Office of National Drug Control Policy bannerskip
skip tertiary linksHome | About | Site Map | Contact

Marijuana: The Perception

How do Pulse Check sources perceive the marijuana problem in their communities? Baltimore and Washington, DC, are the only two cities where no Pulse Check source names marijuana as their community's most widely abused drug. In the other 19 Pulse Check cities, 30 law enforcement, epidemiologic, ethnographic, and non-methadone treatment sources indeed name marijuana as such. Interestingly, Washington, DC, is the only city where a source (law enforcement) considers marijuana to be the drug with the most serious consequences. However, an additional 10 sources in 9 cities (Billings, Birmingham, Denver, Detroit, Los Angeles, Miami, Seattle, St. Louis, and Sioux Falls) name marijuana as the drug related to the second most serious consequences.

Has the perception of the marijuana problem changed between fall 2000 and spring 2001? No sources report any change in their perception of marijuana as a widely abused drug or as a drug related to serious consequences in their communities. Three sources, however, perceive that marijuana has been replaced by another drug contributing to the second most serious consequences in their communities: the Birmingham law enforcement source believes that the diversion and abuse of prescription drugs have replaced marijuana, the Columbia (SC) nonmethadone treatment source believes that LSD has done so, and the Sioux Falls epidemiologic source believes that club drugs have done so.

MARIJUANA: THE DRUG

How available is marijuana across the country and what type of marijuana is available? (Exhibits 1 and 2) Similar to reports in the last Pulse Check, nearly all (39 of 41) epidemiologic, ethnographic, and law enforcement sources who discussed this question consider marijuana to be widely available in their communities. The two exceptions are in Boston and Chicago, where one source in each city describes the drug as somewhat available.

The types of marijuana, compared with marijuana in general, vary more in availability as perceived by the Pulse Check sources knowledgeable on the subject. The most common variety is locally produced commercial -grade marijuana, ranked as widely available by 24 law enforcement, epidemiologic, and ethnographic sources in all but 3 of the 21 Pulse Check cities: Birmingham, Detroit, and St. Louis. Six sources describe local commercialgrade marijuana as somewhat available, three describe it as not very available, and two (in El Paso and Washington, DC) consider it not available at all.

Sinsemilla, or the seedless variety of marijuana, is the second most common variety reported in Pulse Check cities, cited as widely available by 13 law enforcement, epidemiologic, and ethnographic sources in 10 cities spanning all regions of the country: Boston, New York, and Portland (ME) in the Northeast; El Paso and Miami in the South; Detroit and St. Louis in the Midwest; and Billings, Honolulu, and Seattle in the West. Another 13 sources in 10 cities describe sinsemilla as somewhat available, 8 sources in 7 cities report it as not very available, and only 1 source (in El Paso) says it is not available at all.

Exhibit 1. How available is marijuana across the 21 Pulse Check cities?*

Exhibit 1. A map of the US showing how available marijuana is across the 21 Pulse Check cities* according to law enforcement, epidemiological, and ethnographic sources. Marijuana is widely available according to both source types in Honolulu, Los Angeles, Seattle, Denver, Billings, El Paso, Sioux Falls, St. Louis, Detroit, Memphis, New Orleans, Birmingham, Miami, Columbia, Baltimore, Washington DC, Philadelphia, New York City, and Portland. Marijuana in widely available, according to epidemiological and ethnographic sources and somewhat available according to law enforcement sources in Chicago and Boston.
* The Columbia, SC epidemiological source did not provide this information.

*The Columbia (SC) epidemiologic source did not provide this information.

Back to Exhibits

Exhibit 2. What varieties of marijuana are described as "widely" or "somewhat" available across the 21 Pulse Check cities? How has availability changed (fall 2000 vs spring 2001)?*

Exhibit 2. Chart showing what varieties of marijuana are described as

Sources: Law enforcement (L) and epidemiologic/ethnographic (E) respondents
Widely available
Somewhat available
* Arrows indicate up, down, or stable trends. Absence of an arrow indicates that respondent did not provide trend information.
**While both Birmingham sources noted marijuana as widely available, neither rated the different varieties.

Back to Exhibits

Mexican commercial-grade marijuana is as available as sinsemilla, with wide availability cited by 13 sources in 10 cities: Boston and New York in the Northeast; Columbia (SC), El Paso, and Memphis in the South; Detroit in the Midwest; and Billings, Denver, Los Angeles, and Seattle in the West. It is described as somewhat available by another 12 sources across all the regions, not very available by 6 sources, and not available by 3 sources (in New York, New Orleans, and Washington, DC).

Hydroponically grown marijuana is considered widely available by eight sources in seven cities, all either in the Northeast or the South: all four law enforcement sources in the Northeast; both sources in Washington, DC; and the law enforcement sources in Miami and New Orleans. Another 13 sources in 11 cities describe hydroponic marijuana as somewhat available, 9 sources in 9 cities rate it as not very available, and 3 law enforcement sources梚n Baltimore, Billings, and El Paso梒onsider it not available at all.

As reported in the last Pulse Check, of all the marijuana varieties discussed, British Columbian ("BC bud") is least commonly considered widely available, with only four sources reporting it as such. Two are in the Northeast (New York and Philadelphia), one is in the South (El Paso), and one is in the West (Billings). An additional 7 sources in 6 cities give it a somewhat available rating, 8 sources in 7 cities consider it not very available, and it is not available at all according to 10 sources in 8 cities: Boston in the Northeast; Baltimore, El Paso, Memphis, Miami, New Orleans, and Washington, DC, in the South; and Detroit in the Midwest.

It is important to note that in some cases, the different varieties of marijuana can overlap. In Seattle, for example, the categories of "sinsemilla," "locally grown," and "hydroponic" are synonymous: the most common form available is locally grown hydroponic sinsemilla.

Has marijuana availability changed? (Exhibit 3) Marijuana availability remained stable at high levels between fall 2000 and spring 2001, according to the majority of Pulse Checksources who discussed this question (18 of 20 law enforcement sources and 16 of 19 epidemiologic and ethnographic sources). The two law enforcement exceptions are in Baltimore and Sioux Falls, where increased availability appears driven by increases in local commercial grades. The three exceptions among epidemiologic and ethnographic sources are increases in Boston, Denver (where both local and Mexican commercial grades have increased in supply), and New York (where an increase in local commercial-grade marijuana is noted). No sources report declines in overall marijuana availability.

In some sites where overall availability is stable at high levels, some shifts are reported for specific varieties. For example, the Birmingham law enforcement source reports declining availability for three varieties: Mexican commercial, BC bud, and hydroponic marijuana. Conversely, the Honolulu law enforcement source reports increasing availability for three varieties: local commercial grade, sinsemilla, and BC bud. Several sources report increases in hydroponic marijuana availability: the epidemiologic source in St. Louis and the law enforcement sources in Chicago, Miami, and Washington, DC. The St. Louis epidemiologic source also reports periodic rumors, thus far unconfirmed, of the emergence of BC bud. And the Miami epidemiologic source reports that two varieties have increased in supply: sinsemilla and Jamaican.

Exhibit 3. How has marijuana availability changed (fall 2000 vs spring 2001)?*

Exhibit 3. A graphic with arrows showing how marijuana availability has changed (fall 2000 vs spring 2001) by respondent type (L= Law Enforcement Respondent and E= Epidemiological Respondent ).* The graph is shows that marijuana availability is up in Baltimore (L), Boston (E), Denver (E), New York (E), and Sioux Falls (L). Marijuana availability is stable in Baltimore (E), Billings (L and E), Birmingham (L and E), Boston (L), Chicago (L and E), Columbia (L), Denver (L), Detroit (L and E), El Paso (L and E), Honolulu (L and E), Los Angeles (L and E), Miami (L and E), New Orleans (L and E), New York (L), Philadelphia (L and E), Portland (L and E), Seattle (L and E), Sioux Falls (E), St. Louis (L and E), and Washington, DC (L and E). 
* The Boston and Columbia, SC epidemiological sources and the Memphis law enforcement source did not provide this information.

L Law enforcement respondents
E Epidemiologic/ethnographic respondents
*The Boston and Columbia (SC) epidemiologic sources and the Memphis law enforcement source did not provide that information.

Back to Exhibits

How potent is marijuana across the country and how has potency changed? (Exhibit 4) Marijuana potency ranges from 1�percent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for Mexican commercial-grade marijuana in Detroit to 15� percent THC for sinsemilla in Honolulu, according to reporting law enforcement, epidemiologic, and ethnographic sources. Since the last Pulse Check, potency levels remained relatively stable in most reporting cities, except in Memphis, where potency for commercial-grade (domestic and Mexican) marijuana increased, and in Portland (ME), where potency of marijuana in general has increased.

Exhibit 4. How much does marijuana cost in 19 Pulse Check cities?*

City Type Unit Price Purity
(%THC)
Northeast Boston, MA Sinsemilla 1 oz $80�$100 NR
New York, NY NR Bag $10 NR
Hydroponic and organic 1 oz $700�$800 NR
Philadelphia, PA Local commercial 1 oz $150�$200 NR
Portland, ME NR 1 oz $175 NR
South Baltimore, MD NR Bag $5�$10 NR
Birmingham, AL NR 1 gm (joint) $10 NR
Columbia, SC Local or Mexican commercial 3�gm $10 NR
El Paso, TX Mexican commercial 1/4 oz $20 NR
Memphis, TN Local commercial 1 oz $25 5�
NR 1/4 oz $25�$30 NR
Miami, FL Sinsemilla 1/4 oz $100 10�%
Sinsemilla Bag $750�$1,200 NR
New Orleans, LA Domestic commercial Joint $5�$10 NR
Washington, DC Local or Mexican commercial 1/4 oz $25�$75 NR
Local or Mexican commercial 750 mg bag $20 NR
Midwest Chicago, IL Local or Mexican commercial Bag $5�$10 NR
Detroit, MI Mexican commercial 1 oz $150�$200 1�
Sioux Falls, SD Local commercial 1 oz $100�$150 NR
West Denver, CO Local or Mexican commercial 1 oz $100�$200 4%
Sinsemilla 1 oz $300 NR
BC bud 1 oz $500 4%
Honolulu, HI Mexican commercial Joint $5 NR
Kona gold Joint $20 NR
Sinsemilla 1 gm $25 15�%
Los Angeles, CA Mexican commercial Joint $10 4�
Seattle, WA BC bud 1 gm $15�$25 NR

Sources: Law enforcement, epidemiologic, and ethnographic respondents
*Respondents in Billings and St. Louis did not provide this information.

Back to Exhibits

What are street-level marijuana prices across the country and have they changed since the last reporting period? (Exhibit 4) According to law enforcement, epidemiologic, and ethnographic sources, commercial-grade marijuana (Mexican or domestic) ounce prices are generally in the $100�$200 range, except in Memphis, where a $25 price is reported. Sinsemilla tends to be more expensive, as in Denver, where it sells for $300 per ounce, although it costs as little as $80�$100 per ounce in Boston. BC bud is even more expensive, as in Denver, where it sells for $500 per ounce. The highest reported prices, however, are for hydroponic and organic marijuana, which sell for $700�$800 in New York. Joints and bags of either domestic or Mexican commercial-grade marijuana tend to sell for $5�$10. Since the last reporting period, prices have remained relatively stable in reporting Pulse Check cities, except in Seattle, where BC bud prices declined since the last reporting period.

"Early-in-the-month" bags?

According to the Baltimore ethnographic source, as a new marketing strategy, marijuana is available in individual joints, for $2�$3 each, toward the latter part of the month, when users' income is lower; then, early in the following month, it is sold in $5 and $10 bags.

How is marijuana referred to across the country? (Exhibit 5) Similar to reports in previous Pulse Check issues, "grass," "pot," and "weed" remain common slang terms for marijuana across Pulse Check sites. Additionally, as the New York ethnographic source states, "Brand names dominate the scene." Such is also the case in Philadelphia and in some southern cities, such as Memphis and Miami. Some of the more recent names in New York include "texas tea," "purple haze," "arizona," "elo," "hydro," "dro," "pellet," "beef and broccoli" (a combination of hydro and pellet), and "trees." In Philadelphia, some of the latest names include "$ signs," "8 ball," "horse heads," and "marijuana leaf." The Miami epidemiologic source gives further insight into some of the other names: for example, "'kryppy' is short for 'kryptonite'� because it's THAT strong," and "killer" is so named "because it's the worst; it stinks."

How is marijuana packaged and marketed? As reported in the last Pulse Check, the most common marijuana packaging in Pulse Check cities is plastic zipper or sandwich bags. Additional packaging includes loose joints in Baltimore and Portland ME); manilla envelopes, aluminum foil, and plastic wrap in New York; plastic coin zipper bags with logos in Philadelphia; balloons in Denver; and blunts in Washington, DC. No new packaging was reported since the last Pulse Check.

Exhibit 5. How is marijuana referred to in different regions of the country?

Exhibit 5. Map of the U.S. showing how marijuana is referred to in different regions of the country. In the west marijuana is referred to as grass, ragweed, skunkweed, good s--t, ditch weed, BC bud, ganga, dope, pot, bud, and blunt. In Honolulu marijuana is referred to as Kona gold, ditch weed, kaui electric, Maui wowie, bud, pakalolo (crazy tabacco), chronic, grass, and weed. In the Midwest marijuana is referred to as grass, loose shake, weed, dope, bud, smoke, texas tea, purple haze, arizona, elo, hydro, dro, pellet, beef and broccoli (hydro + pellet), trees, $ signs, 8 ball, hershey's kisses, horseheads, marijuana leaf. In the South marijuana is referred to as grass, gungie, weed, smoke, cabbage, broccoli, hay, bud, dank, herb, mota, blunt, dope, thirteen, mary jane, trees, joint, junt, green acres, kine, schwag, gree, dosier, chronic, green, red bud, bubbleberry, gold bu, hydro, teak, ink, clover, ragweed, ditch-weed, kryptonite, kryppy, crippie, regs, skunk, killer, reefer, KD, kindbud, blueberry, white widow, northern lights, and mota.

Sources: Law enforcement, epidemiologic, ethnographic, and treatment respondents

Back to Exhibits

MARIJUANA: THE SELLERS

How are street-level marijuana sellers organized? In most Pulse Check cities, independent sellers are the norm, according to law enforcement respondents. Conversely, in Portland (ME), where major local growers organize out-of-State and local distribution of the drug, most sellers are organized. In four cities, independent and organized distribution networks are mentioned: El Paso, Los Angeles (where organized distributors are affiliated with Mexican cartels), St. Louis, and Seattle. Epidemiologic and ethnographic respondents report organized distribution networks more frequently than do their law enforcement counterparts: most marijuana sellers are organized in Baltimore, Denver (where they are Mexican nationals), Detroit, El Paso, Honolulu (where they are loosely organized groups of two to three "runners" and often affiliated with Mexican nationals), and New Orleans (where they are organized loosely). Additionally, the epidemiologic sources in Chicago and St. Louis report marijuana sellers as both organized and independent.

How is street-level marijuana sold? Marijuana distribution methods continue to vary widely. All (21) law enforcement respondents report marijuana as sold hand-to-hand through acquaintance networks; most also report the use of beepers and delivery-type services. Epidemiologic respondents also report hand-to-hand sales, and most report that these sales occur via acquaintance networks. Moreover, beeper and cell phone use is also reported by epidemiologic sources in Chicago, El Paso, Memphis, Miami, New Orleans, New York, and Sioux Falls, and deliverytype methods are reported in Birmingham, Chicago, Denver, El Paso, Miami, New York, and Washington, DC. Additionally, in New York, marijuana is often delivered to offices, and in Philadelphia, it is sold primarily hand-to-hand on street corners.

Then and Now:

How have marijuana sellers and sales changed (fall 2000 vs spring 2001)?

The marijuana sales scene has remained relatively stable since the lastPulse Check report. Only a few changes are reported, with no discernible regional trends:

Baltimore, MD:
  • Marijuana sellers are increasingly younger, according to the law enforcement source.
Los Angeles, CA:
  • The use of electronic equipment, including cell phones, in marijuana sales has increased, according to the law enforcement source.
Honolulu, HI, and New York, NY:
  • According to law enforcement sources, ecstasy sold with marijuana is new this reporting period.
Miami, FL:
  • The law enforcement source reports that marijuana grown indoors and hydroponically is increasing, perhaps due to drought in the region
New York, NY:
  • According to the epidemiologic source, as marijuana, especially hydroponically grown marijuana, continues to be available, new brand names have appeared.
Portland, ME:
  • The law enforcement source states that marijuana sellers are becoming more organized and the amount sold has increased.
Washington, DC:
  • The epidemiologic source states that marijuana's presence on the drug market has increased.

How old are street-level marijuana sellers? Marijuana sellers are predominantly young adults (18� years), according to most law enforcement, epidemiologic, and ethnographic respondents across Pulse Check sites, but ages vary widely. For example, all age groups are equally likely to sell the drug in Billings, Memphis, and Portland (ME), according to law enforcement sources there. The Baltimore law enforcement and epidemiologic sources report adolescents (13� years) as the predominant sellers, and they are split evenly between adolescents and young adults, according to five sources: the law enforcement sources in Birmingham, Los Angeles, and New Orleans; and the epidemiologic sources in Chicago and Detroit. As in many other cities, Memphis has a wide diversity in the age of sellers: marijuana sellers there are predominantly young adults, but some are as young as preadolescents (<13 years), according to the epidemiologic source.

What other drugs do marijuana dealers sell? According to 11 of 21 law enforcement sources, marijuana sellers sell other drugs, most commonly (and as reported in the last Pulse Check) crack and powder cocaine (in Birmingham, Columbia [SC], Detroit, Honolulu, Los Angeles, New York, and St. Louis). Additionally, methamphetamine is sold with marijuana in Billings, Honolulu, and Memphis; ecstasy in Honolulu, Miami, and New York; heroin in New York; and PCP in New Orleans. Marijuana sellers typically do not sell other drugs in Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Denver, El Paso, Philadelphia, Portland (ME), Seattle, Sioux Falls, and Washington, DC.

Similarly, according to 8 of 14 epidemiologic and ethnographic respondents, marijuana sellers typically sell other drugs, including crack cocaine in five cities (Denver, Detroit, New Orleans, New York, and St. Louis), heroin in four cities (Baltimore, Denver, New York, and St. Louis), powder cocaine in two cities (Denver and New York), and methamphetamine in Denver. In Memphis, any drug available may be sold with marijuana. In St. Louis, many dealers, especially those affiliated with gangs, run a "one-stop shop," selling heroin, crack, and marijuana, as reported in earlier sections.

Do marijuana sellers use their own drug? As reported in the last Pulse Check, according to nearly all law enforcement and epidemiologic respondents, marijuana sellers are very likely to use the drug. Only the Denver and Honolulu epidemiologic sources report that marijuana sellers are not very likely to use the drug.

Are street-level marijuana sellers involved in other crimes? Nearly all law enforcement, epidemiologic, and ethnographic respondents view marijuana sellers as not very likely or somewhat likely to be involved in other crimes, although law enforcement respondents generally report higher crime levels than their epidemiologic counterparts. The most common type of other crime associated with marijuana sellers is nonviolent criminal acts, such as property damage and burglary. Additionally, gang-related crimes are mentioned in nine cities (Baltimore, Birmingham, Detroit, El Paso, Honolulu, Los Angeles, Memphis, St. Louis, and Washington, DC), violent crimes are mentioned in five (Baltimore, Los Angeles, Memphis, St. Louis, and Washington, DC), and prostitution is mentioned in three (Baltimore, El Paso, and Memphis).

Where is marijuana sold? According to law enforcement, epidemiologic, and ethnographic respondents, marijuana sales are widespread. Most (14 of 21) law enforcement respondents report that marijuana is sold in all areas of cities (central, suburban, and rural), four (in Chicago, Columbia [SC], Honolulu, and Washington, DC) report that it is sold mostly in central city areas, and three (in Baltimore, Los Angeles, and New Orleans) report that it is sold in central city and suburban areas. Similarly, four epidemiologic sources (in Birmingham, Denver, St. Louis, and Washington, DC) report that marijuana is sold in all areas of cities, four (in Baltimore, Honolulu, New York, and Portland [ME]) report that it is sold primarily in the central city, and two (in Chicago and Detroit) report its sale in the central city and suburbs. Additionally, suburban areas are the primary sales location in Sioux Falls, and rural areas are in El Paso, according to epidemiologic sources.

Marijuana is sold both indoors and outdoors, according to all (21) law enforcement sources; epidemiologic respondents tend to agree. According to law enforcement respondents, marijuana is sold in a wide variety of specific settings, most commonly streets and inside cars (mentioned by all sources), public housing developments, private residences, around junior high and high schools, and in nightclubs. Epidemiologic and ethnographic sources agree that marijuana is sold in a wide variety of settings, most commonly private residences and streets.

MARIJUANA: THE USERS

How old are marijuana users? (Exhibit 6) As reported in the last Pulse Check issue, adolescents (13� years) outnumber the young adult (18� years) and older adult (>30 years) user groups in eight Pulse Check cities: Baltimore, Columbia (SC), Denver, El Paso, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Portland (ME), and Sioux Falls (according to epidemiologic and ethnographic respondents). Adolescents and young adults are equally likely to be the predominant user group in Seattle. Young adults, however, are named as the largest group of marijuana users in eight cities: Billings, Birmingham, Chicago, Memphis, Miami, Philadelphia, St. Louis, and Washington, DC. Older adults are mentioned only in Detroit (where they equal young adults as the predominant user group), in Honolulu (where all three groups are equally represented), and in Boston. Since the last Pulse Check reporting period, the Memphis and Los Angeles sources note a slight increase among young adults, and the Boston source notes an emerging adolescent group, with an age of initiation typically between 14 and 16 years. A longer term trend is noted in Birmingham, where the young adult group has been steadily increasing for the past decade, in tandem with a decrease in crack use.

In the majority of non-methadone programs, the clients most likely to use marijuana are young adults. Preadolescents, however, are named as the predominant marijuana user group in two non-methadone treatment programs (in Baltimore and Portland [ME]), and adolescents are named in another three programs (in Chicago, Columbia [SC], and Sioux Falls). In the Los Angeles and Seattle programs, marijuana-using clients are equally likely to be adolescents and young adults. Older adults are named as the predominant group in the Denver program, they equal young adults in the El Paso and Philadelphia programs, and they equal both younger groups in the St. Louis program. The Columbia (SC) nonmethadone treatment source notes that the age of first use has become lower since the last Pulse Check reporting period.

Marijuana-using clients in methadone programs tend to be older than those in non-methadone programs: older adults are named as the predominant marijuana users in Chicago, Honolulu, Los Angeles, and Washington, DC, as well as in one of the Boston programs.

Both young adults and older adults are the predominant marijuana users in the El Paso and Portland (ME) programs. Only in the Birmingham program are young adults, exclusively, named as the group most likely to use marijuana. In the second Boston methadone program, marijuana users are equally likely to be adolescents, young adults, and older adults. The Pulse Check source at that program elaborates that methadone clients generally have been chronic marijuana users since their adolescence, and that marijuana tends to be the one drug they don't give up梥ometimes using it daily, sometimes several times a day.

How have marijuana users changed across the country (fall 2000 vs spring 2001)?

According to epidemiologic and ethnographic sources....

Several increases are noted in various age groups:
  • Boston, MA: Adolescents (13� years) are an emerging group.
  • Detroit, MI: Young adults (18� years) have been increasingly using marijuana, so that they now equal older adults (>30 years) as the groups most likely to use the drug. Moreover, adolescents have been emerging as a user group.
  • Los Angeles, CA: Adolescents constitute the largest user group, but young adults have increased slightly.
  • Memphis, TN: Young adults (18� years), the predominant marijuana user group, have increased even more.
  • Sioux Falls, SD: Adolescents constitute the largest user group, but the number of preadolescent users (<13 years) has increased.
  • Washington, DC: Young adults (18� years) constitute the largest user group, but older adults (>30 years) have increased.
An increase in female marijuana users is noted in two cities:
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Philadelphia, PA
Racial/ethnic distributions have shifted in a few cities:
  • Memphis, TN: White marijuana users have increased.
  • Sioux Falls, SD: An increase in marijuana use among middle school students (sixth through eighth grades) is reported among recent immigrants from Ukraine, Russia, and various African tribes. This large new population base bears watching for other emerging drug issues, especially among those of student age.
  • Washington, DC: Increasing use is noted among Hispanics, but that group is still underrepresented relative to the general population.
Drug use patterns have changed in a few cities:
  • Birmingham, AL: Marijuana is most commonly smoked in joints. Blunts are becoming pass�.
  • Memphis, TN, and New Orleans, LA: While joints remain the most common vehicle for smoking marijuana, use of blunts has increased.
  • Honolulu, HI: The combination of marijuana and PCP is a recent development.
  • Philadelphia, PA: A new practice, still rare, is reported: crushing and sprinkling the diverted prescription drug Xanax� (alprazolam) onto marijuana.
According to treatment sources...

  • Novice use of marijuana has remained relatively stable, but increases are reported in one methadone program (in Portland, ME) and in four non-methadone programs: in Billings, MT; Boston, MA; Columbia, SC; and New Orleans, LA.
  • Columbia, SC: The non-methadone treatment source notes an increase in Blacks and Hispanics, an increase in females, and a lower age of first use.
  • Honolulu, HI: The methadone treatment source notes a decline in the number of marijuana/drug combinations.

Why do methadone clients take marijuana?

According to a Boston treatment source, methadone clients sometimes use marijuana daily, sometimes several times a day, for several possible reasons:

  • To potentiate the methadone
  • To temper their heroin cravings
  • As a sleep aid, to counter the impact methadone sometimes has on sleep

Are there any gender differences in who uses marijuana? According to epidemiologic and ethnographic sources, males are more likely than females to use marijuana in all but five Pulse Check cities. In Boston, Chicago, Portland (ME), Sioux Falls, and Washington, DC, males and females are equally likely to do so. Further breakdowns by age, however, show different gender distributions. In Detroit, for example, older marijuana users tend to be males, but the emerging adolescent group appears evenly split between the genders. Since the last Pulse Check reporting period, an increase in female marijuana users has been noted in New Orleans and Philadelphia.

In the treatment population, more than in the population described by epidemiologic and ethnographic sources, both genders are equally likely to use marijuana. Such is the case in 11 non-methadone programs: in all five cities in the West, in both Sioux Falls programs, and in Memphis, Philadelphia, Portland (ME), and Washington, DC. Males predominate in the remaining nine programs where this information was provided. In the Columbia (SC) program, where males are the predominant marijuana users, females have increased since the last Pulse Check reporting period. Similarly, in methadone treatment programs, marijuana users are more likely to be evenly split between the two genders (as reported in Chicago, Honolulu, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Portland [ME], and one of the Boston programs) than to be primarily males (as in Birmingham, El Paso, Washington, DC, and the second Boston program).

Is any racial/ethnic group more likely to use marijuana? As noted in the last Pulse Check issue, the marijuana problem cuts across all racial/ethnic groups. Nine epidemiologic and ethnographic respondents (in Billings, Birmingham, Chicago, El Paso, Philadelphia, Portland [ME], St. Louis, Seattle, and Sioux Falls) report that racial/ethnic distributions are fairly representative of their respective cities' populations. White users are more prominent in the Midwest (in Detroit, Sioux Falls, and St. Louis), in the West (in Billings, Denver, Los Angeles, and Seattle), and in Memphis, Miami, and Portland. The Los Angeles epidemiologic source adds that Whites, who now trail Hispanics in Los Angeles' general population distribution, are nevertheless the most likely to use marijuana. In Birmingham, Whites and Blacks are equally likely to use marijuana. Blacks are more likely than other racial/ethnic groups to use marijuana in six cities: Baltimore, Chicago, Columbia (SC), New Orleans, Philadelphia, and Washington, DC. In Honolulu, Asians are the likeliest to use marijuana, but they are underrepresented relative to the general population. While Hispanics are not Philadelphia's largest marijuana-using population, they are overrepresented relative to the general population. The only racial/ethnic shift reported by epidemiologic/ ethnographic sources since the last Pulse Check reporting period is an increase in White marijuana users in Memphis.

