Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

(1) The management of erectile dysfunction: an update. (2) 2006 addendum.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. The management of erectile dysfunction: an update. Baltimore (MD): American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.; 2005. Various p. [78 references]


  • Montague DK, Jarow JP, Broderick GA, Dmochowski RR, Heaton JP, Lue TF, Milbank AJ, Nehra A, Sharlip ID, Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. The management of erectile dysfunction: an update. Linthicum (MD): American Urologic Association Education and Research, Inc.; 2006 May. Various p. [78 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. The management of erectile dysfunction: an update. Baltimore (MD): American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.; 2005. Various p.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory information has been released.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: The recommendations without the associated supporting text have been excerpted from the guideline. For full context, please refer to the original guideline document.

Definitions of the strength of the recommendations (standard, recommendation, option) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Initial Management and Discussion of Treatment Options with Patients

Recommended Therapies and Patient Information

Standard: The management of erectile dysfunction begins with the identification of organic comorbidities and psychosexual dysfunctions; both should be appropriately treated or their care triaged. The currently available therapies that should be considered for the treatment of erectile dysfunction include the following: oral phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, intra-urethral alprostadil, intracavernous vasoactive drug injection, vacuum constriction devices, and penile prosthesis implantation. These appropriate treatment options should be applied in a stepwise fashion with increasing invasiveness and risk balanced against the likelihood of efficacy (based on review of data and Panel consensus).

Standard: The patient and, when possible, his partner should be informed of the relevant treatment options and their associated risks and benefits. The choice of treatment should be made jointly by the physician, patient, and partner, when possible, taking into consideration patient preferences and expectations and the experience and judgment of the physician (based on Panel consensus).

Treatment Guideline Statements

PDE5 Inhibitors

Standard: Oral PDE 5 inhibitors, unless contraindicated, should be offered as a first-line of therapy for erectile dysfunction (based on review of data and Panel consensus).

Standard: PDE5 inhibitors are contraindicated in patients who are taking organic nitrates (based on review of U.S. Food and Drug Administration [FDA]-approved product labeling and Panel consensus).

Recommendation: The monitoring of patients receiving continuing PDE5 inhibitor therapy should include a periodic follow-up of efficacy, side effects, and any significant change in health status including medications (based on Panel consensus).

Recommendation: Prior to proceeding to other therapies, patients reporting failure of PDE5 inhibitor therapy should be evaluated to determine whether the trial of PDE5 inhibition was adequate (based on Panel consensus).

Recommendation: Patients who have failed a trial with PDE5 inhibitor therapy should be informed of the benefits and risks of other therapies, including the use of a different PDE5 inhibitor, alprostadil intra-urethral suppositories, intracavernous drug injection, vacuum constriction devices, and penile prostheses (based on Panel consensus).

Alprostadil Intra-urethral Suppositories

Standard: The initial trial dose of alprostadil intra-urethral suppositories should be administered under healthcare provider supervision due to the risk of syncope (based on review of FDA-approved product labeling and Panel consensus).

Intracavernous Vasoactive Drug Injection Therapy

Standard: The initial trial dose of intracavernous injection therapy should be administered under healthcare provider supervision (based on Panel consensus).

Standard: Physicians who prescribe intracavernous injection therapy should (1) inform patients of the potential occurrence of prolonged erections, (2) have a plan for the urgent treatment of prolonged erections, and (3) inform the patient of the plan (See the National Guideline Clearinghouse [NGC] summary of the American Urological Association [AUA] guideline The Management of Priapism) (based on Panel consensus).

Vacuum Constriction Devices

Recommendation: Only vacuum constriction devices containing a vacuum limiter should be used whether purchased over-the-counter or procured with a prescription (based on Panel consensus).

Treatment Modalities With Limited Data

Trazodone

Recommendation: The use of trazodone in the treatment of erectile dysfunction is not recommended (based on review of the data and Panel consensus).

Testosterone

Recommendation: Testosterone therapy is not indicated for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in the patient with a normal serum testosterone level (based on Panel consensus).

Yohimbine

Recommendation: Yohimbine is not recommended for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (based on review of the data and Panel consensus).

Other Herbal Therapies

Recommendation: Herbal therapies are not recommended for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (based on review of the data and Panel consensus).

Surgical Therapies

Penile Prosthesis Implantation

Standard: The patient considering prosthesis implantation and, when possible, his partner should be informed of the following: types of prostheses available; possibility and consequences of infection and erosion, mechanical failure, and resulting reoperation; differences from the normal flaccid and erect penis, including penile shortening; and potential reduction of the effectiveness of other therapies if the device is subsequently removed (based on Panel consensus).

Standard: Prosthetic surgery should not be performed in the presence of systemic, cutaneous, or urinary tract infection (based on Panel consensus).

Standard: Antibiotics providing Gram-negative and Gram-positive coverage should be administered preoperatively (based on Panel consensus).

Vascular Surgery

Penile Venous Reconstructive Surgery

Recommendation: Surgeries performed with the intent to limit the venous outflow of the penis are not recommended (based on review of the data and Panel consensus).

Penile Arterial Reconstructive Surgery

Option: Arterial reconstructive surgery is a treatment option only in healthy individuals with recently acquired erectile dysfunction secondary to a focal arterial occlusion and in the absence of any evidence of generalized vascular disease (based on review of the data and Panel consensus).

Definitions:

Strength of Recommendations

  1. Standard: A guideline statement is a standard if (1) the health outcomes of the alternative interventions are sufficiently well-known to permit meaningful decisions, and (2) there is virtual unanimity about which intervention is preferred.
  2. Recommendation: A guideline statement is a recommendation if (1) the health outcomes of the alternative intervention are sufficiently well-known to permit meaningful decisions and (2) an appreciable but not unanimous majority agrees on which intervention is preferred.
  3. Option: A guideline statement is an option if (1) the health outcomes of the interventions are not sufficiently well-known to permit meaningful decisions or (2) preferences are unknown or equivocal.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations are based on current professional literature, clinical experience, and expert opinion.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. The management of erectile dysfunction: an update. Baltimore (MD): American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.; 2005. Various p. [78 references]


  • Montague DK, Jarow JP, Broderick GA, Dmochowski RR, Heaton JP, Lue TF, Milbank AJ, Nehra A, Sharlip ID, Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. The management of erectile dysfunction: an update. Linthicum (MD): American Urologic Association Education and Research, Inc.; 2006 May. Various p. [78 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: Guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1996 (addendum released 2006 May)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. (AUA)

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Panel Members: Drogo K. Montague, MD, Co-chair; Jonathan P. Jarow, MD, Co-chair; Gregory A. Broderick, MD; Roger R. Dmochowski, MD; Jeremy P.W. Heaton, MD; Tom F. Lue, MD; Aaron J. Milbank, MD; Ajay Nehra, MD; Ira D. Sharlip, MD

Consultants: Hanan S. Bell, PhD; Patrick M. Florer; Diann D. Glickman, PharmD

AUA Staff: Kirsten H. Aquino; Edith M. Budd; Michael A. Folmer; Suzanne B. Pope; Carol R. Schwartz

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Committee members received no remuneration for their work. Each member of the committee provided a conflict of interest disclosure to the American Urological Association (AUA).

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. The management of erectile dysfunction: an update. Baltimore (MD): American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.; 2005. Various p.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on March 26, 1999. The information was verified by the guideline developer as of May 14, 1999. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI on July 20, 2005. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on August 17, 2005. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI on November 7, 2006. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on November 29, 2006. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on November 6, 2007, following the updated U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on Viagra, Cialis, Levitra, and Revatio.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is copyrighted by the American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. (AUA).

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo