Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 82* 92* Anchorage, AK......................... 102 103 Atlanta, GA........................... 95* 100 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 88* 88* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 88* 89* Birmingham, AL........................ 88* 90* Bloomington, IN....................... 84* 87* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 104* 108* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 72* 72* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 93* 90* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 87* 96 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 94* 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 101 103 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 91* 92* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 93* 95 Columbus, OH.......................... 93* 99 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 81* 90* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 91* 98 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 91* 97 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 95* 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 98 96 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 89* 95* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 93* 93* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 94* 91* Great Falls, MT....................... 81* 84* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 89* 90* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 87* 93* Hartford, CT.......................... 104* 107 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 88* 87* Honolulu, HI.......................... 97* 104 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 89* 98 Huntsville, AL........................ 89* 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 81* 74* Anchorage, AK......................... 96 103 Atlanta, GA........................... 98 82* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 96* 76* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 91* 79* Birmingham, AL........................ 91* 86* Bloomington, IN....................... 92* 77* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 104 96* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 91* 65* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 87* 90* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 90* 73* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 89* 83* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 103 91* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 94* 87* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 96 83* Columbus, OH.......................... 88* 85* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 90* 70* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 96 81* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 88* 82* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 98 84* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 100 86* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 90* 81* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 91* 79* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 93* 88* Great Falls, MT....................... 72* 79* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 90* 80* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 86* 82* Hartford, CT.......................... 104 101 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 85* 76* Honolulu, HI.......................... 99 93* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 94* 74* Huntsville, AL........................ 92* 81* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 82* 84* Anchorage, AK......................... 99 102 Atlanta, GA........................... 89* 101 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 76* 93* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 92* 94* Birmingham, AL........................ 87* 93* Bloomington, IN....................... 72* 85* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 97 110* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 69* 74* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 96 96* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 93* 90* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 100 99 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 97 106* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 87* 95* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 87* 98 Columbus, OH.......................... 97 96* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 80* 82* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 94 96* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 89* 89* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 95 99 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 92 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 87* 89* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 97 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 100 97* Great Falls, MT....................... 81* 78* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 79* 94* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 83* 90* Hartford, CT.......................... 99 109* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 84* 92* Honolulu, HI.......................... 96 96* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 87* 95* Huntsville, AL........................ 92* 93* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 73* 76* Anchorage, AK......................... 110 103 Atlanta, GA........................... 82* 96 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 84* 91 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 77* 93 Birmingham, AL........................ 74* 92 Bloomington, IN....................... 69* 79* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 109 107 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 59* 73* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 98 93 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 71* 76* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 81* 91 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 110 106 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 80* 91 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 89 95 Columbus, OH.......................... 86* 93 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 81* 75* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 79* 89 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 88* 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 81* 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 97 91 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 96 86* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 87* 97 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 93 89 Great Falls, MT....................... 104 93 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 81* 92 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 72* 78* Hartford, CT.......................... 101 101 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 87* 85* Honolulu, HI.......................... 99 108 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 81* 89 Huntsville, AL........................ 80* 84* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 77* 86* Anchorage, AK......................... 98 103 Atlanta, GA........................... 89* 100 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 84* 89* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 80* 85* Birmingham, AL........................ 74* 92* Bloomington, IN....................... 84* 97 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 93* 104 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 65* 71* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 96* 95* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 87* 98 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 89* 93* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 89* 99 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 86* 93* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 90* 99 Columbus, OH.......................... 83* 95 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 76* 81* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 78* 92* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 92* 98 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 88* 92 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 101 101 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 84* 95* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 82* 104 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 87* 94* Great Falls, MT....................... 83* 86* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 87* 97 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 90* 89* Hartford, CT.......................... 96 100 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 86* 95* Honolulu, HI.......................... 91 97 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 86* 89* Huntsville, AL........................ 85* 87* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis, IN...................... 90* 80* Iowa City, IA......................... 91* 93* Johnstown, PA......................... 81* 85* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 92* 92* Knoxville, TN......................... 86* 102 Lincoln, NE........................... 83* 84* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 99 104 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 90* 90* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 86* 83* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 88* 94* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 90* 105 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 95* 99 Mobile, AL............................ 82* 80* New Orleans, LA....................... 88* 89* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 106* 113* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 85* 85* Ocala, FL............................. 84* 86* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 84* 86* Orlando, FL........................... 86* 93 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 98 105 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 90* 98 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 90* 90* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 97* 102 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 100 108* Reading, PA........................... 95* 103 Reno, NV.............................. 91* 96 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 96* 94 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 91* 97 Rochester, NY......................... 91* 88* Rockford, IL.......................... 93* 89* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 99 101 Salinas, CA........................... 105* 114* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Indianapolis, IN...................... 93* 82* Iowa City, IA......................... 91* 86* Johnstown, PA......................... 87* 75* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 91* 81* Knoxville, TN......................... 94* 71* Lincoln, NE........................... 84* 77* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 104* 92* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 91* 88* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 78* 85* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 88* 77* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 91* 81* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 92* 85* Mobile, AL............................ 82* 71* New Orleans, LA....................... 92* 77* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 111* 97 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86* 80* Ocala, FL............................. 84* 78* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 81* 77* Orlando, FL........................... 84* 79* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 103 89* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 97 81* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 93* 83* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 91* 95* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 106* 95* Reading, PA........................... 90* 85* Reno, NV.............................. 91* 84* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 91* 95* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 91* 83* Rochester, NY......................... 93* 88* Rockford, IL.......................... 93* 84* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 102 94* Salinas, CA........................... 115* 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis, IN...................... 87* 95* Iowa City, IA......................... 84* 98* Johnstown, PA......................... 79* 82* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 89* 96 Knoxville, TN......................... 90* 92* Lincoln, NE........................... 78* 84* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 105 103 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 91* 95* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 88* 86* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 96 94* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 87* 93* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 94 101 Mobile, AL............................ 87* 87* New Orleans, LA....................... 93* 93* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 103 110* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86* 88* Ocala, FL............................. 85* 86* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 85* 87* Orlando, FL........................... 93 88* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 92* 103 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 98 98 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 82* 94* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 101 102 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 94* 102* Reading, PA........................... 98 99 Reno, NV.............................. 93* 96* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 96 97* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 91* 95* Rochester, NY......................... 88* 95* Rockford, IL.......................... 92* 94* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 93 100 Salinas, CA........................... 118* 108* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis, IN...................... 82* 89 Iowa City, IA......................... 89* 95 Johnstown, PA......................... 85* 83* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96 97 Knoxville, TN......................... 75* 81* Lincoln, NE........................... 75* 87* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 97 99 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 97 88* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 81* 94 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 83* 91 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 80* 87* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 97 95 Mobile, AL............................ 83* 91 New Orleans, LA....................... 79* 85* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 113* 106 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 77* 88* Ocala, FL............................. 73* 99 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 89* 100 Orlando, FL........................... 80* 87* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 94 104 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 72* 93 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 85* 89 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 101 103 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 91 100 Reading, PA........................... 90* 93 Reno, NV.............................. 85* 104 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 98 87* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 81* 92 Rochester, NY......................... 83* 83* Rockford, IL.......................... 98 97 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 91 110 Salinas, CA........................... 116* 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Indianapolis, IN...................... 93* 92* Iowa City, IA......................... 86* 90* Johnstown, PA......................... 72* 77* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 90* 91* Knoxville, TN......................... 76* 89* Lincoln, NE........................... 78* 85* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 85* 96 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 85* 88* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 90* 96 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 83* 90* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 83* 92* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 91* 100 Mobile, AL............................ 82* 85* New Orleans, LA....................... 82* 94* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 90* 103 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 80* 83* Ocala, FL............................. 81* 96 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 76* 81* Orlando, FL........................... 73* 99 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 86* 101 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 83* 94 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 85* 90* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 86* 93* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 96* 98 Reading, PA........................... 85* 96 Reno, NV.............................. 84* 95* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 84* 94* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 87* 94* Rochester, NY......................... 86* 93* Rockford, IL.......................... 88* 97 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 95 101 Salinas, CA........................... 82* 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Antonio, TX....................... 83* 92* San Diego, CA......................... 101 105 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 111* 112* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 101 101 Springfield, MA....................... 101 103 Springfield, MO....................... 81* 81* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 94* 95 Tallahassee, FL....................... 85* 80* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 88* 88* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 92* 100 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 100 102 York, PA.............................. 90* 101 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 90* 95* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Antonio, TX....................... 87* 74* San Diego, CA......................... 106 95* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 112* 104 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 95* 100 Springfield, MA....................... 105* 89* Springfield, MO....................... 84* 71* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 95* 80* Tallahassee, FL....................... 86* 81* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 87* 81* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 94* 86* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 103 90* York, PA.............................. 94* 83* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 89* 77* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Antonio, TX....................... 77* 89* San Diego, CA......................... 97 102 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 113* 118* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 102 104* Springfield, MA....................... 104 107* Springfield, MO....................... 83* 84* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 91* 96* Tallahassee, FL....................... 85* 88* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 90* 97 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 93* 94* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 98 108* York, PA.............................. 83* 92* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 85* 89* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Antonio, TX....................... 85* 90 San Diego, CA......................... 94 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 107 110 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 98 99 Springfield, MA....................... 93 102 Springfield, MO....................... 68* 85* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 103 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 77* 81* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 85* 87 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 81* 87* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 88* 108 York, PA.............................. 90* 92 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 88* 89* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Antonio, TX....................... 82* 80* San Diego, CA......................... 90* 94 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 93* 101 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 101 105 Springfield, MA....................... 93* 107* Springfield, MO....................... 80* 83* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 89* 101 Tallahassee, FL....................... 81* 87* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 80* 96 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 90* 91* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 93* 99 York, PA.............................. 82* 96 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 88* 103 * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ncspay.tn.htm. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.