Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
www.ahrq.gov

Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2007 Annual Conference


Results

Text Description is below the image.
  • Cross-section and pre-post conversion comparisons showed that critical access hospital (CAH) had better performance of patient safety than rural PPS hospitals.
  • The odds ratios of poor performance in CAHs compared to rural PPS hospitals are 0.30 (CI: 0.14-0.64) for PSI-6, 0.29 (CI: 0.15-0.56) for PSI-7, 0.40 (CI: 0.24-0.67) for PSI-15, and 0.49 (CI: 0.31-0.80) for composite score of 4 PSIs. CAH conversion had no significant impact on the observed rates of foreign body left during procedure.
  • Moving average CAH indicator had larger effects than binary CAH scale.
  • Sensitivity analyses using tobit models consistent results
  • Findings were robust among sensitivity analyses using different samples and different methods

                Previous Slide Previous Slide         Contents         Next Slide Next Slide


 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care