Print this chapter (1.5MB)
References
Achieve, Inc. 2002. No Child Left Behind: Improving Achievement, Meeting Challenges, Seizing Opportunities. Achieve Policy Brief #5 (Summer).
Achieve, Inc. 2004. The Expectations Gap: A 50-State Review of High School Graduation Requirements. Washington, DC: Author.
Adelman C. 1999. Answers in the Toolbox: Academic Intensity, Attendance Patterns, and Bachelor's Degree Attainment. PLLI 1999-8021. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Adelman C. 2004. Principal Indicators of Student Academic Histories in Postsecondary Education, 1972–2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
Alexander KJ, Entwisle DR, Olson L. 2001. Schools, achievement, and inequality: a seasonal perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23(2):171–91.
Allegretto SA, Corcoran SP, Mishel L. 2004. How Does Teacher Pay Compare? Methodological Challenges and Answers. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
American Association for Employment in Education (AAEE). 2003. 2002 Educator Supply and Demand in the United States. Columbus, OH: Author.
American Diploma Project. 2004. Ready or Not: Creating a High School Diploma That Counts. Washington, DC: Author.
American Federation of Teachers (AFT). 2001. Making Standards Matter 2001: A Fifty-State Report on Efforts to Implement a Standards-Based System. Washington, DC: Author.
Angrist J, Lavy V. 2002. New evidence on classroom computers and pupil learning. The Economic Journal 112(October):735–65.
Banilower ER. 2002. Results of the 2001–2002 Study of the Impact of the Local Systemic Change Initiative on Student Achievement in Science. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc. http://www.horizon-research.com/LSC/news/sps0102.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2005.
Barth P. 2003. A common core curriculum for the new century. Thinking K–16 7(1)(Winter):3–25.
Barton P. 2004. Unfinished Business: More Measured Approaches in Standards-based Reform. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
Becker HJ. 1994. How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 26:291–320.
Boe E, Gilford D. 1992. Teacher Supply, Demand and Quality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Bogler R. 2002. Two profiles of schoolteachers: A discriminant analysis of job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education 18(6):665–73.
Borman J, Boulay M, editors. 2004. Summer Learning: Research, Policies, and Programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Bourque ML, Byrd S, editors. 2000. Student Performance Standards on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Affirmations and Improvements. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board.
Boyd SE, Banilower ER, Pasley JD, Weiss IR. 2003. Progress and Pitfalls: A Cross-Site Look at Local Systemic Change Through Teacher Enhancement. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc. http://www.horizon-research.com/LSC/news/progress_and_pitfalls.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2005.
Broughman SP, Rollefson MR. 2000. Teacher Supply in the United States: Sources of Newly Hired Teachers in Public and Private Schools. NCES 2000-309. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Campbell JR, Hombo CM, Mazzeo J. 2000. NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades of Student Performance. NCES 2000-469. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Carnoy M, Elmore R, Siskin LS, editors. 2003. The New Accountability High Schools and High Stakes Testing. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Cavalluzzo LC. 2004. Is National Board Certification an Effective Signal of Teacher Quality? Alexandria, Virginia: The CAN Corporation. http://www.cna.org/documents/CavaluzzoStudy.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2005.
Choy SP, Chen X. 1998. Toward Better Teaching: Professional Development in 1993–94. NCES 98-230. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Choy SP, Chen X, Bugarin R. Forthcoming. Teacher Professional Development in 1999–2000: What Teachers, Principals, and District Staff Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Clewell BC, Cohen CC, Campbell PB, Perlman L, Deterding N, Manes S, Tsui L, Rao SNS, Branting B, Hoey L, Carson R. 2004. Review of Evaluation Studies of Mathematics and Science Curricula and Professional Development Models. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411149.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2005.
Cogan LS, Schmidt WH, Wiley DE. 2001. Who takes what math and in which track? Using TIMSS to characterize U.S. students' eighth-grade mathematics learning opportunities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23(4)(Winter):323–41.
Cohen D, Hill H. 2000. Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California. Teachers College Record 102(2):294–343.
Coley RJ, Cradler J, Engel PK. 1997. Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in U.S. schools. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. ftp://ftp.ets.org/pub/res/compclss.pdf. Accessed 3 January 2004.
The College Board. 2005. Advanced placement report to the nation: 2005. New York: Author.
Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE). 1997. Policies and Programs for Professional Development for Teachers: Profiles of the States. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Cooper H, Nye B, Charlton K, Lindsay L, Greathouse S. 1996. The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research 66(3):227–68.
Corcoran TC. 1995. Transforming Professional Development for Teachers: A Guide for State Policymakers. Washington, DC: National Governors' Association.
Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). 2003. State Indicators of Science and Mathematics Education 2003. Washington, DC: Author.
Cross RW, Rebarber T, Torres J, Finn Jr. CE, editors. 2004. Grading the Systems: The Guide to State Standards, Tests, and Accountability Policies. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
Cuban L. 1999. The technology puzzle. Education Week 18(43)(August 4):68, 43. http://www.edweek.com. Accessed 4 January 2004.
DeBell M, Chapman C. 2003. Computer and Internet Use by Children and Adolescents in 2001. NCES 2004-014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Darling-Hammond L. 2000. Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives 8(1)(1 January). http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/. Accessed 21 December 2004.
Desimone L, Porter AC, Garet M, Yoon KS, Birman B. 2002. Effects of professional development on teacher's instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24(2):81–112.
Donnelly MB, Dove T, Tiffany-Morales J. 2002. Technology-Related Professional Development in the Context of Educational Reform: A Literature Review. Arlington, VA: SRI International.
Editorial Projects in Education. 2004. State data tables: Capacity to use technology. Education Week: Technology Counts 2004 23(35)(May 6):72–3.
Editorial Projects in Education. 2005. State of the states. Education Week: Quality Counts 2005 24(17).
Elmore RF. 2002. Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Achievement: The Imperative for Professional Development in Education. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.
Frankel M, Stowe P. 1990. New Teachers in the Job Market, 1987 Update. NCES 90-336. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Freeman C. 2004. Trends in Educational Equity for Girls and Women: 2004. NCES 2005-016. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Fuchs T, Woessman L. 2004. Computers and Student Learning: Bivariate and Multivariate Evidence on the Availability and Use of Computers at Home and at School. CESifo Working Paper No. 1321. Munich: Ifo Institute for Economic Research, University of Munich.
Garet MS, Porter AC, Desimone L, Birman BF, Yoon KS. 2001. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal 38(4):915–45.
Goldhaber DD. 2002. The mystery of good teaching: Surveying the evidence on student achievement and teachers' characteristics. Education Next 2(1):50–55.
Goldhaber DD, Anthony E. 2004. Can Teacher Quality Be Effectively Assessed? Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center on Reinventing Public Education.
Goldhaber DD, Brewer DJ. 2000. Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22(2):129–45.
Gonzales P, Guzman JC, Partelow L, Pahlke E, Jocelyn L, Kastberg D, Williams T. 2004. Highlights From the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003. NCES 2005-005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Gray L, Cahalan M, Hein S, Litman C, Severynse J, Warren S, Wisan G, Stowe P. 1993. New Teachers in the Job Market, 1991 Update. NCES 93-392. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Greenberg E, Rhodes D, Ye X, Stancavage F. 2004. Prepared to teach: Teacher preparation and student achievement in eighth-grade mathematics. Paper presented at 2004 annual meeting of American Educational Research Association; April 12–16; San Diego.
Guskey TR. 2003. What makes professional development effective. Phi Delta Kappan 84(10)(June):748–50.
Hanushek EA. 1996. A more complete picture of school resource policies. Review of Educational Research 66(3):397–409.
Hanushek EA, Kain JF, Rivkin SG. 2004. The revolving door. Education Next 4(1)(Winter):76–84.
Hardy L. 1999. Why teachers leave? American School Board Journal 186(6):12–7.
Hawley WD, Valli L. 1999. The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In Darling-Hammond L and Sykes G, editors. Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass(127–150).
Hedges LV, Konstantopoulos S, Thoreson A. 2003. NAEP Validity Studies: Computer Use and Its Relation to Academic Achievement in Mathematics, Reading, and Writing. NCES 2003-15. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Henke RR, Choy SP, Chen X, Geis S, Alt MN. 1997. America's Teachers: Profile of a Profession: 1993–94. NCES 97-460. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Henke RR, Geis S, Giambattista J, Knepper P. 1996. Out of the Lecture Hall and Into the Classroom: 1992–93 College Graduates and Elementary/Secondary School Teaching. NCES 96-899. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Hill HC, Rowan B, Ball DL. 2004. Effects of teachers' mathematics knowledge for teaching on student achievement. Paper presented at 2004 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association; April 12–16; San Diego.
Hirsch E, Koppich JE, Knapp MS. 1999. State Action to Improve Teaching. Policy Brief. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
Hirsch E, Koppich JE, Knapp MS. 2001. Revisiting What States Are Doing to Improve the Quality of Teaching: An Update on Patterns and Trends. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
Horn LJ, Kojaku L. 2001. High School Academic Curriculum and the Persistence Path Through College: Persistence and Transfer Behavior of Undergraduates 3 Years After Entering 4-Year Institutions. NCES 2001-163. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Horn LJ, Zahn L. 2001. From Bachelor's Degree To Work: Major Field of Study and Employment Outcomes of 1992–93 Bachelor's Degree Recipients Who Did Not Enroll in Graduate Education by 1997. NCES 2001-165. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Howard T. 2003. Who receives the short end of the shortage? Implications of the U.S. teacher shortage on urban schools. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 18(2):142–60.
Hoyt J, Sorenson C. 2001. High school preparation, placement testing, and college remediation. Journal of Developmental Education 25(2):26–33.
Hruskocy C, Cennamo K, Ertmer P, Johnson T. 2000. Creating a community of technology users: Students become technology experts for teachers and peers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 81(1):69–84.
Hurst D, Kelly D, Princiotta D. 2004. Educational Attainment of High School Dropout 8 Years Later. NCES 2005-026. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Ingels SJ, Scott LA. 2004. The High School Sophomore Class of 2002: A Demographic Description: First Results From the Base Year of the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002. NCES 2004-371. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Ingersoll RM. 2002. Out-of-Field Teaching, Educational Inequality, and the Organization of Schools: An Exploratory Analysis. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
Ingersoll RM. 2003. Out-of-Field Teaching and the Limits of Teacher Policy. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
Kaye EA, editor. 2002. Requirements for Certification of Teachers, Counselors, Librarians, Administrators for Elementary and Secondary Schools: 2002/03. 67th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kennedy MM. 1998. Form and Substance in In-service Teacher Education. Research monograph no. 13. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Kleiner A, Lewis L. 2003. Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994–2002. NCES 2004-011. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Kulik JA. 2003. Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and secondary schools: What controlled evaluation studies say. Arlington, VA: SRI International.
Lemke M, Sen A, Pahlke E, Partelow L, Miller D, Williams T, Kastberg D, Jocelyn L. 2004. International Outcomes of Learning in Mathematics Literacy and Problem Solving: PISA 2003 Results From the U.S. Perspective: Highlights. NCES 2005-003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Little JW. 1993. Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15(2):129–52.
Loucks-Horsley S, Hewson PW, Love N, Stiles KE. 2003. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Luekens MT, Lyter DM, Fox EE. 2004. Teacher Attrition and Mobility: Results From the Teacher Follow-up Survey, 2000–01. NCES 2004-301. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Ma X, Macmillan RB. 1999. Influences of workplace conditions on teachers' job satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research 93(1):34–47.
