Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 91* 87* Anchorage, AK......................... 114* 98 Atlanta, GA........................... 106* 96 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 98 84* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 99 85* Birmingham, AL........................ 98* 86* Bloomington, IN....................... 94* 83* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 116* 103 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 81* 68* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 104* 86* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 97* 92* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 105* 93 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 112* 98 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 101 87* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 104* 90* Columbus, OH.......................... 103* 94 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 91* 86* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 102 93 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 102* 92* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 106* 93 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 110* 91* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 100 90* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 104* 88* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 105* 87* Great Falls, MT....................... 91* 80* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 99 86* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 98* 89* Hartford, CT.......................... 116* 102 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 98 83* Honolulu, HI.......................... 109* 99 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 99 94 Huntsville, AL........................ 99 89* Indianapolis, IN...................... 100 77* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 89* 91* Anchorage, AK......................... 105* 126* Atlanta, GA........................... 108* 101 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 105* 93* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 100 97* Birmingham, AL........................ 100 105* Bloomington, IN....................... 102 94* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 114* 118* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 100 80* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 96* 111* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 100 90* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 98 103 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 113* 112* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 104 107* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 106* 102 Columbus, OH.......................... 97 105 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 99 86* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 106* 100 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 97 100 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 107* 103 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 110* 106* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 99 100 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 100 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 102 109* Great Falls, MT....................... 80* 98 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 99 99 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 95* 101 Hartford, CT.......................... 114* 124* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 94* 94* Honolulu, HI.......................... 109* 115* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 103 91* Huntsville, AL........................ 101 100 Indianapolis, IN...................... 103 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 94* 90* Anchorage, AK......................... 114* 110* Atlanta, GA........................... 102 108* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 87* 99 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 105* 100 Birmingham, AL........................ 99 99 Bloomington, IN....................... 82* 91* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 111* 117* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 79* 79* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 111* 103 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 106* 96 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 114* 106 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 112* 113* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 99 101 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 100 105 Columbus, OH.......................... 111* 103 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 92* 87* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 108* 103 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 102 95* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 109* 106* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 106 109* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 100 95* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 111* 105* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 114* 104 Great Falls, MT....................... 93* 83* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 91* 100 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 96* 97 Hartford, CT.......................... 114* 116* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 96* 99 Honolulu, HI.......................... 110* 103 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 100 102 Huntsville, AL........................ 106 99 Indianapolis, IN...................... 100 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 91* 87* Anchorage, AK......................... 138* 118* Atlanta, GA........................... 103 110* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 105 104 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 97 107 Birmingham, AL........................ 93 106 Bloomington, IN....................... 86* 91* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 137* 123* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 75* 84* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 122* 107 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 89* 88* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 102 105 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 138* 122* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 100 105 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 112 109* Columbus, OH.......................... 108 107 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 102 86* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 99 102 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 110* 114* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 101 112* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 121* 104 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 121* 99 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 109* 112* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 117* 102 Great Falls, MT....................... 131* 107 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 101 105 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 91* 90* Hartford, CT.......................... 126* 115 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 109 98 Honolulu, HI.......................... 124* 124* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 101 102 Huntsville, AL........................ 100 97 Indianapolis, IN...................... 102 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 92* 94* Anchorage, AK......................... 118* 112* Atlanta, GA........................... 107 109 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 102 97 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 97 93* Birmingham, AL........................ 90* 100 Bloomington, IN....................... 101 106* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 112* 113* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 78* 78* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 115* 103 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 105* 106* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 107 101 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 107* 108* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 103 101 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 109* 108* Columbus, OH.......................... 99 103 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 92* 88* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 94* 101 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 111* 107* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 106* 100 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 122* 110* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 101 103 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 99 114* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 105* 103 Great Falls, MT....................... 99 94* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 105* 106* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 108* 97 Hartford, CT.......................... 115* 109* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 103 104 Honolulu, HI.......................... 110 106 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 103 97 Huntsville, AL........................ 103 95 Indianapolis, IN...................... 112* 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Iowa City, IA......................... 102 89* Johnstown, PA......................... 91* 81* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 103 87* Knoxville, TN......................... 96* 97 Lincoln, NE........................... 92* 80* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 111* 99 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 100 85* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 96* 79* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 99 90* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 106* 94 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 112* 95 Mobile, AL............................ 92* 76* New Orleans, LA....................... 99 84* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 118* 107* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 95* 81* Ocala, FL............................. 94* 82* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 94* 82* Orlando, FL........................... 96 89 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 109* 100 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 101 93 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 100 85* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 108* 98 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 112* 102 Reading, PA........................... 106* 98 Reno, NV.............................. 102* 91* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 107* 90* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 102 92* Rochester, NY......................... 101 84* Rockford, IL.......................... 104* 85* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 110* 96 Salinas, CA........................... 118* 108* San Antonio, TX....................... 93* 87* San Diego, CA......................... 112* 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Iowa City, IA......................... 101 106* Johnstown, PA......................... 96* 93* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 100 100 Knoxville, TN......................... 103 88* Lincoln, NE........................... 92* 95* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 115* 113* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 101 108* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 86* 105* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 97 95* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 102 105 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 110* 123* Mobile, AL............................ 90* 87* New Orleans, LA....................... 102 95* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 122* 119* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 95* 99 Ocala, FL............................. 92* 96* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 89* 95* Orlando, FL........................... 93* 98 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 113* 110* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 107 100 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 102 102 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 100 117* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 117* 117* Reading, PA........................... 99 105* Reno, NV.............................. 100 104* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 100 117* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 101 102 Rochester, NY......................... 103 108* Rockford, IL.......................... 102 103* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 112* 116* Salinas, CA........................... 127* 120* San Antonio, TX....................... 96* 91* San Diego, CA......................... 116* 117* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Iowa City, IA......................... 97 104 Johnstown, PA......................... 90* 87* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 102 103 Knoxville, TN......................... 103 98 Lincoln, NE........................... 90* 90* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 121* 110* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 104 101 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 101 92* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 110* 101 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 107 108* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 115* 107* Mobile, AL............................ 100 93* New Orleans, LA....................... 106* 100 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 118* 118* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 98 94* Ocala, FL............................. 98 92* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 98 93* Orlando, FL........................... 106 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 106 110* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 112* 104 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 94* 101 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 116* 109* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 108* 109* Reading, PA........................... 112* 106* Reno, NV.............................. 106* 103 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 110* 103 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 104* 102 Rochester, NY......................... 101 101 Rockford, IL.......................... 105* 100 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 107 107* Salinas, CA........................... 136* 115* San Antonio, TX....................... 89* 95* San Diego, CA......................... 112* 109* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Iowa City, IA......................... 112* 109* Johnstown, PA......................... 107 95 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 120* 112 Knoxville, TN......................... 94 93* Lincoln, NE........................... 94 100 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 121* 114* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 121* 101 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 102 108* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 104 105 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 122* 109 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 125* 115* Mobile, AL............................ 103 104 New Orleans, LA....................... 99 97 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 141* 122* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 96 100 Ocala, FL............................. 92* 113* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 112* 115* Orlando, FL........................... 100 100 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 118* 119* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 91 107 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 106 102 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 126* 118* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 114* 115* Reading, PA........................... 112* 107 Reno, NV.............................. 106 119* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 123* 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 102 106 Rochester, NY......................... 104 95 Rockford, IL.......................... 123* 111* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 114* 126* Salinas, CA........................... 146* 118* San Antonio, TX....................... 107 103 San Diego, CA......................... 118* 115* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Iowa City, IA......................... 104 98 Johnstown, PA......................... 87* 83* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 108* 99 Knoxville, TN......................... 92* 97 Lincoln, NE........................... 94* 93* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 102 104 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 103 96 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 109* 105* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 100 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 109* 109* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 120* 109* Mobile, AL............................ 99 93* New Orleans, LA....................... 98 102 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 108* 112* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 97 91* Ocala, FL............................. 98 105* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 91* 89* Orlando, FL........................... 88 108 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 103 110* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 99 102 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 102 98 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 104 102 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 115* 107* Reading, PA........................... 103 104 Reno, NV.............................. 101 103 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 101 102 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 105* 102 Rochester, NY......................... 103 102 Rockford, IL.......................... 106* 106* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 114* 110* Salinas, CA........................... 99 106* San Antonio, TX....................... 99 87* San Diego, CA......................... 108* 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 123* 107 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 113* 97 Springfield, MA....................... 113* 98 Springfield, MO....................... 90* 77* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 105* 91* Tallahassee, FL....................... 95* 76* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 99 84* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 103* 95 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 112* 97 York, PA.............................. 100 96 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 100 90* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 123* 128* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 104* 124* Springfield, MA....................... 115* 110* Springfield, MO....................... 93* 87* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 104 98 Tallahassee, FL....................... 95* 100 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 96 99 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 104 106* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 113* 111* York, PA.............................. 103 102 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 98 95* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 130* 126* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 117* 112* Springfield, MA....................... 119* 114* Springfield, MO....................... 96* 89* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 105 103 Tallahassee, FL....................... 97 94* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 104 103 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 107* 101 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 112* 115* York, PA.............................. 95* 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 97 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 135* 126* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 123* 114* Springfield, MA....................... 116* 118* Springfield, MO....................... 85* 97 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 130* 114* Tallahassee, FL....................... 97 93* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 107 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 102 100 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 110* 124* York, PA.............................. 113* 106 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 110* 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 112* 110* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 121* 115* Springfield, MA....................... 112* 117* Springfield, MO....................... 97 91* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 107 110 Tallahassee, FL....................... 98 95* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 96 105 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 108* 99 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 112* 108* York, PA.............................. 99 104 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 106* 112* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ncspay.tn.htm. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.