Table 2. Effectiveness of Primary Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia and Cerebral Toxoplasmosis in HIV-Infected Patients

Regimen Comparison Relative Risk (95% CI) Source, Year (Reference)
Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia Cerebral Toxoplasmosis Mortality Outcomes
Any primary prophylaxis vs. placebo 0.39 (0.27-0.55) Not reported 0.87 (0.60-1.25) Ioannidis, et al., 1996a,b 194
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs. aerosolized pentamidine 0.59 (0.45-0.76) 0.78 (0.55-1.11) 0.88 (0.74-1.06) Bucher, et al., 1997a 195
0.58 (0.45-0.75) Not reported 0.99 (0.80-1.22) Ioannidis, et al., 1996a,b 194
Dapsone-based regimen vs. aerosolized pentamidine 0.90 (0.71-1.15) 0.72 (0.54-0.97) 1.07 (0.90-1.27) Bucher, et al., 1997a 195
0.93 (0.72-1.19) Not reported 0.98 (0.86-1.12) Ioannidis, et al., 1996a,b 194
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs. dapsone-based regimen 0.49 (0.26-0.92) 1.17 (0.68-2.18) 1.08 (0.88-1.25) Bucher, et al., 1997a 195
0.61 (0.34-1.10) Not reported 0.95 (0.82-1.11) Ioannidis, et al., 1996a,b 194
Atovaquone vs. dapsone 0.81 (0.58-1.12) 1.18 (0.26-5.30) 1.25 (0.98-1.59) El-Sadr, et al., 1998196
Dapsone vs. pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine 0.87 (P > 0.05) 1.07 (P > 0.05) 1.15 (not significant) Payen, et al., 1997197
Azithromycin vs. rifabutin in patients already receiving P. carinii prophylaxis 0.42 (0.24-0.76) Not reported Not reported Dunne, et al., 1999198

Notes: aSystematic review.
bIncludes studies of secondary prophylaxis.

Return to Document