Table 1.
Fault Characteristics
Fault (segment) |
Mchar (Mmax) (from length) |
Slip rate (mm/yr) |
Recurrence
time[1]
for characteristic earthquake (years) |
Characteristic (A) or Hybrid (B) |
References |
Queen Charlotte |
8.1 |
58 |
130 |
A |
Nishenko and Jacob
(1990) |
Fairweather, offshore |
7.9 |
52 |
120 |
A |
Nishenko and Jacob
(1990); Plafker et al. (1993) |
Fairweather, onshore |
7.8 |
52 |
110 |
A |
Nishenko and Jacob
(1990) |
Denali, southeast |
8.1[2] |
2 |
1900 |
B |
Plafker et al. (1993) |
Denali, central |
8.0 |
10 |
700 |
B |
Plafker et al. (1993) |
Totschunda |
7.7 |
11.5 |
400 |
B |
Plafker et al. (1993) (See text) |
Castle Mountain |
7.5[3] |
0.5 |
5000 |
B |
(See text) |
Transition |
8.2 |
10 |
200 |
A |
(See text) |
[1] Recurrence times are estimated from the rate of
seismic moment release for earthquakes of the characteristic magnitude required
to balance the observed geologic slip rate, and are rounded to two significant
figures.
[2] On the basis of length alone the southeast Denali
fault would give a magnitude exceeding 8.1.
However, there seems to be no historical precedent for a continental,
strike-slip fault generating an earthquake with a moment magnitude, Mw,
exceeding 8.1.
[3] On the basis of length alone, the Castle Mountain
fault would yield a magnitude of 7.8.
In view of the uncertainties of the length, slip rate and other seismic
characteristics of the fault, a lower value of 7.5 was adopted. Because this lower estimate leads to more
frequent earthquakes, and thus higher estimates of hazard, this is considered
an appropriately conservative assumption.