|
Final Report of the Independent Counsel
|
Document Title |
File Format and Size |
Print Copy Pages |
---|---|---|
Orders Filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit | PDF 259K | Orders |
Title Page | PDF 7K | Title Page |
Table of Contents | PDF 20K | i-xi |
Submittal | PDF 9K | 1 |
I. Introduction | PDF 18K | 2 |
A. The Jurisdictional Grant to the Independent Counsel | PDF 18K | 6 |
B. Investigative Steps Taken by the Office of the Independent Counsel | PDF 10K | 10 |
C. Lack of Cooperation by Witnesses | PDF 10K | 11 |
II. Scope of Report | PDF 10K | 12 |
III. Findings | PDF 19K | 13 |
IV. Summary of Alleged Violations | PDF 8K | 18 |
A. Watkins's Statements Regarding Mrs. Clinton's Involvement in the Travel Office Firings. | PDF 26K | 19 |
B. Mrs. Clinton's Statements Regarding Her Involvement in the Travel Office Firings. | PDF 23K | 27 |
C. David Watkins Prepared a Memorandum Between September and November 1993 Regarding the Causes of the Travel Office Firings. | PDF 17K | 34 |
D. the Watkins Memorandum Was Not Disclosed to This Office or Congress Until January 1996. | PDF 8K | 38 |
V. Factual Summary | PDF 10K | 38 |
A. There Was Evidence of Mismanagement of Travel Office Funds at the Time of the Firings. | PDF 16K | 39 |
B. Business Entities and Campaign Staff that Provided Travel Services to the Clinton-Gore Campaign and the Press Covering the Campaign Wanted to Provide Travel Services to the Clinton Administration. | PDF 57K | 44 |
C. Martens Complained to Thomason About His Rejection by the Travel Office, Which Ultimately Was Communicated to the President, First Lady, and Other Senior White House Staff. | PDF 54K | 66 |
D. The Events of April -- May 1993. | PDF 241K | 86 |
E. The White House Responded to Public Controversy Over the Firings By Conducting an Internal Review. | PDF 58K | 185 |
F. Numerous Other Investigations Into Various Aspects of the Travel Office Firings Followed. | PDF 23K | 209 |
VI. Analysis of Potential Statutory Violations | PDF 18K | 216 |
A. The Evidence is Insufficient to Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt That David Watkins's Statements to the GAO, Congress, or This Office Were False. | PDF 21K | 220 |
B. The Evidence is Insufficient to Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt That Mrs. Clinton Knowingly Made False Statements. | PDF 36K | 226 |
C. The Evidence is Insufficient to Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt that David Watkins or others Obstructed Justice by Withholding the Watkins Memorandum. | PDF 7K | 239 |
VI. Summary Conclusion | PDF 13K | 240 |
Appendix A. | ||
I. Witnesses Were Uncooperative in this office's Investigation. | PDF 32K | i |
II. The Department of Justice Did Not Receive Timely Production of Documents in Its Investigation. | PDF 13K | xii |
III. The White House Did Not Cooperate With the General Accounting Office. | PDF 15K | xiv |
IV. The House Committee's Investigation. | PDF 10K | xvii |
Appendix B. | ||
Independent Counsel Reauthorization Act of 1994 | PDF 20K | i-vii |
Appendix C. | ||
Evolution of the Watkins Memorandum | PDF 34K | i-xi |
Attachment -- Watkins Memorandum, November 15, 1993, Final Version. | PDF 655K | 1-11 |
Appendix D. | ||
I. The Watkins Memorandum Was Produced to the OIC in January 1996. | PDF 15K | i |
II. The White House Failed to Produce the Memorandum Until January 1996 Even Though it Was Responsive to Numerous Pending Requests For Production. | PDF 22K | iv |
Appendix of Comments or Factual Information Submitted Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 594(h)(2) | ||
Hillary Rodham Clinton | PDF 941K | 1-11 |
Billy Ray Dale | PDF 258K | 1-4 |
Brian Foucart | PDF 173K | 1-2 |
Ed Hamblin | PDF 88K | 1 |
Thomas F. McLarty, III | PDF 202K | 1-2 |
Matthew Lee Moore | PDF 2.8M | 1-44 |
Bernard Nussbaum | PDF 1.2M | 1-19 |
Bruce L. Overton | PDF 107K | 1-2 |
Patsy Thomasson | PDF 62K | 1-2 |
Margaret Williams | PDF 75K | 1-2 |