skip
general nav links ![]() ![]() ACHP News ![]() National Historic Preservation Program ![]() Working with Section 106 ![]() Federal, State, & Tribal Programs ![]() Training & Education ![]() Publications ![]() Search |
![]() |
skip specific nav links Home ![]() ![]() ![]() General Services Administration Historic Preservation Program Cultural Resource Management: Policy and Regulations Section 106 Notes Agency and Related Links The General Services Administration’s Built LegacyThe federal government has a long history of constructing and maintaining many of our nation’s public landmarks. The primary responsibility for the design, construction, and stewardship of America’s public buildings was passed from the Department of the Treasury and individual agencies to the Public Works Administration (PWA) in 1939. By 1949, the General Services Administration (GSA) and its Public Buildings Service (PBS) was created and the stewardship responsibilities were transferred to them, By this time, the built inventory included Custom Houses, Court Houses, Post Offices, and federal agency offices all over the United States and its territories. Textbook examples of architectural styles such as: Greek Revival, Richardsonian Romanesque, Beaux Arts, Art Deco, and Neo-classical came to symbolize the permanence and stature of the federal government. The names of those employed to design these buildings included many of America’s leading architects at that time, such as Robert Mills, Cass Gilbert, and John Russell Pope.
By 1976, the Public Buildings Cooperative Use Act encouraged GSA to make public buildings more accessible to the public by locating cultural, educational, recreational, and commercial activities in federal properties. By giving GSA authority to lease space for these activities, it created a new alternative for keeping federal buildings occupied and economically viable.
Regional Historic Preservation OfficersThe General Services Administration is divided into 11 Regional Offices and the Central Office which is located in Washington DC. The Regional Historic Preservation Officer (RHPO) is the GSA employee responsible for overseeing compliance of regional projects and decisions with federal preservation laws and regulations. GSA LiaisonIn August 2002, a Reimbursable Support Agreement was entered into between the GSA the ACHP to support a full time senior staff position at the ACHP to serve as the principal point of contact for handling all GSA program and project review activities. This partnership has been highly beneficial to GSA and has lead to the following accomplishments:
Under the supervision of the Office of Federal Agency Programs, the GSA Liaison serves as the primary policy coordinator for cultural management initiatives developed in conjunction with GSA, identifies and recommends critical cultural resource management issues for consideration and resolution by the ACHP and GSA, and serves as principal staff in the review of GSA projects under Section 106, coordinating with GSA Headquarters and appropriate regional offices. The incumbent is also responsible for coordinating such reviews with the appropriate State Historic Preservation Offices, Tribal Historic Preservation Offices, and the public. In addition he will be responsible for updating and maintaining the context of this web page. If you have any questions or comments please contact the GSA Liaison, Mr. Héctor M. Abreu-Cintrón. He can be reached at 202.606.8517 or by email at habreu@achp.gov. Cultural Resource Management: Policy and RegulationsGeneral Services Administration Order ADM 1020.2, “Procedures for Historic Properties”, [issued August 20, 1982 as ADM 1020.1, amended October 19, 2003 as ADM 1020.2], GSA Center for Historic Buildings GSA Order ADM 1020.2 provides guidance on GSA’s procedures for complying with federal regulations for the use, protection, and enhancement of its historic properties and cultural resources. The document delineates GSA’s historic preservation program and cites laws and regulations that guide GSA’s preservation policy as well as their NHPA compliance responsibilities. It also establishes professional standards for GSA personnel responsible for their national and regional preservation programs, as well as other staff members engaged in activities that affect historic resources. Finally, it outlines the methodology for effectively integrating federal stewardship goals into GSA’s business activities. Site Selection Guide, [March 2003], GSA Public Building Service, Office of the Chief Architect GSA has broad discretion in selecting sites for public buildings under 40 U.S.C. Section 3304. The Site Selection Guide provides an outline for the entire site selection process. Projects that may adversely impact historic sites, districts or individual buildings which may contribute to a districts historic significance are required under Section 106 of the NHPA to consult with the ACHP and the appropriate SHPO. The consultative process is fully described in the document. The guidance also make reference to other policies such as EO 13006 “Locating in Historic Buildings in Central Cities” which requires that federal agencies give appropriate consideration to properties within historic districts when selecting locations for their facilities. Executive Order 13006 Fact Sheet: Locating in Historic Buildings in Central Cities, [2000], GSA Center for Historic BuildingsThe Fact Sheet includes what the order means to GSA, why it's important to the way they do business, information on outreach efforts designed to raise GSA employees' and other federal agencies' awareness of and compliance with EO 13006, and contact information for those who want to know more. Article: The Economics of Preservation. [Published in the National Trust for Historic Preservation "Forum Journal", Vol. 6, No. 1, Sept/Oct 1999] In this article, GSA demonstrates that many older historic buildings can be more efficient and profitable than newer buildings. The Article is one of many new approaches to property management now reshaping the way GSA manages its extensive holdings of historic real estate. Issues such as operating costs, customer satisfaction and functional replacement values are discussed in making the economic argument for preserving historic resources as opposed to new construction. U.S. Court Design Guide, [Published 1991, revised December 1997], The U.S. Court Design Guide, which have been revised four times since their initial publication, describe the types of spaces associated with facilities for the U.S. Court of Appeals, U.S. Districts Courts, U.S. Magistrate Judges, and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. The Courts Design Guide provides new and revised design criteria for renovating existing court buildings, retrofitting other types of buildings, renovating and retrofitting historic buildings, and accommodating courts in multi-tenant and leased facilities. Since new Court House constructions can have substantial impacts to historic districts and sites, the guidance provides a section dedicated to addressing these