Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Practice parameters for the treatment of narcolepsy and other hypersomnias of central origin.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline is an update of a previously issued version (Standards of Practice Committee of the American Sleep Disorders Association. Practice parameters for the use of stimulants in the treatment of narcolepsy. Sleep 1994;17[4]:348-51).

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory information has been released.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The levels of evidence (I-V) and levels of recommendation (standard, guideline, option) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

  1. An accurate diagnosis of a specific hypersomnia disorder of central origin should be established. This evaluation should include a thorough evaluation of other possible contributing causes of excessive daytime sleepiness. (Standard)
  2. Treatment objectives should include control of sleepiness and other sleep related symptoms when present. (Standard)
  3. The following are treatment options for narcolepsy.
    1. Modafinil is effective for treatment of daytime sleepiness due to narcolepsy (Standard).
    2. Sodium oxybate is effective for treatment of cataplexy, daytime sleepiness, and disrupted sleep due to narcolepsy. (Standard) Sodium oxybate may be effective for treatment of hypnagogic hallucinations and sleep paralysis. (Option)
    3. Amphetamine, methamphetamine, dextroamphetamine, and methylphenidate are effective for treatment of daytime sleepiness due to narcolepsy. (Guideline)
    4. Selegiline may be an effective treatment for cataplexy and daytime sleepiness. (Option)
    5. Ritanserin may be effective treatment of daytime sleepiness due to narcolepsy. (Option)
    6. Scheduled naps can be beneficial to combat sleepiness but seldom suffice as primary therapy for narcolepsy. (Guideline)
    7. Pemoline has rare but potentially lethal liver toxicity, is no longer available in the United States, and is no longer recommended for treatment of narcolepsy. (Option)
    8. Tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), venlafaxine, and reboxetine may be effective treatment for cataplexy. (Guideline)
    9. Tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and venlafaxine may be effective treatment for treatment of sleep paralysis and hypnagogic hallucinations. (Option)
  1. Modafinil may be effective for treatment of daytime sleepiness due to idiopathic hypersomnia. (Option)
  2. The following medications may be effective treatments for specific types of hypersomnia due to a medical condition.
    1. Modafinil may be effective for treatment of daytime sleepiness due to Parkinson's disease. (Option)
    2. Modafinil may be effective for treatment of daytime sleepiness due to myotonic dystrophy. (Option)
    3. Methylphenidate may be effective for treatment of daytime sleepiness due to myotonic dystrophy. (Option)
    4. Modafinil may be effective for treatment of daytime sleepiness due to multiple sclerosis. (Guideline)
  1. Lithium carbonate may be effective for treatment of recurrent hypersomnia and behavioral symptoms due to Kleine-Levin syndrome. (Option)
  2. The following medications may be effective for treatment of daytime sleepiness in idiopathic hypersomnia (with and without long sleep time), recurrent hypersomnia, and hypersomnia due to a medical condition: amphetamine, methamphetamine, dextroamphetamine, methylphenidate, and modafinil. (Option)
  3. The following are treatment recommendations previously applied to narcolepsy only. Their application is now extended to the hypersomnias of central origin covered by this practice parameter paper by committee consensus.
    1. Combinations of long- and short-acting forms of stimulants may be indicated and effective for some patients. (Option)
    2. Treatment of hypersomnias of central origin with methylphenidate or modafinil in children between the ages of 6 and 15 appears to be relatively safe. (Option)
    3. Regular follow-up of patients with hypersomnia of central origin is necessary to monitor response to treatment, to respond to potential side effects of medications, and to enhance the patient's adaptation to the disorder. (Standard)
      1. A patient previously stabilized on stimulant medication should be seen regularly by a health care provider at least once per year, and preferably once every 6 months, to assess the development of medication side effects, including sleep disturbances, mood changes, and cardiovascular or metabolic abnormalities.
      2. Follow-up is necessary to determine adherence and response to treatment; to monitor for the safety of medications in individual patients; and to assist the patient with occupational and social problems.
      3. Patients with severe sleepiness should be advised to avoid potentially dangerous activities at home and at work, and should not operate a motor vehicle until sleepiness is appropriately controlled by stimulant medications.
      4. Of the stimulants used to treat hypersomnia of central origin, amphetamines, especially at high doses, are the most likely to result in the development of tolerance.
      5. Patients who fail to respond to adequate doses of stimulant medication should be carefully assessed for other sleep disorders that may contribute to excessive sleepiness such as insufficient sleep, inadequate sleep hygiene, circadian rhythm disorders, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, or periodic limb movement disorder.
      6. For side effects, dosage ranges, use in pregnancy and by nursing mothers, and contraindications, see Tables 6 and 7 in the companion guideline document (see the "Companion Documents" field).
      7. Health care providers should assist the patient with occupational and social accommodation for disabilities due to hypersomnia of central origin.
      8. Polysomnographic re-evaluation of patients should be considered if symptoms of sleepiness increase significantly or if specific symptoms develop that suggest new or increased sleep abnormalities that might occur in disorders such as sleep apnea or periodic limb movement disorder.

Definitions:

Classification of Evidence

Level I: Randomized, well-designed trials with low alpha and beta error,* or meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with homogeneity of result

Level II: Randomized trials with high alpha and beta error, methodologic problems, or high quality cohort studies*

Level III: Nonrandomized concurrently controlled studies (case-control studies)

Level IV: Case-control or cohort studies with methodological problems, or case series

Level V: Expert opinion, or studies based on physiology or bench research

*Alpha (type I error) refers to the probability that the null hypothesis is rejected when in fact it is true (generally acceptable at 5% or less, or P <0.05). Beta (Type II error) refers to the probability that the null hypothesis is mistakenly accepted when in fact it is false (generally, trials accept a beta error of 0.20). The estimation of Type II error is generally the result of a power analysis. The power analysis takes into account the variability and the effect size to determine if sample size is adequate to find a difference in means when it is present (power generally acceptable at 80% to 90%).

Levels of Recommendation

Standard: This is a generally accepted patient-care strategy that reflects a high degree of clinical certainty. The term standard generally implies the use of Level I Evidence, which directly addresses the clinical issue, or overwhelming Level II Evidence.

Guideline: This is a patient-care strategy that reflects a moderate degree of clinical certainty. The term guideline implies the use of Level II Evidence or a consensus of Level III Evidence.

Option: This is a patient-care strategy that reflects uncertain clinical use. The term option implies either inconclusive or conflicting evidence or conflicting expert opinion.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see the "Major Recommendations" field).

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1994 (revised 2007 Dec)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American Academy of Sleep Medicine - Professional Association

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM)

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Standards of Practice Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Members: Michael Littner MD; Stephen F. Johnson MD; W. Vaughn McCall MD, MS; W. McDowell Anderson MD; David Davila MD; Kristyna Hartse PhD; Clete A. Kushida MD, PhD; Merrill S. Wise MD; Max Hirshkowitz PhD; B. Tucker Woodson MD, FACS

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have indicated no financial conflicts of interest.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline is an update of a previously issued version (Standards of Practice Committee of the American Sleep Disorders Association. Practice parameters for the use of stimulants in the treatment of narcolepsy. Sleep 1994;17[4]:348-51).

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available (in Portable Document Format [PDF]) from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Web site.

Print copies: Available from the Standards of Practice Committee, American Academy of Sleep Medicine, One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 920, Westchester, IL 60154; Web site: www.aasmnet.org.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on April 25, 1999. The information was verified by the guideline developer on May 24, 1999. This summary was updated by ECRI on October 22, 2001. The update information was verified by the guideline developer as of November 21, 2001. This summary was updated by ECRI on February 11, 2005, following the release of a public health advisory from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regarding Adderall and related products. This summary was updated by ECRI on November 18, 2005, following the release of a public health advisory from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regarding Cylert. This summary was updated by ECRI on August 28, 2006 following the updated U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on Adderall. This summary was updated by ECRI on September 7, 2006 following the updated U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on Dexedrine. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on April 11, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions. Please contact the American Academy of Sleep Medicine for information regarding reproduction of American Academy of Sleep Medicine guidelines.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo