Table 2. Studies of Risk Factor Assessment1

  Author Design N Validated Risk Factors Included Outcome Performance Quality Rating2
Bone Density Outcomes Slemenda, 1990 (34) Cross-sectional 124 No Age, height, weight, calcium intake, caffeine intake, alcohol and tobacco use, urinary markers of bone turnover Correct classification of high or low BMD (lowest third of subjects) Midshaft radius: 68% low, 77% high. Lumbar spine: 61% low, 45% high. Femoral neck: 66% low, 53% high Poor
Falch, 1992 (35) Cross-sectional 73 Yes Low body weight, reduced renal phosphate reabsorption, smoking Bone loss Sensitivity 36%, specificity 89%, PPV 74% Poor
Ribot, 1992 (36) Cross-sectional 1565 No Weight, menopause, duration of menopause Vertebral BMD <-2 SD Sensitivity 73%, specificity 66% Fair
Elliot, 1993 (37) Cross-sectional 320 Yes Spine BMD: age, weight, smoking status, age at menarche. Femoral neck BMD: age, weight, family history, activity, smoking status Low lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD (lowest third of age matched normal range) Lumbar spine: sensitivity 86%, specificity 32%. Femoral neck: sensitivity 89%, specificity 25% Fair
Michaelsson, 1996 (38) Cross-sectional 175 No Weight >70 kg Femoral neck BMD <-2.5 SD Sensitivity 94%, specificity 36%, PPV 21%, NPV 97% Fair
Verhaar, 1998 (39) Cross-sectional 61 No 1. Arm span-height difference of at least 3 cm. 2. Arm span-height difference, age above or below 70, and whether arm span was below or above 160 cm BMD <-2.5 SD and vertebral fracture Arm span only: sensitivity 58%, specificity 56%. Arm span, age, arm span length: sensitivity 81%, specificity 64% Poor
Ballard, 1998 (40) Cross-sectional 1158 No Age, age at menopause, height, weight, gravidity, parity, current use of steroids, current HRT Osteoporosis of femoral neck and/or spine ROC area 0.73 Fair
Lydick, 1998 (41) Cross-sectional 1279 Yes SCORE = age (3 times first digit of age in years), weight (- 1 times weight in pounds divided by 10 and truncated to integer), race (5 if not black), estrogen use (1 if never used), rheumatoid arthritis (4 if present), history of fractures (4 for each fracture after age 45 of wrist, hip, or rib, to a maximum of 12) Femoral neck BMD <-2 SD Sensitivity 89%, specificity 50%; ROC area 0.81 using a score of 6, or greater Good
Goemaere, 1999 (42) Cross-sectional 300 No 18-item questionnaire of risk factors for osteoporosis (race, height loss, age, weight, smoking, coffee, alcohol, dairy product use, activity, family history, existence of comorbidities, history of wrist fracture, menopause before 45 years, corticosteroid use) Lumbar spine, femoral neck, and hip BMD Lumbar spine: ROC area 0.66; Femoral neck: ROC area 0.69; Hip: ROC area 0.76 Fair
Cadarette, 2000 (43) Cross-sectional 926 Yes ORAI = age (15 points if >75, 9 if 65-74, 5 if 55-64), weight (9 if <60 kg, 3 if 60-69.9 kg), current use of HRT (2 if not currently using) Hip or lumbar spine BMD <-2.5 Sensitivity 95%, specificity 41% using a score of >9 Good
Fracture Outcomes Kleerekoper, 1989 (44) Case-control 663 No Model 1; total months of lactation, family history of osteoporosis, years post menopause, weight. Model 2: breast fed, surgical menopause, age at menarche, age, smoking status Vertebral fractures Model 1: ROC area (SE) 0.55 (0.07); sensitivity 56%; specificity 54%. Model 2: ROC 0.51 (0.042); sensitivity 63% specificity 39% Fair
van Hemert, 1990 (45) Cohort 1014 No Age, metacarpal cortical area, relative cortical area, BMI, height, diameter of forearm, diameter of knee, age at menarche, age at menopause, smoking, number of children, period of lactation Osteoporotic fractures Sensitivity 48%, specificity 82% Fair
Cooper, 1991 (46) Case-control 1012 No Age, height, vertebral fracture after age 45, age of last menstrual period, number of children, ever use oral corticosteroid Vertebral fractures Sensitivity 51%, specificity 69% Fair
Wolinsky and Fitzgerald, 1994 (47) Cohort 368 No White race, female gender, living in southern U.S., age, having been hospitalized in the previous year, previous fall, body mass Hip fractures ROC 0.71; sensitivity 64.7%, specificity 65.7% Fair
Johnell, 1995 (48) Case-control 5618 No Late menarche, poor mental score, low BMI, low physical activity, low exposure to sunlight, and low consumption of calcium and tea Hip fractures Sensitivity 55%, specificity 65% Fair
Ranstam, 1996 (49) Case-control 7474 No Mental-functional risk score: knowledge of the day of week, knowledge of age, ability to wash, ability to dress Hip fractures A less than perfect score had a sensitivity 46%, specificity 79% Fair
Tromp, 1998 (50) Cohort 1469 No Female gender, living alone, past fractures, inactivity, height, use of analgesics Probablility of fractures No predictors = 0%; 4 predictors = 12.9% Fair
Burger, 1999 (51) Cohort 5208 No Model with BMD: age, gender, height, use of a walking aid, current smoking, BMD of femoral neck. Model without BMD: age, gender, height, use of a walking aid, current smoking, weight Hip fractures Model with BMD: ROC area 0.88; sensitivity 70%, specificity 84%. Model without BMD: ROC area 0.83; sensitivity 70%, specificity 83% Fair

Note:
1BMD = Bone mineral density, BMI = Body mass index, CI = Confidence interval, HRT = Hormone replacement therapy, NPV = Negative predictive value, PPV = Positive predictive value, ROC = Receiver operating characteristic (values >0.80 are usually required to consider a test to be effective), RR = Relative risk, SD = Standard Deviation, SE = Standard error.
2Based on criteria developed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (22).


Return to Document