In Re: William David Watkins and In Re: Hillary Rodham
Clinton
Document Title |
File Format and Size |
Print Copy Pages |
| Orders Filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
PDF 259K |
Orders |
| Title Page |
PDF 7K |
Title Page |
| Table of Contents |
PDF 20K |
i-xi |
| Submittal |
PDF 9K |
1 |
| I. Introduction |
PDF 18K |
2 |
| A. The Jurisdictional Grant to the Independent Counsel |
PDF 18K |
6 |
| B. Investigative
Steps Taken by the Office of the Independent Counsel |
PDF 10K |
10 |
| C. Lack of Cooperation by Witnesses |
PDF 10K |
11 |
| II. Scope of Report |
PDF 10K |
12 |
| III. Findings |
PDF 19K |
13 |
| IV. Summary of Alleged Violations |
PDF 8K |
18 |
| A. Watkins's Statements Regarding Mrs. Clinton's Involvement in the Travel Office Firings. |
PDF 26K |
19 |
| B. Mrs. Clinton's Statements Regarding Her Involvement in the Travel Office Firings. |
PDF 23K |
27 |
| C. David Watkins Prepared a Memorandum Between September and November 1993 Regarding the Causes of the Travel Office Firings. |
PDF 17K |
34 |
| D. the Watkins Memorandum Was Not Disclosed to This Office or Congress Until January 1996. |
PDF 8K |
38 |
| V. Factual Summary |
PDF 10K |
38 |
| A. There
Was Evidence of Mismanagement of Travel Office Funds at
the Time of the Firings. |
PDF 16K |
39 |
| B. Business Entities and Campaign Staff that Provided Travel Services to the Clinton-Gore Campaign and the Press Covering the Campaign Wanted to Provide Travel Services to the Clinton Administration. |
PDF 57K |
44 |
| C. Martens Complained to Thomason About His Rejection by the Travel Office, Which Ultimately Was Communicated to the President, First Lady, and Other Senior White House Staff. |
PDF 54K |
66 |
| D. The Events of April -- May 1993. |
PDF 241K |
86 |
| E. The White House Responded to Public Controversy Over the Firings By Conducting an Internal Review. |
PDF 58K |
185 |
| F. Numerous Other Investigations Into Various Aspects of the Travel Office Firings Followed. |
PDF 23K |
209 |
| VI. Analysis of Potential Statutory Violations |
PDF 18K |
216 |
| A. The
Evidence is Insufficient to Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
That David Watkins's Statements to the GAO, Congress, or
This Office Were False. |
PDF 21K |
220 |
| B. The Evidence is Insufficient to Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt That Mrs. Clinton Knowingly Made False Statements. |
PDF 36K |
226 |
| C. The Evidence is Insufficient to Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt that David Watkins or others Obstructed Justice by Withholding the Watkins Memorandum. |
PDF 7K |
239 |
| VI. Summary Conclusion |
PDF 13K |
240 |
| Appendix A. |
| I. Witnesses Were Uncooperative in this office's Investigation. |
PDF 32K |
i |
| II. The Department of Justice Did Not
Receive Timely Production of Documents in Its Investigation. |
PDF 13K |
xii |
| III. The White House Did Not
Cooperate With the General Accounting Office. |
PDF 15K |
xiv |
| IV. The House Committee's Investigation. |
PDF 10K |
xvii |
| Appendix B. |
| Independent Counsel Reauthorization Act of 1994 |
PDF 20K |
i-vii |
| Appendix C. |
| Evolution of the Watkins Memorandum |
PDF 34K |
i-xi |
| Attachment -- Watkins Memorandum, November 15, 1993, Final Version. |
PDF 655K |
1-11 |
| Appendix D. |
| I. The Watkins Memorandum Was Produced to the OIC in January 1996. |
PDF 15K |
i |
| II. The White House Failed to Produce the Memorandum Until January 1996 Even Though it Was Responsive to Numerous Pending Requests For Production. |
PDF 22K |
iv |
| Appendix of Comments or Factual Information Submitted Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 594(h)(2) |
| Hillary Rodham Clinton |
PDF 941K |
1-11 |
| Billy Ray Dale |
PDF 258K |
1-4 |
| Brian Foucart |
PDF 173K |
1-2 |
| Ed Hamblin |
PDF 88K |
1 |
| Thomas F. McLarty, III |
PDF 202K |
1-2 |
| Matthew Lee Moore |
PDF 2.8M |
1-44 |
| Bernard Nussbaum |
PDF 1.2M |
1-19 |
| Bruce L. Overton |
PDF 107K |
1-2 |
| Patsy Thomasson |
PDF 62K |
1-2 |
| Margaret Williams |
PDF 75K |
1-2 |
