Link to United States Department of Justice Home Page
United States Department of Justice Seal of the United States Department of Justice displayed against a background image of the U.S. flag
Civil Division
Civil Division: Voted One of the Best Places to Work

Employees rank the Civil Division in the top 10% of government offices
APPELLATE STAFF
  • Employs approximately 60 lawyers

  • Responsible for the appellate work of the entire Civil Division

  • Handles the many cases that are appealed directly from administrative agencies to the courts of appeals

The Appellate Staff was established in 1953 by Warren Burger, then Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Division.  Attorneys on the Staff draft briefs and argue cases in the courts of appeals.  In addition, each attorney participates in drafting various documents for the United States Supreme Court, including petitions for certiorari and briefs on the merits.

Examples of our practice

The Staff's broad and varied litigation includes constitutional issues of individual liberties, issues of societal and collective rights exercised by the government and issues affecting national security and executive authority.  For example, the Appellate Staff has been involved in several cases challenging state AMegan's Laws,@ laws that protect children by requiring released sex offenders to register with state officials and permitting the state to publish their identities so that communities can be aware of the presence of these sex offenders.

In Global Relief Foundation v. O'Neill, the Appellate Staff successfully defended against challenges to actions taken by the Secretary of Treasury pursuant to the global terrorism financing executive order issued by President Bush.  Global Relief, a charitable organization with ties to Hamas, a foreign terrorist organization, had claimed that the blocking, in aid of investigation, of their bank accounts and business records violated the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Constitution.

The Appellate Staff also handles cases with enormous potential impact on the public fisc.  In Schism v. United States, for example, plaintiffs sought free lifetime medical care (for themselves and their dependants), contending that the Government induced them to serve in the military by recruiters' repeated promises that, upon retirement, they and their dependents would be entitled to such care.  The government advised the appellate court that the Department of Defense had estimated that the panel's decision could potentially lead to claims by 1.5 million individuals for more than $15 billion in damages.

The Appellate Staff is also actively participating in important litigation concerning campaign finance reform.  McConnell v. FEC involves a challenge to the constitutionality of various provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002, popularly known as the McCain-Feingold statute, which imposes various restrictions on the financing of federal election campaigns.


 

Contact Us   |   Accessibility   |   A-Z Index   |   Site Map  |   Archive   |   Privacy Policy  |   Legal Policies and Disclaimers
FOIA   |   For DOJ Employees   |   Other Government Resources   |   Office of the Inspector General   |   USA.gov   |   No FEAR Act