 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FY 2005 Cohort
GPRA information contained in these spreadsheets (MS Excel 70KB) is for the Fiscal Year 2005 cohort of Safe Schools/Healthy Students Initiative grantees.
The measures track grantee progress in reducing substance abuse and violence, and improving attendance and access to mental health services. Grantees were not required to provide baseline data in their applications for funding, or to collect baseline data before beginning program implementation. Grantees were able to select individual items that responded to the GPRA measures, but also addressed locally identified problems and challenges. As a result, data furnished for GPRA measures may not be comparable from grantee to grantee.
In many instances, grantees provided data in their performance reports for more than one item per measures (for example, data about rates of use for several different drugs, or information about attitudes about drug use). In order to provide a brief look at grantee progress for this cohort, we selected just a single item measure per grant site to include in the spreadsheets posted here. Generally, we selected items for inclusion that were reported by the largest number of grantees.
FY 2004 Cohort
GPRA information contained in these spreadsheets (MS Excel 49kb) is for the Fiscal Year 2004 cohort of Safe Schools/Healthy Students Initiative grantees. This was the first year in which GPRA measures were established for the program.
The measures track grantee progress in reducing substance abuse and violence, and improving attendance and access to mental health services. Grantees were not required to provide baseline data in their applications for funding, or to collect baseline data before beginning program implementation. Grantees were able to select individual items that responded to the GPRA measures, but also addressed locally identified problems and challenges. As a result, data furnished for GPRA measures may not be comparable from grantee to grantee.
In many instances, grantees provided data in their performance reports for more than one item per measures (for example, data about rates of use for several different drugs, or information about attitudes about drug use). In order to provide a brief look at grantee progress for this cohort, we selected just a single item measure per grant site to include in the spreadsheets posted here. Generally, we selected items for inclusion that were reported by the largest number of grantees.
Performance Reports
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||
