Methodology for Knowledge Capture
To capture the unique aspects of implementing the Chronic
Care Model in the academic environment, a knowledge capture team composed of
staff from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the
Association of American Medical Colleges, and Delmarva Foundation visited four
high-performing sites in 2006 to learn about their successful implementation of
the Chronic Care Model in their residency programs.
The team visited Summa Health System from September 12-13, Oregon Health & Science University from September 18-19, the University of Cincinnati
Academic Health Center from October 3-4, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center from October 11-12.
The mission of the knowledge capture team was to compile
these sites' knowledge and share it with other academic settings to help them
adopt similar changes in their own organizations.
Along with the knowledge capture team, colleagues from other
institutions attended site visits and were able to ask questions about the
site's tests of change, adoptions, and implementations. They were also
encouraged to share their own experiences with the Chronic Care Model. This led
to robust discussions that would probably have not happened if the knowledge
capture team were there alone.
The Site
Visits
Before each visit, teams at each site were asked to prepare
presentations detailing their most effective, results-producing changes in a
step-by-step fashion. These teams, called improvement teams, were also asked to
share the lessons they learned from changes that were not successful.
When preparing their comments, the teams were given a series
of questions about both specific process changes as well as organizational
changes to consider. Lastly, they were asked to compile any forms, training
materials, and communication tools they created that contributed to their
success.
The
Presentations
The knowledge capture team collaborated with the improvement
teams to create a one-day agenda for the site visits. The format followed
15-minute descriptions of the successful changes followed by 45 minutes of
dialogue, which included questions and comments from all participants.
Each improvement team organized their presentations based on
the changes that had the greatest impact. Following the visits, the knowledge
capture team identified common themes in the presentations and organized the
information in this toolkit.
Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Section