issues. GSA Historic Building Leasing, [February 2000], GSA Center for Historic Buildings and the Arts Center of Expertise The GSA Historic Building Leasing Study was undertaken to determine the extent to which GSA leases space in historic buildings and the influence of the preference on leases awarded. The study also identifies obstacles to leasing historic buildings, and strategies for increasing such leases. Quantitative as well as qualitative data is presented with lists of major tenant in GSA historic properties. Data is relevant as of 2000. Growth, Efficiency and Modernism: GSA Buildings of the 1950s, 60s and 70s, [Fall 2003], GSA Center for Historic Buildings On December 5, 2000, GSA brought together 75 leading private-sector architects and preservation experts to discuss how to best contend with the aesthetic and performance challenges of GSA buildings constructed between 1960 and 1979. The GSA symposium, Architecture of the Great Society was held at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, in partnership with the Yale School of Architecture, the ACHP, the American Architectural Foundation, and the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Results of the symposium readdressed the study period to include those buildings significant to the 1950s as well. The Modernism publication provides the context for evaluating the historic and architectural significance of GSA’s mid century modern buildings as they near the 50-year threshold for National Register eligibility. Richly illustrated with significant examples of the Modernism movement, the publication is also available as a hardbound copy by contacting GSA’s Centers for Historic Buildings at historic.buildings@gsa.gov ![]() Case Digest of GSA CasesEach year thousands of federal actions undergo Section 106 review. The vast majority of the cases is routine and resolved at the state or tribal level, without the ACHP’s involvement. However, a considerable number of cases, present issues or challenges that warrant the ACHP’s attention. In addition, the creation of the GSA liaison position has presented GSA with the opportunity to highlight and provide effective consultation in GSA cases which:
In the past, the ACHP’s quarterly Case Digest report has highlighted a few of these case, however, since the establishment of the Liaison position there has been a more consistent presence. Click here for the PDF of the Case Digest archives. Therefore, due the expanding and unique complexities of GSA cases, the Liaison will be highlighting these and additional 106 cases than those normally presented in the Case Digest. The database will have a link, which will be posted within this section soon.
GSA Memorandum of Agreement and Programmatic Agreement DatabaseThe GSA Liaison has created an accessible database of GSA MOAs and PAs for users in pdf format. The agreements can be found under their respective GSA Region (1-11). For example, an agreement document for the state of New York would be under the Region 2 folder. The documents are available and are a useful tool in determining if your current 106 case may have similarities with other previously successful agreements scenarios. These agreement documents can be beneficial as a first step in drafting an agreement document. However, it must be stressed that each project is different and unique, and al negotiations and resolutions should always be conducted under the 106 consultative process. These documents should not be construed as boilerplate. The GSA Liaison will be managing this link and constantly updating it with the latest agreement documents, so periodic visits are recommended. The link can be found at: http://www.achp.gov/GSAagreements/Programmatic Agreement among Region 8 of the General Services Administration: The State Historic Preservation Office of North Dakota; [Colorado and Utah]; and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation regarding the Preservation, Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Leasing of Historic Properties In August 27, 2002, the GSA’s Rocky Mountain regional office (Region 8) notified the ACHP that it was interested in developing Programmatic Agreements (PA) for the management of its historic resources for those States within their jurisdiction (Montana, Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, South Dakota and North Dakota). We assisted them in the development of the first two such PAs, with the States of Utah and Colorado, which were signed by the ACHP in February 9, 2004. These individual State PAs will guide Region 8 in the preservation, maintenance, rehabilitation and leasing of their historic properties. The agreements are a direct result of GSA’s interest in avoiding future contentious preservation issues such as occurred in the State of Utah with the new U.S. Courthouse project in Salt Lake City. The PA for the state of North Dakota was signed in December 12, 2004. As in the Utah and Colorado PAs, this PA established GSA’s management procedures for their regional preservation and rehabilitation program, leasing program, and approval process. It will provide an opportunity for the parties to this agreement to participate in a meaningful and timely manner to assist the region in fulfilling its responsibilities to identify, evaluate and take into account the effects of its undertakings on historic properties pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). It will also provide the North Dakota SHPO and the ACHP the opportunity to assist GSA in fulfilling its responsibilities pursuant to Section 110 of the NHPA. The ACHP is listed as the mediator if procedural disputes arise in the implementation of this PA. In addition, the agreement contains undertakings excluded from review by the North Dakota SHPO, which will expedite the management of the identified historic resources. Finally, there are stipulated training requirements for all regional building management staff on the importance of historic preservation and correct standards for the maintenance and rehabilitation of these resources. The PA can be found in the aforementioned MOA/PA database. African Burial Ground, New York, NY In 1991, the remains of more than 400, 17th and 18th century Africans were discovered during construction of the Foley Square Project Federal building in New York City. The finding deeply impacted the descendants and broader community and at the same time renewed awareness in cultural significance and historic preservation. Since then, the GSA has been driven to complete what has become known as the African Burial Ground Project, a major effort to memorialize the legacy of those buried at the site.Visit the web site at africanburialground.gov for more information. Agency and Related LinksGSA Center for Historic Buildings Web site The General Services Administration home page is www.gsa.gov. The Centers For Historic Buildings has an excellent web site with a wealth of technical information as well as publications and guidelines not mentioned here at www.gsa.gov/historicpreservation. Historic Building Posters & Screensaver
|