Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Oklahoma City, OK..................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 97* 107* Anchorage, AK......................... 121* 119* Atlanta, GA........................... 112* 117* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 104* 103 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 105* 104 Birmingham, AL........................ 104* 105* Bloomington, IN....................... 100 102 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 124* 126* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 86* 84* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 111* 105* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 103* 112* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 111* 114* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 119* 119* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 108* 107 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 111* 110* Columbus, OH.......................... 110* 115* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 96* 105* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 108* 114* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 108* 113* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 112* 113* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 117* 111* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 106* 110* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 110* 108* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 111* 106* Great Falls, MT....................... 97* 97 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 105* 105* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 104* 109* Hartford, CT.......................... 123* 124* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 105* 102 Honolulu, HI.......................... 116* 121* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 106* 114* Huntsville, AL........................ 106* 108* Indianapolis, IN...................... 107* 94 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Oklahoma City, OK..................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 100 95* Anchorage, AK......................... 118* 133* Atlanta, GA........................... 121* 107* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 118* 98* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 112* 102* Birmingham, AL........................ 113* 111* Bloomington, IN....................... 114* 99 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 128* 124* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 113* 84* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 107* 116* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 112* 95* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 109* 108* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 127* 117* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 117* 113* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 119* 107* Columbus, OH.......................... 109* 110* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 111* 91* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 119* 105* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 109* 106* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 121* 108 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 123* 111* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 111* 105* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 112* 103* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 115* 114* Great Falls, MT....................... 89* 103* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 112* 104* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 106* 106* Hartford, CT.......................... 128* 130* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 105* 99* Honolulu, HI.......................... 123* 121* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 116* 95* Huntsville, AL........................ 113* 105* Indianapolis, IN...................... 115* 106* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Oklahoma City, OK..................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 97* 97* Anchorage, AK......................... 117* 118* Atlanta, GA........................... 105 117* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 89* 107* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 108* 108* Birmingham, AL........................ 102 107* Bloomington, IN....................... 84* 98* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 114* 127* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 81* 86* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 113* 111* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 109* 104* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 117* 115* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 114* 122* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 102 109* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 103 113* Columbus, OH.......................... 114* 111* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 94* 94* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 111* 111* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 104* 103* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 112* 114* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 109* 118* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 102* 103* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 114* 113* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 117* 112* Great Falls, MT....................... 95* 90* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 93* 108* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 98 104* Hartford, CT.......................... 117* 125* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 98 107* Honolulu, HI.......................... 113* 111* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 103 110* Huntsville, AL........................ 108* 107* Indianapolis, IN...................... 103 110* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Oklahoma City, OK..................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 82* 76* Anchorage, AK......................... 124* 103 Atlanta, GA........................... 92 95 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 94* 90* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 87* 92* Birmingham, AL........................ 83* 92* Bloomington, IN....................... 77* 79* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 123* 107 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 67* 73* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 109* 93* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 80* 76* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 91* 91* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 123* 106* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 89 91* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 100 95* Columbus, OH.......................... 97 93 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 91 75* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 89* 89* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 99 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 90 97 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 108 90* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 108* 86* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 98 97* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 104 89* Great Falls, MT....................... 117* 93* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 90* 91* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 81* 78* Hartford, CT.......................... 113 100 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 97 85* Honolulu, HI.......................... 111* 107 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 90* 89* Huntsville, AL........................ 90* 84* Indianapolis, IN...................... 92* 89* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Oklahoma City, OK..................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 101 106* Anchorage, AK......................... 130* 127* Atlanta, GA........................... 117* 123* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 111* 110* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 106* 105* Birmingham, AL........................ 98 113* Bloomington, IN....................... 110* 120* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 122* 128* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 85* 88* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 126* 116* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 115* 120* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 117* 114* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 117* 122* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 113* 114* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 119* 122* Columbus, OH.......................... 109* 117* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 100 99 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 102 114* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 121* 120* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 116* 113* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 133* 125* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 111* 117* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 108* 128* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 115* 116* Great Falls, MT....................... 109* 106* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 115* 120* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 118* 110* Hartford, CT.......................... 126* 124* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 113* 117* Honolulu, HI.......................... 120* 119* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 113* 110* Huntsville, AL........................ 112* 107* Indianapolis, IN...................... 122* 114* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Iowa City, IA......................... 108* 108* Johnstown, PA......................... 97* 99 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 109* 107* Knoxville, TN......................... 102* 118* Lincoln, NE........................... 98* 97* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 118* 121* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 107* 104* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 102* 97 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 105* 110* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 106* 122* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 113* 115* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 119* 116* Mobile, AL............................ 97* 93* New Orleans, LA....................... 105* 103* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 126* 131* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 101 99 Ocala, FL............................. 100 100 Orlando, FL........................... 102 108 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 116* 122* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 107* 114* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 106* 105 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 115* 119* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 119* 125* Reading, PA........................... 112* 120* Reno, NV.............................. 108* 112* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 114* 110* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 108* 112* Rochester, NY......................... 108* 103 Rockford, IL.......................... 110* 103* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 117* 117* Salinas, CA........................... 125* 132* San Antonio, TX....................... 99* 107* San Diego, CA......................... 119* 122* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Iowa City, IA......................... 113* 112* Johnstown, PA......................... 107* 97* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 112* 105* Knoxville, TN......................... 116* 92* Lincoln, NE........................... 104* 99 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 129* 119* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 113* 113* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 96* 111* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 109* 100 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 112* 105* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 114* 110* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 124* 129* Mobile, AL............................ 101 92* New Orleans, LA....................... 114* 99 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 137* 125* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 106* 104* Ocala, FL............................. 104* 100 Orlando, FL........................... 104* 103 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 127* 115* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 120* 105* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 115* 108* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 112* 122* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 131* 123* Reading, PA........................... 111* 110* Reno, NV.............................. 112* 109* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 113* 123* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 113* 107* Rochester, NY......................... 115* 114* Rockford, IL.......................... 115* 108* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 126* 122* Salinas, CA........................... 143* 126* San Antonio, TX....................... 107* 96* San Diego, CA......................... 131* 123* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Iowa City, IA......................... 99 113* Johnstown, PA......................... 92* 94* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 104 111* Knoxville, TN......................... 106* 106* Lincoln, NE........................... 92* 97* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 124* 119* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 107* 109* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 103* 100 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 112* 109* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 102 108* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 110 117* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 117* 116* Mobile, AL............................ 102 101 New Orleans, LA....................... 109* 108* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 121* 128* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 101 102* Ocala, FL............................. 100 99 Orlando, FL........................... 109 101 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 108* 119* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 115* 113* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 96 109* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 119* 118* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 111* 118* Reading, PA........................... 115* 114* Reno, NV.............................. 109* 111* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 113* 112* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 107* 110* Rochester, NY......................... 103* 109* Rockford, IL.......................... 108* 108* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 110 116* Salinas, CA........................... 139* 125* San Antonio, TX....................... 91* 102* San Diego, CA......................... 114* 118* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Iowa City, IA......................... 100 95* Johnstown, PA......................... 95 82* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 107 97 Knoxville, TN......................... 84* 81* Lincoln, NE........................... 84* 87* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 108* 99 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 109* 87* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 91* 94* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 93* 91* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 89* 87* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 109 94 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 112* 100 Mobile, AL............................ 93* 91* New Orleans, LA....................... 89* 85* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 126* 106* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86* 87* Ocala, FL............................. 82* 98 Orlando, FL........................... 90* 87* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 105 104 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 81* 93 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 95 89* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 113* 103 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 102 100 Reading, PA........................... 100 93* Reno, NV.............................. 95 103 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 110* 87* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 91* 92* Rochester, NY......................... 93* 83* Rockford, IL.......................... 110* 97* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 102 110* Salinas, CA........................... 130* 103 San Antonio, TX....................... 95 90* San Diego, CA......................... 106 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Iowa City, IA......................... 114* 110* Johnstown, PA......................... 95* 94* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 118* 112* Knoxville, TN......................... 100 110* Lincoln, NE........................... 102 105* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 112* 118* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 112* 108* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 119* 119* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 110* 111* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 109* 113* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 119* 123* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 132* 123* Mobile, AL............................ 108* 105* New Orleans, LA....................... 108* 116* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 118* 126* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 106* 102* Ocala, FL............................. 107* 119* Orlando, FL........................... 96 122* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 113* 124* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 109* 115* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 111* 111* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 114* 115* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 126* 121* Reading, PA........................... 112* 118* Reno, NV.............................. 111* 117* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 111* 116* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 115* 115* Rochester, NY......................... 113* 115* Rockford, IL.......................... 116* 119* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 125* 124* Salinas, CA........................... 108* 119* San Antonio, TX....................... 108* 99 San Diego, CA......................... 118* 116* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 131* 131* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 121* 118* Springfield, MA....................... 121* 120* Springfield, MO....................... 96* 94* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 112* 111* Tallahassee, FL....................... 101 93* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 105* 103 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 109* 116* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 119* 118* York, PA.............................. 107* 117* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 106* 110* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 138* 134* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 117* 130* Springfield, MA....................... 129* 116* Springfield, MO....................... 104* 92* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 117* 103 Tallahassee, FL....................... 106* 105* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 107* 104* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 116* 111* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 127* 116* York, PA.............................. 116* 107* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 110* 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 133* 136* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 120* 121* Springfield, MA....................... 122* 124* Springfield, MO....................... 98* 97* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 107* 111* Tallahassee, FL....................... 100 102* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 106* 112* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 110* 109* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 115* 125* York, PA.............................. 98* 106* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 100 103* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 120* 109* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 110* 99 Springfield, MA....................... 104 102 Springfield, MO....................... 76* 85* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 116* 99 Tallahassee, FL....................... 87* 81* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 96 87* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 91* 87* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 98 108* York, PA.............................. 101 92* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 98 88* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 122* 125* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 133* 130* Springfield, MA....................... 122* 132* Springfield, MO....................... 106* 103* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 117* 125* Tallahassee, FL....................... 107* 107* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 105 118* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 118* 111* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 122* 121* York, PA.............................. 108* 118* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 115* 127* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ncspay.tn.htm. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.