STRATEGIC GOAL SIX: Protect American Society by Providing for the Safe, Secure, and Humane Confinement of Persons in Federal Custody |
DOJ is responsible for the confinement of persons convicted of federal crimes and sentenced to terms of incarceration, and those charged with federal offenses and detained while awaiting trial or sentencing, a hearing on their immigration status, or deportation. Three of DOJ's components, the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), the United States Marshals Service (USMS), and the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), engage in activities related to this function.
BOP's primary responsibility consists of maintaining secure, safe and humane correctional institutions for sentenced offenders placed in its custody. BOP develops and operates correctional programs that seek a balanced application of the concepts of punishment, deterrence, and incapacitation with opportunities to prepare the offender for successful reintegration into society. Through the National Institute of Corrections, BOP provides assistance to international, federal, state, and local correctional agencies.
BOP conducts its incarceration function using a range of BOP operated institutions of varying security levels, as well as the use of privately operated facilities, including half-way houses, and facilities provided through Intergovernmental Agreements. While BOP deals with the unique problems that accompany the long-term custody and care of sentenced federal prisoners, BOP is also a major provider of detention bed space and operates several metropolitan detention centers. In addition, BOP houses all D.C. adult felons sentenced to a term of confinement. As of December 2001, 8,222 D.C. sentenced felons were moved into BOP custody, including 450 who were in BOP custody prior to the passage of the Revitalization Act.
Pre-sentenced inmates, persons charged with federal offenses awaiting trial, and persons detained while awaiting trial are primarily the responsibility of USMS. USMS does not operate any detention centers; rather it obtains the beds it needs to house this population from state and local jails and detention centers, BOP, INS and private facilities. USMS is responsible for ensuring that detainees make their scheduled court appearances, thereby contributing to the orderly work of the Federal Courts.
INS likewise detains persons who are charged with violating immigration law, have entered the U.S. illegally, or have been ordered deported. INS houses its detainees in its own detention facilities (Service Processing Centers), contract facilities, state and local jails, and BOP facilities.
The Office for the Federal Detention Trustee is responsible for the direction of the USMS and INS with respect to the exercise of detention policy setting and operations for the DOJ. The Federal Detention Trustee has the authority and is responsible for management of DOJ detention resource allocations, financial management of detention operations, coordinating with the components involved in detention on important issues, which include implementation of detention standards, detention planning activities with input from law enforcement components whose initiatives create the federal detention population, and ensuring the implementation of efficiency and effectiveness improvements in DOJ detention operations.
MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES
The Department has two material weaknesses in this area:
Prison Crowding - This has been a departmental material weakness since 1985. We anticipate that it will continue to be an issue given the federal laws (e.g., mandatory minimum sentences), increased resources for law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies, and a stronger emphasis on prosecution of gun-related crimes. New prison construction cannot keep up with the growth in sentenced offenders.
Detention Space and Infrastructure - This has been a material weakness since 1989. Both the USMS and the INS are experiencing rapid growth in their need for detention space. The USMS is experiencing a shortage of detention space near Federal court cities, due to the same reasons listed above for prison crowding. The INS, under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, is required to detain certain aliens until removal. These expanding needs for detention space place increasingly heavy demands on the USMS and INS infrastructure, including transportation, buildings, communications equipment, and staff.
The DOJ Office of Inspector General (OIG) includes Detention Space and Infrastructure in its December 2001 list of top ten management challenges facing the Department. The OIG also addresses the need for more bed space for juveniles, as well as the possibility that the Department's response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks will create an even greater need for detention space.
Performance measures related to these material weaknesses are noted.
PROGRAM EVALUATIONS
The USMS reduced prisoner medical care costs by $11.8 million in FY 2001 through application of its Medicare rate legislation authority (P.L. 106-113). Also, the prisoner medical care consolidation pilot program between the USMS and BOP was extended for another year at all federal medical centers and three BOP detention facilities (New York City, Miami, and Oklahoma City). The issue of national implementation of the medical consolidation pilot was referred to the DOJ for final decision regarding funding levels.
The USMS and Veteran's Administration (VA) executed an interagency agreement to permit USMS use of a VA contractor to re-price all its medical claims and collect vital program cost and savings data. This approach eliminated the requirement for the USMS to do its own procurement actions for these services. As part of the program implementation process, the USMS established a USMS Advisory Group of Administrative Officers from six districts to conduct a pilot project to test and streamline standard operating procedures and establish policy. The new system not lonely applies savings rates of approximately 60% per claim, but it also reduces the potential for duplicative claim payments. The pilot project was in place for six months and saved the USMS a total of $814,344 in prisoner medical car costs. The pilot was extended and full implementation is expected nationwide by the end of the second quarter of FY 2002.
The Department is responsible for ensuring these detainees are housed in humane and safe environments. To ensure detainees are being protected, the Department is conducting Conditions of Confinement Reviews (CCRs) of a sampling of non-federal facilities housing federal detainees. In addition, the CCR process is to result in an improved methodology for the inspection of non-federal detention facilities by DOJ inspection teams in the future. The CCRs, which began in November 2000 and are scheduled for completion by March 1, 2002, will cover the 40 largest use non-federal detention facilities utilized by the INS and USMS. These 40 facilities house approximately 30 percent of the combined INS and USMS detention population. As of December 2001, 34 of the 40 assessments were completed, 14 at INS facilities and 14 at USMS facilities. The remaining 6 INS facilities' CCRs are scheduled to be completed in the second quarter FY 2002. Corrective action plans are being developed for those facilities where improvements were indicated in the CCRs.
During FY 2002, the INS Detention Program will continue its use of the detention projection model to assess the impact of resource and policy decisions. In addition, in FY 2002 INS plans to continue to develop alternatives to secure detention with the aim of increasing the appearance rate at final order hearings. Alternative detention settings will be evaluated specifically directed at juveniles and families to reduce unnecessary separations and other adverse impacts.
Regular review of Detention and Removals Program management is conducted through the INS Program for Excellence and Comprehensive Tracking (INSpect). The scope of the review includes high-risk areas, including facility issues; security and control; detainee conduct and detainee services; transportation and escort; and docket control.
During FY 2002, the Federal Detention Trustee will conduct a needs assessment of detention and detainee handling requirements and will develop a baseline report for the present efficiency and effectiveness of all aspects of detention and detainee handling. Additionally, the Trustee will establish two regional detention pilot projects, one along the Southwest border, and one located in the Midwest. Elements of pilot projects will include centralized management of Inter-Governmental Agreements, prisoner transportation, healthcare management, and Cooperative Agreement Program grants under the Detention Trustee, as directed by Congress.
Additionally in FY 2003, when INS and USMS budget resources with respect to detention functions are consolidated within the Trustee, the Trustee will contract for the creation of a national repository for State and Local governments and private detention space providers to electronically post vacancies, rates, services, administrative costs, and availability, mode of transportation and medical facilities and services. Detention space and service providers will supply their daily rates, costs, and any applicable service fees, as well as the basis for the calculation of the rates. Those posting vacancies will also be required to list and provide a means for verification of their credentials and accreditations. The goal of creating this nationwide electronic detention space clearinghouse is to enable Federal users to find more cost-efficient space where they need it and a tool to control transportation costs.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
6.1: DETENTION Provide for the safe, secure and humane confinement of detained persons awaiting trial, sentencing, or immigration proceedings |
Annual Goal 6.1: Provide for the safe, secure and humane confinement of detained persons awaiting trial, sentencing, or immigration proceedings |
STRATEGIES
|
DOJ's performance plan includes goals to provide sufficient bed space for the expected increase in the detention populations of both USMS and INS. The INS detainee population levels are tied directly to the effectiveness of apprehension efforts and therefore affect the number of alien removals. INS has a severe shortage of bed space and the law enforcement personnel to handle the processing and removal of aliens in immigration proceedings, relative to the total number of potentially removable aliens in the country. Additionally, the INS has an increased emphasis on terrorist investigations, and will continue to focus its law enforcement efforts on identifying and removing criminal aliens and aliens who have been issued final orders of removal, but who have not appeared for their removal. These efforts will require increased bed space, but more importantly, increased levels of law enforcement personnel. The USMS pre-trial and pre-sentenced population is also expected to continue to increase as a result of growth in enforcement and prosecutorial personnel over the past several years. The success of DOJ's investigators and prosecutors at solving crimes, arresting suspects and trying cases places increasing workload demands on both INS and USMS detention activities.
MEANS - Annual Goal 6.1 |
Dollars/FTE
Appropriation | FY 2001 Actual | FY 2002 Enacted | FY 2003 Requested | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTE | $ mill | FTE | $ mill | FTE | $ mill | |
Breached Bond/Detention Fund | 31 | 61 | 44 | 119 | 44 | 169 |
USMS Construction | 9 | 18 | 9 | 24 | 9 | 15 |
Detention Trustee | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 18 | 1389 |
Federal Prison System | 3985 | 338 | 3985 | 350 | 3985 | 364 |
Federal Prisoner Detention | 0 | 617 | 0 | 706 | 0 | 0 |
FPS Building and Facilities | 9 | 9 | 0 | 153 | 0 | 0 |
Immigration and Naturalization Svc | 3338 | 835 | 3759 | 905 | 3807 | 819 |
Immigration User Fee | 159 | 76 | 173 | 90 | 184 | 91 |
Subtotal | 7531 | $1954 | 7976 | $2348 | 8047 | $2846 |
Skills
Deputy U.S. Marshals must be knowledgeable of regulations regarding restraining,
feeding, clothing and housing federal prisoners, and must ensure that prisoner
rights are not violated while in custody of the USMS. In addition, they must be
able to establish and maintain coordination with personnel from other law enforcement
agencies at the federal, state, and local levels. INS Deportation Officers and
Detention Enforcement Officers must have expert knowledge of applicable Immigration
and Nationality law, other Federal statutes, regulations, Executive Orders, Policies
and procedures; including rules of search and seizure, arrest authorities, and
Federal Rules of Evidence, INS Detention Standards and ACA accreditation standards
for detention facilities. They must also be proficient in various law enforcement
skills including proficiency with firearms and non-deadly force methods. Personnel
must maintain a high degree of interpersonal skills and problem solving and investigative
ability as well as ethical and moral standards consistent with the organization's
set of core values. They must possess strong computer skills with a variety of
office productivity systems and software, as well as with specialized law enforcement
and national security, databases.
Information
Technology
USMS is in the process of developing one centralized application, the Justice
Detainee Information System (JDIS), from its five offender-based applications.
The following systems are in place to accomplish this goal: the Warrant Information
Network, the Prisoner Tracking System, the Automated Prisoner Scheduling System,
the Automated Booking Station, and the Prisoner Medical Tracking system. JDIS
will allow the USMS to manage prisoners and track them through the entire judicial
process. INS systems utilized to collect detention data are the Deportable Alien
Control (DACS) and Criminal Alien Information System (CAIS). Ultimately, the data
will be captured in ENFORCE (the INS' enforcement case management database currently
being deployed).
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT - Annual Goal 6.1 |
6.1A Ensure Adequate, Cost Effective Detention Capacity (Management Challenge) |
Background/Program
Objectives:
USMS administers the Federal Prisoner Detention (FPD) program for the federal
government using funding appropriated specifically for the care of prisoners in
the U.S. The FPD appropriation provides financial support for the housing, subsistence,
medical care, and medical guard service for federal detainees remanded to USMS
custody. The responsibility begins when a prisoner is brought into USMS custody.
It continues through the trial process, and ends when a prisoner is acquitted
or arrives at a designated BOP facility to serve a sentence. The USMS pre-trial
population is generated by public policy and multi-component investigative and
prosecutorial efforts within the DOJ or other federal law enforcement agencies.
Since USMS, like BOP, is at the receiving end of the federal law enforcement initiatives
and efforts, USMS has no control over the number of detainees remanded to its
custody and has no option other than to house and care for the detainees.
Under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 and other immigration laws, INS is authorized, and sometimes required, to detain illegal aliens to help facilitate their removal from the United States. INS administers a national detention program using funding appropriated specifically for the care of aliens arrested. INS provides or obtains the transportation, housing, subsistence, medical care, and guard service for detainees held in INS custody. The responsibility begins when a detainee is brought into INS custody. It continues through the trial process where the detainee is found admissible to the U.S. and is released on bond or supervision, or until removed from the U.S. The detainee population is generated by multi-component investigative and prosecutorial efforts within the INS. The detainee population consists of criminals, non-criminals, unaccompanied juveniles, and families. These categories normally require different levels of custodial care. INS endeavors to place detainees into detention facilities that are appropriate for their custody category.
Everyday the INS and USMS are challenged to provide adequate cost-effective and appropriate transportation and bed space for each of the different categories of individuals placed into custody. Factors affecting where an individual is confined include: 1) the proximity of the facility; 2) the cost per bed; 3) health issues; 4) the amenability of a facility to detain aliens; 5) the security of the facility; and 6) if detention standards of confinement are being met. INS routinely utilizes its own facilities, contract facilities, state and local government facilities, and contract juvenile facilities to house detainees. Detention bed space for INS and USMS detainees are routinely acquired at the lowest cost to the government through: 1) Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs), where a daily rate is paid; 2) INS or federal detention facilities, where the government must pay for construction and operation of the facility; 3) Cooperative Agreements with state and local governments, where capital investment funding is provided in exchange for a guarantee of a certain number of bed spaces, for which a daily rate is paid when these bed spaces are used; 4) contract facilities; and 5) juvenile housing facilities.
Performance: | |
Performance Measure: Jail Day Costs [USMS] | |
FY 2001 Target: $60 | |
FY 2001 Actual: $59 | |
Discussion: The national jail day rate increased 4.3% in FY 2001--from $56.57 in FY 2000 to $59.01, slightly below the $60.00 target established last year. The USMS is housing a lower percentage of prisoners than anticipated in private facilities, where the per diem rate is higher. Any increase in the federal pre-trial population that forces the USMS to house a larger percentage of prisoners in private detention facilities will increase the national jail day rate accordingly. | |
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: Based on program performance in FY 2001, the USMS is increasing the FY 2002 target from $60.00 to $61.00 per day. The additional cost is reflective of increased detention needs and increased reliance on more expensive private beds. | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: $63.00 | |
Public Benefit: USMS acquires detention space at the lowest possible cost to the government through the use of Inter-Governmental Agreements, cooperative agreements with State and local governments, private jail facilities, and federal detention facilities. By obtaining this space and managing the prisoner population, detainees who are flight risks or potential dangers to the public were safely and securely detained for the length of their involvement with the judicial process. |
Jail
Day Costs [USMS] Data Collection and Storage: Data are maintained in 94 separate district Prisoner Tracking System (PTS) databases. This information is downloaded monthly into a Prisoner Services Division (PSD) Access database, where it is maintained. Jail rate information is maintained in PSD's Access database and is updated by changes to contractual agreements. Data Validation and Verification: Monthly population data are validated and verified (for completeness, correct dates, trends, etc.) monthly by PSD before it is posted to PSD's Access database. Jail rate information is verified and validated against actual jail contracts. Data Limitations: PTS is very time and labor intensive. Lack of a real-time centralized system results in data that is close to six weeks old before it is available at a national level. |
Performance Measure: Per Capita Costs [INS] | |
FY 2001 Target: $75 | |
FY 2001 Actual: $72 | |
Discussion: Per capita costs vary significantly between facilities due to the variability of population (gender, health, and number), facility ages, local economic conditions, facility security level, and so forth. They are tracked and managed on a facility-by-facility basis and are used in the prudent fiscal management of the detention system. However, they are not indicative of program performance in meeting adequate and appropriate detention for the alien population in custody. | |
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: Based on performance in FY 2001, we expect to meet the corresponding FY 2002 target of $75.00. | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: $85.00 | |
Public Benefit: INS maintains adequate capacity to detain persons in Federal custody in cost-effective, safe, secure and humane facilities, while awaiting trial, a hearing, or deportation. |
Per
Capita Costs [INS] Data Collection and Storage: Data are collected in the Deportable Alien Control System (DACS). DACS provides specific data about the detention stay of individual aliens. INS collects data on the average daily alien population in custody through manual tracking validated against DACS. The field consolidates statistics for each INS location and state and local jails used by INS on a weekly basis. Headquarters consolidates the data into a report that contains aggregate population counts for specific categories of detainees. Data Validation
and Verification: The statistics are corroborated through submission audits
and contact with field offices for missing information. DACS data validation and
verification is described in the Interior Enforcement section of Strategic Goal
Four. |
Strategies to
Achieve the FY 2003 Goal:
In FY 2003, DOJ will work cooperatively with the private sector and state and
local governments to establish and maintain adequate capacity to detain persons
in federal custody in cost-effective, safe, secure and humane facilities, while
awaiting trial, a hearing, or deportation. Specifically, we will obtain sufficient
detention space to house an estimated 70 percent of the projected daily population
of 43,137 persons in the custody of USMS in state, local and private facilities.
In addition, BOP will continue to support USMS requirements by housing approximately
30 percent of federal pretrial detainees in BOP facilities.
In FY 2003, INS will continue to work with the USMS, BOP, DOJ, private sector, and state and local governments to maintain adequate bed space to house detainees safely, securely, and humanely. Additionally, INS will work closely with all of its suppliers to ensure cost-efficiency of all detention facilities. INS will develop alternatives to detention that enable INS to better utilize its bed space, resources and manpower while maintaining compliance with immigration law. Efforts that minimize time in detention should facilitate an increase in removals, as well as yield cost savings.
Beginning in FY 2003, both INS and USMS resources related to detention will be consolidated within the Office of the Detention Trustee. This will centralize the majority of DOJ's detention activities, allowing for a coordinated Departmental effort when obtaining detention space and to ensure the Trustee has the authority necessary to direct detention policy and to manage detention resources.
Crosscutting
Activities:
DOJ works cooperatively with the private sector and state and local governments
to establish and maintain adequate capacity to detain persons in federal custody
in cost-effective, safe, secure, and humane facilities that meet all appropriate
standards. In FY 2003, when INS and USMS budget resources with respect to detention
functions are consolidated within the Trustee, the Trustee will contract for the
creation of a national repository for State and Local governments and private
detention space providers to electronically post vacancies, rates, services, administrative
costs, and availability, mode of transportation and medical facilities and services.
Detention space and service providers will supply their daily rates, costs, and
any applicable service fees, as well as the basis for the calculation of the rates.
Those posting vacancies will also be required to list and provide a means for
verification of their credentials and accreditations. The goal of creating this
nationwide electronic detention space clearinghouse is to enable Federal users
to find more cost-efficient space where they need it and a tool to control transportation
costs.
Additionally, the Office of the Detention Trustee will work with the Federal judiciary and the INS to expand the use of home detention, electronic monitoring, and video conferencing. As part of this effort, the Trustee will work with the Federal Judiciary on joint research efforts, pilot projects and in offering workshops for Federal judges on pretrial release and detention issues. The Trustee will also work with the Federal Judicial Center and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts to develop a risk prediction instrument to assist in the determination of which offenders would be best suited for home detention and/or electronic monitoring.
6.1B Operate Facilities that are Safe and Secure |
Background/
Program Objectives:
INS seeks the safe, secure, and humane treatment of detainees. INS has the highest
regard for human rights and public safety. Therefore, it strives to maintain facilities
that meet the accreditation standards of INS and correctional professions. Professional
accreditation and compliance with INS detention standards alone do not provide
an indication of the safe and humane treatment of detainees. Additional indicators
are needed to track progress toward this objective. INS will be reviewing its
detention program to correct facility deficiencies and implement the changes necessary
to achieve safe and humane detention facilities and detention methods for all
detainees.
INS developed and began to implement new service-wide Detention Standards in FY 2001. Initial assessments of INS owned and contracted facilities were completed in FY 2001 and will now be performed annually. The results of these internal assessments will become the basis for specific facilities' improvements and for service-wide program changes where indicated. Additionally, INS has committed to obtain American Corrections Association (ACA) accreditation for all of its owned and contracted facilities as expeditiously as practicable. Further, INS is committed to ensuring that, with the proper resources being provided, all facilities used for more than 72 hours, will be in compliance with INS detention standards by the end of FY 2003. Though detention space continues to be at a premium, these initiatives will ensure that the facilities and procedures under INS' control meet the highest standards and provide safe and humane conditions for all detainees.
Performance: | |
Performance Measure: Percent of INS Facilities with American Correctional Association (ACA) Accreditation (NOTE: All data have been corrected to reflect percentages based on a total of 16 facilities, 9 INS-owned and operated and 7 contractor owned and operated.) | |
FY 2001 Target: 88% | |
FY 2001 Actual: 63% | |
Discussion: INS continues to seek ACA Accreditation for all nine INS-owned Service Processing Centers (SPCs) and Contract Detention Facilities (CDFs). In FY 2001, 63% (10 of 16) SPCs and CDFs were accredited by the ACA. The facilities that are not accredited are working to receive accreditation and two are expected to enter the final process in FY 2002 and achieve accreditation in FY 2003, achieving the 75% target. This process can take as much as 18 months from the date of the initial petition until accreditation is received. | |
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: Based on program performance in FY 2001, we do not expect to meet the corresponding FY 2002 target of 88% and are decreasing the target to 63%. | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: 75% | |
Public Benefit: Accreditation by ACA provides INS with an external assessment of the conditions within its detention facilities with respect to their security, safety and humane treatment of detainees. In conjunction with the more comprehensive INS Detention Standards (that address the unique needs of INS detainees more directly and completely), these provide indications that facilities and detainee management procedures continue to provide for the detainees' and employees' safety and security. |
%
of Facilities with ACA Accreditations (based on # of sites) [INS] Data Collection
and Storage: ACA accreditation data reported are the findings, certifications,
and recommendations of the accrediting agencies. |
Performance Measure: NEW MEASURE: Reduction in significant events (assaults, escapes, thefts) Involving a Detainee or Employee by 5% (NOTE: This target may be modified subsequent to the development of the baseline in FY 2002.) | |
FY 2001 Target: N/A | |
FY 2001 Actual: N/A | |
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: FY 2002 is a baseline year for data collection in this area. | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: In FY 2003 INS will reduce significant events (assaults, escapes, thefts) involving detainees and employees by 5%. |
NEW
MEASURE: Reduction in Significant Events Data Collection and Storage: Data collection of incidents will be through the use of Significant Incident Reports (SIR). SIRs are submitted by regions to Headquarters as incidents take place. Incident data will be rolled up and reported on a monthly basis. There is currently no automated mechanism to capture incident data. An "incident" is defined as a conflict or disturbance between persons that may have a serious result such as an assault, escape or theft. Data Validation and Verification: Data related statistics are corroborated through audits and contact with regions for missing information. Data Limitations: None known at this time. |
Strategies to
Achieve the FY 2003 Goal:
INS will undertake several strategies to achieve this objective. INS will provide
safe facilities by adhering to the guidelines of INS Detention Standards, while
working with the ACA to develop a tailored set of ACA guidelines that fit unique
INS requirements. INS will begin a program in FY 2002 to inspect all facilities
it uses to house illegal aliens for more than 72 hours. Through a rigorous inspection
program, INS can ensure that those who are detained by INS will receive safe,
secure, and humane treatment.
INS will maintain facilities and methods that routinely segregate criminals from non-criminals, unaccompanied juveniles from adults, and strive not to divide families. INS will work to reduce significant incidences such as assaults, escapes, and thefts involving detainees or employees by developing officer and training standards and expanding detainee video surveillance. During FY 2002, INS will develop and implement an incident report tracking system to gather data for analysis of categories and reasons for incidents. The INS will then identify strategies and approaches to reduce the occurrence of these types of incidents. A reduction in incidents will indicate better monitoring, oversight, and custodial care of detained aliens.
Crosscutting
Activities:
DOJ works cooperatively with the private sector and state and local governments
to establish and maintain adequate capacity to detain persons in federal custody
in cost effective, safe, secure, and humane facilities.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
6.2: PRISON CAPACITY Ensure that sufficient cost effective prison capacity exists so that violent and other serious criminal offenders are imprisoned to the fullest extent of the law |
Annual Goal 6.2: Ensure that sufficient cost effective prison capacity exists so that violent and other serious criminal offenders are imprisoned to the fullest extent of the law |
STRATEGIES
|
BOP tries to accommodate the increasing population in the most cost effective manner, following a policy of adding capacity through the utilization of contract facilities (where the inmate security level is appropriate), expansion of existing facilities, the acquisition of existing private or other correctional facilities, the acquisition and conversion of military and other properties to prison use, and the construction of new prisons. During FY 2001, over 16 percent of the BOP inmate population was housed in privately-managed prisons, contract facilities, and other alternative confinement.
MEANS - Annual Goal 6.2 |
Dollars/FTE
Appropriation | FY 2001 Actual | FY 2002 Enacted | FY 2003 Requested | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTE | $ mill | FTE | $ mill | FTE | $ mill | |
Federal Prison System | 250 | 435 | 309 | 579 | 313 | 599 |
FPS Building and Facilities | 254 | 751 | 370 | 661 | 350 | 385 |
Subtotal | 504 | $1186 | 679 | $1239 | 663 | $994 |
Skills
BOP requires well trained and educated staff from correctional officers to the
warden, project managers to oversee construction projects, contract specialists
to negotiate large construction contracts, and innovative program specialists
to identify secure and community based alternatives to traditional incarceration
for nonviolent offenders.
Information
Technology
Inmate data are collected on the BOP on-line system (SENTRY); personnel data is
collected on the Human Resource Management Information System (HRMIS); and financial
data on the Financial Management Information System (FMIS). BOP also utilizes
population forecast modeling in order to plan for future construction and contracting
requirements to meet capacity needs. The United States Parole Commission utilizes
a parolee database for hearings and status of cases.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT - Annual Goal 6.2 |
6.2A Reduce Prison Crowding (Management Challenge) |
Background/
Program Objectives:
BOP facilities are crowded at 31 percent above rated capacity system-wide. While
state and local incarceration growth rates have declined in recent years, BOP
has experienced record growth: an increase of 10,027 inmates during FY 1998; over
11,373 in FY 1999; 11,436 in FY 2000; and 11,447 in FY 2001. Given increased resources
for law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies, and a strong emphasis on the war
on terrorism, this trend is likely to continue into the future.
BOP constantly monitors facility capacity, population growth, and prisoner crowding. As federal inmate population levels are projected to increase and continue to exceed the rated capacity of BOP, every possible action is being taken to protect the community, while keeping institutional crowding at manageable proportions to ensure that federal inmates continue to serve their sentences in a safe and humane environment.
Performance: | |
Performance Measure: % Crowding by Security Level | |
FY 2001 Target: 40% Low, 57% Medium, 56% High | |
FY 2001 Actual: 40% Low, 59% Medium, 42% High | |
Discussion: Crowding at high security facilities was lowered by activating two U.S. penitentiaries and entering into Intergovernmental Agreements with the State of Virginia to house approximately 1,200 high security felons sentenced in D.C. | |
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: Based on program performance in FY 2001, we expect to meet the following FY 2002 targets: Low: 40%, Medium: 50%, High: 47% | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: Low: 43%, Medium: 46%, High: 44% | |
Public Benefit: Society is protected by confining offenders in the controlled environments of prisons and community-based facilities that are safe, humane, cost-efficient, appropriately secure, and that provide work and other self-improvement opportunities to assist offenders in becoming law-abiding citizens. |
%
of Crowding by Security Level [BOP] Data Collection and Storage: Data are gathered from several computer systems. Inmate data is collected on the BOP on-line system (SENTRY); personnel data is collected from the National Finance Center (NFC) database, Human Resource Management Information System (HRMIS), and from field locations reporting on a regular basis; and financial data is collected on the Financial Management Information System (FMIS). BOP also utilizes population forecast modeling in order to plan for future construction and contracting requirements to meet capacity needs. Data Validation and Verification: Within BOP headquarters, staff in different divisions retrieve and verify data on a daily basis, analyze it, and formulate reports and projections. Data Limitations: Due to the unpredictable environment in prisons and other external factors, there may often be discrepancies between projected and actual numbers contained in the performance graphs. Most plans are developed based on historical data, past experience and joint agency efforts to project for the future. |
Strategies to
Achieve the FY 2003 Goal:
BOP continues activating new facilities and expanding existing facilities to add
beds to rated capacity. In addition, BOP contracts with private providers and
enters cooperative agreements with other units of government to acquire additional
capacity. DOJ will also begin to aggressively analyze existing private and other
correctional facilities for sale, which may offer a more timely and affordable
alternative to new prison construction.
Crosscutting
Activities:
DOJ works cooperatively with the private sector and state and local governments
to establish and maintain adequate capacity to detain persons in federal custody
in cost-effective, safe, secure and humane facilities. In addition, the implementation
of the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of
1997 is coordinated through the efforts of BOP, United States Parole Commission,
the District of Columbia Department of Corrections, and Detention and Court Services
and Offender Supervision Trustees.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
6.3: PRISON OPERATIONS Maintain and operate the federal prison system in a safe, secure, humane and efficient manner |
Annual Goal 6.3: Maintain and operate the federal prison system in a safe, secure, humane and efficient manner |
STRATEGIES
|
BOP places inmates in facilities that are appropriately secure and offer programs that provide for constructive use of time and afford an opportunity for positive change. BOP assigns a custody status to offenders that relates to the degree of supervision needed and ensures that offenders are placed in the most appropriate and least expensive correctional environment. Supervision of inmates is provided throughout the institutions wherever inmates are located or may have access.
Proper maintenance, modernization and repair of BOP institutions are essential for safe and secure operations. Failure to adequately maintain structures and utility systems erodes capital investment and multiplies the costs in future years of accomplishing the required maintenance and repair. BOP's Modernization and Repair (M&R) program provides the resources to undertake essential rehabilitation and renovation or replacement projects at existing institutions to ensure that structures, utilities systems, and other plant facilities are kept in a good state of repair.
In addition to routine scheduled maintenance operations, institutions perform detailed annual inspections to ensure that necessary systems are kept in a state of good repair. Prison facilities are subject to heavy use, since they are used 24 hours a day, with record crowding levels. They are experiencing extensive wear and tear, which must be addressed to keep these facilities safe and secure for both staff and inmates.
While prevention has an enormous impact on the safety and security of BOP institutions, preparation for actual emergencies is also critical. BOP continues to take a proactive approach to crisis management through training programs for its Special Operations Response Teams, Disturbance Control Teams, and Hostage Negotiation Teams.
MEANS - Annual Goal 6.3 |
Dollars/FTE
Appropriation | FY 2001 Actual | FY 2002 Enacted | FY 2003 Requested | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTE | $ mill | FTE | $ mill | FTE | $ mill | |
Federal Prison System | 17866 | 1663 | 19422 | 1733 | 19973 | 1855 |
U.S. Parole Commission | 84 | 9 | 95 | 10 | 104 | 11 |
Subtotal | 17950 | $1672 | 19517 | $1743 | 20077 | $1866 |
Skills
BOP must maintain a staff of project managers and professional engineers/architects
to ensure design compliance and monitor construction activities. The staff must
have broad knowledge of institution operations and management requirements. Project
managers must have a wide variety of construction skills and the ability to supervise
large inmate work crews.
Information
Technology
BOP utilizes the Physical Plant Review Program to incorporate physical plant and
infrastructure issues, repairs, and major equipment replacements. BOP also relies
upon the Computerized Maintenance Management System to track preventive maintenance,
equipment history, recommended replacement schedules, and costs related to institution
maintenance.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT - Annual Goal 6.3 |
6.3A Operate Facilities Efficiently |
Background/
Program Objectives:
The goal of the BOP Facilities Management Program is to ensure existing facilities
are maintained in compliance with security, safety, and applicable regulations,
building codes, and industry standards. During the past seven years, facility
training has been offered to both line staff and managers to develop staff skill
levels for present and future facilities operations. The current program was established
in 1994. The training has assisted institutions in lowering operating costs by
training staff to perform required testing and maintenance procedures in-house
and require less contracting with outside resources.
BOP is currently participating in a joint interagency agreement with the General Services Administration National Utilities Management Program (NUMP). The agreement provides authority to NUMP for negotiation and transportation of natural gas for use by BOP at various institutions. Institutions under the NUMP program will continue to receive the best possible price for gas regardless of fluctuations in the gas market.
Performance: | |
Performance Measure: Per Capita Costs | |
FY 2001 Target: $65 | |
FY 2001 Actual: $61 | |
Discussion: Crowding in BOP facilities resulted in more inmates in BOP facilities and thus, lower per capita costs than originally projected. | |
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: Based on performance during FY 2001, we expect to meet the FY 2002 of $63.00. | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: $65.00 | |
Public Benefit: Society benefits by BOP's stewardship in efficient use of taxpayer dollars. |
Per
Capita Costs [BOP] Data Collection
and Storage: The BOP collects and analyzes actual obligation data from the
DOJ FMIS. The actual obligation data are compared against the average daily population
to determine the per capita costs. Data Limitations: Information is limited by program/activity level and location. |
Strategies to
Achieve the FY 2003 Goal:
BOP maintains an efficient system by placing inmates in the least restrictive
and least expensive correctional environment appropriate to their custody and
security level needs. More BOP facilities are being constructed at existing BOP
locations to take advantage of the efficiencies afforded by shared services at
prison complexes. The BOP continues to explore new technology in fields such as
health care, distance learning, and security, which have the potential to contain
correctional expenses. The use of telehealth within the BOP at the medical referral
centers for telepsychiatry and medical consultations has helped avoid additional
costs of moving inmates in and out of institutions for medical care as well as
aided in avoiding costs to have additional medical staff on-site. The BOP has
begun implementation of the Primary Care Provider Team concept where inmates are
assigned to a specific team of health care providers. The concept is expected
to improve the continuity of care for the inmate population, as well as decrease
health care costs within the BOP.
Crosscutting
Activities:
BOP must work cooperatively with DOJ agencies, U.S. Courts, U.S. Military, other
state and local law enforcement, and numerous private and not for profit organizations
to successfully carry out its mission.
6.3B Operate Facilities that are Safe and Secure |
Background/
Program Objectives:
One of DOJ's most serious objectives is the safe, secure, and humane treatment
of detainees and inmates. The Department has the highest regard for human rights
and public safety. Therefore, it strives to maintain facilities that meet the
accreditation standards of several professional organizations, including health
care and correctional professions.
BOP significantly reduces the possibility of escape with long-term emphasis on security enhancements, physical plant improvements, enhanced training, and increased emphasis on staff supervision of inmates.
Inmate idleness is the number one cause of inmate unrest and violence in prison. Federal Prison Industries (FPI) is the most important correctional management inmate program in the Bureau of Prisons. FPI employs and provides skills training and ensures the safe and secure operation of the institutions. Not only does FPI play a vital role in the management of inmates, but it also improves the likelihood that inmates will remain crime-free upon their release from BOP facilities. A recent comprehensive study conducted by BOP demonstrated that FPI provides inmates with an opportunity to develop work ethics and skills, contributes substantially to lower recidivism, and increases job-related success of inmates upon their release.
Performance: | |
Performance Measure: % of BOP Facilities with ACA Accreditations | |
FY 2001 Target: 94% | |
FY 2001 Actual: 95% | |
Discussion: During FY 2001, five facilities received initial accreditation. The BOP continues to strive to meet the goal that all institutions will be accredited within two years of activation. Each year new facilities are activating which affects the percentages of facilities that can be reviewed in the outyears, causing the targets to fluctuate. | |
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: Based on program performance FY 2001, we expect to achieve the corresponding FY 2002 target of 93%. | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: 95% | |
Public Benefit: Institutions receiving accreditation from ACA provides an external assessment of BOP's ability to meet basic correction facility standards and ensure security and safety. |
%
of BOP Facilities with ACA Accreditations [BOP]* Data Collection and Storage: The data compiled by the BOP is gathered from three main computer systems: Inmate data are collected on the BOP on-line system (SENTRY); personnel data is collected from the National Finance Center (NFC) database, the Human Resource Management Information System (HRMIS), and from field locations reporting on a regular basis; and financial data is collected on the Financial Management Information System (FMIS). The BOP relies on an in-house database on Microsoft Access to effectively track and manage modernization and repair projects (dates and costs). All financial information is extracted from the FMIS system and entered into the database. Data Validation and Verification: Within BOP headquarters, staff in different divisions retrieve and verify data on a daily basis, analyze it, and formulate reports and projections. Data Limitations: Due to the unpredictable environment in prisons, there may often be discrepancies between projected and actual numbers contained in the performance graphs. Most plans are developed based on historical data and past experience to project for the future. * The BOP has several correctional complexes that are comprised of two to five individual institutions. In the past, each BOP facility was accredited separately including facilities at correctional complexes. Effective in FY 2000, the BOP's goal is to have facilities that are located together accredited as one. |
Performance Measure: Escapes from Secure Prisons | |
FY 2001 Target: 0 Escapes | |
FY 2001 Actual: 4 Escapes | |
Discussion: The overriding mission of the BOP is to protect society by confining offenders in controlled environments of correctional facilities that are safe, humane, and appropriately secure. However, the BOP is confronted with ever more sophisticated and dangerous inmates who pose a continued threat to escape. As such, BOP has developed strategies to prevent escapes emphasizing enhanced training, intelligence gathering, and sanctions (identification, detection, and deterrence). Additionally, as an agency the BOP: (1) utilizes maximum-security facilities to confine inmates with security and management issues; (2) develops intelligence teams and liaisons with all levels of law enforcement for the purposes of intelligence gathering; (3) monitors social mail, phone calls, and visits for evidence of criminal activity to include escapes; (4) makes use of additional cameras and closed-circuit video recording equipment; (5) identifies inmates with an escape history for closer monitoring and institutional placement; (6) develops emergency preparedness assessments; (7) holds major mock escape exercises; and (8) performs After-Action reviews following all escapes and implements relevant recommendations developed during the review process. | |
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: The BOP will maintain the optimum performance target of 0 escapes. | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: 0 escapes | |
Public Benefit: Society is protected by confining offenders in the controlled environments of prisons and community-based facilities that are safe, humane, cost-efficient, and appropriately secure, and that provide work and other self-improvement opportunities to assist offenders in becoming law-abiding citizens. |
Performance Measure: Inmate Assaults and Homicides (NOTE: While it is the objective of the Department to eliminate all assaults and homicides, the targets reflect predictions based solely on historical data.) | |
FY 2001 Target: 2,795 Assaults, 4 Homicides | |
FY 2001 Actual: 2,622 Assaults, 9 Homicides | |
Discussion: Every reasonable precaution is taken to ensure that all inmates are provided with a safe and secure environment during incarceration by operating institutions of varying security levels in order to house inmates in facilities that are consistent with their security needs. Institutions are designated as minimum, low, medium, high or administrative (encompassing medical referral centers, medical detention centers, etc.) As a result of improved design and construction, physical plant improvements, enhanced training, as well as an increased emphasis on staff supervision of inmates, BOP has experienced a significant reduction in the level of assaults. This fact is particularly noteworthy in the context of the dramatically increasing inmate population. Due to enhanced law enforcement efforts against crime, drugs, and weapons, as well as the enforcement of the Southwest border, an increasing number of Federal inmates have histories of violence and gang activity. These inmates are generally younger, impulsive, and confrontational. We believe this may have led to the increased amount of homicides in FY 2001. In an effort to prevent assaults and homicides, the BOP utilizes maximum-security institutions to confine inmates with management issues or chronic behavioral patterns that cannot be addressed in any other Bureau facility. Additionally, the BOP continuously assesses security procedures to assure the safety of our inmate population. While direct staff supervision of inmates remains by far the most important aspect of institutional security, the BOP has found the use of cameras and closed-circuit video recording equipment acts as a deterrent to misconduct, assaults, and homicides within institutions. |
|
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: Despite the increasing inmate population, the BOP will strive to minimize assault and homicide rates in its prisons. Based on performance in FY 2001, the FY 2002 estimates are 3,074 Assaults and 5 Homicides. | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: 3,381 assaults, 6 homicides | |
Public Benefit: BOP offers programs for violent offenders which aim to reduce antisocial attitudes and behaviors, emphasize the values of respect for self and others, the responsibility for personal actions, honesty in relationships, and tolerance. These skills are also vital for successful reintegration into society when offenders are eventually released from prison. |
Escapes
from Secure Prisons [BOP] Inmate
Assaults and Homicides [BOP] Data Definition: Assaults includes assaults between inmates and inmates and inmates and staff. Data Collection and Storage: Data are gathered from three main computer systems. Inmate data is collected on the BOP on-line system (SENTRY); Personnel data is collected from the National Finance Center (NFC) database, the Human Resource Management Information System (HRMIS), and from field locations reporting on a regular basis; and Financial data is collected on the Financial Management Information System (FMIS). The BOP relies on an in-house database on Microsoft Access to effectively track and manage modernization and repair projects (dates and costs). All financial information is extracted from the FMIS system and entered into the database. Data Validation and Verification: Within BOP headquarters, staff in different divisions retrieve and verify data on a daily basis, analyze it, and formulate reports and projections. Data Limitations: Due to the unpredictable environment in prisons, there may often be discrepancies between projected and actual numbers contained in the performance graphs. Most plans are developed based on historical data and past experience to project for the future. |
Strategies to
Achieve the FY 2003 Goal:
BOP ensures institution security through a combination of physical features, security
technology, classification of inmates based upon risk factors, direct staff supervision,
and inmate programs. BOP operates institutions at five security levels (minimum,
low, medium, high, and administrative) to meet the various security needs of its
diverse inmate population. Inmates are assigned a custody status (maximum, in,
out, community) which relates to the degree of supervision needed and ensures
that offenders are placed in the least restrictive and least expensive environment
appropriate to their custody and security needs. BOP utilizes technological advances
such as Ion Spectrometry and video surveillance to improve the safety and security
of both staff and inmates. Self improvement programs designed to break the cycle
of crime such as the Responsibility and Values Enhancement Program, and Wellness
Life Skills Building Program, and the New Pathways Program, in addition to faith-based
programs have proven to be effective combating behaviors which threaten the security
of staff and inmates. The Challenge, Opportunity, Development, and Ethics treatment
program for high security inmates targets the reduction of antisocial attitudes
and behaviors, and emphasizes the values of respect for self and others, responsibility
for personal actions, honesty in relationships, and tolerance, has significantly
reduced misconduct among program participants.
BOP employs a unit management concept at its facilities, focusing on effective communication between staff and inmates. This concept fosters high morale and promotes a positive atmosphere where offenders can observe and model positive behavior. The opportunity for continuous and open communication enables BOP staff to gather important intelligence informally and become aware of potential problems at a very early stage, avoiding more costly intervention later on.
BOP attempts to reduce the potential for violence with long-term emphasis on correction management programs such as the Federal Prison Industries, physical security improvements, gang management, Residential Drug Treatment Programs, renewed accentuation on basic correctional approaches, and a more interactive style with inmates.
Crosscutting
Activities:
Accreditation by the American Correctional Association (ACA) provides BOP with
an external assessment of its ability to meet the basics of corrections. ACA accreditation
provides external certification that federal prisons provide decent living conditions,
offer adequate programs and services, and accommodate inmate constitutional rights,
by ensuring compliance with more than 450 adult correctional standards developed
by corrections professionals in the public and private sectors. The BOP goal is
to have all institutions or correctional complexes accredited within two years
of activation. BOP will continue to prepare all activated facilities for accreditation
with ACA. In addition, BOP's National Institute of Corrections works with state,
local, and international corrections officials to improve management and conditions
in prisons.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
6.4: INMATE SERVICES Provide services and programs to facilitate inmates' successful reintegration into society, consistent with community expectations and standards |
Annual Goal 6.4: Provide services and programs to facilitate inmates' successful reintegration into society, consistent with community expectations and standards |
STRATEGIES
|
BOP employs a unit management concept at its facilities, focusing on effective communication between staff and inmates. This concept fosters high morale and promotes a positive atmosphere where offenders can observe and model positive behavior. The opportunity for continuous and open communication enables BOP staff to gather important intelligence informally and become aware of potential problems at a very early stage, avoiding more costly intervention later on.
All medically fit inmates will continue to work and have the opportunity to participate in general and occupational educational programs, psychological services, religious and fitness activities. Federal Prison Industries will strive to employ twenty-five percent of inmates in secure facilities. BOP will continue to provide residential drug treatment to 100 percent of eligible inmates.
BOP provides services and programs to address inmate needs, providing productive activities, and facilitating the successful reintegration of inmates into society. Inmate care includes: providing adequate medical care; meeting appropriate dietary requirements; providing a residential drug treatment program; providing general education and skills-based training, ensuring that all medically fit inmates required to work do so; and affording inmates the opportunity to participate in other productive activities such as "special needs" programs, worship services, adult education, and parenting classes.
MEANS - Annual Goal 6.4 |
Dollars/FTE
Appropriation | FY 2001 Actual | FY 2002 Enacted | FY 2003 Requested | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTE | $ mill | FTE | $ mill | FTE | $ mill | |
Commissary Fund | 478 | 0 | 619 | 0 | 642 | 0 |
Federal Prison Industries | 1666 | 0 | 2014 | 0 | 2061 | 0 |
Federal Prison System | 8235 | 1075 | 9188 | 1147 | 9522 | 1264 |
Subtotal | 10379 | $1075 | 11821 | $1147 | 12225 | $1264 |
Skills
BOP requires trained educators, program specialists, medical personnel, and industrial
experts with appropriate experience and education. The staff must have broad knowledge
of institution operations and management, and be skilled in applying, adapting,
and imparting their knowledge in carefully controlled, closely directed settings.
Information
Technology
BOP relies upon SENTRY computer system and other databases to accurately track
inmate medical, education, work and recreation programming needs.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT - Annual Goal 6.4 |
6.4A Provide Work and Education Programs |
Background/
Program Objectives:
BOP plays a vital role in federal law enforcement, not only by incarcerating offenders,
but also in helping to break the cycle of crime. First and foremost, BOP protects
public safety by ensuring that federal offenders serve their sentences. Through
imprisonment, BOP helps deter criminal activity by showing actual and potential
offenders the consequences of crime. To help break the cycle of crime, BOP provides
a range of educational and vocational training programs and counseling to assist
inmates in successful transition to the community upon release.
BOP provides work and education programs and other self-improvement opportunities to assist offenders in becoming law-abiding citizens. The BOP Post-Release Employment Study (PREP) demonstrated that these programs can lead to lower recidivism and improves institutional security by reducing inmate idleness.
Performance: | |
Performance Measure: % Inmates with a GED/High School Diploma, 7 Months Prior to Release | |
FY 2001 Target: 66% | |
FY 2001 Actual: 66% | |
Discussion: In FY 2001, 6,144 inmates earned their GED, which represents an increase of approximately 10 percent over FY 2000. A recent U.S. Department of Education recidivism study indicated that participation in correctional education programs, such as the GED program, reduced the probability of re-incarceration by 23%. | |
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: Based on program performance in FY 2001, we expect to meet the corresponding FY 2002 target of 66%. | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: 69% | |
Public Benefit: Research has shown that inmates who complete education/vocational training programs while in prison are less likely to return to prison than their counterparts who did not participate in programs. |
%
of Inmates with a GED/High School Data Collection and Storage: Inmate data are collected on the BOP on-line system (SENTRY); personnel data is collected on the Human Resource Management Information System (HRMIS); and financial data on the Financial Management Information System (FMIS). BOP relies on the BOP inmate tracking system (SENTRY) in order to identify and track inmates in work, education, and recreation programs. Reports on education and other programs are extracted from the SENTRY database, generally on a quarterly basis. One exception to this is the General Education Diploma (GED) program completion reporting that is provided by the American Council on Education, a non-profit agency, through its GED testing services. GED completions are reported to BOP headquarters with copies to institution and regional education personnel. Data Validation and Verification: Within BOP headquarters, staff in different divisions retrieve and verify data on a daily basis, analyze it, and formulate reports and projections. Data Limitations: Due to the unpredictable environment in prisons and other external factors, there may often be discrepancies between projected and actual numbers contained in the performance graphs. Most plans are based on historical data, past experience, and joint agency efforts to project for the future. |
Performance Measure: Number of Inmates Completing at Least One Vocational Program | |
FY 2001 Target: 7,927 Completed | |
FY 2001 Actual: 9,570 Completed | |
Discussion: During FY 2001, we exceeded the target for inmates completing at least one vocational program. | |
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: Based on program performance in FY 2001, we expect to meet the corresponding FY 2002 target of 9,491. | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: 9,571 | |
Public Benefit: Incarcerated adults who participate in training programs and acquire a marketable skill are more successful in obtaining gainful employment upon release. The public benefits on both social and economic levels (individuals provide economic support for families and pay taxes). |
Number
of Inmates Completing at Least One Vocational Program [BOP] Data Collection and Storage: Data are gathered from three main computer systems. Inmate data is collected on the BOP on-line system (SENTRY); personnel data is collected on the Human Resource Management Information System (HRMIS); and financial data on the Financial Management Information System (FMIS). BOP relies on the BOP inmate tracking system (SENTRY) in order to identify and track inmates in work, education, and recreation programs. Reports on education and other programs are extracted from the SENTRY database, generally on a quarterly basis. Data Validation and Verification: Within BOP headquarters, staff in different divisions retrieve and verify data on a daily basis, analyze it, and formulate reports and projections. Data Limitations: Due to the unpredictable environment in prisons and other external factors, there may often be discrepancies between projected and actual numbers contained in the performance graphs. Most plans are based on historical data, past experience, and joint agency efforts to project for the future. |
Strategies to
Achieve the FY 2003 Goal:
BOP will provide services and programs to address inmate needs that contribute
to successful reintegration into society.
The BOP is in the developmental stages of a residential faith-based living unit program to be piloted in various institutions.
Crosscutting
Activities:
BOP actively recruits volunteers to assist with religious and other services,
organizes community service projects, and holds mock job fairs through partnerships
with community groups, public service organizations, and other agencies in order
to raise community awareness, foster community relationships, and prepare inmates
for reintegration into the community and family units. During FY 2001, over 33,454
volunteers worked with BOP inmates inside and outside of BOP facilities.
