|
January 9, 2008
CBCA 875-RELO
In the Matter of STEPHEN F. FISCHER
Stephen F. Fischer, San Diego,
CA, Claimant.
Judy Hughes, Standards and
Compliance, Finance Mission Area, Defense Finance and Accounting Service,
Columbus, OH, appearing for Department of Defense.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
This case
addresses the question of whether an employee who is transferred in a permanent
change of station (PCS) may receive storage in transit (SIT) of household goods
(HHG) at government expense after the 180-day period allowed under the Federal
Travel Regulation (FTR) and Joint Travel Regulations (JTR) ends. For the reasons stated below, reimbursement
for SIT after 180 days is only allowed under a limited exception where an
employee=s PCS move also involves temporary duty (TDY) in
countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan.
That exception does not apply in this case, and this Board lacks the
authority to allow reimbursement due to other personal circumstances.
Background
Claimant, Mr.
Stephen F. Fischer, an employee of the Department of the Navy, was transferred
in a permanent change of station (PCS) move from his previous place of
employment at Lakehurst, New Jersey, to Naval Air Station North Island, San
Diego, California. His reporting date
was November 7, 2005. He was authorized
a period of ninety days for SIT. He was
granted an extension of an additional ninety days. That 180-day period ended on March 24, 2006,
but Mr. Fischer contends that he continued to keep his household goods in
storage after that date due to delays in selling his home and various marital
and health-related problems in his family.
Continued storage after 180 days cost Mr. Fischer $6500. Mr. Fischer was denied reimbursement for that
storage cost by the Per Diem, Travel, and Transportation Allowance Committee
(PDTATAC).
Discussion
The PDTATAC
properly followed the applicable travel regulations in denying Mr. Fischer
reimbursement for SIT in excess of 180 days.
The FTR states the following:
Is there a time limit for the temporary storage of an
authorized HHG shipment?
The initial period of temporary storage at Government
expense shall not exceed 90 days in connection with any authorized HHG
shipment. The HHG may be placed in
temporary storage at origin, in transit,
at destination, or any combination thereof.
However, upon your written request, an additional 90 days may be
authorized by the designated agency official.
In no case may the maximum time limit for temporary storage exceed 180
days.
41 CFR 302-7.8 (2005) (FTR
302-7.8). The Joint Travel Regulations
(JTR), which are also applicable, provide the following:
SIT (in connection with authorized HHG transportation)
should not exceed 90 days unless the employee requests (in writing) an additional
period, [not to exceed] 90 days, that is authorized/approved by a
Service/Defense Agency designated official.
If no additional storage is authorized/approved, the employee is
financially responsible for the additional storage expense (FTR ' 302-7.8).
JTR C5190-B.1. The only exception under the JTR that allows
reimbursement for SIT beyond the 180-day maximum is for Aemployees on a PCS to a new PDS with en route TDY
assignments to locations such as Iraq and Afghanistan.@ Id.
C5191. Mr. Fischer=s PCS move did not involve those circumstances, and
consequently, his reimbursement is limited to SIT for no more than 180
days.
Mr. Fischer
argues that the Board should waive the restrictions on reimbursement for more
than 180 days of SIT because his agency supports his request, and it has the
funds to reimburse him due to the Auncontrollable@ events related to his relocation. The General Services Administration Board of
Contract Appeals, which previously decided these relocation claims, recognized
the following:
[A]n agency may not confer power upon itself. It literally has no power to act . . . unless
and until Congress confers power upon it . . . . Allowing an agency to make a payment for a
purpose not authorized by statute or regulation, . . . would violate the
Appropriations Clause of the Constitution.
U.S. Const. art. I, ' 9, cl. 7 (ANo money
shall be drawn from the Treasury but in Consequence of Appropriations made by
Law.@).
Gary MacLeay, GSBCA 15394-RELO, 01-1 BCA & 31,210, at 154,079 (2000). This Board=s
authority to reimburse relocation costs Ais
grounded in subchapter II of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, and the
regulations issued by the Administrator of General Services (under express
Congressional charge) to implement that statute.@ Teresa M. Erickson, GSBCA 15210-RELO,
00-1 BCA & 30,900, at 152,473.
AThose regulations have the force of law and must be
followed.@ Id. Our authority extends no further. See Edward B. Giagni, GSBCA
16972-RELO, 07-1 BCA & 33,476 (2006).
Regardless of whether officials within Mr. Fischer=s agency would allow reimbursement and have the funds
to do so, this Board can only permit reimbursement for those amounts allowed
under applicable statutes and regulations.
Decision
Mr. Fischer=s claim is denied.
______________________
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge