Hospital Survey on Patient Safety: 2007 Database Report

Summary

In response to requests from hospitals interested in comparing their results against those from other hospitals on the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) established the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture Comparative Database. In spring and summer 2006, U.S. hospitals that administered the AHRQ patient safety culture survey voluntarily submitted their data for inclusion in this new database. The 2007 database consists of data from 382 participating hospitals and 108,621 hospital staff respondents who completed the survey. This report was developed as a tool for:

Development of the Survey

The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was pilot tested, revised, and then released in November 2004. It is designed to assess hospital staff opinions about patient safety issues, medical error, and event reporting; it includes 42 items that measure 12 areas or composites of patient safety culture:

  1. Communication openness.
  2. Feedback and communication about error.
  3. Frequency of events reported.
  4. Handoffs and transitions.
  5. Management support for patient safety.
  6. Nonpunitive response to error.
  7. Organizational learning/continuous improvement.
  8. Overall perceptions of patient safety.
  9. Staffing.
  10. Supervisor/manager expectations and actions promoting safety.
  11. Teamwork across units.
  12. Teamwork within units.

Survey Administration Statistics

Characteristics of Participating Hospitals

Characteristics of Respondents

Areas of Strength for Most Hospitals

Teamwork within units. This score—the extent to which staff support one another, treat each other with respect, and work together as a team—was the patient safety culture composite with the highest average percent positive response (78 percent), indicating this is an area of strength for most hospitals. The survey item with the highest average percent positive response (85 percent) was: "When a lot of work needs to be done quickly, we work together as a team to get the work done."

Patient safety grade. On average, the majority of respondents within hospitals (70 percent) gave their work area or unit a grade of either "A-Excellent" (22 percent) or "B-Very Good" (48 percent) on patient safety. However, there was a wide range of response in patient safety grades, from at least one hospital where none of the respondents (0 percent) provided their unit with a patient safety grade of "A-Excellent," to a hospital where 63 percent did.

Areas with Potential for Improvement for Most Hospitals

Nonpunitive response to error. This score—the extent to which staff feel that their mistakes and event reports are not held against them and that mistakes are not kept in their personnel file—was the patient safety culture composite with the lowest average percent positive response (43 percent), indicating this is an area with potential for improvement for most hospitals. The survey item with the lowest average percent positive response (35 percent) was: "Staff worry that mistakes they make are kept in their personnel file," (an average of only 35 percent strongly disagreed or disagreed with this item).

Number of events reported. On average, the majority of respondents within hospitals (53 percent) reported no events in their hospital over the past 12 months. It is likely that this percentage represents underreporting of events, and was identified as an area for improvement for most hospitals because potential patient safety problems may not be recognized or identified, and therefore may not be addressed. However, there was a wide range of response in the number of events reported, from a hospital where 96 percent of respondents had not reported a single event over the past 12 months, to a hospital where only 5 percent had not reported an event.

Results by Hospital Characteristics

Results on the survey's patient safety culture composites and items by hospital characteristics (bed size, teaching status, ownership and control, region) are highlighted. A 5 percent difference in percent positive scores was used as a rule of thumb to identify meaningful differences in scores.

Bed Size

Teaching Status, and Ownership and Control

Region*

Patient Safety Grade

Number of Events Reported


*Note: States are categorized into AHA-defined regions as follows:

Mid Atlantic/New England: NY, NJ, PA, ME, NH, VT, MA, RI, CT West North Central: MN, IA, MO, ND, SD, NE, KS
South Atlantic: DE, MD, DC, VA, WV, NC, SC, GA, FL West South Central: AR, LA, OK, TX
East North Central: OH, IN, IL, MI, WI Mountain: MT, ID, WY, CO, NM, AZ, UT, NV
East South Central: KY, TN, AL, MS Pacific: WA, OR, CA, AK, HI

Results by Respondent Characteristics

Results on the survey's patient safety culture composites and items by respondent characteristics (work area/unit, staff position, interaction with patients) are highlighted. A 5 percent difference in percent positive scores was used as a rule of thumb to identify meaningful differences in scores.

Respondent Work Area/Unit

Respondent Staff Position

Respondent Interaction With Patients

Patient Safety Grade

Number of Events Reported

Action Planning for Improvement

The delivery of survey results is not the end point in the survey process, it is just the beginning. It is often the case that the perceived failure of surveys to create lasting change is actually due to faulty or nonexistent action planning or survey followup. Seven steps of action planning are provided to give hospitals guidance on next steps to take to turn their survey results into actual patient safety culture improvement.

  1. Understand your survey results.
  2. Communicate and discuss the survey results.
  3. Develop focused action plans.
  4. Communicate action plans and deliverables.
  5. Implement action plans.
  6. Track progress and evaluate impact.
  7. Share what works.

Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Section