passenger vehicle crashes, but about 1/3 of the fatalities. Since light trucks are more prone to rollover, and as their percentage of the U.S. fleet continues to increase, this crash mode continues to constitute a disproportionate segment of the Nation's highway safety problem. As part of the agency's comprehensive approach to rollover, and in response to a petition for rulemaking, the agency is considering whether an upgrade to the roof crush requirements is warranted. This rulemaking is significant because of public interest in vehicle safety. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 05/20/1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Fuel Economy Standards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AG97 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 01/22/2001; End of Comment Period 3/22/2001. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: This rulemaking clarifies when and how predecessor and successor automobile manufacturers may use the fuel economy credits of the predecessor or successor. The use of carry forward or carry back credits is specified for manufacturers that merge. This action is considered significant because it affects the treatment of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) penalties. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 04/27/1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: 69 FR 77663 |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
65. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Retention Performance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AH34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: As part of the agency's comprehensive approach to rollover, and to harmonize with the first global technical regulation, this rulemaking would upgrade the door retention requirements, add test requirements for sliding doors, add secondary latch requirements for doors other than hinged side doors and back doors, and provide a new test procedure for assessing inertial forces. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 07/07/1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: 69 FR 75020 |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||
66. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Frontal Offset | |||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AH73 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined | |||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Request for Comments: Publication Date 02/03/2004; End of Comment Period 04/05/2004. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: This rulemaking would establish a Federal motor vehicle safety standard for high-speed frontal offset crash testing. The frontal offset test is a crash test for automobiles and light trucks in which the subject vehicles are run into a deformable honeycomb barrier. The barrier contacts only 40 percent of the front of the vehicle, simulating an off-center frontal collision. The agency is considering adding the high speed offset test to the frontal occupant protection standard to measure vehicle structural integrity and reduce the number and severity of lower-body injuries. NHTSA is examining whether implementing a new offset test might create disbenefits to occupants of other vehicles. The agency originally scheduled the publication of an NPRM by 10/08/03. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 11/22/1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||
67. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Event Data Recorders | |||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AI72 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule | |||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Request for Comments: Publication Date 10/11/2002; End of Comment Period 01/09/2003. NPRM: Publication Date 06/14/04; End of Comment Period 08/13/04. NPRM: OMB Clearance 06/03/2004;Publication Date 06/14/2004;End of Comment Period 08/13/2004. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: In the past several years, there has been considerable interest from the safety community in establishing requirements for event data recorders (EDRs). The agency is considering what role NHTSA should take in implementing EDRs in motor vehicles. This rulemaking would establish requirements for EDRs in new vehicles if an EDR is in the vehicle. The requirement would include a minimum set of data to be collected and enhanced survivability in crashes. This rule is significant because of public interest. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 07/12/2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Side Impact Protection Upgrade | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage:None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: Two Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS) -- No. 201, "Occupant Protection in Interior Impact" and No. 214, "Side Impact Protection" -- specify requirements for side impact protection. At present, FMVSS No. 214 specifies a moving deformable barrier (MDB) test addressing mainly the chest injury problem. The head injury reduction is partially addressed in FMVSS No. 201. This rulemaking would require in FMVSS No. 214 a vehicle-to-pole impact test to reduce the number of fatal and serious head injuries, which is not addressed in FMVSS No. 201. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 06/28/2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: 69 FR 27990 |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
69. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Reforming CAFE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: ANPRM: Publication Date 12/29/03; End of Comment Period 4/27/04. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: Through this action, the agency intends to begin a public discussion on potential ways, within current statutory authority, to update the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Program and to make it more consistent with our public policy objectives. The agency will seek comments on a number of possible concepts and measures, and invite the public to present additional concepts not presented here. The discussion is not intended to address the stringency of proposed CAFE standards in the future, but rather the basic structure of the CAFE program. The agency is interested in any suggestions towards revamping the CAFE program in such a way as to enhance overall fuel economy while protecting occupant safety and American jobs. The potential changes range from modest changes to existing definitions separating passenger cars from light trucks (i.e., vans, pickup trucks and SUVs) to more significant structural changes to light truck fuel economy standards. The definitional changes could potentially expand the definition of light truck to include larger SUV's that are not currently subject to fuel economy standards, add criteria to existing definitions of light trucks and ensure that vehicles subject to the lower fuel economy standards applicable to trucks have sufficient functionality to be properly classified as trucks. The advance notice also requests comment on changing the existing approach to setting light truck fuel economy standards from one of setting a fixed standard applicable to all sizes of trucks in the light truck fleet to one of setting a standard that changes in relationship to a selected attribute of trucks in the fleet. Under such an attribute-based standard, the required fuel economy would change in relationship to either the weight of the vehicle, the size of the vehicle, or both. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 04/01/2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Undetermined:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||
70. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Tire Pressure Monitoring | |||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ23 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule | |||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 09/16/04; End of Comment Period 11/15/04. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: The Transportation Recall Enhancement Accountability and Documentation (TREAD) Act required the Secretary of Transportation to initiate rulemaking to require a warning system in new motor vehicles to indicate to the operator when a tire is significantly under-inflated. The agency issued a final rule for tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS)(establishing FMVSS No. 138) on June 5, 2002; however, the final rule establishing the standard was vacated by a decision issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in August 2003. The agency will take action in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act to re-establish FMVSS No. 138, in a manner consistent with the court's decision, and also provide a new phase-in period. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/06/2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |