Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline is updates a previous version: Hyers TM, Agnelli G, Hull RD, Morris TA, Samama M, Tapson V, Weg JG. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest 2001 Jan;119(1 Suppl):176S-193S.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory and/or warning information has been released.

  • February 28, 2008, Heparin Sodium Injection: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) informed the public that Baxter Healthcare Corporation has voluntarily recalled all of their multi-dose and single-use vials of heparin sodium for injection and their heparin lock flush solutions. Alternate heparin manufacturers are expected to be able to increase heparin production sufficiently to supply the U.S. market. There have been reports of serious adverse events including allergic or hypersensitivity-type reactions, with symptoms of oral swelling, nausea, vomiting, sweating, shortness of breath, and cases of severe hypotension.
  • August 16, 2007, Coumadin (Warfarin): Updates to the labeling for Coumadin to include pharmacogenomics information to explain that people's genetic makeup may influence how they respond to the drug.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The rating scheme is defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Treatment of Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT)

Initial Treatment of Acute DVT of the Leg

  1. For patients with objectively confirmed DVT, the guideline developers recommend short-term treatment with subcutaneous (SC) low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or intravenous (IV) unfractionated heparin (UFH) or SC UFH (all Grade 1A).
  2. For patients with a high clinical suspicion of DVT, the guideline developers recommend treatment with anticoagulants while awaiting the outcome of diagnostic tests (Grade 1C+).
  3. In acute DVT, the guideline developers recommend initial treatment with LMWH or UFH for at least 5 days (Grade 1C).
  4. The guideline developers recommend initiation of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) together with LMWH or UFH on the first treatment day and discontinuation of heparin when the international normalized ratio (INR) is stable and >2.0 (Grade 1A).

IV UFH for the Initial Treatment of DVT

  1. If IV UFH is chosen, the guideline developers recommend that it be administered by continuous infusion with dose adjustment to achieve and maintain an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) prolongation corresponding to plasma heparin levels from 0.3 to 0.7 IU/mL anti-Xa activity by the amidolytic assay (Grade 1C+).
  2. In patients requiring large daily doses of UFH without achieving a therapeutic aPTT, the guideline developers recommend the measurement of the anti-Xa level for dose guidance (Grade 1B).

SC UFH for the Initial Treatment of DVT

  1. In patients with acute DVT, the guideline developers recommend that SC administered UFH can be used as an adequate alternative to IV UFH (Grade 1A).
  2. For patients who receive SC UFH, the guideline developers recommend an initial dose of 35,000 U/24 hours SC, with subsequent dosing to maintain the aPTT in the therapeutic range (Grade 1C+).

LMWH for the Initial Treatment of DVT

  1. In patients with acute DVT, the guideline developers recommend initial treatment with LMWH SC once or twice daily over UFH as an outpatient if possible (Grade 1C), and as inpatient if necessary (Grade 1A).
  2. In patients with acute DVT treated with LMWH, the guideline developers recommend against routine monitoring with anti-factor Xa level measurements (Grade 1A).
  3. In patients with severe renal failure, the guideline developers suggest IV UFH over LMWH (Grade 2C).

Systematically Administered Thrombolysis in the Initial Treatment of DVT

  1. In patients with DVT, the guideline developers recommend against the routine use of IV thrombolytic treatment (Grade 1A).
  2. In selected patients, such as those with massive ileofemoral DVT at risk of limb gangrene secondary to venous occlusion, the guideline developers suggest IV thrombolysis (Grade 2C).

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Initial Treatment of DVT

  1. In patients with DVT, the guideline developers recommend against the routine use of catheter-directed thrombolysis (Grade 1C).
  2. The guideline developers suggest that this treatment should be confined to selected patients such as those requiring limb salvage (Grade 2C).

Catheter Extraction or Fragmentation and Surgical Thrombectomy for the Initial Treatment of DVT

  1. In patients with DVT, the guideline developers recommend against the routine use of venous thrombectomy (Grade 1C).
  2. In selected patients such as patients with massive ileofemoral DVT at risk of limb gangrene secondary to venous occlusion, the guideline developers suggest venous thrombectomy (Grade 2C).

Vena Caval Interruption for the Initial Treatment of DVT

  1. For most patients with DVT, the guideline developers recommend against the routine use of a vena cava filter in addition to anticoagulants (Grade 1A).
  2. The guideline developers suggest the placement of an inferior vena cava filter in patients with a contraindication for or a complication of anticoagulant treatment (Grade 2C), as well as in those with recurrent thromboembolism despite adequate anticoagulation (Grade 2C).

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Agents for the Initial Treatment of DVT

  1. For the initial treatment of DVT, the guideline developers recommend against the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (Grade 2B).

Immobilization

  1. For patients with DVT, the guideline developers recommend ambulation as tolerated (Grade 1B).

Long-term Treatment of Acute DVT of the Leg

VKAs for the Long-term Treatment of DVT

  1. For patients with a first episode of DVT secondary to a transient (reversible) risk factor, the guideline developers recommend long-term treatment with a VKA for 3 months over a treatment for shorter periods (Grade 1A).

    Underlying values and preferences: This recommendation ascribes a relatively high value to preventing recurrent thromboembolic events and a relatively low value on bleeding and cost.

    Remark: The latter recommendation applies both to patients with proximal vein thrombosis and to patients with symptomatic DVT confined to the calf veins.

  2. For patients with a first episode of idiopathic DVT, the guideline developers recommend treatment with a VKA at least 6 to 12 months (Grade 1A).
  3. The guideline developers suggest that patients with first-episode idiopathic DVT be considered for indefinite anticoagulant therapy (Grade 2A).

    Underlying values and preferences: This recommendation ascribes a relatively high value to preventing recurrent thromboembolic events and a relatively low value on bleeding and cost.

  4. For patients with DVT and cancer, the guideline developers recommend LMWH for the first 3 to 6 months of long-term anticoagulant therapy (Grade 1A). For the patients, the guideline developers recommend anticoagulant therapy indefinitely or until the cancer is resolved (Grade 1C).
  5. For patients with a first episode of DVT who have documented antiphospholipid antibodies or who have two or more thrombophilic conditions (e.g., combined factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210 gene mutations), the guideline developers recommend treatment for 12 months (Grade 1C+). The guideline developers suggest indefinite anticoagulant therapy in these patients (Grade 2C).

    Underlying values and preferences: This recommendation ascribes a relatively high value to preventing recurrent thromboembolic events and a relatively low value on bleeding and cost.

  6. For patients with a first episode of DVT who have documented deficiency of antithrombin, deficiency of protein C or protein S, or the factor V Leiden or prothrombin 20210 gene mutation, homocysteinemia, or high factor VIII levels (>90th percentile of normal), the guideline developers recommend treatment for 6 to 12 months (Grade 1A). The guideline developers suggest indefinite therapy as for patients with idiopathic thrombosis (Grade 2C).

    Underlying values and preferences: This recommendation ascribes a relatively high value to preventing recurrent thromboembolic events and a relatively low value on bleeding and cost.

  7. For patients with two or more episodes of objectively documented DVT, the guideline developers suggest indefinite treatment (Grade 2A).
  8. The guideline developers recommend that the dose of VKA be adjusted to maintain a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.5 (range, 2.0 and 3.0) for all treatment durations (Grade 1A). The guideline developers recommend against high-intensity VKA therapy (INR range, 3.1 to 4.0) (Grade 1A). The guideline developers recommend against low-intensity therapy (INR range, 1.5 to 1.9) compared to INR range of 2.0 to 3.0 (Grade 1A).
  9. In patients who receive indefinite anticoagulant treatment, the risk-benefit of continuing such treatment should be reassessed in the individual patient at periodic intervals (Grade 1C).
  10. The guideline developers suggest repeat testing with compression ultrasonography for the presence or absence of residual thrombosis or measurement of plasma D-dimer (Grade 2C).

LMWH for the Long-term Treatment of DVT

  1. For most patients with DVT and cancer, the guideline developers recommend treatment with LMWH for at least the first 3 to 6 months of long-term treatment (Grade 1A).

    Remark: The regimens of LMWH that have been established to be effective for long-term treatment in randomized trials are dalteparin, 200 IU/kg body weight daily (qd) for 1 month, followed by 150 IU/kg qd thereafter, or tinzaparin at 175 IU/kg body weight SC qd.

The Post-Thrombotic Syndrome

Elastic Stockings for the Prevention of the Post-Thrombotic Syndrome (PTS)

  1. The guideline developers recommend the use of an elastic compression stocking with a pressure of 30 to 40 mm Hg at the ankle during 2 years after an episode of DVT (Grade 1A).

Physical Treatment of the PTS

  1. The guideline developers suggest a course of intermittent pneumatic compression for patients with severe edema of the leg due to PTS (Grade 2B).
  2. The guideline developers suggest the use of elastic compression stockings for patients with mild edema of the leg due to the PTS (Grade 2C).

Drug Treatment of the PTS

  1. In patients with mild edema due to PTS, the guideline developers suggest administration of rutosides (Grade 2B).

Initial Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

IV UFH or LMWH for the Initial Treatment of PE

  1. For patients with objectively confirmed nonmassive PE, the guideline developers recommend short-term treatment with SC LMWH or IV UFH (both Grade 1A).
  2. For patients with a high clinical suspicion of PE, the guideline developers recommend treatment with anticoagulants while awaiting the outcome of diagnostic tests (Grade 1C+).
  3. In patients with acute nonmassive PE, the guideline developers recommend LMWH over UFH (Grade 1A).
  4. In acute nonmassive PE, the guideline developers recommend initial treatment with LMWH or UFH for at least 5 days (Grade 1C).
  5. In patients with acute nonmassive PE treated with LMWH, the guideline developers recommend against routine monitoring with anti-factor Xa levels (Grade 1A).
  6. In patients with severe renal failure, the guideline developers suggest IV UFH over LMWH (Grade 2C).
  7. If IV UFH is chosen, the guideline developers recommend administration by continuous infusion with dose adjustment to achieve and maintain an aPTT prolongation corresponding to plasma heparin levels from 0.3 to 0.7 IU/mL anti-Xa activity by the amidolytic assay (Grade 1C+).
  8. In patients requiring large daily doses of UFH without achieving a therapeutic aPTT, the guideline developers recommend the measurement of the anti-Xa level for dose guidance (Grade 1B).
  9. The guideline developers recommend initiation of VKA together with LMWH or UFH on the first treatment day and discontinuation of heparin when the INR is stable and >2.0 (Grade 1A).

Systemically and Locally Administered Thrombolytic Drugs for the Initial Treatment of PE

  1. For most patients with PE, the guideline developers recommend clinicians not use systemic thrombolytic therapy (Grade 1A). In selected patients, the guideline developers suggest systemic administration of thrombolytic therapy (Grade 2B). For patients who are hemodynamically unstable, the guideline developers suggest use of thrombolytic therapy (Grade 2B).
  2. The guideline developers suggest clinicians not use local administration of thrombolytic therapy via a catheter (Grade 1C).
  3. For patients with PE who receive thrombolytic regimens, the guideline developers suggest the use of thrombolytic regimens with a short infusion time over those with prolonged infusion times (Grade 2C).

Catheter Extraction or Fragmentation for the Initial Treatment of PE

  1. For most patients with PE, the guideline developers recommend against use of mechanical approaches (Grade 1C). In selected highly compromised patients who are unable to receive thrombolytic therapy or whose critical status does not allow sufficient time to infuse thrombolytic therapy, the guideline developers suggest use of mechanical approaches (Grade 2C).

Pulmonary Embolectomy for the Initial Treatment of PE

  1. For most patients with PE, the guideline developers recommend against pulmonary embolectomy (Grade 1C). In selected highly compromised patients who are unable to receive thrombolytic therapy or whose critical status does not allow sufficient time to infuse thrombolytic therapy, the guideline developers suggest pulmonary embolectomy (Grade 2C).

Vena Caval Interruption for the Initial Treatment of PE

  1. In PE patients with a contraindication for or a complication of anticoagulant treatment, as well as in those with recurrent thromboembolism despite adequate anticoagulation, the guideline developers suggest placement of an inferior vena caval filter (both Grade 2C).

Long-term Treatment of Acute PE

VKAs for the Long-term Treatment of PE

  1. For patients with a first episode of PE secondary to a transient (reversible) risk factor, the guideline developers recommend long-term treatment with a VKA for at least 3 months (Grade 1A).
  2. For patients with a first episode of idiopathic PE, the guideline developers recommend treatment with a VKA at least 6 to 12 months (Grade 1A).
  3. The guideline developers suggest that patients with first-episode idiopathic PE be considered for indefinite anticoagulant therapy (Grade 2A).

    Underlying values and preferences: This recommendation ascribes a relatively high value to preventing recurrent thromboembolic events and a relatively low value on bleeding and cost.

  4. For patients with PE and cancer, the guideline developers recommend LMWH for the first 3 to 6 months of long-term anticoagulant therapy (Grade 1A). These patients should then receive anticoagulant therapy indefinitely or until the cancer is resolved (Grade 1C).
  5. For patients with a first episode of PE who have documented antiphospholipid antibodies or who have two or more thrombophilic conditions (e.g., combined factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210 gene mutations), the guideline developers recommend treatment for 12 months (Grade 1C+). For these patients, the guideline developers suggest indefinite anticoagulant therapy (Grade 2C).

    Underlying values and preferences: This recommendation ascribes a relatively high value to preventing recurrent thromboembolic events and a relatively low value on bleeding and cost.

  6. For patients with a first episode of PE who have documented deficiency of antithrombin, deficiency of protein C or protein S, or the factor V Leiden or prothrombin 20210 gene mutation, homocysteinemia, or high factor VIII levels (>90th percentile of normal), the guideline developers recommend treatment for 6 to 12 months (Grade 1A). The guideline developers suggest indefinite therapy for patients with idiopathic PE (Grade 2C).

    Underlying values and preferences: This recommendation ascribes a relatively high value to preventing recurrent thromboembolic events and a relatively low value on bleeding and cost.

  7. For patients with two or more episodes of objectively documented PE, the guideline developers suggest indefinite treatment (Grade 2A).
  8. The guideline developers recommend that the dose of VKA be adjusted to maintain a target INR of 2.5 (INR range, 2.0 and 3.0) for all treatment durations (Grade 1A). The guideline developers recommend against high-intensity VKA therapy (INR range, 3.1 to 4.0) [Grade 1A]. The guideline developers recommend against low-intensity therapy (INR range, 1.5 to 1.9) compared to INR range of 2.0 to 3.0 (Grade 1A).
  9. In patients who receive indefinite anticoagulant treatment, the risk-benefit of continuing such treatment should be reassessed in the individual patient at periodic intervals (Grade 1C).

LMWH for the Long-term Treatment of PE

  1. For most patients with PE and concurrent cancer, the guideline developers recommend treatment with LMWH for at least the first 3 to 6 months of long-term treatment (Grade 1A).

    Remark: The LMWH regimens that have been established to be effective for long-term treatment are dalteparin, 200 IU/kg body weight qd for 1 month followed by 150 IU/kg qd thereafter, and tinzaparin at 175 IU/kg body weight SC qd.

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTPH)

Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy, VKAs, and Caval Filter for the Treatment of CTPH

  1. In selected patients with CTPH (i.e., patients with central disease under the care of an experienced surgical/medical team), the guideline developers recommend pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (Grade 1C).
  2. The guideline developers recommend that life-long treatment with VKA to an INR of 2.0 to 3.0 be administered following pulmonary thromboendarterectomy, and also be administered to patients with CTPH who are ineligible for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (Grade 1C).
  3. The guideline developers suggest the placement of a vena caval filter before or at the time of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for CTPH (Grade 2C).

Superficial Thrombophlebitis

Treatment for Superficial Thrombophlebitis

  1. For patients with superficial thrombophlebitis as a complication of an infusion, the guideline developers suggest topical diclofenac gel (Grade 1B) or oral diclofenac (Grade 2B).
  2. For patients affected by spontaneous superficial thrombophlebitis, the guideline developers suggest intermediate dosages of UFH or LMWH for at least 4 weeks (Grade 2B).

Acute Upper Extremity DVT

IV UFH or LMWH for the Initial Treatment of Upper Extremity DVT

  1. For patients with acute upper-extremity DVT, the guideline developers recommend initial treatment with UFH (Grade 1C+) or LMWH (Grade 1C+).

Thrombolytic Therapy for the Initial Treatment of Upper Extremity DVT

  1. In selected patients with acute upper-extremity DVT (e.g., in those with a low risk of bleeding and symptoms of recent onset), the guideline developers suggest a short course of thrombolytic therapy for initial treatment (Grade 2C).

Catheter Extraction, Surgical Thrombectomy, or Superior Vena Caval Filter for the Initial Treatment of Upper Extremity DVT

  1. In selected patients with acute upper-extremity DVT (e.g., those with failure of anticoagulant or thrombolytic treatment and persistent symptoms), the guideline developers suggest surgical embolectomy (Grade 2C) or catheter extraction (Grade 2C).
  2. In selected patients with acute upper-extremity DVT (e.g., those in whom anticoagulant treatment is contraindicated), a superior vena caval filter (Grade 2C) could be considered for initial treatment.

Anticoagulants for the Long-term Treatment of Upper Extremity DVT

  1. For patients with acute upper-extremity DVT, the guideline developers recommend long-term treatment with a VKA (Grade 1C+).

    Remark: As for acute DVT of the leg (see above), a similar process should be considered for determining the duration of VKA treatment.

Elastic Bandages for the Long-term Treatment of Upper Extremity DVT

  1. In patients with upper-extremity DVT who have persistent edema and pain, the guideline developers suggest elastic bandages for symptomatic relief (Grade 2C).

Definitions

Grade of Recommendation Clarity of Risk/Benefit Methodological Strength of Supporting Evidence Implications
1A

Clear

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) without important limitations

Strong recommendation; can apply to most patients in most circumstances without reservation

1C+

Clear

No RCTs, but strong RCT results can be unequivocally extrapolated, or overwhelming evidence from observational studies

Strong recommendation; can apply to most patients in most circumstances

1B

Clear

RCTs with important limitations (inconsistent results, methodological flaws*)

Strong recommendation; likely to apply to most patients

1C

Clear

Observational studies

Intermediate-strength recommendation; may change when stronger evidence is available

2A

Unclear

RCTs without important limitations

Intermediate-strength recommendation; best action may differ depending on circumstances or patients' or societal values

2C+

Unclear

No RCTs, but strong RCT results can be unequivocally extrapolated, or overwhelming evidence from observational studies

Weak recommendation; best action may differ depending on circumstances or patients' or societal values

2B

Unclear

RCTs with important limitations (inconsistent results, methodological flaws*)

Weak recommendation; alternative approaches likely to be better for some patients under some circumstances

2C

Unclear

Observational studies

Very weak recommendation; other alternatives may be equally reasonable

*These situations include RCTs with both lack of blinding and subjective outcomes, where the risk of bias in measurement of outcomes is high, or RCTs with large loss to follow-up.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2001 Jan (revised 2004 Sep)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American College of Chest Physicians - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Funding was provided through an unrestricted educational grant by AstraZeneca LP, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myer Squibb/Sanofi-Synthelabo Partnership, and Organon Sanofi-Synthelabo LLC.

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Panel on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Primary Authors: Harry R. Büller, MD (Chair); Giancarlo Agnelli, MD; Russel D. Hull, MBBS, MSc, FCCP; Thomas M. Hyers, MD, FCCP; Martin H. Prins, MD; Gary E. Raskob, PhD

Committee Co-Chairs: Jack Hirsh, MD, FCCP (Chair); Gregory W. Albers, MD; Gordon H. Guyatt, MD, MSc; Holger J. Schünemann, MD, MSc, PhD, FCCP

Participants: Giancarlo Agnelli, MD; Amin Al-Ahmad, MD; Pierre Amarenco, MD; Jack E. Ansell, MD; Shannon M. Bates, MD; Richard C. Becker, MD; Peter B. Berger, MD; David Bergqvist, MD, PhD, FRCS; Rebecca J. Beyth, MD, MSc; Stewart Brower, MLIS; Harry R. Buller, MD; Henry I. Bussey, PharmD, FCCP; Christopher P. Cannon, MD, FACC; Elizabeth A. Chalmers, MB, ChB, MD, MRCP(UK). FRCPath; Anthony K.C. Chan, MD; G. Patrick Clagett, MD; Barry Coller, MD; Clifford W. Colwell, MD; Deborah Cook, MD, MSc; James E. Dalen, MD, MPH, FCCP; J. Donald Easton, MD; Michael Ezekowitz, MD; Garret A. Fitzgerald, MD; William H. Geerts, MD, FCCP; Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, MD, FCCP; Alan S. Go, MD; Shaun D. Goodman, MD, FACC; Ian A. Greer, MD, FRCP, FRCOG; Andreas Greinacher, MD; Jeremy Grimshaw, MD, PhD; Cindy Grines, MD; Jonathan L. Halperin, MD; Robert A. Harrington, MD; John Heffner, MD, MPH; John A. Heit, MD; Judith S. Hochman, MD, FACC; Dieter Horstkotte, MD, FESC; Russell D. Hull, MBBS, MSc, FCCP; Elaine Hylek, MD; Thomas M. Hyers, MD, FCCP; Mark R. Jackson, MD; Alan Jacobson, MD; Roman Jaeschke, MD, MSc; Ajay Kakkar BSc, PhD; Clive Kearon, MD, PhD, FCCP; Matthew Kraay; Michael R. Lassen, MD; Mark N. Levine, MD, MSc; Alessandro Liberati, MD; Gregory YH Lip, MD, FESC, FACC; Warren J. Manning, MD; M. Patricia Massicotte, MD, MSc, FRCPC, MSc; Thomas W. Meade, MD; Venu Menon, MD, FACC; Alan D. Michelson, MD; Nancy Miller, RN; Paul Monagle, MBBS, MSc, MD, FRACP, FRCPA, FCCP; Heather Munger, MLS; Christopher M. O’Connor, MD; Martin O’Donnell, MD; E. Magnus Ohman, MD, FCCP; Carlo Patrono, MD; Stephen G. Pauker, MD; Graham F. Pineo, MD; Leon Poller, MD; Jeffrey J. Popma, MD; Martin H. Prins, MD; Robert Raschke, MD, MS; Gary Raskob, PhD; Joel G. Ray, MD, MSc; Gerald Roth, MD; Ralph L. Sacco, MD; Deeb N. Salem, MD, FCCP; Meyer M. Samama, MD; Andrew Schafer; Sam Schulman, MD, PhD; Daniel Singer, MD; Michael Sobel, MD; Paul D. Stein, MD, FCCP; Marco Tangelder, MD; Victor F. Tapson, MD, FCCP; Philip Teal, MD; Raymond Verhaeghe, MD; David A. Vorchheimer, MD; Theodore E. Warkentin, MD; Jeffrey Weitz, MD; Robert G. Wilcox, MD

