Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Reading, PA........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 86* 80* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 100 94* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 94* 86* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 92* 85* Bloomington, IN....................... 88* 79* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 99* 94* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 110* 98 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 75* 70* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 100 81* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 90* 85* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 100 93 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 107* 93* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 95* 84* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 99 87* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 98* 94 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 86* 80* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 95* 90* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 96* 91* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 101 90* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 104* 88* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 94* 89* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 99 85* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 98* 81* Great Falls, MT....................... 87* 75* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 93* 82* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 92* 88* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 111* 101 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 93* 85* Honolulu, HI.......................... 102* 97 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 94* 90* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 94* 83* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Reading, PA........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 90* 86* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 110* 96* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 102 90* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 104 98 Bloomington, IN....................... 99 87* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 111* 102* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 118* 113* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 95 76* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 102 108* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 100 85* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 100 100 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 117* 106* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 107 102 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 108* 101 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 103 101 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 98 83* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 107* 93* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 102 95* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 109* 106* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 113* 103* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 99 97* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 105 95* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 102 104* Great Falls, MT....................... 83* 96* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 102 94* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 97 96 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 118* 120* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 92* 91* Honolulu, HI.......................... 108* 113* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 106 86* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 103 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Reading, PA........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 86* 87* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 91* 104* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 98 94* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 90* 96* Bloomington, IN....................... 78* 89* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 93* 95* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 100 113* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 65* 76* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 96* 97* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 91* 92* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 106 101 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 103 108* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 87* 96* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 93* 100 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 99 97* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 82* 85* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 95 97 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 91* 90* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 99 101 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 93 103* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 89* 91* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 99 101 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 99 96* Great Falls, MT....................... 85* 81* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 81* 94* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 82* 92* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 101 111* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 86* 94* Honolulu, HI.......................... 102 94* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 90* 97* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 96 91* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Reading, PA........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 79* 78* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 89* 93* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 85* 97 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 84* 88* Bloomington, IN....................... 75* 75* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 104 86* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 122* 106 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 64* 79* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 112* 97 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 76* 76* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 87* 92* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 128* 104 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 88 92* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 100 94 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 97 93 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 91* 73* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 87* 89* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 99 92* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 90* 100 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 99 90* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 111* 82* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 102 97 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 116* 92* Great Falls, MT....................... 108* 86* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 86* 85* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 77* 78* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 112 103 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 99 82* Honolulu, HI.......................... 113* 99 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 87* 85* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 87* 84* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Reading, PA........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 90* 93* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 103 107 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 94* 93* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 86* 96* Bloomington, IN....................... 96* 106* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 108* 105* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 107* 112* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 75* 75* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 106* 103* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 100 103 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 100 100 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 103 106* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 99 100 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 102 106* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 95 99 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 90* 86* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 90* 98 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 105* 103* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 98 104 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 115* 110* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 95* 100 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 98 110* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 99 99 Great Falls, MT....................... 98 97 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 100 103 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 104* 94* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 111* 109* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 99 102 Honolulu, HI.......................... 108 101 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 100 94* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 100 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 94* 72* Iowa City, IA......................... 96* 92* Johnstown, PA......................... 84* 72* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 97* 83* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 101 87* Knoxville, TN......................... 91* 94* Lincoln, NE........................... 87* 76* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 106* 97 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 93* 82* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 93* 87* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 96* 94* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 100 90* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 107* 100 Mobile, AL............................ 88* 71* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 96* 82* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 113* 104* Ocala, FL............................. 88* 72* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 89* 78* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 90* 83* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 93* 78* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 103* 96 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 96* 93* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 95* 86* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 103* 90* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 107* 96* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 95* 86* Richmond, VA.......................... 96* 89* Rochester, NY......................... 96* 80* Rockford, IL.......................... 97* 80* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 106 94* Iowa City, IA......................... 100 100 Johnstown, PA......................... 92* 87* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 107 97 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 104 114* Knoxville, TN......................... 107 82* Lincoln, NE........................... 92* 91* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 116* 109* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 99 103* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 96 87* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 105 99 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 104 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 113* 115* Mobile, AL............................ 89* 86* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 108* 94* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 126* 115* Ocala, FL............................. 89* 92* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 95 90* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 92* 94 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 94 100 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 117* 104* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 110* 99 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 103 96* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 105 111* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 122* 115* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 103 98* Richmond, VA.......................... 103 97* Rochester, NY......................... 104 105* Rockford, IL.......................... 105 98* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 89* 95* Iowa City, IA......................... 88* 96 Johnstown, PA......................... 81* 83* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 94 97 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 96* 98* Knoxville, TN......................... 94* 93* Lincoln, NE........................... 79* 87* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 108* 105* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 94* 94* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 95* 97* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 90* 96 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 99 102 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 104 103* Mobile, AL............................ 89* 91* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 96* 97* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 109* 114* Ocala, FL............................. 88* 89* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 84* 87* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 95 87* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 90* 87* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 93* 105* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 100 97 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 85* 96* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 107 104 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 96* 105* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 99 95* Richmond, VA.......................... 90* 100 Rochester, NY......................... 92* 96* Rockford, IL.......................... 93* 94* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 93* 88* Iowa City, IA......................... 101 94* Johnstown, PA......................... 94* 82* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 100 92* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 106* 89* Knoxville, TN......................... 80* 79* Lincoln, NE........................... 82* 87* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 108* 102 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 104 86* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 91* 92* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 91* 89* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 106 95 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 108 96 Mobile, AL............................ 90* 91* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 91* 86* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 130* 106* Ocala, FL............................. 79* 98 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 100 99 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 88* 85* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 90* 95 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 104 104 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 80* 95 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 95 90* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 113* 103 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 110* 103 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 92* 101 Richmond, VA.......................... 89* 94* Rochester, NY......................... 96 81* Rockford, IL.......................... 105 92* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 105* 98 Iowa City, IA......................... 99 99 Johnstown, PA......................... 83* 87* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 104 98 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 96* 105* Knoxville, TN......................... 87* 97* Lincoln, NE........................... 88* 94* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 99 105 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 98 92* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 95* 96* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 93* 101 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 102 106* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 113* 109* Mobile, AL............................ 92* 102 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 99 105* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 105* 111* Ocala, FL............................. 91* 104* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 84* 84* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 84 108 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 105* 107* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 98 105 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 95 101 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 97 96 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 99 100 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 109* 107* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 96* 99 Richmond, VA.......................... 100 101 Rochester, NY......................... 97* 100 Rockford, IL.......................... 101 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 106* 94* Salinas, CA........................... 112* 104 San Antonio, TX....................... 90* 85* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 107* 98 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 117* 102 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 108* 93* Springfield, MA....................... 108* 92* Springfield, MO....................... 86* 76* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 101 87* Tallahassee, FL....................... 90* 75* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 93* 82* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 89* 78* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 97* 96 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 106* 95* York-Hanover, PA...................... 96* 96* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 94* 90* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 120* 112* Salinas, CA........................... 130* 118* San Antonio, TX....................... 100 87* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 119* 115* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 128* 124* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 111* 118* Springfield, MA....................... 122* 106* Springfield, MO....................... 94 86* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 108* 96* Tallahassee, FL....................... 93 96 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 98 94* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 98 93* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 112* 101 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 120* 106* York-Hanover, PA...................... 107* 98* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 101 93* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 99 104* Salinas, CA........................... 121* 111* San Antonio, TX....................... 91* 90* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 99 104* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 117* 119* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 107* 104* Springfield, MA....................... 104* 109* Springfield, MO....................... 87* 86* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 91* 98 Tallahassee, FL....................... 86* 89* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 92* 96* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 87* 91* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 93* 96 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 101 111* York-Hanover, PA...................... 85* 95* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 82* 91* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 99 107* Salinas, CA........................... 123* 99 San Antonio, TX....................... 95* 95* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 109* 101 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 120* 106 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 108* 99 Springfield, MA....................... 107* 96 Springfield, MO....................... 76* 81* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 118* 102 Tallahassee, FL....................... 79* 81* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 95 87* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 82* 87* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 86* 83* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 98 106* York-Hanover, PA...................... 97 91* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 93* 87* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Reading, PA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 112* 110* Salinas, CA........................... 100 105* San Antonio, TX....................... 96* 89* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 104 101 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 107 110* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 115* 113* Springfield, MA....................... 107* 114* Springfield, MO....................... 91* 98 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 104 111* Tallahassee, FL....................... 92* 94* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 92* 103 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 90* 90* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 102 94* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 105 107* York-Hanover, PA...................... 95* 105* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 100 111* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Combined Statistical Area (CSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, December 2003.