skip to content
Solicitor General Paul D. Clement
About the Office of the Solicitor General
Former Solicitors General
OSG in Historical Context
Bibliography
Briefs
Type of Filing By Term
Subject/Client
Briefs 1982-1997
Help/Glossary
Supreme Court Decisions
Opportunities
Attorney Assistants
Bristow Fellows
Law Students
Summer Research Positions
Contact OSG
OSG FOIA
DOJ Home
Briefs 2002
No. 01-858: Gladden v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1469: Heartland v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1502: Elias v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1503: Court of Common Please v. Popovich - Opposition
No. 01-1521: Islamic Republic v. McKesson - Opposition
No. 01-1559: Massaro v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1607: Dico v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1618: Abbell and Moran v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1622: National Coalition to Save Our Mall, et al. v. Gale A. Norton - Opposition
No. 01-1624: City of Middletown v. RECAP - Opposition
No. 01-1662: Grid Radio v. FCC - Opposition
No. 01-1674: Golden Rainbow Fund v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 01-1685: Chavez v. Universal Maritime - Opposition
No. 01-1687: Griffin v. Dep't VA -Opposition
No. 01-1692: Midwest Gas v. FERC - Opposition
No. 01-1695: Hsia v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1736: Panarella, Jr. v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1749: Markowski v. SEC - Opposition
No. 01-1772: Ken Roberts Co. v. FTC - Opposition
No. 01-1778: McBryde v. Committee to Review - Opposition
No. 01-1782: Griffin v. Secretary of VA - Opposition
No. 01-1799: Central Pines v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1809: Morrison v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1815: Brown v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1826: Forshey v. Principi - Opposition
No. 01-1846: LEAF v. EPA - Opposition
No. 01-1858: Ihnen v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1867: Mulder v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 01-1875: Guard Publishing v. Willms - Opposition
No. 01-1877: Granadoa-Mondragon v. INS - Opposition
No. 01-1878: Hawaii v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1880: Gross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue - Opposition
No. 02-15: Shelton v. CPSC - Opposition
No. 02-44: Cor-Bon v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-54: Coltec Industries v. Hobgood - Opposition
No. 02-59: Cheshire v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue - Opposition
No. 02-73: Student Loan Fund v. Dep't of Educ. - Opposition
No. 02-125: King v. State of Georgia - Response (Motion to dismiss or affirm)
No. 02-126: Whitemore v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-136: Yang v. United States - Response (Hold)
No. 02-145: Cooper v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-155: Gallegos v. Principi - Opposition
No. 02-182: Georgia v. Ashcroft - Response (Motion to Affirm)
No. 02-196: National Park v. Department of Interior - Opposition
No. 02-209: Fernandez v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-217: Wilson v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-218: Grine v. Coombs - Opposition
No. 02-228: Enright v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-240: Pedroni v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-249: Peabody Coal Co. v. Groves - Opposition
No. 02-253: University of Texas v. Siler-Khodr - Opposition
No. 02-274: White v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-275: Restrepo v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 02-277: Haveman v. Westside Mothers - Opposition
No. 02-283: Association of Civilian Technicians v. FLRA - Opposition
No. 02-297: Doyle v. Hydro Nuclear Services - Opposition
No. 02-319: Pitt v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-320: Karamanos v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-323: NDC Health v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-338: United Federal Leasing v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-374: Oberhauser v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-384: Blackthorne v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-409: Favish v. Office of Independent Counsel - Opposition
No. 02-455: Schmidt v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-460: Schneider v. England - Opposition
No. 02-468: Citizen Power v. FERC - Opposition
No. 02-476: Independent Petroleum v. Watson - Opposition
No. 02-500: Atlantic Richfield v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-504: Brockton Hospital v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 02-527: Building and Construction v. Allbaugh - Opposition
No. 02-527: Building & Construction Trades Department v. Allbaugh - Supplemental Opposition
No. 02-529: Transmission Agency of Northern California v. Sierra Pacific Power Company - Opposition
No. 02-544: Hodges v. Abraham - Opposition
No. 02-545: Chandler v. Lovell - Opposition
No. 02-553: Brickwood Contractors v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-557: Paper v. INS - Opposition
No. 02-585: Peabody Coal Co. v. Gray - Opposition
No. 02-592: Hasan v. Dep't of Labor - Opposition
No. 02-593: Hall Holding v. Chao - Opposition
No. 02-599: Anthony v. Favish - Response (Hold)
No. 02-615: Dubon-Otero v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-617: Phillips v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-621: Bidegary v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-636: D&J Enterprises v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-648: Campbell v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-655: Carter v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-658: Alaska v. EPA - Opposition
No. 02-693: Lamie v. United States Trustee - Response
No. 02-700: Turtle Island v. Evans - Opposition
No. 02-710: Casa de Cambio v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-714: Oklahoma v. Thompson - Opposition
No. 02-734: Penn Triple v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-738: Custom Ship Interiors v. Roberts - Opposition
No. 02-751: Sun Praire v. Martin - Opposition
No. 02-787: Perna v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-798: Fabri-Centers v. Choa - Opposition
No. 02-801: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections - Koslow - Opposition
No. 02-834: Jericol v. Napier - Opposition
No. 02-845: Silvey v. Chao - Opposition
No. 02-846: Mazares v. Department of the Navy - Opposition
No. 02-856: FAA v. City of Alameda - Motion to Vacate
No. 02-862: Boise Cascade Corp. v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-868: Skeddle v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-878: Villa Maria, Inc. v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 02-889: Crump v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-900: Harris v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-915: Krilich v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-925: Board of Trustees v. Nanda - Opposition
No. 02-931: Airstar v. F.A.A. - Opposition
No. 02-938: Castle v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-956: A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc. v. Barnhart - Opposition
No. 02-980: Core Communications, Inc. v. FCC - Opposition
No. 02-995: Berwind Corp. v. Barnhart - Opposition
No. 02-1045: Andersen v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1086: Power Engineering Co. v. United States -
No. 02-1088: Leider v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1091: Coalition v. FERC - Opposition
No. 02-1099: Mireles v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1111: Michigan Cmty. Servs. v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 02-1124 and 02-1135: Bowler v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1131: Nkounkou v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 02-1141: Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Ltd. v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1155: Coalition of Clergy v. Bush - Opposition
No. 02-1170: Test and Braun v. Commissioner - Opposition
No. 02-1175: Fife v. SEC - Opposition
No. 02-1178: McKillop v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1185: Butler v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1186: Pronsolino v. Nastri - Opposition
No. 02-1191: Donato v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1206: Tigue v. DOJ - Opposition
Nos. 02-1215 and 02-1265: Producer Coalition v. FERC ExxonMobil Gas Marketing Co. v. FERC - Opposition
No. 02-1221: United States Shoe Corp. v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1225: Tocco v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1226: Schism v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1228: Shreffler v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1270: Perlman v. Dep't of Justice - Opposition
No. 02-1272: DePaoli v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1273: Armendariz-Montoya v. Schmidt - Opposition
No. 02-1286: Hohenberg Bros. v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1289: North Jersey Media v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 02-1291: Tax and Accounting v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1308: Ho v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1314: Kansas v. Robinson - Opposition
No. 02-1317: Cook v. Principi - Opposition
No. 02-1326: Mick v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1344: Dias v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 02-1349: Merlino v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1353: Tenenbaum v. White - Opposition
No. 02-1355: Barstow v. IRS - Opposition
No. 02-1367: Eustace v. Commissioner - Opposition
No. 02-1377: Doe v. Chao - Opposition
No. 02-1384: Joe's Stone Crab, Inc. v. EEOC - Opposition
No. 02-1386: FCC v. Missouri - REPLY (PETITION)
No. 02-1393: Saucerman v. Norton - Opposition
No. 02-1409: Cable Car Advertisers v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 02-1411: Boeing Co. v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1419: Shenango Inc. v. Barnhart - Opposition
No. 02-1472: Cherokee Nation v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1489: Hollins v. Barnhart - Opposition
No.02-1498: Willis v. STB - Opposition
No. 02-1501: Miller Waste Mills v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 02-1512: Arbon Steel Serv. Co. v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1513: Stewart v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1523: Sanford v. Thompson - Opposition
No. 02-1529: Gomez-Chavez v. Achim - Opposition
No. 02-1537: Leeper v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue- Opposition
No. 02-1547: Ramsey v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1581: Johnson v. United States - Opposition
No. 02-1674: McConnell v. FEC - Response (On Appeal)
No. 02-1675: NRA v. FEC - Response (On Appeal)
No. 02-1676: FEC v. McConnell - Response (Jurisdiction)
No. 02-1676A: FEC v. McConnell - Response (Jurisdiction)
No. 02-1727: Republican Nat'l Comm. v. FERC - Response (Jurisdiction)
No. 02-1733: National Right to Life Committee v. FEC - Response (Jurisdiction)
No. 02-1734: American Civil Liberties Union v. FEC - Response (Jurisdiction)
No. 02-1740: Adams v. FEC - Response (Juridsiction)
No. 02-1747: Paul v. FEC - Response (Jurisdiction)
No. 02-1753: Cal. Democratic Party v. FEC - Response (Jurisdiction)
No. 02-1755: AFL-CIO v. FEC - Response (Jurisdiction)
No. 02-1756: Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. FEC - Response (Jurisdiction)
Contact Us
|
Accessibility
|
A-Z Index
|
Site Map
|
Archive
|
Privacy Policy
|
Legal Policies and Disclaimers
FOIA
|
For DOJ Employees
|
Other Government Resources
|
Office of the Inspector General
|
USA.gov
|
No FEAR Act