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Dr. Büller has received speaker's honoraria and consultancy fees. The total did not exceed $10,000US/year. In addition, clinical studies are supported by educational grants.

Dr. Agnelli has received honoraria for his participation on advisory boards and/or as speaker at educational events from AstraZeneca, Aventis Pharma and Sanofi-Synthelabo-Organon.

Dr. Hull has received research funding from Aventis, Pharmacia (now Pfizer), Leo Pharma, Emisphere Technologies, Dupont Pharmaceuticals (now Bristol-Myers Squibb) and Pharmion. He has received honoraria for his participation on advisory boards and/or as a speaker at educational events from Aventis, Bayer, Pharmacia (now Pfizer), Leo Pharma, Emisphere Technologies, Dupont Pharmaceuticals (now Bristol-Myers Squibb) and Pharmion.

Dr. Hyers has received honoraria as a speaker for AstraZeneca, Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Organon-Sanofi, and Pharmacia. He has served as a consultant for AstraZeneca and Aventis.

Dr. Raskob has received research funding from Sanofi-Synthelabo, Organon, Aventis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and has received honoraria for his participation on advisory boards and/or as a speaker at educational events for Sanofi-Synthelabo, Organon, AstraZeneca, Pharmacia, Aventis, Amgen, and Pharmion.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline is updates a previous version: Hyers TM, Agnelli G, Hull RD, Morris TA, Samama M, Tapson V, Weg JG. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest 2001 Jan;119(1 Suppl):176S-193S.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available from the Chest - The Cardiopulmonary and Critical Care Journal.

Print copies: Available from the American College of Chest Physicians, Products and Registration Division, 3300 Dundee Road, Northbrook IL 60062-2348.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

  • The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Evidence-based guidelines. Northbrook, IL: ACCP, 2004 Sep.
  • Methodology for guideline development for the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Northbrook, IL: ACCP, 2004 Sep.
  • Applying the grades of recommendation for antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Northbrook, IL: ACCP, 2004 Sep.
  • Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant treatment: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Northbrook, IL: ACCP, 2004 Sep.
  • Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy: from evidence to application: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Northbrook, IL: ACCP, 2004 Sep.
  • Platelet-active drugs: the relationships among dose, effectiveness, and side effects: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Northbrook, IL: ACCP, 2004 Sep.

Electronic copies: Available from the Chest - The Cardiopulmonary and Critical Care Journal Web site.

Print copies: Available from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), Products and Registration Division, 3300 Dundee Road, Northbrook IL 60062-2348.

The following is also available:

  • Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-based guidelines; quick reference guide. Northbrook, IL: ACCP, 2004 Sep. Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) download available at ACCP Web site.

Additional implementation tools are also available:

  • Clinical resource: antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Northbrook, IL. ACCP, 2004. Ordering information: Available from the ACCP Web site.

PATIENT RESOURCES

The following is available:

  • A patient's guide to antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. In: Clinical resource: antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Northbrook (IL): American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP). 2004.

Ordering information is available from the ACCP Web site.

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on July 30, 2001. The information was verified by the guideline developer on October 17, 2001. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI on December 8, 2004. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on January 12, 2005. This summary was updated by ECRI on March 6, 2007 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Coumadin (warfarin sodium). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on June 22, 2007 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on heparin sodium injection. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on September 7, 2007 following the revised U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Coumadin (warfarin). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on March 14, 2008 following the updated FDA advisory on heparin sodium injection.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo