skip to content
Solicitor General Paul D. Clement
About the Office of the Solicitor General
Former Solicitors General
OSG in Historical Context
Bibliography
Briefs
Type of Filing By Term
Subject/Client
Briefs 1982-1997
Help/Glossary
Supreme Court Decisions
Opportunities
Attorney Assistants
Bristow Fellows
Law Students
Summer Research Positions
Contact OSG
OSG FOIA
DOJ Home
Briefs 2003
No. 03M10: American Forest & Paper Ass'n v. League of Wilderness Defenders - Motion to dismiss or affirm (Response)
No. 02-1466: Farreau v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1472: Cherokee Nation v. United States - Supplemental (Response)
No. 02-1474: Alabama Power Co. v. FCC - Response (Opposition)
No. 02-1569: AT&T v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1576: Nigro v. Fed. Lab. Rel. Auth. - Opposition
No. 02-1590: Mt. States Legal Found. v. Bush - Opposition
No. 02-1593: Bedroc Limited, LLC v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1608: Greg Ruggiero v. FCC - Opposition
No. 02-1620: Independent Ins. Agents and Brokers v. Hawke - Opposition
No. 02-1623: Tulare County v. George W. Bush - Opposition
No. 02-1626: Courtney v. Smith - Opposition
No. 02-1631: Portales v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1643: Ebeck v. Hedrick - Opposition
No. 02-1655: Alameida v. Mayweathers - Opposition
No. 02-1657: Scarborough v. Principi - Opposition
No. 02-1665: Gambone v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1735: California Trout v. FERC - Opposition
No. 02-1739: Willie Young v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1762: Espinoza v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1807: Doris Day Animal League v. Veneman - Opposition
No. 02-1822: Anderson v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1849: JUDICIAL WATCH v. ROSSOTTI - Opposition
No. 02-1856: Applied Companies v. Rumsfeld - Opposition
No. 02-1859: Boca v. U.S.A. - Opposition
No. 02-1866: Shwayder v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-7: Newdow v. U.S. Congress - Opposition
No. 03-16: Krilich v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-20: Florida Municipal Power v. FERC - Opposition
No. 03-22: Trout v. Johnson - Opposition
No. 2003-46:Global Relief Fund. v. Snow - Opposition
No. 03-48: Biltmore Forest Broadcasting v. FCC - Opposition
No. 03-0103 Watts v. Brownlee - Opposition
No. 03-0111: Tennessee v. Dep't of Transportation - Opposition
No. 03-114: So. Carolina Med. Ass'n v. HHS - Opposition
No. 03-115: Danzell v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 03-127: Taylor v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-0128: United Technologies v. Rumsfeld - Opposition
No. 03-132: Bakal v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 03-136: Andrews v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-146: Lotz v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-147: Producer Coalition v. FERC Shell v. FERC - Opposition
No. 03-165: General Motors v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-184: Ballard v. Commissioner - Opposition
03-197: King v. Rumsfeld -Opposition
No. 03-230: Moise v. Bulger - Opposition
No. 03-254: Core Concepts v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-269: Wettergreen v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 03-277: Brookens v. FLRA - Opposition
No. 03-283: Shell v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-288: Bronx Legal Servs. v. Legal Servs. Corp. - Opposition
No. 03-290: Norfolk Shipbuilding v. Campbell - Opposition
No. 03-298: Lewis v. Peterson - Opposition
No. 03-304: Wilson v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-309: Blackburn v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-310: Twisdale v. Snow - Opposition
No. 03-312: Maher v. OWCP - Opposition
No. 03-317: Vidtape, Inc. v. Chao - Opposition
Nos. 03-0334 Rasul v. Bush and 03-0343 Odah v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-339: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain - Response (In support of petition)
No. 03-359: AFGE v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-366: New Orleans v. Ibos - Opposition
No. 03-396: Shuster v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-418: Martinez v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-433: Alcan Aluminum v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-439: Haas v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs - Opposition
No. 03-445: Padilla v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 03-454: Rosell v. Wood - Opposition
No. 03-472: Center for National Security Studies v. DOJ - Opposition
No. 03-501: Standford v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 03-507: Fax.com, Inc. v. Missouri - Opposition
No. 03-525: Rosario v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-529: American Electric Power Co. v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-546: Thosteson v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-552: Applegate v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-562: Macharia v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-575: Patti v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-583: Leocal v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 03-592: Schutz v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-596: Goodine v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-622: McNab v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-624: Azdell v. James - Opposition
No. 03-637: Newdunn Assocites v. United States Army Corps of Engineers - Opposition
No. 03-645: Knock v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-660: Freeman v. Commissioner - Response (Hold)
No. 03-674: Jama v. INS - Opposition
No. 03-691: Egwaoje v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-701: Deaton v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-725: Pasquantino v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-732: Johnson v. Daley - Opposition
No. 03-737: Lipscomb v. FLRA - Opposition
No. 03-738: Bivings v. Department of the Army and Laberge v. Department of the Navy - Opposition
No. 03-750: Small v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-751: Roes v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-761: Rancho Viejo v. Norton - Opposition
No. 03-775: Holy Land Foundation v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 03-781: Shelton v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-829: Penn v. Bodin - Opposition
No. 03-831: Ranger Cellular v. FCC - Opposition
No. 03-838: Thompson v. Chojnacki - Opposition
No. 03-841: Dalrymple v. Reno - Opposition
No. 03-858: UAW v. Choa - Opposition
No. 03-867: CF Industries v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-0872: Vaughn v. Principi - Opposition
No. 03-882: Thomson v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-883: Wolgast Corp. v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 03-887: Vasquez v. Snow - Opposition
No. 03-888: Mackby v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-895: Rosales v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-897: N.C. Payphone v. FCC - Opposition
No. 03-909: Louis v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 03-915: Defenders of Wildlife v. Hogarth - Opposition
No. 03-929: Rapanos v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-934: Merle v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-935: North Dakota v. Ubbelohde - Opposition
No. 03-938: Christian v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-949: Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 03-960: Gross Seed v. DOT - Opposition
No. 03-984: Balser v. United States DOJ - Opposition
No. 03-992: Hatchett v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1004: Ammex, Inc. v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1007: Freedom v. Rumsfeld - Opposition
No. 03-1034: Kanter v. Commissioner - Opposition
No. 03-1071: County of Okanogan v. National Marine Fisheries
No. 03-1073: Bailey v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1081: Domtar v. FERC - Opposition
No. 03-1085: Samirah v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 03-1088: Rise v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1114: A-One Medical v. Chao - Opposition
No. 03-1125: Texas Cities v. EPA - Opposition
No. 03-1131: Cinemark v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1140: Calor v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1147: Roeder v. Islamic Republic of Iran - Opposition
No. 03-1159: Skwira v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1172:Linsenmeyer v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1187: ALLOC v. ITC - Opposition
No. 03-1266: Laton v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1280: George v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1288: Holmes v. OWCP - Opposition
No. 03-1293: Hall v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1313: Davis v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1326: Hawkins v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1327: Fanning v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1334: Imperial County Air Pollution v. Sierra Club - Opposition
No. 03-1339: University of Medicine of Dentistry v. Carrigan - Opposition
No. 03-1341: Baxter Int'l Inc. v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1347: Orloff v. FCC - Opposition
No. 03-1359: Mitchell v. Chapman - Opposition
No. 03-1375: Rybicki v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1404: Bass v. Madison - Response
No. 03-1415: Raymond v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1424: Al-Marri v. Rumsfeld - Opposition
No. 03-1425: Barmes v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1428: City of Austin v. Norman Mineta - Opposition
No. 03-1440: Kalamas Services v. OWCP - Opposition
No. 03-1449: Aeroquip-Vickers v. Commissioner - Opposition
No. 03-1480: Ishler v. IRS - Opposition
No. 03-1487: Fisher v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-1540: LaFontaine v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-44: Sabri v. United States - Opposition
No. 03-6696: Hamid v. Rumsfeld - Response
No. 03-6747: M.K.B. v. Warden - Response (Motion to Seal)
03-86: Estate of Atkinson v. Commissioner - Opposition
Contact Us
|
Accessibility
|
A-Z Index
|
Site Map
|
Archive
|
Privacy Policy
|
Legal Policies and Disclaimers
FOIA
|
For DOJ Employees
|
Other Government Resources
|
Office of the Inspector General
|
USA.gov
|
No FEAR Act