Short Contents | Full Contents Other books @ NCBI


Surgeon General Reports, SAMHSA TIPs, SAMHSA PEPs AHCPR Archived Technology Assessments

Cryosurgery for Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radiation Therapy

Prepared by: Martin Erlichman, M.S., Harry Handelsman, D.O., and S. Steven Hotta, M.D., Ph.D.

Health Technology Assessment

Number 13

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Rockville, Maryland Department of Health and Human Services Donna E. Shalala, Ph.D., Secretary Agency for Health Care Policy and Research John M. Eisenberg, M.D., Administrator

June 1999

AHCPR Pub. No. 99-0004

Abstract

Patients with prostate cancer are commonly treated medically or undergo radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy. Radiation therapy is usually selected for patients with local or regional disease and patients for whom traditional surgery has failed. The local recurrence of cancer in patients treated with radiation therapy presents a difficult challenge regarding the selection of further treatment options. A commonly applied treatment is salvage prostatectomy, but it can be difficult and complicated, with positive surgical margins occurring in as many as 50 percent of patients and with significant postoperative morbidity. Hormonal therapy, which is not curative, has served as an alternative to surgery in patients who have failed to respond to radiation therapy. Cryosurgery, the destruction of diseased tissue by freezing, is increasingly used both as a first-line therapy and as a second-line therapy (salvage therapy) in patients for whom radiation therapy has failed. Recent reports suggest that cryosurgery may be a useful alternative procedure for treating some of these patients with recurrent cancers. Outcomes of cryosurgery are improving through better instrumentation, surgical technique, and experience. The available data suggest that some patients with radioresistant cancer appear to benefit from the use of cryosurgery as a salvage therapy. Use of this technique has resulted in biochemical disease-free survival for varying periods of some patients who had recurrent prostate carcinoma following radiation therapy; however, morbidity remains high and relatively few patients have had adequate followup. Salvage cryosurgery prospective clinical trials are warranted and would help determine long-term survival benefits and make possible the comparison of cryotherapy patient survival rates with those of untreated biopsy-positive patients.top link

Foreword

The Center for Practice and Technology Assessment (CPTA) evaluates the risks, benefits, and clinical effectiveness of new or unestablished medical technologies. In most instances, assessments address technologies that are being reviewed for purposes of coverage by federally funded health programs.

The CPTA assessment process includes a comprehensive review of the medical literature and emphasizes broad and open participation from within and outside the Federal Government. A range of expert advice is obtained by widely publicizing the plans for conducting the assessment through publication of an announcement in the Federal Register and solicitation of input from Federal agencies, medical specialty societies, insurers, and manufacturers. The involvement of these experts helps ensure inclusion of the experienced and varying viewpoints needed to round out the data derived from individual scientific studies in the medical literature.

The CPTA analyzed and synthesized data and information received from experts and the scientific literature. The results are reported in this assessment. Each assessment represents a detailed analysis of the risks, clinical effectiveness, and uses of new or unestablished medical technologies. If an assessment has been prepared to form the basis for a coverage decision by a federally financed health care program, it serves as the Public Health Service's recommendation to that program and is disseminated widely.

The CPTA is one component of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services.


Douglas B. Kamerow, M.D., M.P.H. John M. Eisenberg, M.D.
Director Administrator
Center for Practice and Technology Assessment Agency for Health Care Policy and Research

Questions regarding this assessment should be directed to:

Center for Practice and Technology Assessment
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
Willco Building, Suite 310
6000 Executive Boulevard
Rockville, MD 20852
Telephone: (301) 594-4015
top link


Copyright and Disclaimer