Skip to main content
Skip to sub-navigation
About USAID Our Work Locations Policy Press Business Careers Stripes Graphic USAID Home
USAID: From The American People Latin America and the Caribbean Lácteos Palmares employees taste cheese at the Second Cheese Festival in Tegucigalpa, sponsored by Land O’Lakes - Click to read this story

Home »
Country & Regional Profiles »
LAC Key Issues »
LAC: Democracy »
LAC: Environment »
LAC: Trade »
Press Room »
Congressional Budget Justification 2006 »
Economic and Social Database »


LAC Alternative Dispute Resolution

 

Search



USAID Supports Alternative Dispute Resolution
In Latin America and the Caribbean

Overview

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is an exercise through which community-based disputes are resolved by facilitated negotiation, conciliation/mediation, and arbitration. These mechanisms often precede or replace formal court proceedings and may include processes designed to manage community tension.

Typical characteristics of ADR include:
Flexibility and informality: ADR processes are less formal than judicial processes and lack the extensive written documentation of formal proceedings. They increase access and facilitate solutions for citizens who are intimidated by or unable to participate in more formal judicial systems.

Equity: ADR is more concerned with equality than the rule of law. Resolutions are based on principles and terms that are determined to be equitable for each particular case rather than on uniformly applied legal standards. This becomes particularly important in societies, in which citizens do not receive fair justice under the formal legal system.

Direct participation and communication between disputants: With ADR, disputants design their own settlements and therefore are required to engage in direct dialogue with one another in the interest of reconciliation. This participation is essential to lasting and solid resolutions.

Alternative dispute resolution is an important option in countries where:

  • Case backlogs or complex procedures impair court effectiveness;
  • Illiterate and/or poor people cannot afford to navigate conventional legal channels; or
  • Small informal systems can better reach a geographically dispersed population.

ADR models can emphasize the importance of reconciliation and relationships over “winning” in dispute resolution. Mutually agreed-upon outcomes allow for creativity and increased satisfaction with judicial processes (thereby increasing court responsiveness to local conditions and compliance with court judgments).

Next section - USAID Alternative Dispute Resolution Activities in Latin America and the Caribbean

 

Back to Top ^

Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:13:09 -0500
Star