[DOCID: f:hr083.110] From the House Reports Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] Union Calendar No. 48 110th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - House Report 110-83 OVERSIGHT PLANS FOR ALL HOUSE COMMITTEES with accompanying recommendations __________ by the COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (Required by House Rule X, Clause 2(d)(2)) together with MINORITY VIEWS <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT> March 30, 2007.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; (202) 512ÿ091800 Fax: (202) 512ÿ092250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402ÿ090001 COMMITTEE ON OVERSISGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HENRY A. WAXMAN, California, Chairman TOM LANTOS, California TOM DAVIS, Virginia EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York DAN BURTON, Indiana PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York JOHN M. McHUGH, New York ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland JOHN L. MICA, Florida DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts CHRIS CANNON, Utah WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri JOHN J. DUNCAN, Jr., Tennessee DIANE E. WATSON, California MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts DARRELL E. ISSA, California BRIAN HIGGINS, New York KENNY MARCHANT, Texas JOHN A. YARMUTH, Kentucky LYNN A. WESTMORELAND, Georgia BRUCE L. BRALEY, Iowa PATRICK T. McHENRY, North Carolina ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina Columbia BRIAN P. BILBRAY, California BETTY McCOLLUM, Minnesota BILL SALI, Idaho JIM COOPER, Tennessee ------ ------ CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, Maryland PAUL W. HODES, New Hampshire CHRISTOPHER S. MURPHY, Connecticut JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland PETER WELCH, Vermont Phil Schiliro, Chief of Staff Phil Barnett, Staff Director Earley Green, Chief Clerk David Marin, Minority Staff Director C O N T E N T S __________ Page Recommendations.................................................. 1 Agriculture...................................................... 7 Appropriations................................................... 15 Armed Services................................................... 24 Budget........................................................... 49 Education and the Workforce...................................... 54 Energy and Commerce.............................................. 59 Financial Services............................................... 69 Foreign Affairs.................................................. 98 Homeland Security................................................ 121 House Administration............................................. 136 Judiciary........................................................ 144 Natural Resources................................................ 152 Oversight and Government Reform.................................. 171 Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence....................... 209 Rules............................................................ 219 Science and Technology........................................... 238 Small Business................................................... 248 Standards of Official Conduct.................................... 259 Transportation and Infrastructure................................ 263 Veterans' Affairs................................................ 283 Ways and Means................................................... 291 Views Minority views of Hon. Tom Davis, Hon. Christopher Shays, Hon. Dan Burton, Hon. John L. Mica, Hon. Mark E. Souder, Hon. Chris Cannon, Hon. John J. Duncan, Jr., Hon. Michael R. Turner, Hon. Darrell E. Issa, Hon. Kenny Marchant, Hon. Lynn A. Westmoreland, Hon. Patrick T. McHenry, Hon. Virginia Foxx, Hon. Brian P. Bilbray, and Hon. Bill Sali........................... 300 (iii) ? LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ---------- House of Representatives, Washington, DC, March 30, 2007. Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Dear Ms. Speaker: In accordance with Rule X(2)(d)(2) of the Rules of the House of Representatives, I respectfully submit the oversight plans of each committee together with recommendations to ensure the most effective coordination of such plans and otherwise achieve the objectives of the House Rules. Henry A. Waxman, Chairman. (v) Union Calendar No. 48 110th Congress Report HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110-83 ====================================================================== OVERSIGHT PLANS FOR ALL HOUSE COMMITTEES WITH ACCOMPANYING RECOMMENDATIONS _______ March 30, 2007.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed _______ Mr. Henry A. Waxman, from the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform submitted the following REPORT OVERSIGHT IN THE 110TH CONGRESS RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM I. Overview One of Congress' main constitutional responsibilities is to conduct oversight to check abuses by the other branches of government and ensure the effective operation of our laws. As the Supreme Court recognized 50 years ago: The power of the Congress to conduct investigations is inherent in the legislative process. That power is broad. It encompasses inquiries concerning the administration of existing laws as well as proposed or possibly needed statutes. It includes surveys of defects in our social, economic or political system for the purpose of enabling Congress to remedy them. It comprehends probes into departments of the Federal Government to expose corruption, inefficiency or waste.