Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Solitary pulmonary nodule.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Khan A, Davis SD, Goodman PC, Haramati LB, Leung AN, McLoud TC, Rosado de Christenson ML, Rozenshtein A, White CS, Kaiser LR, Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging. Solitary pulmonary nodule. [online publication]. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR); 2005. 5 p. [30 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Henschke CI, Yankelevitz D, Westcott J, Davis SD, Fleishon H, Gefter WB, McLoud TC, Pugatch RD, Sostman HD, Tocino I, White CS, Bode FR, Swensen SJ. Work-up of the solitary pulmonary nodule. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 2000 Jun;215(Suppl):607-9.

The appropriateness criteria are reviewed annually and updated by the panel as needed, depending on introduction of new and highly significant scientific evidence.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

ACR Appropriateness Criteria®

Clinical Condition: Solitary Pulmonary Nodule, Noncalcified.

Variant 1: Nodule >1 cm, low clinical suspicion for cancer.

Radiologic Exam Procedure Appropriateness Rating Comments
CT, chest, high-resolution 8 To detect occult calcifications, fat, bronchus sign, etc.
Fine needle aspiration 8 If nodule shows contrast enhancement or PET scan is positive
PET scan 8 If nodule is indeterminate on HRCT
CT, chest, with contrast 6 Probably not indicated if PET performed
Watchful waiting with CT follow-up 4  
Appropriateness Criteria Scale
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 = Least appropriate 9 = Most appropriate

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Variant 2: Nodule >1 cm, moderate to high clinical suspicion for cancer.

Radiologic Exam Procedure Appropriateness Rating Comments
CT, chest, high-resolution 8 To detect occult calcifications, fat, bronchus sign, etc.
Fine needle aspiration 8 If nodule shows contrast enhancement or PET scan is positive
PET scan 8 If nodule is indeterminate on HRCT
CT, chest, with contrast 6 Probably not indicated if PET performed
Watchful waiting with CT follow-up 2  
Appropriateness Criteria Scale
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 = Least appropriate 9 = Most appropriate

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Variant 3: Nodule <1 cm, low clinical suspicion for cancer.

Radiologic Exam Procedure Appropriateness Rating Comments
Watchful waiting with CT follow-up 8  
CT, chest, high-resolution 7  
CT, chest, with contrast 3  
PET scan 3  
Fine needle aspiration 2  
Appropriateness Criteria Scale
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 = Least appropriate 9 = Most appropriate

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Variant 4: Nodule <1 cm, moderate to high clinical suspicion for cancer.

Radiologic Exam Procedure Appropriateness Rating Comments
CT, chest, high-resolution 8  
Fine needle aspiration 6  
Watchful waiting with CT follow-up 5  
CT, chest, with contrast 4  
PET scan 2  
Appropriateness Criteria Scale
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 = Least appropriate 9 = Most appropriate

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

In view of the variety of diagnostic tests available and the variable accuracy of the different diagnostic techniques, no single algorithm for work-up is generally accepted. It has been found to vary from institution to institution. This is probably appropriate given the varying prevalence of lung disease in different parts of the country, varying skill levels of operators, and varying availability of equipment.

Abbreviations

  • CT, computed tomography
  • HRCT, high resolution computed tomography
  • PET, positron emission tomography

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

Algorithms were not developed from criteria guidelines.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations are based on analysis of the current literature and expert panel consensus.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Khan A, Davis SD, Goodman PC, Haramati LB, Leung AN, McLoud TC, Rosado de Christenson ML, Rozenshtein A, White CS, Kaiser LR, Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging. Solitary pulmonary nodule. [online publication]. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR); 2005. 5 p. [30 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1995 Sep (revised 2005)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American College of Radiology - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American College of Radiology (ACR) provided the funding and the resources for these ACR Appropriateness Criteria®.

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Committee on Appropriateness Criteria, Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Panel Members: Arfa Khan, MD (Review author); Sheila D. Davis, MD (Panel chair); Philip C. Goodman, MD; Linda B. Haramati, MD; Ann N. Leung, MD; Theresa C. McLoud, MD; Melissa L. Rosado de Christenson, MD; Anna Rozenshtein, MD; Charles S. White, MD; Larry R. Kaiser MD

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Henschke CI, Yankelevitz D, Westcott J, Davis SD, Fleishon H, Gefter WB, McLoud TC, Pugatch RD, Sostman HD, Tocino I, White CS, Bode FR, Swensen SJ. Work-up of the solitary pulmonary nodule. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 2000 Jun;215(Suppl):607-9.

The appropriateness criteria are reviewed annually and updated by the panel as needed, depending on introduction of new and highly significant scientific evidence.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the American College of Radiology (ACR) Web site.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Anytime, Anywhere™ (PDA application). Available from the ACR Web site.

Print copies: Available from the American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Drive, Reston, VA 20191. Telephone: (703) 648-8900.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on March 25, 1999. The information was verified by the guideline developer on September 9, 1999. The summary was updated on February 12, 2002. The information was verified again by the guideline developer on March 25, 2002. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI on January 4, 2006. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on January 19, 2006.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo