Due to the early reporting
date (just six weeks after the end of the fiscal year) and the wide variety of
sources from which the Department receives performance data – including states,
contractors, and domestic and international grant recipients – not all of the
data required to report performance results are available, so the Department
estimates performance results for some of its goals.
Where estimates have been
used in this report, they are clearly identified as such. These estimates are
based on methodologies developed by the programs and reviewed by the Department
of Labor’s Office of Inspector General. Most of these performance estimates
use partial year data and then extrapolate for the entire fiscal year. In instances
where final quarter data have not traditionally been representative of the
entire fiscal year, other estimating methodologies were used.
New indicators often lack
data needed to establish targets. For such indicators, the first year’s target
may be to establish a baseline (abbreviated as “base” in this table); success
is determined by gathering the data as planned.
Performance Goal 04-1.1A (ETA)
Increase the employment, retention, and
earnings of individuals registered under the WIA Adult program.
|
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
PY 2000
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2001
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2002
Goal Not Achieved
|
PY 2003
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2004
Goal Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Percent
of participants employed in the first quarter after program exit
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
70%
|
74%
|
Y
|
71%
|
74%
|
Y
|
75%
|
77%
|
Y
|
Percent
of those employed in the first quarter after program exit still employed in
the third quarter after program exit
|
77%
|
78%
|
Y
|
78%
|
79%
|
Y
|
80%
|
84%
|
Y
|
82%
|
85%
|
Y
|
85%
|
86%
|
Y
|
Average
earnings change for those who are employed in the first quarter after program
exit and still employed in the third quarter after program exit
|
$3264
|
$3684
|
Y
|
$3361
|
$3555
|
Y
|
$3423
|
$2900
|
N
|
$3100
|
$3260
|
Y
|
$3300
|
$3746
|
Y
|
Average
cost per participant
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
$2192
|
$2153**
|
Y
|
Data Source(s): Annual State WIA performance reports included in the Enterprise Information Management
System (EIMS) and Unemployment Insurance Wage Records
|
Performance Goal 04-1.1B
(ETA)
Improve the outcomes for
job seekers and employers who receive core employment and workforce
information services through One-Stop Career Centers.
|
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
PY 2000
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2001
Goal Not Achieved
|
PY 2002
Goal Not Achieved
|
PY 2003
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2004
Goal Not Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Percent of job seekers registered for employment services who enter employment with a new employer by the end of the second quarter following registration |
|
|
|
— |
— |
— |
55% |
63% |
Y |
58% |
61% |
Y |
58% |
64% |
Y |
PY
2000: Employment Service applicants entering employment
|
3.2 million
|
3.9 million
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
of job seekers who continue to be employed two quarters after initial entry
into employment with a new employer
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
76%
|
—
|
—
|
70%
|
—
|
—
|
72%
|
80%
|
Y
|
72%
|
81%
|
Y
|
Average
cost per participant
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
$52
|
$62
|
N
|
Data Source(s): Annual State WIA performance reports included in the Enterprise Information Management
System (EIMS) and Unemployment Insurance Wage Records
Notes: In DOL’s FY 2006
Performance Budget, the goal statement referred to these services as the
“public labor exchange.” In PY 2000-03, this goal included three additional
indicators now under Performance Goal 04-4.1A.
|
Performance Goal 04-1.1C
(ETA)
Increase the employment,
retention, and earnings replacement of individuals registered under the
Workforce Investment Act Dislocated Worker program
|
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
PY 2000
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2001
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2002
Goal Not Achieved
|
PY 2003
Goal Not Achieved
|
PY 2004
Goal Not Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Participants employed in
the first quarter after program exit
|
71%
|
75%
|
Y
|
73%
|
79%
|
Y
|
78%
|
82%
|
Y
|
78%
|
82%
|
Y
|
82%
|
84%
|
Y
|
Participants employed in
the first quarter after program exit still employed in the third quarter
after program exit
|
82%
|
83%
|
Y
|
83%
|
87%
|
Y
|
88%
|
90%
|
Y
|
88%
|
90%
|
Y
|
91%
|
91%
|
Y
|
Percent of pre-dislocation
earnings for those employed in the first quarter after program exit and still
employed in the third quarter after program exit
|
90%
|
95%
|
Y
|
91%
|
101%
|
Y
|
98%
|
90%
|
N
|
93%
|
91%
|
N
|
91%
|
93%
|
Y
|
Average cost per
participant
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
$3195
|
$3318**
|
N
|
Data Source(s): Annual State WIA performance reports included in the Enterprise Information Management
System (EIMS) and Unemployment Insurance Wage Records
|
Performance Goal 04-1.1D
(VETS)
Improve the employment
outcomes for veterans who receive public labor exchange services and
veterans’ program services
|
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2001
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2002
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2003
Goal Not Measured
|
PY 2003
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2004
Goal Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Percent of veteran job
seekers employed in the first or second quarter following registration
|
27%
|
33%
|
Y
|
34%
|
43%
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
58%
|
58%
|
Y
|
58%
|
60%
|
Y
|
Percent of veteran job
seekers still employed two quarters after initial entry into employment with
a new employer
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
72%
|
79%
|
Y
|
80%
|
81%
|
Y
|
Percent of disabled veteran
job seekers employed in the first or second quarter following registration
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
54%
|
56%
|
Y
|
Percent of disabled veteran
job seekers still employed two quarters after initial entry into employment
with a new employer
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
78%
|
79%
|
Y
|
Entered employment rate
for homeless veterans participating in the Homeless Veterans Reintegration
Program (HVRP)
|
50%
|
54%
|
Y
|
54%
|
54.4%
|
Y
|
54.5%
|
60.3%
|
Y
|
54.5%
|
61%
|
Y
|
60%
|
65%
|
Y
|
Employment retention rate
after 6 months for homeless veteran HVRP participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
57%**
|
Y
|
Data Source(s): State Workforce
Agency administrative reports, State UI wage records and homeless veteran
grantee reports.