Similarly, reports from treatment sources show how the marijuana problem touches all racial/ethnic groups. According to non-methadone treatment sources, marijuana users are predominantly Whites in 9 programs (in Billings, Columbia [SC], El Paso, Los Angeles, Memphis, Philadelphia, Portland [ME], Seattle, and Sioux Falls), Blacks in 11 programs (in Baltimore, Birmingham, Detroit, El Paso, Los Angeles, Memphis, Miami, New Orleans, New York, Philadelphia, and Washington, DC), Hispanics in 4 programs (in Chicago, El Paso, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia), and Asians in 2 programs (in Honolulu and Los Angeles). (Sources in El Paso, Los Angeles, Memphis, and Philadelphia list more than one group as predominant.) The Columbia non-methadone treatment source notes an increase in Black and Hispanic marijuana users since the last Pulse Check.

According to methadone treatment sources, Whites are the predominant marijuana users in four programs (in Boston, Honolulu, Los Angeles, and New Orleans), Blacks in three (in Birmingham, Chicago, and Washington, DC), Hispanics in three (in El Paso, Los Angeles, and New Orleans), and Asians in the Honolulu program. (The Honolulu and New Orleans sources list more than one group.)

Exhibit 6. What age group is most likely to use marijuana?

Exhibit 6. Bar chart showing what age group is most likely to use marijuana by source (epidemilogic/ethnographer, non-methadone treatment, and methadone treatment sources) and age (preadolescents - under 13, adolescents - 13-17 years, young adults - 18-30 years, older adults - over 30 years old). Epidemiological/ethnographer sources report that young adults were most likely to be marijuana users followed by adolescents and older adults. Non-methadone treatment sources report that young adults were most likely to use marijuana followed by adolescents, older adults, and preadolescents. Methadone treatment sources report that older adults were most likely to use marijuana followed by young adults and adolescents.

Note: In some cities, more than one age group is named.

Back to Exhibits

Is any socioeconomic group more likely to use marijuana? As with race/ethnicity, marijuana use knows no socioeconomic bounds. Epidemiologic and ethnographic sources report that all SES groups are represented relatively evenly among marijuana users in six Pulse Check cities: Denver, Detroit, Honolulu, New Orleans, Portland (ME), and St. Louis. Middle SES groups are more likely to use marijuana in seven cities (Billings, Chicago, El Paso, Los Angeles, Memphis, Miami, and Sioux Falls), and low SES groups are named in five (Baltimore, Columbia [SC], New York, Philadelphia, and Washington, DC). The Birmingham source names both low and high SES groups as the most likely to use marijuana, and the Seattle source names low to middle SES groups. No changes are reported since the last Pulse Check reporting period.

Non-methadone treatment sources, however, paint a somewhat different picture. The majority (in 15 cities) report that marijuana-using clients in their programs are likely to come from low SES backgrounds. Only two (in Denver and Sioux Falls) name the middle SES group, and another two (in El Paso and Los Angeles) name both the low and middle SES groups. St. Louis is the only Pulse Check city where marijuana-using clients are equally likely to come from all three (low, middle, and high) SES groups. According to methadone treatment sources, low SES groups predominate in five programs, middle SES groups in two, and both low and middle SES groups in one (Boston); New Orleans is the only city where all three SES groups are named.

Where do marijuana users tend to reside? (Exhibit 7) As reported in the last Pulse Check, marijuana users, more so than other drug users, reside "everywhere"梐 term used by numerous sources to refer to central city, suburban, and rural places of residence. Specifically, epidemiologic and ethnographic sources report all three locations in nine Pulse Check cities: Birmingham, El Paso, Miami, and New Orleans in the South; Detroit and St. Louis in the Midwest; and Denver, Honolulu, and Seattle in the West. Suburban residences are more predominant in Billings, Los Angeles, and Sioux Falls, and both suburban and central city residences are reported in Boston and Chicago. central city residences are more commonly reported in the Northeast (in New York, Philadelphia, and梐long with rural areas梚n Portland [ME]) and the South (in Baltimore, Columbia [SC], Memphis, and Washington, DC). Since the last Pulse Check, the El Paso epidemiologic source notes an increase in marijuana users living in rural areas. That shift, however, is probably not due to new use: more likely, it is because more outreach efforts are reaching those areas.

Marijuana users in non-methadone treatment programs are likely to live in central city areas, as reported in 12 Pulse Checkcities (New York and Philadelphia in the Northeast; Baltimore, Birmingham, El Paso, Miami, New Orleans, and Washington, DC, in the South; Chicago and Detroit in the Midwest; and Billings, Denver, and Los Angeles in the West). They are likely to reside in the suburbs in Columbia (SC), El Paso, Portland (ME), and Seattle, while rural areas predominate in both Sioux Falls programs. Only in Honolulu and St. Louis are clients likely to live in all three types of locations.

According to responding methadone treatment sources, marijuana users in six programs reside predominantly in central city areas (in Birmingham, Boston, Chicago, El Paso, Portland [ME], and Washington, DC), those in Los Angeles live in both central city and suburban areas, and those in a second Boston program live in the suburbs. All three types of locations are named in Honolulu and New Orleans.

Exhibit 7. Where are drug users most likely to reside?

Exhibit 7. Bar chart showing where drug users are most likely to reside by drug type (marijuana, powder cocaine, crack, and heroin) and area (rural, suburbs, central city, and all areas). Marijuana users are equally as likely to reside in central cities as all areas followed by suburbs and rural areas. Powder cocaine users are most likely to reside in central cities followed by suburbs and all areas and rural areas equally. Crack users are most likely to reside in central cities, followed by suburbs and all areas. Heroin users are most likely to reside in central cities followed by suburbs.

Sources: Epidemiologic and ethnographic respondents Note: Some respondents list two areas per city.

Back to Exhibits

How do marijuana users wind up in treatment? (Exhibit 8) The vast majority (17 of 21) of non-methadone treatment sources report that marijuana clients at their programs come mainly from court or criminal justice referrals. These findings differ from those in the last Pulse Check in two ways. First, during the last reporting period, the number of marijuana clients exceeded crack and heroin clients in court or criminal justice referrals, whereas during the current period, heroin and crack clients have slightly surpassed marijuana clients in this type of referral. Second, the proportions of clients with criminal justice referrals have increased for all three drugs: from less than 50 percent of responding sources during the last reporting period to more than 80 percent during the current period. These percentages should be viewed with caution because the numbers involved are relatively small and because we cannot generalize Pulse Check findings to the general treatment population. That said, these findings make sense in light of the growing legislative trend toward diverting misdemeanor drug abusers out of law enforcement and into treatment.

Comparatively few non-methadone treatment sources list referral sources other than courts or the criminal justice system. Only four list alcohol or drug abuse health care providers (in Memphis, Philadelphia, Portland [ME], and Washington, DC), three name individual referrals (in El Paso, Memphis, and Washington, DC), another three name school referrals (in Baltimore, Chicago, and Columbia [SC]), two name employer referrals (in Honolulu and Washington, DC), and only one (in Memphis) lists other health care providers.

Exhibit 8. How are different drug users referred to treatment?

Exhibit 8. Bar chart showing how different drug users are referred to treatment by drug type (marijuana, heroin, and crack) and referral source (court/criminal justice, alcohol/drug abuse health care provider, individual, school, employer, and health care provider) according to non-methadone treatment respondents. The majority of non-methadone treatment sources report that marijuana, heroin, and crack clients in their programs are referred by court or criminal justice referrals.

Sources: Non-methadone treatment respondents

Back to Exhibits

How do marijuana users take marijuana? Joints seem to be the most common vehicle for smoking marijuana, as reported by the vast majority of epidemiologic and ethnographic respondents. However, blunts (hollowed-out cigars filled with marijuana) are more common than joints in Baltimore and Philadelphia, and they are nearly as common as joints in Birmingham, but they are reportedly becoming passé in that city. In some cities, different subgroups of marijuana users prefer different vehicles for smoking marijuana. In Boston, for example, central city residents tend to use blunts, while suburban residents tend to use joints. Similarly, in St. Louis, Blacks who live in the central city tend to use blunts. Increases in blunt use are reported in Memphis and New Orleans, although in the latter city they are not referred to by that term. Pipes and "bongs" are other vehicles for smoking marijuana, as reported in Denver, Miami, and Seattle.

Non-methadone treatment sources report blunts as the predominant vehicle more often than epidemiologic and ethnographic sources. Such is the case in nine programs: in Baltimore, Chicago, Columbia (SC), El Paso, Honolulu, New Orleans, Seattle, Sioux Falls, and Washington, DC.

Additionally, marijuana users in Birmingham, Boston, Los Angeles, Memphis, and the second Sioux Falls program are equally likely to use blunts and joints. Joints are more common in Billings, Detroit, Miami, New York, Philadelphia, and Portland (ME). Most clients in Denver, and some in Los Angeles and Sioux Falls, tend to smoke marijuana in pipes.

Eight out of nine methadone treatment respondents report that their clients smoke marijuana in joints (in Boston, Chicago, El Paso, Honolulu, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Portland [ME], and Washington, DC). In a second Boston program, however, marijuana smokers are equally likely to use joints, blunts, and bongs.

What other drugs do marijuana users take? (Exhibit 9) According to epidemiologic and ethnographic sources, marijuana users often also use crack, sometimes sequentially and sometimes in combination, particularly throughout the Northeast (in Boston, New York, and Philadelphia), the South (in Birmingham, Columbia [SC], El Paso, Memphis, and Washington, DC), and the Midwest (in Chicago, Detroit, and St. Louis). Powder cocaine is sometimes used with marijuana in Memphis, Miami, and Philadelphia. The Boston ethnographic source hears occasional reports about marijuana being mixed with both heroin and cocaine, but has not personally observed such cases. As that source notes, "Heroin users tend not to use marijuana because they have to be on their toes too much." In Philadelphia, some users occasionally crumble and sprinkle the diverted prescription drug alprazolam (Xanax�) onto marijuana; others sometimes mix honey into marijuana to add flavor and "slow the burn." In Miami, marijuana is taken with ecstasy, and in Memphis, marijuana is laced with methamphetamine or amphetamine梐 combination that has increased since the last reporting period. PCP lacing or dipping is reported in Boston, Chicago, Honolulu, New Orleans, New York, Philadelphia, and Washington, DC. The PCP combination in Honolulu is a recent development. Elsewhere in the West, the only other drugs mentioned are embalming fluid in Seattle, and club drugs (ecstasy, LSD, and GHB) in Los Angeles.

Marijuana: First drug of abuse?

According to the Los Angeles epidemiologic source, "Marijuana is not always the precursor to other drug use: now, it sometimes follows club drug use. Some 'rave kids' start by using GHB, then move on to ecstasy, and subsequently end up using marijuana. Some of these users have never even smoked cigarettes."

Exhibit 9. What are some slang terms for drug combinations involving marijuana?

Marijuana combined with what drug Slang Term City
Marijuana + crack Oolies Boston
Coolies New York
Diablitos or turbos Philadelphia
Worties Washington, DC
Marijuana dipped in same water used to cook crack Elo New York
Marijuana + powder cocaine Primos Chicago, El Paso, Los Angeles
Marijuana + PCP Wets New York, Philadelphia
Love boat Philadelphia

Sources: Epidemiologic, ethnographic, and treatment provider respondents

Back to Exhibits

Marijuana users in several nonmethadone treatment programs also take crack. Such reports, like those of epidemiologic and ethnographic sources, occur in the South (in Miami, New Orleans, and Washington, DC) and in the Midwest (in Detroit and Sioux Falls). Unlike epidemiologic and ethnographic reports, no crack use is noted in the Northeast, but two reports emanate from the West (in Billings and Seattle). Marijuana clients in Birmingham, Chicago, Columbia (SC), El Paso, and Los Angeles use powder cocaine. The Birmingham source notes that sometimes the dealer laces the marijuana with cocaine, but with the user's knowledge. PCP use is noted among marijuana clients in Billings, Chicago, Memphis, Miami, Portland (ME), and Washington, DC. In Billings and Chicago, embalming fluid is sometimes added to the marijuana-PCP mixture. Embalming fluid is also mentioned in Birmingham, where some clients soak marijuana in the substance. Marijuana clients in Billings and Sioux Falls sometimes use methamphetamine. Heroin is mentioned only in Philadelphia and St. Louis, but the St. Louis source notes that "Most marijuana users don't use anything else but alcohol. On the other hand, most hardcore drug users also smoke marijuana."

In methadone treatment programs, some marijuana clients use crack in Chicago, Los Angeles, and New Orleans. The El Paso source notes that some dealers lace marijuana with heroin or cocaine but that the users are not aware of this practice until they are tested at the clinic. The Honolulu source notes a decline in the number of combinations.

Where and with whom is marijuana used? As reported in the last Pulse Check, many epidemiologic and ethnographic sources use the word "everywhere" to describe the settings and contexts of marijuana use. Of 20 sources who discussed this question, 11 report that users are equally likely to smoke the drug both indoors and outdoors, 12 assert that users tend to use it in groups or among friends, and 9 report that users are equally likely to smoke marijuana both in public and in private. Solo use and group use are equally likely in eight cities. For example, in Boston, users report smoking marijuana while alone as a sleep aid or sexual stimulant. However, in no city does any source report that solo use is predominant. The specific settings are as varied as the possibilities梖rom concerts in Philadelphia to the workplace in St. Louis, from festivals in Denver to outside supermarkets and shopping malls in El Paso, from before and after raves in Miami to around junior high and high schools in 10 Pulse Check cities.

Similarly, non-methadone treatment sources frequently report that marijuana users are equally likely to smoke the drug indoors and outdoors, and the majority reports that users tend to smoke the drug in groups or among friends. These sources, however, are about equally divided on the question of public versus private use: clients in Baltimore, Billings, Chicago, Columbia (SC), Honolulu, New York, and Washington, DC, tend to smoke marijuana in public; clients in Birmingham, Detroit, Memphis, Miami, New Orleans, Portland (ME), St. Louis, and Sioux Falls tend to do so in private; and clients in Denver, El Paso, Los Angeles, and Seattle are equally likely to smoke marijuana in public and in private.

Marijuana users in methadone programs, however, have much more discrete use patterns than their counterparts in non-methadone treatment. In the majority of reporting programs, users prefer to smoke marijuana indoors rather than outdoors, and in private rather than in public. These clients, however, still retain the social aspect of marijuana use: no methadone treatment sources report that solo use is predominant over use in groups or among friends.

MARIJUANA: THE COMMUNITY

What is the impact of and community reaction to the marijuana problem?

  • Billings, MT: A new media campaign, targeting both parents and youth, focuses on marijuana and alcohol. The campaign is converting existing ONDCP printed matter into locally relevant messages. Efforts are underway to similarly access and localize ONDCP's Media Campaign messages. Several other recent community prevention efforts include the following: parent seminars; services to under-privileged, high-risk youth, such as mentor programs at Boys' and Girls' Clubs; and programs that focus on Native American youth. It is too early to assess the impact of these efforts, and grant applications are currently being made to sustain them.

  • Hawaii: After an 8-month halt, the Big Island抯 Operation Green Harvest marijuana eradication effort was reinstated in April 2001. The epidemiologic source predicts that the amount of "local grow" will go back down, but that this decline will affect the amount of marijuana exported, not the amount consumed locally. Hawaii also has a "Weed and Seed" program, similar to many States' "Drug Free Zones," with stiff sentences for drug arrests around schools.

  • Sioux Falls, SD: The local school district is promoting a parent education program that supports zero tolerance for all drugs. The effort includes letters to parents and billboards about communicating with their children. Anecdotal reports from parents so far suggest that the program is having a positive impact. Additionally, the area has recently completed its first full year of a school-based drug testing program partially funded by the school system. Under this program, parents can sign up their children in advance for random testing and agree to have conversations with them about drugs; alternatively, parents can request one-time tests as they feel necessary. Students from the first category are testing positive at significantly lower levels than those from the second category. Thus, apparently, the parent-child conversations are having an impact, and it is possible that students are using the testing as an excuse not to use the drug.

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader

skip navigationInformation Quality Guidelines | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Disclaimer | Accessibility | FOIA