U.S. Department
of Labor
Office of Inspector General
Audit Report
Welfare-to-Work Formula
Grant Program Implementation Progress
This document is a summary of a printed document. The printed
document may contain charts and photographs
which are not reproduced in this electronic version. If you require
the printed version of this document, contact the
Freedom of Information Act Officer, Office of Inspector General,
U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC
20210, or call (202) 219-4930.
This report reflects the findings of the Office of Inspector General
at the time that the audit report was issued.
More current information may be available as a result of the
resolution of this audit by the Department of Labor
program agency and the auditee. For further information concerning
the resolution of this report's findings,
please contact the program agency.
Report Title: Welfare-to-Work Formula Grant Program
Implementation Progress
Report Number: 03-99-018-03-386
Issue Date: September 20, 1999
The Welfare-to-Work (WtW) formula grant program was authorized by the
Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA) to move hard-to-employ welfare recipients
into unsubsidized jobs and economic self-sufficiency. The Act authorized
$3 billion for WtW grants in Fiscal Years (FYs) 1998 and 1999. After certain
set-asides, approximately 25 percent is awarded through a competitive grant
process, and the remaining 75 percent is distributed by formula to the
states. WtW formula grant funds must be spent within 3 years of the award.
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) performed an audit to determine
the status of program implementation for seven state WtW formula grantees.
The 7 states represented 48 percent of the $1 billion in formula grant
funds awarded for FY 1998.
All but one of the seven states we visited were slow in implementing
their WtW program because of factors that were either unforeseen or not
considered when the states developed their WtW service and outcome levels
and spending estimates. Specifically:
-
WtW program and administrative requirements mandated by the authorizing
legislation were viewed as restrictive by WtW grantees. This caused WtW
grantees difficulties in identifying eligible clients; arranging necessary
matching funds; and developing financial reporting systems capable of tracking
expenditures by client populations, cost categories, and program activities.
-
At the same time, as grantees were struggling with the perceived challenges
of the WtW requirements, sufficient funding under the less restrictive
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program was available to
serve the client population targeted by WtW. As a result, local service
providers with access to the less restrictive TANF funds opted to spend
those funds first.
-
Launching WtW, a major new Federal program, required that state and local
plans be developed and approved, service provider procurement actions completed,
and coordination arrangements with other agencies finalized. Moreover,
the entities responsible for WtW are, in most cases, also responsible for
implementing the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA), which will make
sweeping reforms to the Nation's workforce development system, in their
respective jurisdictions.
Some of these factors have been addressed by program modifications that
are included in the President's and Congress' proposed reauthorization
of the WtW program. However, if these states continue at the current pace,
the WtW formula grant funds will not be spent within the mandated 3-year
period, in turn limiting the number of individuals who will obtain the
assistance needed in moving from welfare into employment.
To accelerate the progress in implementing the WtW formula grant program,
OIG recommended that the Employment and Training Administration (ETA):
-
Seek legislative changes to permit the Secretary of Labor to amend the
length of time the states have to spend the WtW formula grant funds;
-
Work with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (DHHS') Administration
for Children and Families to develop a strategy that effectively integrates
TANF and WtW so that all funding sources are used to provide workforce
investment services to TANF and WtW eligible recipients;
-
Continue to pursue the legislative changes currently being proposed to:
(1) simplify and expand the definition of eligible recipients more accurately
to reflect characteristics of hard-to-employ, long-term TANF recipients
and (2) streamline and simplify financial reporting requirements;
-
Explore, with states not reviewed as part of this audit, whether the matching
requirement is an issue that affects their implementation of the WtW formula
grant program, and seek appropriate legislative changes if needed; and
-
Continue to take an active role in assisting states and local agencies
that are having problems implementing their WtW programs, and provide the
necessary technical assistance to help them address barriers that may be
impeding progress in getting the program fully operational.
Full Report in PDF
Return
to Audit Reports
Return to Audit Reports (Text Only)