ESEA: Improving Teacher Quality State Grants - FY 2007
CFDA Number:
|
84.367
- Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
|
Program Goal: To improve teacher and principal quality and increase the number of highly qualified teachers in the classroom and highly qualified principals and assistant principals in schools.
|
|
Objective
1 of 2:
Show an annual increase in the percentage of classes taught by highly qualified teachers.
|
Indicator 1.1 of 4: Highly qualified teachers in high-poverty schools: The percentage of core academic classes taught by highly qualified teachers in high-poverty schools.
|
|
Measure 1.1.1 of 1: The percentage of core academic classes in high-poverty schools taught by highly qualified teachers.
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Source: Consolidated State Performance Report.
Frequency: Annually.
Next Data Available:
December 2006
Explanation: FY 2003 data was to establish the baseline. FY 2003 actual performance was estimated from the Consolidated State Performance Report, submitted in September 2003.
|
Indicator 1.2 of 4: Highly qualified teachers in low-poverty schools: Percentage of core academic classes taught by highly qualified teachers in low-poverty schools.
|
|
Measure 1.2.1 of 1: The percentage of core academic classes taught by highly qualified teachers in low poverty schools
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Source: Consolidated State Performance Report
Frequency: Annually.
Next Data Available:
December 2006
Explanation: FY 2004 data were used to establish the baseline. FY 2004 data were estimated from Consolidated State Performance Report submitted in September 2004.
|
Indicator 1.3 of 4: Highly qualified teachers in elementary schools: Percentage of core academic classes taught by highly qualified teachers in elementary schools.
|
|
Measure 1.3.1 of 1: The percentage of core academic classes in elementary schools taught by highly qualified teachers .
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Source: Consolidated State Performance Report
Frequency: Annually.
Next Data Available:
December 2006
Explanation: FY 2003 data was used to establish the baseline. FY 2003 data were estimated from Consolidated State Performance Report submitted in September 2003.
|
Indicator 1.4 of 4: Highly qualified teachers in secondary schools: Percentage of core academic classes in secondary schools taught by highly qualified teachers.
|
|
Measure 1.4.1 of 1: The percentage of core academic classes in secondary schools taught by highly qualified teachers.
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Source: Consolidated State Performance Report
Frequency: Annually.
Next Data Available:
December 2006
Explanation: FY 2003 data was used to establish the baseline. FY 2003 data were estimated from Consolidated State Performance Report submitted in September 2003.
|
Objective
2 of 2:
Improve the operational efficiency of the program
|
Indicator 2.1 of 1: Program Efficiency: A decrease in the number of days it takes the Department of Education to send a monitoring report to States after monitoring visits.
|
|
Measure 2.1.1 of 1: Average number of days between monitoring visit and report sent to state.
|
Year
|
Actual Performance
|
Performance Targets
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Source: Program office records.
Frequency: Annually.
Next Data Available:
December 2006
Explanation: The FY 2006 target is to establish a baseline. The FY 2007 target is baseline minus 1 percent.
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081028231822im_/http://www.ed.gov/images/ed_c_dline.gif)
Return to table of contents
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081028231822im_/http://www.ed.gov/images/ed_c_dline.gif)
Last Modified: 01/27/2006