Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Use of irinotecan in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group. Figueredo A, Moore M, Germond C, Kocha W, Maroun J, Zwaal C. Use of irinotecan in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2004 Jul. 21 p. (Practice guideline report; no. 2-16). [40 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

  • The Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group (DSG) recommends second-line treatment with irinotecan, either alone or in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, to selected patients in whom first-line therapy has failed.
  • It is appropriate to offer irinotecan monotherapy as second-line treatment to patients following failure of first-line treatment with:
    • Infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)
    • Bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (Mayo or de Gramont schedule)
    • Oral capecitabine
    • Raltitrexed
  • Although based on non-randomized controlled trial evidence, the Gastrointestinal Disease Site Group supports second-line treatment with irinotecan, either alone or in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, as second-line treatment to patients following failure of first-line treatment with:
    • Infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Original Guideline: April 1999

Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), six phase II trials, and one monograph were reviewed. The randomized controlled trials compared irinotecan with best supportive care (BSC) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusional chemotherapy in patients for whom first-line 5-FU bolus therapy failed. Three phase II studies also presented data on chemotherapy-naïve patients.

July 2004 Update

The recommendations are supported by randomized controlled trials.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group. Figueredo A, Moore M, Germond C, Kocha W, Maroun J, Zwaal C. Use of irinotecan in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2004 Jul. 21 p. (Practice guideline report; no. 2-16). [40 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1999 Apr 30 (revised 2004 Jul)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Program in Evidence-based Care - State/Local Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER COMMENT

The Program in Evidence-based Care (PEBC), is a project supported by Cancer Care Ontario and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Cancer Care Ontario
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Provincial Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Members of the Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group disclosed potential conflict of interest information.

GUIDELINE STATUS

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on August 19, 1999. The information was verified by the guideline developer as of September 17, 1999. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI on December 3, 2001. The updated information was reviewed by the guideline developer as of January 10, 2002. This information was updated again by ECRI on May 14, 2004. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on June 2, 2004. This NGC summary was updated on August 12, 2005. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on September 13, 2005.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo