Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
www.ahrq.gov


Table 4.  Summary of Environmental Interventions

Author, Year
(Quality)
Study Design Type of Inter- vention Years Conducted N Age Duration of followup Baseline BLL BLL (µg/dL) Results
(Initial/Final/Change)
Summary of Effect
Aschengrau, 1994 85;
Aschengrau, 199786

(N/A)
Randomized environmental intervention; no untreated comparison group Soil 1989-1990 152 <4 2 years 7 to 24 µg/dL T1: 13.10 / 10.65 / -2.44 (95% CI -3.32, -1.57)
T2: 12.94 / 7.69 / -5.25 (95% CI -6.51, -3.99)
T3: 10.54 / 9.15 / -1.30 (95% CI -4.03. +1.26)
All Ts: 12.66 / 9.77 / -2.89 (95% CI -3.64. -2.13)
C: None
N/A
Aschengrau, 199872

(Fair)
RCT Dust, paint 1993-1995 63 <4 6 months 16.9 µg/dL T1 (high BLL, not randomized): 17.5 / 9.1 / -8.4
T2 (random): 17.6 / 11.5 / -6.2
C (random): 16.3 / 10.4 / -5.9
T1 vs. C: -0.3 (95% CI -3.8, +3.3)
T2 vs. C: -2.5 (95% CI -7.0, +2.1)
No effect
Campbell, 200375

(Fair)
Non- randomized controlled trial; followup at the Philadelphia site of TLC, a chelation RCT Dust NR 73 12-34 months 3-6 months post-treatment 20-44 µg/dL No significant difference mean BLL at any clinic visit between children whose homes were cleaned vs. those whose homes were not cleaned. BLL declined among both groups. No effect
Clark, 200469

(N/A)
Observational, no untreated comparison group Dust, paint NR 869 children 6 months to 6 years 6 weeks ND Mean change after intervention +8.4 µg/dL
Predictors of BLL increase of >5 µg/dL:
Child's age at baseline (p=0.006)
Mother's education (p=0.002)
Exterior building condition (p=0.007)
Season of sample collection (p<0.001)
N/A
Farrell, 199880

(Fair)
RCT Soil 1990 408 enrolled  in 263 houses;
187 completed the study
6 months to 6 years 1 year 11 µg/dL T: 12.1 (1988) / 9.7 (1991)
C: 10.9 (1988) / 8.4 (1991)

Treatment effect, adjusted for effects of time, seasonality, SES, age, and mouthing behavior:
T (pre - post): 0.030 (SE 0.034)
C (pre - post): 0.075 (SE 0.036)
T vs. C: -0.045 (SE 0.037)
No effect
Galke, 200178

(N/A)
Descriptive study, no comparison group Dust 1994-1997 240 children
1,212 dwellings
6 months to 6 years 12 months Median 10 µg/dL T: 11.0 / 8.2 / -2.8
C: none
N/A
Haynes, 200274

(Good)
Meta-analysis Dust, paint; meta-analysis of RCTs NR 4 studies, total subjects = 533 NR 6 to 48 months 6.7 to 16.9 µg/dL Weighted mean change, T vs. C (95%CI):
2 educational dust control trials: -0.33 (-1.4, 0.74)
2 professional dust control trials: -1.52 -3.41, 0.37

All trials:
% >10 µg/dL in T vs. C: similar
% >15 µg/dL in T vs. C: 6% vs. 14% (p=0.008)
% >20 µg/dL in T vs. C: 2 vs. 6% (p=0.024)
No effect overall; effects  seen at higher lead levels
Jordan, 200382

(Fair)
RCT Education NR 594 mothers and 378 of their children Birth to 36 months 2 years <10 µg/dL T vs. C
% who maintained BLL <10 µg/dL: 81 vs. 73% (p=ns)
% with BLL 10-19.99: 15 vs. 24% (p=ns)
% with BLL >20 µg/dL: 4 vs. 2% (p=ns)
No effect
Lanphear, 199983;
Lanphear, 200034;
Lanphear, 200293

(Fair)
RCT Education NR 275 6 months 48 months 2.9 µg/dL Change from age 6 to 24 months:
T: 2.8 / 7.3 / +5.6 (sic)
C: 2.9 / 7.8 / +6.3 (sic)
T vs. C: (p=ns)
No effect
Lanphear, 200387

(N/A)
Two cross- sectional surveys before and after soil abatement Soil 1993-1996 198 in first survey, 215 in second survey 6-72 months N/A (cross- sectional) 5.6 µg/dL T: 5.6 / 3.0 / -3.6, p=0.0001
C: 3.0 / 2.6 / -1.4, p=0.06

Stratifying by age, adjusted for mouthing behavior score and socioeconomic status:
Age 36-72 months: 2.3 µg/dL decline (p=ns)
Age 6-36 months: 2.5 µg/dL decline (p=0.03)
Effect seen only in young children who had not been exposed
Leighton, 200373

(Good)
Retrospective cohort study Dust, paint 1994-1997 221 6 months to 6 years 10-14 months 20-44 µg/dL Decline occurred regardless of remediation: 24.3 / 12.3 / -12 (p<0.01)
T: 24.6 / 11.6 -53%
C: 23.8 / 13.9 -41%

Remediation effect adjusted for race: 11% (p=ns)

Effect of remediation tended to be stronger in younger children (10 to <36 months) vs. 36-72 months (p=0.06)
No effect
Rhoads, 199970

(Fair)
RCT Dust NR 113; final BLL obtained from 99 6-36 months 1 year 12 µg/dL T: 12.4 / 10.3 / -2.1
C: 11.6 / 11.6 / +0.1
T vs. C: -1.9 µg/dL (p<0.05)

Adjustment for baseline BLL
+
Schultz, 199984

(Fair)
Retrospective cohort study Education 1994 187 Mean age 3.35 6 months 20-24 µg/dL Change in BLL, T vs. C: -4.2 vs. -1.2 (p<0.001) +
Strauss, 200579

(Fair)
Retrospective cohort study Dust, paint 1993-2002 1179 <36 months 3 years 4.5-7.0 µg/dL T vs. C BLL reduction, adjusted for time, seasonality, age, and gender.

Matched on pre-intervention BLL:
T: 7.07 / 3.59 / -3.48
C: 6.62 / 4.28 / -2.34 (p=0.015)

Matched on pre-intervention BLL and housing criteria:
T: 7.07 / 3.57 / -3.50
C: 5.76 / 3.96 / -1.80 (p=0.116)
+
Swindell, 199476

(N/A)
Retrospective chart review; no comparison group Dust, paint 1987-1990 132 Mean 35 months Range 12-91 months 2 weeks to 6 months following abatement 26 µg/dL T: 26.0 / 21.2 / -4.8 (p<0.001)
T group with baseline <20 µg/dL: 16.7 / 19.2 / +2.5 (p=0.053)
C: none

Stratified by baseline BLL, reductions within 1 year occurred in
97% with baseline >30
81% with baseline 20-29
35% with baseline <20
+ only if baseline BLL >20
Taha, 199971

(Fair)
Retrospective cohort study Dust, paint 1994 42 eligible data analyzed for 37 6 months and 6 years Mean 69 days after abatement 28.8 µg/dL Adjusted for season and age of child:
T: 28.8 / 22.8 / -6.0 (p=0.05)
C: 31.1 / 29.5 / -1.6 (p=ns)
+

Abbreviations: '+' = benefit; C = Control group; NR = Not reported; NS = Not significant; RCT = Randomized-controlled trial; T = Treatment group; TLC = Treatment of Lead-exposed Children study.

Return to Document

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care