6.4B Provide Residential Drug Treatment Programs to Eligible Inmates |
Background/
Program Objectives:
The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act (VCCLEA) of 1994 requires BOP
to provide appropriate substance abuse treatment for 100 percent of "eligible"
inmates by the end of FY 1997 and each year thereafter. As codified in Federal
Code 3621(e)(5)(B), to be eligible for treatment the prisoner must be: sentenced
to BOP custody; determined by BOP to have a substance abuse disorder; residing
in a BOP institution; and be within 24 months of release. An estimated 34 percent
of the sentenced federal inmate population has a substance abuse disorder and
requires some type of drug abuse treatment.
In response to the rapid growth in the federal inmate population with drug abuse histories, BOP developed a comprehensive drug abuse treatment strategy consisting of four components: drug abuse education; non-residential drug abuse treatment programs; residential drug abuse treatment programs; and transitional drug abuse treatment services.
Preliminary research findings suggest that the program is effective in reducing recidivism and substance abuse. The ongoing evaluation, conducted with the funding and assistance from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, reveals that offenders who completed the drug abuse treatment program and had been released to the community for a minimum of six months were less likely to be re-arrested or to be detected for drug use than were similar inmates who did not participate in the drug abuse treatment program.
Performance: | |
Performance Measure: 100% of Eligible Inmates Enrolled in Residential Drug Treatment | |
FY 2001 Target: 14,000 | |
FY 2001 Actual: 15,441 | |
Discussion: The National Institute on Drug Abuse and BOP's Office of Research and Evaluation are conducting a long-term outcome study of the Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program. Preliminary results of this study for inmates six months out of custody demonstrate that Federal inmates who successfully completed the residential program were 73% less likely to be re-arrested in the first six months after release than similar inmates who did not receive and successfully complete treatment. Similarly, among inmates who had drug urinalysis tests under post-release supervision, those inmates who completed the residential program were 44% less likely to test positive for drug use than those who had not received the treatment. The results of this study for inmates three years out of custody continue to support the success of this program. | |
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: Based on program performance in FY 2001 we expect to achieve the FY 2002 target of 16,000 eligible inmates enrolled in residential treatment. | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: 17,200 | |
Public Benefit: Preliminary research findings suggest that the program is effective in reducing recidivism and substance abuse. As stated above, offenders who complete the drug abuse treatment program are less likely to be rearrested or detected for drug use than inmates who do not participate in the drug abuse treatment program. |
100%
of Eligible Inmates Enrolled in Residential Treatment [BOP] Data Collection and Storage: Data are gathered from three main computer systems. Inmate data is collected on the BOP on-line system (SENTRY); personnel data is collected on the Human Resource Management Information System (HRMIS); and financial data on the financial Management Information System (FMIS). BOP relies on the BOP inmate tracking system (SENTRY) in order to identify and track inmates in work, education, and recreation programs. Reports on education and other programs are extracted from the SENTRY database, generally on a quarterly basis. Data Validation and Verification: Within BOP headquarters, staff in different divisions retrieve and verify data on a daily basis, analyze it, and formulate reports and projections. Data Limitations: Due to the unpredictable environment in prisons and other external factors, there may often be discrepancies between projected and actual numbers contained in the performance graphs. Most plans are based on historical data, past experience, and joint agency efforts to project for the future. |
Strategies to
Achieve the FY 2003 Goal:
BOP will continue to provide services and programs that address inmate needs and
contribute to successful reintegration into society. BOP will continue to expand
residential drug treatment programs in order to accommodate the increasing number
of inmates needing residential treatment. The percentage of inmates with a substance
abuse disorder has risen from 30.5 percent to 34 percent over the last decade.
Since FY 1997, BOP has been providing residential drug treatment to 100 percent
of all inmates needing and wanting treatment within 24 months of release. Based
on the anticipated growth in inmate population, BOP is planning to establish ten
additional residential drug abuse programs in FY 2002 and five additional programs
in FY 2003.
Crosscutting
Activities:
Eligible residential drug program graduates are referred to halfway houses to
be enrolled in community-based drug treatment programs which provide aftercare
to reinforce what was learned in the residential program setting. BOP works closely
with and monitors private sector drug treatment service providers to ensure inmates
receive proper aftercare.
6.4C Provide Cost Effective Quality Inmate Health Care |
Background/
Program Objectives:
BOP is working to control escalating health care costs. Unfortunately, inmate
populations have exhibited high risk behavior such as drug and substance abuse,
resulting in infectious diseases. This, coupled with an aging population and longer
sentences, has prompted BOP to work diligently at preventing large medical increases
normally associated with these chronic conditions.
During FY 2000, BOP and USMS conducted a pilot at three BOP facilities where BOP assumed responsibility for USMS prisoners' medical care housed in these facilities in an effort to consolidate some detention functions. All medical referral centers were added to the pilot by the fourth quarter of FY 2000. Cost data continues to be collected and analyzed to provide additional data for assessment of the program. The Department has collected comments from the BOP and USMS and will make recommendations regarding the future of the program.
Performance: | |
Performance Measure: Daily Per Capita Medical Costs | |
FY 2001 Target: $8.17 | |
FY 2001 Actual: $7.75 | |
Discussion: Costs were under the projected target due to the following strategies: continued implementation of medical contacts at all institutions using benchmark Medicare rates for negotiating the price of services; use of a prime vendor contract for pharmaceuticals; emphasis on hiring nurses instead of physicians assistants to perform routine medical care; and emphasis on prevention of illness. | |
FY 2002 Performance Plan Evaluation: Based on performance during FY 2001, we expect to meet the corresponding FY 2002 target of $8.03. | |
FY 2003 Performance Target: $8.37 | |
Public Benefit: Containing medical per capita costs benefits the public by ensuring that taxpayer dollars are being used wisely and prudently. Efforts to control costs in health services while providing a community standard of care to the inmate population shows BOP's commitment to providing a safe and humane environment while preserving government resources. |
Daily
Per Capita Medical Costs [BOP] Data Collection and Storage: Data are gathered from several computer systems. Inmate data is collected on the BOP on-line system (SENTRY); personnel data is collected from the National Finance Center (NFC) database, Human Resource Management Information System (HRMIS), and from field locations reporting on a regular bases; and financial data is collected on the Financial Management Information System (FMIS). BOP also utilizes population forecast modeling in order to plan for future construction and contracting requirements to meet capacity needs. Data Validation and Verification: Within BOP headquarters, staff in different divisions retrieve and verify data on a daily basis, analyze it, and formulate reports and projections. Data Limitations: While the data is both timely and reliable, there is little data available for comparison in this area. However, costs appear to reflect effective efforts at control escalating health care costs. |
Strategies to
Achieve the FY 2003 Goal:
The BOP will continue to explore new technology fields such as heath care,
distance learning, and security, which have the potential to contain correctional
expenses. The use of telehealth within the BOP at the medical referral centers
for telepsychiatry and medical consultations has helped avoid additional costs
of moving inmates in and out of institutions for medical care, as well as aided
in avoiding costs to have additional medical staff on-site. The BOP has begun
implementation of the Primary Care Provider Team concept where inmates are assigned
to a specific team of health care providers. The concept is expected to improve
the continuity of care for the inmate population, as well as decrease health care
costs within the BOP.
Crosscutting
Activities:
In order to deliver adequate healthcare to inmates, BOP utilizes Public Health
Service employees along with contract healthcare workers in BOP facilities, and
contracts with physicians and hospitals in local communities to provide care not
readily available inside BOP institutions. In addition, BOP has worked cooperatively
with the Department of Veterans Affairs and the National Institute of Justice
to implement telehealth technology at many BOP locations.