Note: In FY 2003, this
program transitioned to a new system of measuring and reporting outcomes that
is consistent with the common measures and operates on a program year basis.
Also, HVRP entered employment rates for periods prior to PY 2004 were
reported under another performance goal.
|
Performance Goal 05-1.1A (ETA)
Strengthen the registered apprenticeship
system to meet the training needs of business and workers in the 21st
Century.
|
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2002
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2003
Goal Substantially Achieved
|
FY 2004
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Percent of those employed
in the quarter after registration still employed nine months later
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
78%
|
Y
|
Average wage gain for tracked entrants employed in the
first quarter after registration and still employed nine months later (see
note below)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
$1.26
|
Y
|
Average cost per registered apprentice
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
$109
|
Y
|
New programs in new and
emerging industries
|
293
|
326
|
Y
|
359
|
359
|
Y
|
366
|
526
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
New apprentices registered by OATELS staff only
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,592 |
69,597 |
Y |
— |
— |
— |
FY 2002-03: All
registrations
|
86,647
|
129,388
|
Y
|
133,909
|
130,615
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New apprenticeship
programs
|
1854
|
2952
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
New businesses involved
in apprenticeship
|
3248
|
5883
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Data Source(s):
Registered Apprenticeship Information System (RAIS) and Apprenticeship
Information Management System (AIMS)
Note: Twenty-three
states are federally-registered apprenticeship programs and enter data on
individuals into the Registered Apprenticeship Information System (RAIS). A
group of “tracked entrants” is defined as the cohort of apprentices
registered and entered into RAIS during a given reporting period.
|
Performance Goal 05-1.1B
(ODEP)
Provide national
leadership to increase access and employment opportunities for youth and
adults with disabilities receiving employment, training, and employment
support services by developing, testing, and disseminating effective practices |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2002
Goal Achieved |
FY 2003
Goal Not Achieved |
FY 2004
Goal Achieved |
FY 2005
Goal Achieved |
Target |
Result |
* |
Target |
Result |
* |
Target |
Result |
* |
Target |
Result |
* |
People
with disabilities served through ODEP projects
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2391
|
6151
|
Y
|
6718
|
9768
|
Y
|
Entered employment rate
at pilot sites
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
13.3%
|
19.0%
|
Y
|
24%
|
24.1%
|
Y
|
3-month and 6-month
retention rates for people with disabilities served by the pilots
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
12.3%
6.9%
|
Y
|
22%
17%
|
46.7%
39.0%
|
Y
Y
|
Effective practices
identified through pilot project sites and other research-related initiatives
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
10
|
Y
|
11
|
19
|
Y
|
Implement 30 new Olmstead
grant projects, targeted at persons with significant disabilities who are
institutionalized
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
30
|
16
|
N
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Implement 12 youth grant
projects (6 of which are new technology skills projects) to assist youth
through the One-Stop Centers and the WIA youth programs
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
12
|
21
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Implement 12
demonstration programs, through grants, designed to develop and test
strategies and techniques that need to be implemented in order for One-Stop Centers and WIA youth programs to effectively serve persons with significant
disabilities.
|
12
|
16 WIA, 22 other
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Data Source(s): ODEP
Division of Program Management and Research & Evaluation Team
|
Performance Goal 04-1.2A
(ETA)
Increase placements and
educational attainments for youth served through the WIA youth program |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
PY 2000
Goal Substantially Achieved
|
PY 2001
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2002
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2003
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2004
Goal Not Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Percent of the 14-18 year-old youth who enter the program without a diploma or equivalent that attain a secondary school diploma or equivalent by the first quarter after exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51% |
55% |
Y |
52% |
63% |
Y |
53% |
65% |
Y |
PY 2000-01: Percent of the
14–18 year-old youth either employed, in advanced training, post-secondary
education, military service or apprenticeships in the third quarter after
program exit
|
50%
|
47%
|
N
|
50%
|
50%
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of 19–21 year-old
youth employed in the first quarter after exit
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
63%
|
67%
|
Y
|
65%
|
71%
|
Y
|
68%
|
72%
|
Y
|
Percent of 19–21 year-old
youth employed in the first quarter after exit still employed in the third
quarter after program exit
|
70%
|
74%
|
Y
|
75%
|
75%
|
Y
|
77%
|
80%
|
Y
|
78%
|
81%
|
Y
|
79%
|
82%
|
Y
|
Average cost per
participant
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
$2663
|
$2822**
|
N
|
Data Source(s): Annual State WIA performance reports included in the Enterprise Information Management
System (EIMS) and Unemployment Insurance Wage Records
|
Performance Goal 04-1.2B
(ETA)
Improve educational
achievements of Job Corps students, and increase participation of Job Corps
graduates in employment and education |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
PY 2000
Goal Substantially Achieved
|
PY 2001
Goal Substantially Achieved
|
PY 2002
Goal Not Achieved
|
PY 2003
Goal Not Achieved
|
PY 2004
Goal Not Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Percent of Job Corps graduates (within 1 year of program exit) and former enrollees (within 90 days of program exit) who enter employment or enroll in post-secondary education or advanced/occupational skills training
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
— |
— |
85% |
84% |
N |
PY 2000-02: Percent of
graduates who enter employment or enroll in education
|
85%
|
91%
|
Y
|
85%
|
90%
|
Y
|
90%
|
87%
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of students earning a high school diploma, GED or certificate while enrolled in a Job Corps program
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PY 2002-03: The number
of students who attain high school diplomas while enrolled in Job Corps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3912
|
6381
|
Y
|
7658
|
8003
|
Y
|
64%
|
64%
|
Y
|
Percent
of students who achieve literacy or numeracy gains of one Adult Basic
Education (ABE) level (one ABE level is approximately equivalent to two grade
levels)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
45%
|
47%
|
Y
|
Average
cost per participant
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
$22,503
|
$24,809
|
N
|
Percent of graduates who
continue to be employed or enrolled in education six months after initial
placement date
|
70%
|
67%
|
N
|
70%
|
64%
|
N
|
65%
|
63%
|
N
|
65%
|
63%
|
N
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Average hourly wages of
graduates with jobs at six months after initial placement
|
$7.50
|
$7.97
|
Y
|
$7.25
|
$7.96
|
Y
|
$8.20
|
$8.03
|
S
|
$8.20
|
$8.95
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Data Source(s): Job
Corps Management Information System
|
Performance Goal 05-1.3A
(BLS)
Improve information
available to decision-makers on labor market conditions, and price and
productivity changes |
*Indicator target reached (Y), substantially reached (S)
or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2004
Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Substantially Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Improve relevancy
Cumulative number of
series (e.g., Current Employment Statistics, Employment Cost Index, etc.)
converted to the North American Industry Classification System (12 series in total)
|
8
|
8
|
Y
|
9
|
9
|
Y
|
Improve accuracy
Coverage
Increase the percent of domestic output of in-scope services included in the Producer Price Index (PPI) |
59.2%
|
59.2%
|
Y
|
75.7%
|
76.3%
|
Y
|
Improve accuracy
Coverage
Increase the percent of in-scope industries in the labor productivity measures
|
58.0%
|
58.0%
|
Y
|
58.3%
|
59.2%
|
Y
|
Improve accuracy
Response
Improve the response to
the Employment Cost Index
|
78%
|
78%
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Enhance information
technology
Lessen the likelihood of
major systems failures that could affect the PPI's ability to release data on
time, as measured by the percent of the components of the new repricing
system completed
|
33%
|
17%
|
N
|
40%
|
37%
|
N
|
Enhance efficiency and
effectiveness
Cost per transaction of
the Internet Data Collection Facility
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
$3.32
|
$2.44
|
Y
|
Raise customer
satisfaction with BLS products and services (e.g., the American Customer
Satisfaction Index)
|
75%
|
82%
|
Y
|
75%
|
74%
|
S
|
Deliver economic data on
time (Percent of scheduled releases issued on time)
|
100%
|
96%
|
S
|
100%
|
100%
|
Y
|
Percent of accuracy
measures met (e.g., revision, response rates, etc.)
|
100%
|
83%
|
S
|
100%
|
100%
|
Y
|
Data Source(s): Office
of Publications and Special Studies report of release dates against OMB
release schedule for BLS Principal Federal Economic Indicators; News releases
for each Principal Federal Economic Indicator; BLS budget submissions and
Quarterly Review and Analysis System; ACSI Quarterly E-Government scores.
|
Performance Goal 05-2.1A
(ESA)
American workplaces
legally employ and compensate workers |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2002
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2003
Goal Substantially Achieved
|
FY 2004
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Ensuring Customer
Service
Average number of days to
conclude a violation complaint
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
178
|
Y
|
Ensuring Customer
Service
FY 2003-04: Average
number of days to conclude a complaint
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
126
|
108
|
Y
|
108
|
92
|
Y
|
|
|
|
Reducing employer
recidivism
Percent of prior
violators who achieved and maintained FLSA compliance following a full FLSA
investigation
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
74%
|
71%
|
N
|
72%
|
72%
|
Y
|
Reducing employer
recidivism
Percent of
reinvestigations without any violations
|
base
|
34%
|
Y
|
36%
|
37%
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Reducing employer
recidivism
Percent of
reinvestigations with identical violations
|
base
|
19%
|
Y
|
17%
|
17%
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Increasing compliance
in industries with chronic violations
Percent of low-wage
workers across identified low-wage industries paid and employed in compliance
with FLSA and MSPA. (for FY 2005, Southern CA garment and NYC garment)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
54%
76%
|
Y
Y
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the garment manufacturing industry by
Percent of employees paid
“on the payroll” in New York City
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
33%
|
Y
|
34%
|
39%
|
Y
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the garment manufacturing industry by
Number of manufacturers
in southern California that monitor contractors
|
43%
|
53%
|
Y
|
714
|
715
|
Y
|
729
|
729
|
Y
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the garment manufacturing industry by
Percent of employees paid “on the payroll” in southern California
|
— |
— |
—
|
base
|
91%
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the garment manufacturing industry by
New contractors in NYC
participating in Compliance Assistance program
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
72
|
73
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the garment manufacturing industry by
Number of manufacturers
in NYC that monitor contractors
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
153
|
158
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the garment manufacturing industry by
Percent of contractors in
NYC that pay all employees “on the payroll”
|
53%
|
42%
|
N
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the garment manufacturing industry by
Number of monitoring
components used by manufacturers in monitoring contractors for compliance in
southern California
|
5.6
|
6.4
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the garment manufacturing industry by
Percent of contractors in
southern California that pay all employees “on the payroll”
|
65%
|
92%
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the garment manufacturing industry by
Percentage of compliance
of new contractors in NYC
|
55%
|
43%
|
N
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the long-term health care industry by
Percent of nursing homes
in compliance with the FLSA.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
45%
|
55%
|
Y
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the long-term health care industry by
Percent of nursing home
employees employed or paid in compliance with the FLSA.
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
91% |
90% |
N
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the long-term health care industry by
Percent of nursing home
complaint cases concluded in 180 days
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
42%
|
48%
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the long-term health care industry by
Percent of employees in
residential care paid in compliance with the FLSA overtime requirements
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
85%
|
77%
|
N
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the long-term health care industry by
Additional employees of
multi-establishment nursing home corporations impacted by corporate proactive
steps such as training and self-audit.
|
6000
|
16,426
|
Y |
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the long-term health care industry by
Nursing home employers
provided compliance assistance information through seminars and other
outreach efforts
|
2559
|
7681
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in the long-term health care industry by
Percent of employers
(residential living) in compliance with the recordkeeping requirements of the
Fair Labor Standards Act
|
base
|
77%
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in agricultural commodities by
Number
of employees affected by compliance assistance programs for agricultural
employers subject to the DWHaT provisions of MSPA
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
4743 |
911,004 |
Y |
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in agricultural commodities by
Number
of agricultural housing providers who corrected violations following an
investigation.
|
— |
— |
— |
170 |
256 |
Y |
259 |
335 |
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in agricultural commodities by
Number
of agricultural housing providers who corrected violations following a first
investigation
|
— |
— |
—
|
98 |
133 |
Y |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in agricultural commodities by
Percent of employers in
compliance with the MSPA disclosure provisions.
|
base |
61% |
Y |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in agricultural commodities by
Percent of employers in
compliance with the MSPA wage provisions.
|
base |
91% |
Y |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in agricultural commodities by
Percent of employers in
compliance with the MSPA housing safety and health provision.
|
base |
74% |
Y |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in agricultural commodities by
Percent of employers in
compliance with MSPA vehicle safety provisions
|
base |
88% |
Y |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in agricultural commodities by
Percent of employers
complying with MSPA drivers license provisions
|
base |
90% |
Y |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in agricultural commodities by
Percent of employers
complying with MSPA vehicle insurance provisions
|
base |
85% |
Y |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
FY 2002-04: as
indicated in agricultural commodities by
Percent of investigated
employers in compliance with child labor provisions of the FLSA
|
base |
98% |
Y |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
Ensuring timely and
accurate prevailing wage determinations
Number of wage determination forms processed per 1,000 hours.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
1491
|
Y
|
1506
|
1667
|
Y
|
Ensuring timely and
accurate prevailing wage determinations
Percent of survey-based
DBA wage determinations issued within 60 days of receipt of the underlying
survey data.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
80%
|
87%
|
Y
|
81%
|
84%
|
Y
|
Data Source(s): Wage and
Hour Investigator Support and Reporting Database (WHISARD) data; WH
significant activity reports; regional logs and reports on local initiatives;
and statistically valid investigation-based compliance surveys in defined
industries
|
Performance Goal 05-2.1B
(ESA)
Ensure union financial
integrity, democracy and transparency |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2002
Goal Achieved |
FY 2003
Goal Not Achieved |
FY 2004
Goal Achieved |
FY 2005
Goal Substantially Achieved |
Target |
Result |
* |
Target |
Result |
* |
Target |
Result |
* |
Target |
Result |
* |
Percent of unions
with fraud
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
base |
9% |
Y |
— |
— |
— |
FY 2002-03: Percent of investigative resources applied to criminal investigation that
result in convictions
|
base |
50% |
Y |
53% |
63% |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
union reports meeting standards of acceptability for public disclosure
|
|
|
|
base
|
73%
|
Y
|
75% |
92% |
Y |
95% |
94% |
S |
FY 2002-03: The timely filing of union annual financial reports by unions with annual
receipts over $200,000
|
base |
44% |
Y |
85% |
64% |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Union dollars protected
per staff day
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
base |
$136,617 |
Y |
Data Source(s): OLMS
union audit data and e.LORS data system
Note: Fraud indicator
data are reported every other (even) year.
|
Performance Goal 05-2.2A
(ETA)
Make timely and accurate
benefit payments to unemployed workers, facilitate the reemployment of
Unemployment Insurance claimants, and set up Unemployment tax accounts
promptly for new employers |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2001
Goal Not Achieved |
FY 2002
Goal Not Achieved |
FY 2003
Goal Not Achieved |
FY 2004
Goal Achieved |
FY 2005
Goal Substantially Achieved |
Target |
Result |
* |
Target |
Result |
* |
Target |
Result |
* |
Target |
Result |
* |
Target |
Result |
* |
Pay Benefits Promptly:
percent of all intrastate first payments made within 14/21 days
|
|
|
|
91% |
88.7% |
N |
91% |
89% |
N |
89.2% |
90.3% |
Y |
89.9% |
90%** |
Y |
FY 2001: Number of states
meeting or exceeding the Secretary’s Standard for intrastate payment
timeliness
|
48 |
42 |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detect Overpayments:
Percent of estimated detectable/recoverable overpayments that States
establish for recovery
|
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
59% |
54% |
N |
59% |
59.5% |
Y |
59.5% |
59%** |
S |
FY 2002: Establish a
measure and baseline for payment accuracy
|
|
|
|
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilitate Reemployment:
Entered employment rate for UI claimants
|
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
base |
51.5% |
Y |
— |
— |
— |
FY 2003: Develop a
measure and a method to obtain entered employment information on UI claimants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002: Define a
measure of entered employment of Unemployment Insurance claimants and
establish a baseline
|
|
|
|
Y |
N |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Establish Tax Accounts
Promptly: Percent of new employer liability determinations made within 90
days of the end of the first quarter in which liability occurred.
|
|
|
|
80% |
81.7% |
Y |
80% |
83% |
Y |
82.2% |
82.5% |
Y |
82.4% |
83%** |
Y |
FY 2000-01: Number of
states meeting or exceeding the minimum performance criterion for benefit
adjudication quality
|
26 |
25 |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency: Quality-weighted
base initial claims per $1,000 of inflation-adjusted base grant funds
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
8.55 |
8.60** |
Y |
Data Source(s): Eligibility
Determinations Quality: ETA 9056; Payment Timeliness: 9050, 9050p Reports; Payment
Accuracy: Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) program and ETA 227 report; Facilitate
Reemployment: Unemployment Insurance wage records; New Status Determinations
Timeliness: ETA 581 report
Note: This goal was
reported as not achieved in the FY 2004 PAR based on estimated data. Actual
data for the first indicator, Pay Benefits Promptly, exceeded the target.
|
Performance Goal 05-2.2B
(ESA)
Minimize the impact of
work-related injuries |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2001
Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2002
Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2003
Goal Substantially Achieved
|
FY 2004
Goal Substantially Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Substantially Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Lost
production days (LPD) per 100 employees for FECA cases of the United States
Postal Service (see note below)
|
|
|
|
115
|
131
|
N
|
130
|
143
|
N
|
146
|
147
|
N
|
148
|
135
|
Y
|
FY 2001: combined with
all other governmental agencies
|
66.7
|
76.9
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LPD
rate for FECA cases of All Other Governmental Agencies (see note below)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
55
|
54
|
Y
|
54.7
|
55
|
N
|
55.4
|
62.6
|
N
|
61
|
56
|
Y
|
FECA
Vocational Rehabilitation placements with new employers for injured USPS
employees
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
52
|
56
|
Y
|
56
|
59
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Savings
in the FECA program through use of Periodic Roll Management
|
$95 million
|
$103 million
|
Y
|
$19 million
|
$26 million
|
Y
|
$20 million
|
$25 million
|
Y
|
$18 million
|
$24 million
|
Y
|
$17 million
|
$21 million
|
Y
|
Trend
in indexed cost per case of FECA cases receiving medical treatment remains
below the Milliman Health Cost Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+9.1%
|
-2.8%
|
Y
|
+8.8%
|
+2.4%
|
Y
|
+8.1%
|
+2.8%
|
Y
|
FY
2002: Reduce Inflation-adjusted costs per case in the FECA program
|
|
|
|
$2219
|
$2604
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001: Reduction in
average annual cost for physical therapy and psychiatric services
|
-1% (both)
|
+4.5%, -3%
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Targets
met for key communications performance areas
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
5
|
Y
|
3
|
4
|
Y
|
3
|
3
|
Y
|
Average
days required to resolve disputed issues in Longshore and Harbor Worker’s
Compensation Program contested cases
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
242
|
285
|
N
|
279
|
266
|
Y
|
274
|
247
|
Y
|
245
|
254
|
N
|
Percent
of Black Lung benefit claims filed under the revised regulations for which,
following an eligibility decision, there are no requests for further action
from any party pending one year after receipt of the claim.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
68.5%
|
89.9%
|
Y
|
70.5%
|
86.6%
|
Y
|
74.5%
|
82.2%
|
Y
|
76.5%
|
80.6%
|
Y
|
Percent
of Initial Claims for benefits in the Energy Program processed within standard
timeframes
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
75%
|
79%
|
Y
|
77%
|
92%
|
Y
|
80%
|
80%
|
Y
|
FY
2002: 120 days for Department of Energy (DOE) employees or contractors
employed at DOE facilities
|
|
|
|
75%
|
48%
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
days for employees of Atomic Weapons Employers (AME) and Beryllium Vendors
|
|
|
|
75%
|
48%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Final Decisions in the Part B Energy Program processed within standard timeframes |
|
|
|
|
|
S |
75% |
76.9% |
Y |
77% |
99% |
Y |
80% |
94.7% |
Y |
FY 2002: Claims or No-Contest Denials within 75 days of the Recommended Decision. |
|
|
|
75% |
76% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews of the Written Record within 75 days of request |
|
|
|
75% |
74% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal Hearings within 250 days of request |
|
|
|
75% |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claimants
under Part E to whom compensation benefits are paid
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1200
|
1525
|
Y
|
Data Source(s): 1&2.
Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA) data systems, Federal agency
payroll offices and Office of Personnel Management employment statistics; 3.
Nurse/Rehabilitation Tracking System 4. Periodic Roll Management System and
FECA Automated Compensation Payment System; 5. FECA Medical Bill Pay System
and Milliman USA Health Cost Index Report; 6. Telecommunications system
standard reports, FECA district office and national MIS reports, customer
surveys, focus group records and other customer service performance data
sources; 7. Longshore Case Management System; 8. Black Lung Automated Support
Package; 9-11. Energy Program Case Management System
Note: In FY 2004, OWCP
changed the way it measures LPD. The FY 2003 result data for USPS and also
for all other government agencies’ LPD’s reflect the results prior to the
measurement changes. LPD’s are now measured in real-time rather than with
accumulated data.
|
Performance Goal 05-2.2C
(EBSA)
Secure pension, health
and welfare benefits |
*Indicator target reached (Y), substantially reached (S)
or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2003
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2004
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Enforcement:
Ratio
of closed civil cases with corrected violations to civil closed cases.
|
50%
|
69%
|
Y
|
50%
|
69%
|
Y
|
66%
|
76%
|
Y
|
Enforcement:
Ratio
of criminal cases referred for prosecution to total criminal cases
|
25% |
40% |
Y |
25% |
45% |
Y |
37.7% |
45% |
Y |
Participant Assistance:
Customer Satisfaction Index, or comparable
measurement, for Participants and Beneficiaries who have contacted EBSA for
assistance.
|
59
|
59
|
Y
|
61
|
62
|
Y
|
63
|
67
|
Y
|
Participant Assistance:
Additional
applications to Voluntary Compliance programs
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
8340 |
14,082 |
Y |
Data Source(s):
Enforcement Management System and The Gallup Organization/Technical Assistance
and Inquiry System (TAIS)
|
Performance Goal 05-2.2D
(PBGC)
Serve sponsors of
covered pension plans and participants in trusteed plans |
*Indicator target reached (Y), substantially reached (S)
or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2004
Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Not Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
American Customer
Satisfaction Index (ACSI) score for sponsors of covered pension plans who
have contacted PBGC for assistance
|
71
|
69
|
N
|
72
|
68
|
N
|
ACSI score for
participants in trusteed plans who have contacted PBGC for assistance.
|
77
|
78
|
Y
|
78
|
79
|
Y
|
Data Source(s): American
Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) report
|
Performance Goal 05-3.1A
(OSHA/MSHA)
Reduce work-related
fatalities |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2001
M: Goal Achieved
|
FY 2002
M: Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2003
O: Goal Not Achieved
M: Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2004
O: Goal Not Achieved
M: Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Not Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
O: Fatalities per
100,000 workers
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1.59
|
1.62
|
N
|
1.57
|
1.61
|
N
|
1.52
|
1.71**
|
N
|
M: Fatal incidence rate
(number of mining fatalities per 200,000 hours worked)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.020
|
.023
|
N
|
.022
|
.017
|
Y
|
.022
|
.018**
|
Y
|
FY 2001-02: Mine
fatalities
|
89
|
71
|
Y
|
64
|
71
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data Source(s): OSHA
Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) and Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) Current Employment Statistics (CES). Mine Accident, Injury,
and Employment information that mine operators and contractors report to MSHA
under Title 30 Code of Federal Regulations Part 50
Note: Prior to FY 2005,
OSHA and MSHA performance goals were separate. Goal and indicator
achievements are distinguished by labels – O for OSHA, M for MSHA.
|
Performance Goal 05-3.1B
(OSHA/MSHA)
Reduce work-related
injuries and illnesses |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2001
O: Goal Achieved
M: Goal Achieved
|
FY 2002
O: Goal Not Achieved
M: Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2003
O: Goal Achieved
M: Goal Achieved
|
FY 2004
O: Goal Achieved
M: Goal Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Not Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
O: Days away from work
case rate per 100 workers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
1.7**
|
Y
|
1.7
|
1.6**
|
Y
|
1.7
|
1.5**
|
Y
|
FY 2001-02: Injury and
illness incidence rates in industries characterized by high-hazard workplaces
(Lost workdays used in FY 2001, days away from work in FY 2002)
Shipyard
|
11.9
|
7.5
|
Y
|
6.8
|
8.1
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001-02: Injury and
illness incidence rates in industries characterized by high-hazard workplaces
(Lost workdays used in FY 2001, days away from work in FY 2002)
Food
processing
|
7.9
|
6.3
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001-02: Injury and
illness incidence rates in industries characterized by high-hazard workplaces
(Lost workdays used in FY 2001, days away from work in FY 2002)
Meat
Products
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
7.7
|
7.9
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001-02: Injury and
illness incidence rates in industries characterized by high-hazard workplaces
(Lost workdays used in FY 2001, days away from work in FY 2002)
Nursing
homes
|
7.7
|
7.3
|
Y
|
6.6
|
7.6
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001-02: Injury and
illness incidence rates in industries characterized by high-hazard workplaces
(Lost workdays used in FY 2001, days away from work in FY 2002)
Logging
|
6.4
|
3.5
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001-02: Injury and
illness incidence rates in industries characterized by high-hazard workplaces
(Lost workdays used in FY 2001, days away from work in FY 2002)
Construction
(injuries only in FY 2001)
|
4.6
|
3.9
|
Y
|
3.6
|
3.8
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M: All-injury incidence
rate (all injuries, including fatalities, per 200,000 hours worked)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
4.26
|
N
|
3.85
|
4.07
|
N
|
3.48
|
3.82**
|
N
|
FY 2001-02: Non-fatal
injury incidence rate
|
3.65
|
3.29
|
Y
|
2.87
|
3.15
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M: Percent of respirable
coal dust samples exceeding the applicable standards for designated
occupations
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
15.0
|
N
|
14.2
|
11.7
|
Y
|
11.1
|
10.2
|
Y
|
10.1
|
10.7
|
N
|
FY 2000-01: Percent of
coal dust samples that are out of compliance for high risk mining occupations
|
11.1%
|
10.2%
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M: Percent of silica
dust samples in metal and nonmetal mines with a concentration
result/enforceable level (C/E) ratio of at least 0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
base
|
—
|
N
|
FY 2001-04: Percent of
silica dust samples in metal and nonmetal mines exceeding the applicable
standards for high risk occupations
|
|
|
|
8.8%
|
6.6%
|
Y
|
8.6%
|
6.5%
|
Y
|
6.2%
|
5.6%
|
Y
|
|
|
|
FY 2001: Index
percentage of silica dust samples that are out of compliance for high risk
mining occupations
|
80%
|
64%
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M: Percent of noise
samples in metal and non-metal mines with a C/E ratio of at least 0.5
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
—
|
N
|
M: Percent of noise samples
above the citation level in coal mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
base
|
—
|
N
|
FY 2001-04: Percent of
noise exposures above the citation level in all mines
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
8.6%
|
5.8%
|
Y
|
9.3%
|
4.8%
|
Y
|
4.6%
|
4.6%
|
Y
|
|
|
|
Data Source(s): Bureau
of Labor Statistics (BLS) Annual Survey of Occupational Injuries and
Illnesses (ASOII). FY 2003 estimated results use CY 2001 data; FY 2004
estimated results use CY 2002 data. Dust samples collected by MSHA
inspectors. Coal Mine Safety and Health MIS. Metal and Non-Metal Mine
Safety and Health MIS.
Note: Prior to FY 2005,
OSHA and MSHA performance goals were separate. Goal and indicator
achievements are distinguished by labels – O for OSHA, M for MSHA.
|
Performance Goal 05-3.2A
(ESA)
Federal contractors
achieve equal opportunity workplaces |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2001
Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2002
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2003
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2004
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Incidence of
discrimination among Federal contractors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9%
|
1.2%
|
Y
|
9%
|
1%
|
Y
|
7%
|
2%
|
Y
|
FY 2001-02: For
contractors participating in specified compliance assistance activities and subsequently
evaluated
Rate
of compliance findings for SIC 50
|
base |
50.9% |
Y |
51.9% |
58.4% |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001-02: For
contractors participating in specified compliance assistance activities and subsequently
evaluated
For
SIC 87
|
base |
49.6% |
Y |
48.6% |
64.5% |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001-02: For
contractors participating in specified compliance assistance activities and subsequently
evaluated
Rate
of findings of severe violations for SIC 50
|
base |
7.7% |
Y |
6.7% |
2.2% |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001-02: For
contractors participating in specified compliance assistance activities and subsequently
evaluated
For
SIC 87
|
base |
9.0% |
Y |
8.0% |
1.6% |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001-02: For
contractors participating in specified compliance assistance activities and subsequently
evaluated
Rate
of focused and offsite compliance evaluations for SIC 50
|
base |
36.5% |
Y |
37.5% |
52.8% |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001-02: For
contractors participating in specified compliance assistance activities and subsequently
evaluated
For
SIC 87
|
base |
27.8% |
Y |
28.8% |
50.8% |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compliance among Federal
contractors in all other respects of equal opportunity workplace standards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59%
|
72.4%
|
Y
|
61%
|
91%
|
Y
|
62%
|
86%
|
Y
|
FY 2001-02: For
contractors and subcontractors selected for evaluation, outreach, or compliance
assistance activities
Rate
of compliance findings for all supply and service closures
|
base |
52.9% |
Y |
53.9% |
62.9% |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001-02: For
contractors and subcontractors selected for evaluation, outreach, or compliance
assistance activities
Rate
of findings of severe violations for contractors and subcontractors that have
had prior contact with DOL/OFCCP
|
base |
9.8% |
N |
8.8% |
2.7% |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001-02: For
contractors and subcontractors selected for evaluation, outreach, or compliance
assistance activities
Rate
of focused and offsite compliance evaluation
|
base |
34.1% |
N |
35.1% |
49.8% |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data Source(s): Case
Management System (CMS)
|
Performance Goal 05-3.2B
(VETS)
Reduce employer-employee employment
issues originating from service members’ military obligations conflicting
with their civilian employment |
*Indicator target reached (Y), substantially reached (S)
or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2004
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Not Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Percent of USERRA cases resolved within 90 days of filing
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
85%
|
80.4%
|
N
|
Percent of USERRA cases resolved within 120 days of filing
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
92%
|
88.4%
|
N
|
Percent of USERRA cases resolved within one year of filing
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
99%
|
99.8%
|
Y
|
FY 2004: Indicators will
be established to target reductions in USERRA compliance problems that are
most severe and pervasive based on survey of veterans and service members
covered by USERRA.
|
base
|
4
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Data Source(s): USERRA
Information Management System (UIMS)
|
Performance Goal 05-3.3A
(ILAB)
Contribute to the elimination
of the worst forms of child labor internationally |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2001
Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2002
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2003
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2004
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Substantially Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Number of children
prevented or withdrawn from child labor and provided education or training
opportunities as a result of DOL-funded International Labor Organization
projects
|
50,000 |
25,800 |
N |
50,000 |
51,927 |
Y |
60,000 |
69,915 |
Y |
70,000 |
91,724 |
Y |
116,000 |
150,708 |
Y |
Number of countries with
increased capacities to address child labor as a result of DOL-funded
International Labor Organization projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
26 |
Y |
20 |
39 |
Y |
FY 2001-03: Action
plans, policies or programs established that combat child labor and/or
promote access to education for child laborers or children at-risk
|
15 |
13 |
N |
10 |
15 |
Y |
15 |
19 |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of children
completing education programs as a result of ILAB's Child Labor Education
Initiative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50% |
38% |
N |
FY 2003-04: Child Labor
Education projects that establish targets for education retention and
completion rates in project areas
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
6 |
8 |
Y |
8 |
16 |
Y |
|
|
|
Percent of children
retained in education programs as a result of ILAB's Child Labor Education
Initiative
|
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65% |
80% |
Y |
FY 2004: Child Labor
Education Initiative projects that establish baseline for rate of enrollment
and drop out for targeted children
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
Y |
|
|
|
FY 2002-03: Countries in
which new Child Labor Education Initiative projects begin
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
Y |
9 |
10 |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of target children
enrolled in education programs as a result of ILAB's Child Labor Education
Initiative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
98,394 |
Y |
FY2001-03: Children
targeted for prevention or removal from child labor, particularly its worst
forms, through the provision of education or training opportunities in new
DOL-funded programs
|
100,000 |
200,000 |
Y |
90,000 |
103,772 |
Y |
40,000 |
83,682 |
Y |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
Countries that ratify
International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 182 on Worst Forms of Child
Labor.
|
25 |
63 |
Y |
15 |
29 |
Y |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Data Source(s): ILO-IPEC
(grantee) through progress reports and project monitoring; Child Labor
Education Initiative Grantees
Note:
For FY 2005, retention result includes
all children enrolled in Education Initiative (EI) projects in FY 2001 and FY
2002, but not those who have completed the program.
Completion results
include children who were enrolled in FY 2001 EI projects prior to FY 2005.
|
Performance Goal 05-3.3B
(ILAB)
Improve living standards
and conditions of work internationally |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2001
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2002
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2003
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2004
Goal Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Percent of USDOL project
beneficiaries who consider the project to have improved their conditions of
work
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
63%
|
Y
|
base
|
62%
|
Y
|
83%
|
83%
|
Y
|
Percent of individuals
whose economic situation has benefited from USDOL project assistance
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
39%
|
Y
|
base
|
39%
|
Y
|
43%
|
60%
|
Y
|
Compliance with national
labor laws
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
base
|
3.78 million
|
Y
|
FY 2003-04: Percent of
workplaces exposed to USDOL project assistance that have implemented new
measures to prevent workplace accidents and illnesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
base
|
10%
|
Y
|
base
|
73%
|
Y
|
|
|
|
Employment-related
discrimination against persons living with HIV/AIDS
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
base
|
270
|
Y
|
FY 2004: Number of new
countries where HIV/AIDS workplace education projects begin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
7
|
Y
|
|
|
|
HIV/AIDS risk behaviors
among targeted workers
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
19,500
|
Y
|
Number of workers
participating in pension funds that are government regulated by project
partner agencies
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
3.545 million
|
Y
|
base
|
no data
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Countries committed to
undertake improvements in assuring compliance and implementation of core
labor standards
|
15
|
15
|
Y
|
7
|
41
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Countries that commit
with US/DOL assistance to make substantive improvements in raising income
levels of working families
|
8
|
10
|
Y
|
6
|
49
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Data Source(s): OFR
grantees and contractors
|
Performance Goal 04-4.1A
(ETA)
Build a demand-driven
workforce system by increasing access to workforce information |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
PY 2000
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2001
Goal Not Achieved
|
PY 2002
Goal Not Achieved
|
PY 2003
Goal Achieved
|
PY 2004
Goal Substantially Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Job openings listed with
the public labor exchange (with both State Workforce Agencies and America’s Job Bank)
|
11.2 million
|
12.3 million
|
Y
|
13.5 million
|
11.8 million
|
N
|
11.8 million
|
10.2 million
|
N
|
10.3 million
|
12.5 million
|
Y
|
12.994million
|
14.675 million
|
Y
|
Number of job searches
conducted by job seekers using America’s Job Bank
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
169 million
|
Y
|
170.788
million
|
138.567 million
|
N
|
The number of resume
searches conducted by employers from America’s Job Bank will be collected to
determine a baseline for setting future performance targets.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
8 million
|
Y
|
8.090 million
|
9.249 million
|
Y
|
New employers registered
with America’s Job Bank
|
60,000
|
66,563
|
Y
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Percent of new requirements
ratings for O*NET-SOC occupations
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
15%
|
—
|
21%
|
22%
|
Y
|
Percent of O*NET-SOC occupations
for which updated data are released
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
15%
|
—
|
21%
|
22%
|
Y
|
Web site visits to O*NET
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2.7 million
|
—
|
2.77 million
|
3.91 million
|
Y
|
Data Source(s): America’s Job Bank Service Center and quarterly state performance reports included in the Enterprise
Information Management System (EIMS).
Note: This is a new goal
for PY 2004. Data and goal achievement for prior periods were reported under
Outcome Goal 1.1 (Employment Service). O*NET indicators and targets appear
in DOL’s FY 2006 Congressional Budget Justification; however, they were
inadvertently omitted from the FY 2006 DOL Performance Budget Overview.
|
Performance Goal 05-4.1A
(ETA)
Assist employers in
meeting their workforce needs by providing them with expeditious
determinations on their applications to hire foreign workers |
*Indicator target reached (Y), substantially reached (S)
or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2005
Goal Not Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Percent of H-1B applications
processed within seven days of the filing date for which no prevailing wage
issues are identified
|
100%
|
100%
|
Y
|
Percent of employer
applications for labor certification under the streamlined system that are
resolved within six months of filing
|
base
|
57%
|
Y
|
The average cost for
processing a new PERM application
|
base
|
$523
|
Y
|
Percent of the H-2B
applications processed within 60 days of receipt
|
90%
|
85%**
|
N
|
Data Source(s): Automated
processing systems and fax/mail processing system
|
Performance Goal 05-4.1B
(ETA)
Increase the employment,
retention, and earnings replacement of workers dislocated in important part
because of trade and who receive trade adjustment assistance benefits |
*Indicator target reached
(Y), substantially reached (S) or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2001
Goal Substantially Achieved
|
FY 2002
Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2003
Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2004
Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Not Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Participants employed in
the first quarter after program exit
|
73%
|
65%
|
N
|
78%
|
66%
|
N
|
78%
|
62%
|
N
|
70%
|
63%
|
N
|
70%
|
65%**
|
N
|
Participants employed in
the first quarter after program exit still employed in the third quarter
after exit
|
80%
|
90%
|
Y
|
88%
|
89%
|
Y
|
90%
|
86%
|
N
|
88%
|
89%
|
Y
|
89%
|
91%**
|
Y
|
Percent of pre-separation
earnings for those still employed in the third quarter after program exit
|
82%
|
85%
|
Y
|
90%
|
80%
|
N
|
90%
|
74%
|
N
|
90%
|
74%
|
N
|
80%
|
75%**
|
N
|
Average cost per training
participant
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
$16,000
|
$13,358**
|
Y
|
Data Source(s): TAPR
(Trade Act Participant Report) included in the Enterprise Information
Management System (EIMS)
|
Performance Goal 05-4.2A
(OASP)
Maximize regulatory
flexibility and benefits and promote flexible workplace programs |
*Indicator target reached (Y), substantially reached (S)
or not reached (N)
**Estimated
|
FY 2004
Goal Not Achieved
|
FY 2005
Goal Achieved
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Target
|
Result
|
*
|
Criteria and timeline
established for regulatory reviews
|
|
|
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
FY 2004: Seek input from
the public as part of its decision-making process in determining which
regulations or regulatory programs should be prioritized for review for their
effects on small businesses and entities
|
Y
|
N
|
N
|
|
|
|
Unit cost baseline
established, and plan developed to identify practices that are not
cost-effective
|
|
|
|
Develop Plan
|
N
|
Y
|
FY 2004: Ensure that all
new regulatory proposals identify monetary costs, benefits, and net benefits,
and include a summary of this information in all Regulatory Impact Analyses
performed by DOL agencies
|
17
|
17
|
Y
|
|
|
|
Develop plan to review
all significant regulations for maximum flexibility
|
Y
|
N
|
N
|
Develop Plan
|
Y
|
Y
|
Percent of small
employers with access to health care benefit plans
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
base
|
—
|
N/A
|
Women's Bureau - Flex-Options for Women Project
Best practices for, and models of, flexible workplace practices are identified and publicized.
|
|
|
|
Develop Studies |
Y |
Y |
Women's Bureau - Flex-Options for Women Project
FY 2004: Companies enlisted as corporate mentors
|
40 |
41 |
Y |
|
|
|
Women's Bureau - Flex-Options for Women Project
Women-owned businesses seeking to establish workplace flexibility policies or programs
|
80 |
77 |
S |
|
|
|
Data Source(s): DOL's Spring 2004 Regulatory Agenda - Initiatives supplied by DOL agencies to OASP. Women's Bureau: Application forms from mentors and businesses; program progress reports; and informal conversations with participants. |