This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

U.S. Department of Justice Seal and Letterhead
 

May 3, 1993


SUMMARY OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
FOR MONDAY, APR. 26, 1993 THROUGH FRIDAY, APR. 30, 1993


4/26/93 U.S. v. Grow Group, Inc.
Criminal No.: 93 80473 (E.D. Mich.)

One-count information was filed in U.S. District Court in Detroit, Michigan, charging Grow Group, Inc., a New York corporation, with fixing prices, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, on perchloroethylene, a major dry cleaning solvent.

4/28/93 U.S. v. Sharon Brasseaux LeBlanc
Criminal No.: CR93-60010 (W.D. La.)

Two-count indictment was filed in U.S. District Court in Lafayette, Louisiana, charging Sharon Brasseaux LeBlanc, an employee of Charles J. Friedman and Pamela A. Friedman, owners and/or principal operators of Seafood Incorporated; Seafood Incorporated of Henderson, Louisiana; Acadiana Fresh Seafood, Inc.; and A.F. Holding Company, as well as the related company Southern Seafood of Louisiana, Inc., with one count of perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 1623 and one count of obstruction of justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1503, in connection with her testimony before a federal grand jury conducting an investigation to determine, among other things, whether any person or company engaged in the business of purchasing, peeling, processing, and selling crawfish, or their employees, had violated or were violating the Sherman Act, or other federal criminal laws, in the Western District of Louisiana and elsewhere.

4/28/93 U.S. v. White Swan. Inc.
Criminal No.: CR-H-93-132 (S.D. Tx.)

One-count information was filed in U.S. District Court in Houston, Texas, charging White Swan, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal office in Euless, Texas, with rigging bids, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, for the award and performance of contracts to supply wholesale grocery products to certain public school districts and other public entities located in southeastern Texas.

4/28/93 U.S. v. Barber Dairies, Inc.
Criminal No.: CR93-PT084-E (N.D. Ala.)

One-count information was filed in U.S. District Court in Birmingham, Alabama, charging Barber Dairies, Inc. of Oxford, Alabama, with rigging bids, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, for the award and performance of contracts to supply milk to county and independent school boards within northeast Alabama, beginning at least as early as sometime in the early 1980's and continuing thereafter at least through July 1989.

4/29/93 U.S. v. Oglesby Construction, Inc.
Criminal No.: 3:93CR730 (N.D. Ohio)

One-count information was filed in U.S. District Court in Cleveland, Ohio, charging Oglesby Construction, Inc. of Norwalk, Ohio, with rigging bids, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, for certain highway pavement marking contracts in New York State, beginning at least as early as March 1990 and continuing at least until March 1991. Highway pavement marking companies apply reflective material such as paint, epoxy and thermoplastic to roads and highways to form stripes, lines and other traffic control indicators.

Copies of legal filings are available from the Legal Procedure Unit, Antitrust Division, Room 3233, Telephone No.: 514-2481.

93-127