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178, 187 (1957). Oversight activities have uncovered significant waste, fraud, and abuse throughout the Federal Government. A report issued in 2006 by the Democratic staff of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (then known as the Committee on Government Reform) identified 118 Federal contracts worth $745.5 billion that the Government Accountability Office [GAO], the Defense Contract Audit Agency, inspectors general, or other government officials found to involve significant waste, fraud, abuse, or mismanagement. In the area of Iraq reconstruction contracting alone, Pentagon auditors have identified over $10 billion in suspect charges by government contractors in Iraq-- costs deemed either unreasonable or unsupported by appropriate documentation. Congressional efforts to investigate government waste can lead to tremendous benefits for American taxpayers. GAO, which conducts investigations at the request of Members of Congress, reports that the financial benefits from its work in fiscal year 2006 alone totaled $51 billion. House Rule 10, Clause 2 recognizes Congress' critical oversight duties, establishing a process whereby each standing committee is required to adopt an oversight plan for that Congress. Under this rule, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is to review the various plans and, in consultation with the Speaker, the Majority Leader, and the Minority Leader, report to the House the oversight plans along with any recommendations that the House leadership and the Committee may have to ensure effective coordination. Pursuant to this rule, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has reviewed and consulted with House leadership about the oversight plans of the standing House committees for the 110th Congress. These plans outline an ambitious blueprint for meeting Congress' oversight responsibilities. The Oversight Committee has several recommendations regarding coordination of oversight in the House of Representatives. The committee first recommends that all committees draw on the wide variety of available oversight resources in their ongoing efforts to evaluate oversight needs and priorities. GAO, in particular, has vast experience both in conducting and evaluating the need for oversight. On January 9, 2007, GAO identified dozens of suggested areas for oversight for the 110th Congress.\2\ GAO also recently issued its biannual ``High Risk'' report, which identifies government programs that are particularly vulnerable to waste, fraud, or abuse.\3\ Another valuable resource for congressional oversight is the agency Inspectors General, who can provide guidance to Congress through their audit plans and individual counsel. Committees should also review relevant court rulings, past committee legislative and oversight reports, and the findings of other experts. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ U.S. Government Accountability Office, Suggested Areas for Oversight for the 110th Congress (GAO-07-235R) (Nov. 17, 2006), sent by David Walker, Comptroller General of the United States, to Representative Henry A. Waxman, chairman, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (Jan. 9, 2007). \3\ U.S. Government Accountability Office, High Risk Series: An Update (GAO-07-310) (Jan. 31, 2007). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, in any oversight effort, the committees should seek the expertise of the Committee on House Administration and Committee on Standards of Official Conduct if any questions arise regarding appropriate use of House resources and the standards of conduct applicable to members and staff. The oversight plans submitted by these two committees reflect a commitment to ensuring that all House committees have the tools and guidance necessary to facilitate efficient and ethical oversight. Further, the task of ensuring accountability and appropriate policies on complex issues often requires the participation of multiple committees. Based on their respective jurisdictions and experience, different committees can lend varying types of expertise to the evaluation of a given matter. The oversight plans approved by the committees for the 110th Congress recognize that a number of key issues demand scrutiny by several different committees. With respect to such issues, the committees and subcommittees should be in close communication to ensure that they share the benefits of their findings and unique expertise, as well as to avoid duplication or redundancy. Part II below describes a few examples of important areas identified by committees on which these recommendations may be instructive. II. Examples of Key Oversight Areas CONTRACTING In recent years, the ``shadow government'' of private companies working under Federal contract has exploded in size. Between 2000 and 2005, procurement spending increased by over $175 billion, making Federal contracts the fastest growing component of Federal discretionary spending. Several committees plan to examine this growth in government reliance on contractors. The Committee on Homeland Security plans to focus its oversight attention in this area on the integration and coordination of procurement in the Department of Homeland Security's legacy components and on ensuring that effective management controls are put in place at the Department to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse. The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform plans to conduct oversight of contracting governmentwide, with a continuing focus on those contracts issued for services in Iraq. Other committees, including the Committees on Science and Technology, Energy and Commerce, Transportation and Infrastructure, and Veterans Affairs, plan to conduct oversight of contracts let by agencies under the committees' respective jurisdictions. ECONOMIC SECURITY AND CONSUMER PROTECTION House committees will also examine issues relating to economic security and consumer protection that greatly affect the lives of Americans without substantial economic means. The Committee on Financial Services will oversee many Federal assistance and consumer protection programs for housing, insurance, investment, and access to financial services. The Committee on Education and Labor plans to conduct oversight of Federal protections of workers' rights and the Federal effort to promote retirement security. The Committee on the Judiciary will oversee Federal efforts to protect consumers against fraud. The Committee on the Budget will evaluate whether the Federal budget appropriately reflects domestic priorities. The Committee on Energy and Commerce will examine Federal activities to ensure the widespread deployment and availability of technologies and services at reasonable rates. EXECUTIVE POWER Another subject of significant House oversight will be the limits and use of executive power. The Committee on the Judiciary will look into a variety of concerns regarding unilateral exercise of executive branch authority, particularly where it affects individual rights and liberties. The Committees on Armed Services and Intelligence will review issues relating to the implementation of the Military Commission Act and the detention policies of the U.S. Military. In addition, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence plans to conduct an in-depth review of the President's NSA Surveillance Program. Both the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform plan to examine the classification, over-classification, and selective declassification of executive branch material. Finally, the Committee on Appropriations will review budget requests for and the execution of intelligence activities. GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE Global climate change is one of the most complex and significant issues that this Congress will address through both oversight and legislative action. Accordingly, multiple committees are planning oversight activities to consider the impacts of global warming on our environment and economy and policy options to avoid the worst potential effects. The Committee on Energy and Commerce is planning a broad review of the social, economic, cultural, and homeland security implications of climate change and policy options for responding to it. The Committee on Foreign Affairs is planning hearings to examine international aspects of global climate change. The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure will be looking at the connection between transportation policy and energy policy in response to climate change concerns. The Committee on Natural Resources plans to examine renewable resource options, an effort that will contribute to our understanding of ways to mitigate the global climate change. The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is examining the influence of politics on the public dissemination of findings of government scientists with expertise in global climate change. As Congress seeks appropriate policy options on global warming, effective oversight coordination among the appropriate committees could serve to advance initiatives that would promote emissions reductions, advance carbon sequestration-- both geologic and in soils and forests--and help the Nation prepare for unavoidable climate change. In addition, such coordination could benefit efforts to further international commitment to reduce greenhouse gases and to understand how the prospects for such an agreement could be affected by domestic action on global warming. HEALTH The Nation's health care system faces major challenges, including large and growing numbers of Americans without health care coverage, steeply rising health care costs, increases in preventable chronic disease, an emergency care system that is at the breaking point, and the threat of pandemic flu. A number of House committees will review these and other pressing public health issues. The Committee on Energy and Commerce plans to review the management of the Medicaid and Medicare programs by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS], the ability of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to respond to disease outbreaks, and the capacity of the Food and Drug Administration to ensure the safety of drugs, medical devices, and the food supply. The Committee on Ways and Means plans to conduct oversight on the operation of the Medicare program and its administration by CMS, health insurance coverage, and emergency care. The Committee on Small Business plans to examine options for increasing affordable health insurance coverage for small employers. The Committee on Agriculture plans to review the Department of Agriculture's administration of meat and poultry inspection laws and FDA's food inspection activities. The Committee on Homeland Security plans to conduct oversight on the actions by the Department of Homeland Security [DHS] to provide for response capabilities to a biological event, including a pandemic flu outbreak. The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has initiated investigations into pharmaceutical pricing and marketing. HOMELAND SECURITY A number of committees will be conducting oversight to ensure the Nation is best prepared to address homeland security threats and domestic emergencies. Several committees will monitor Hurricane Katrina reconstruction efforts in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. For instance, the Committee on Homeland Security will be evaluating the Department of Homeland Security's emergency preparedness and response plans in the wake of the disaster. The Committee on Financial Services will be overseeing federally provided housing in the region, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce will conduct oversight into the rebuilding of health services in the region. The Committee on Homeland Security also will review key aspects of Federal terrorism preparedness. The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure will oversee programs administrated by the Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration regarding the security of the civil aviation system. In addition, the Committee on Energy and Commerce will oversee efforts to ensure adequate emergency communications capabilities to first responders and the general public. IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN The House will devote considerable oversight resources to the ongoing war in Iraq, examining areas such as the number of troops on the ground, the security situation, and contracts to support reconstruction activities. The Committee on Armed Services, for example, plans to review the President's strategy for Iraq, the proper force strength, ongoing military activities, and the effectiveness of the Iraq Security Forces. The Committee on Foreign Affairs plans to look into both the military and reconstruction components of U.S. policy, and to monitor the Iraqi counter-insurgency efforts. The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform plans to oversee Iraq reconstruction with a focus on contracts with private companies that provide reconstruction assistance in Iraq. The Committee on Veterans Affairs will review whether the servicemen and servicewomen returning from duty in Iraq and other areas are receiving the health care, employment opportunities, and other support our Nation owes its veterans. Afghanistan is recognized as a front in the war on terror, and committees plan to increase attention to ensuring appropriate policy in that region. The Committee on Armed Services intends to review the status of the NATO forces and evaluate their ability to fight terrorism on the Afghani/ Pakistani border. The Committee on Foreign Affairs will also review U.S. policy toward Afghanistan, particularly the threat posed by the Taliban and the increase in narcotics production. The Committee on the Budget will examine the impact on the Federal budget of spending for efforts to combat terrorism in this region and other areas. III. Conclusion The oversight plans approved by the standing House committees have set the House on a course toward ensuring accountability and appropriate policies on issues of concern to the American public. The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform will continue to work with the other House committees and the House leadership throughout the 110th Congress to promote effective congressional oversight. [The oversight plans of all House committees follow:] <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT> MINORITY VIEWS OF HON. TOM DAVIS, HON. CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, HON. DAN BURTON, HON. JOHN L. MICA, HON. MARK E. SOUDER, HON. CHRIS CANNON, HON. JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., HON. MICHAEL R. TURNER, HON. DARRELL E. ISSA, HON. KENNY MARCHANT, HON. LYNN A. WESTMORELAND, HON. PATRICK T. MCHENRY, HON. VIRGINIA FOXX, HON. BRIAN P. BILBRAY, AND HON. BILL SALI In the 109th Congress, this committee proved once again that oversight matters. The committee and its seven subcommittees convened 256 investigative hearings on a very diverse portfolio of subjects, from contracting in Iraq to steroids in professional baseball. At the committee's request, the Government Accountability Office [GAO] produced 359 reports, testimonies and briefings in support of oversight investigations and program reviews. As a result of this committee's oversight, billions of dollars worth of outright savings, avoidable costs and increased revenues have been identified and captured. Pursuant to the committee's broad jurisdictional grant under House Rules, and guided by the committee's Oversight Plan, investigations were pursued into matters affecting the ``[o]verall economy, efficiency, and management of government operations and activities, including Federal procurement.'' \1\ In the course of that oversight, the committee and subcommittees uncovered wasteful spending, mismanagement, ineffective policy implementation, and poor interagency coordination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Rule X, clause 1(h)(6), Rules of the House of Representatives, 109th Congress. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Direct savings and other financial benefits identified as a result of the committee's GAO work alone now total $6.4 billion.\2\ Current oversight yielded savings in areas such as the Department of Defense excess property reutilization system ($42 million) and information technology investments at the Department of Interior ($80 million). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ The total represents the net present value in fiscal year 2006 of financial benefits identified and accrued as a result of GAO findings and recommendations contained in work on which the Government Reform Committee was a requestor. The process used to calculate and review savings and other financial benefits attributed to GAO Recommendations is described at length in the Performance and Accountability Report for Fiscal Year 2005 at http://www.gao.gov/ new.items/d061sp.pdf. Accessed March 28, 2007. Savings and other benefits may be captured over 5 fiscal years. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The minority agrees that one of Congress' main constitutional responsibilities is to conduct oversight regarding the scope of congressional hearings, and the minority agrees this is captured well by the Supreme Court in Watkins v. United States, namely The power of the Congress to conduct investigations is inherent in the legislative process. That power is broad. It encompasses inquiries concerning the administration of existing laws as well as proposed or possibly needed statutes. It includes surveys of defects in our social, economic or political system for the purpose of enabling the Congress to remedy them. It comprehends probes into departments of the Federal Government to expose corruption, inefficiency or waste.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178, 187 (1957). However, the oversight power is not absolute. The Supreme Court finding relied on by the majority goes on to describe the need for a balanced approach to the use of an important --------------------------------------------------------------------------- constitutional authority: But, broad as is this power of inquiry, it is not unlimited. There is no general authority to expose the private affairs of individuals without justification in terms of the functions of the Congress. This was freely conceded by the Solicitor General in his argument of this case. Nor is the Congress a law enforcement or trial agency. These are functions of the executive and judicial departments of government. No inquiry is an end in itself; it must be related to, and in furtherance of, a legitimate task of the Congress. Investigations conducted solely for the personal aggrandizement of the investigators or to ``punish'' those investigated are indefensible.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Id. Effective, constructive oversight is much more a matter of due diligence and digging than depositions and sensational disclosures. The minority is concerned the majority may abuse the deposition authority provided to this committee under the 110th House Rules. The minority also is concerned with the majority's practice of threatening subpoenas to witnesses unless they ``agree'' to transcribed interviews. These non- deposition depositions, which were never anticipated in the formulation of the committee rules, allow for the abrogation of procedural rights and safeguards otherwise available to the minority and the witnesses. Without those protections, interviews happen with little or no notice, and selected excerpts from the resulting ``transcripts'' appear in press releases and unofficial committee documents. We hope the committee will continue to uncover waste, mismanagement and fraud in a non-partisan, non-abusive manner. To that end, the minority requests that the following oversight be conducted: <bullet> LOn February 26, 2007, we requested the committee conduct oversight on the implementation of the REAL ID Act of 2005. The REAL ID Act requires the Department of Homeland Security to establish security standards for State drivers' licenses that will be used for identification for Federal purposes, such as boarding a commercial aircraft. Timely implementation of these identification standards is critical to improving national security. Yet, there have been reports that at least 17 States have passed or are considering resolutions opposing the implementation of the REAL ID Act, and there are additional concerns over the costs. The act authorizes making grants to States and provides authority for the Secretary to grant extensions of time if States ``provide adequate justification for noncompliance.'' This committee should examine the States' progress toward implementation, including obstacles, and determine whether full and timely implementation will subject States to initial costs that warrant Federal support and whether the Secretary has adequate authority to extend the deadline for those States that encounter real obstacles to full compliance by the May 2008 deadline. <bullet> LOn March 21, 2007, we asked the committee to continue its oversight into aviation security by holding a hearing to examine whether current policies on inspection of inbound air cargo adequately protect Americans in the post-September 11th world. According to TSA, approximately 200 carriers--foreign and domestic--transported about 9.4 billion pounds of air cargo into the United States in 2005. Approximately 40 percent of that, or about 4 billion pounds, were shipped on passenger aircraft. A recent Government Accountability Office report that Mr. Davis requested has suggested that the Transportation Security Administration and Border Protection take a variety of steps to assess risks and vulnerabilities, share information, implement an inspection plan, measure compliance and join with industry and foreign governments to identify security practices used elsewhere that could strengthen DHS' programs. <bullet> LThe majority plans to conduct oversight of the Iraq war by focusing only on reconstruction contracts with private companies. Since 2004, the committee has been engaged in continuous and vigorous oversight of contracting activities in the war zone, including 5 full committee hearings, 14 subcommittee sessions, numerous briefings from the agencies involved, and review of thousands of documents from key Federal agencies. Although continuing oversight over reconstruction contracts is important for this committee, we believe the majority's plans to focus solely on contracting is too limiting. This committee should conduct oversight across the board, by reviewing what interagency coordination was conducted before operations were launched, and how other agency participation was supposed to help with the reconstruction of Iraq and Afghanistan. <bullet> LSince 2004, the committee has been investigating conditions and medical processing systems at Walter Reed and other Army medical holdover hospitals. The investigation, which culminated in a hearing in February 2005, uncovered serious stove-piped processes, with no one responsible for assisting the wounded through their care and disposition. The committee ordered the Department of the Army to report quarterly on actions taken to address the problems. Lack of substantial efforts by the Army prompted Mr. Davis to request Mr. Waxman hold a full committee hearing on Walter Reed in February. Through the experience of helping almost 100 individual soldiers navigate the system, Mr. Davis helped draft legislative proposals to bring immediate improvements to the Department of Defense wide medical system. Continued oversight is needed to assure what should be a major overhaul of the Department of Defense medical processing and assistance to the wounded. <bullet> LThe committee has conducted vigorous oversight of post-September 11th challenges that face the National Guard and its personnel. Starting in January 2004, the committee has held hearings on Department of Defense programs that did not take into account the growing reliance on the Reserve component at home and abroad. Specifically, committee investigations into payment travel reimbursement problems affecting the Army Guard and Reserve, Federal debt collection from the wounded, and stove-piped medical hold processing systems, have resulted in changes in Department of Defense personnel policies for Reserve component soldiers and their families. The committee also has held hearings challenging the Department of Defense to better resource, equip and train the National Guard in its historic role as first military responders to homeland disasters. The committee has heard testimony from some of our Nation's Governors, in the continuing effort to improve Federal/ State integrated disaster response. <bullet> LButtressed by GAO studies sponsored by Mr. Davis and the House Katrina Report, the committee has found that the Department of Defense has continually ignored its responsibility to equip the National Guard, as it currently receives less than 10 percent of the Department budget despite providing 45 percent of the combat forces abroad and 99 percent of military assistance to civilian authorities at home. In 2006, Mr. Davis sponsored the bi-partisan, bi-cameral National Guard Empowerment Act. Supported by the National Governors, State Adjutants General, National Guard Associations and its members, this bill would allow for better planning, resourcing and representation of the Guard at the Department of Defense. This bill has been the focus of the work of the Commission on National Guard and Reserve and has been re-introduced in 2007. Mr. Davis has asked Mr. Waxman to continue to build on this oversight by holding hearings focused on correcting the inequalities at the Department of Defense concerning active and Reserve component soldiers and improving joint Federal and State military planning, training and exercising for man-made and natural-disaster response. <bullet> LWe also strongly urge the committee to continue the Subcommittee on Energy and Resources' investigation of the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service [MMS] over defective leases that were signed in 1998 and 1999. MMS' failure to include statutorily required royalty payments in offshore oil leases already has cost taxpayers billions and if the ongoing lawsuit to remove price thresholds in all leases from 1996 to 2000 is successful, they could lose up to $80 billion. The investigation should be continued to insure MMS audit and compliance functions, its structure, organization and personnel policies are ensuring the full payment of royalties to the government. The minority also has concerns with the manner in which certain current oversight investigations are being conducted: <bullet> LWe have concerns with the committee's handling of its investigation into how pharmaceutical pricing may contribute to waste, fraud and abuse in Federal health programs. The committee requested 12 sponsors of Medicare Part D prescription drug programs to provide information regarding the price concessions they have negotiated with drug manufacturers and the plans' individual cost structures. Committee staffers have indicated they will release the information per findings of gross abuse. This information is highly confidential, and therefore, it is critical for the committee to be sensitive in handling the information. Disclosure of proprietary business information-- including pharmaceutical pricing information--can be anticompetitive. The minority is concerned it could result in higher, not lower, drug prices for consumers. The Congressional Budget Office recently estimated disclosure of this information could result in an increase of $10 billion in Medicare costs over the next 10 years. LWhile the Medicare Part D program is off to a strong start, we agree Congress should monitor the program. However, any efforts to oversee the program must take into account the confidential nature of the plan's negotiations. Congressional oversight should not undermine the plans' ability to negotiate further discounts on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries. <bullet> LIn the 109th Congress, then-Chairman Davis held two hearings investigating climate change, including the science of climate change, potential impacts of climate change, and possible technological solutions to climate change. The committee was commended for stripping away partisan differences and tackling one of the most important and critical issues currently facing Americans. Additionally, the committee opened its ongoing investigation into allegations of political interference in climate change science by the White House. LThe minority is concerned by the tone and manner of this ongoing investigation. Specifically, the minority recognizes scientists and policymakers rely upon one another and, specifically, that the mere convergence of politics and science does not in itself denote ``interference.'' Further, the minority is concerned the committee's inquiries may be moving from a legitimate conversation about politics and science into a potentially dangerous dynamic where the academic freedom of scientists--especially those perceived to have the ``wrong'' conclusions--is inhibited. The minority is concerned current committee hearings relating to issues of politicization of science are entirely backwards-looking and would recommend more proactive steps toward solving the growing threat of climate change. Hon. Tom Davis. Hon. Christopher Shays. Hon. Dan Burton. Hon. John L. Mica. Hon. Mark E. Souder. Hon. Chris Cannon. Hon. John J. Duncan, Jr. Hon. Michael R. Turner. Hon. Darrell E. Issa. Hon. Kenny Marchant. Hon. Lynn A. Westmoreland. Hon. Patrick T. McHenry. Hon. Virginia Foxx. Hon. Brian P. Bilbray. Hon. Bill Sali. <all>