Macdonald D. 1999. Teacher attrition: A review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education 15(8)(November):835–48.
Madigan T. 1997. Science Proficiency and Course Taking in High School: The Relationship of Science Coursetaking Patterns to Increases in Science Proficiency Between 8th and 12th Grades. NCES 97-838. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
McCaffrey DF, Lockwood JR, Koretz DM, Hamilton LS. 2003. Evaluating Value-Added Models for Teacher Accountability. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Meyer R. 1998. The Production of Mathematics Skills in High School: What Works? Chicago and Madison, WI: Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies, The University of Chicago and Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Miller E. 1995. The old model of professional development survives in a world where everything else has changed. Harvard Education Letter 11(1)(January/February):1–3.
Monk DH, King J. 1994. Multi-level teacher resource effects on pupil performance in secondary mathematics and science: The role of teacher subject matter preparation. In: Ehrenberg R, editor. Contemporary Policy Issues: Choices and Consequences in Education. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press. p 29–58.
Moursund D, Bielefeldt T. 1999. Will New Teachers Be Prepared to Teach in a Digital Age? A National Survey on Information Technology in Teacher Education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology.
Mullis IVS, Martin MO, Gonzalez EJ, Chrostowski SJ. 2005. TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth and Fourth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Murnane RJ, Singer JD, Willett JB, Kemple JJ, Olson RJ. 1991. Who Will Teach? Policies That Matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB). 2000. 2001 Science Framework for the 1996 and 2000 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: Author.
National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB). 2002. Mathematics Framework for the 2003 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: Author.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2001. The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2000. NCES 2001-517. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2003a. The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics Highlights 2003. NCES 2004-451. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2003b. The Nation's Report Card: Science 2000. NCES 2003-453. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2004a. The Condition of Education 2004. NCES 2004-077. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2004b. Digest of Education Statistics 2003. NCES 2005-025. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2004c. International Outcomes of Learning in Mathematics Literacy and Problem Solving: PISA 2003 Results From the U.S. Perspective: Highlights. NCES 2005-003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2005. The Condition of Education 2005. NCES 2005-094. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, DC: Author.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF). 1996. What Matters Most: Teaching for America's Future. New York: Author.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF). 1997. Doing What Matters Most: Investing in Quality Teaching. New York: Author.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF). 2003. No Dream Denied: A Pledge to America's Children. Washington, DC: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Research Council (NRC). 1996. The National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Board (NSB). 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). 2002. A Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). 2004. A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.
Neidorf TS, Binkley M, Gattis K, Nohara D. Forthcoming. A Content Comparison of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), and Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003 Mathematics Assessments. NCES 2005-112. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Odden A, Kelley C. 2002. Paying Teachers for What They Know and Do: New and Smarter Compensation Strategies to Improve Schools. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2000. Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators, 2000. Paris: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2003a. Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators, 2003. Paris: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2003b. The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills. Paris: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2004. Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators, 2004. Paris: Author.
Parsad B, Jones J. 2005. Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994–2003. NCES 2005-015. Washington, DC: Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Parsad B, Lewis L. 2003. Remedial Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions in Fall 2000. NCES 2004-010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Parsad B, Lewis L, Farris E. 2001. Teacher Preparation and Professional Development: 2000. NCES 2001-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Pellegrino JW, Jones LR, Mitchell KJ. 1998. Grading the Nation's Report Card: Evaluating NAEP and Transforming the Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Perie M, Moran R, Lutkus AD. 2005. NAEP 2004 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades of Student Performance in Reading and Mathematics. NCES 2005-464. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Perkins R, Kleiner B, Roey S, Brown J. 2004. The High School Transcript Study: A Decade of Change in Curricula and Achievement, 1990–2000. NCES 2004-455. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Peter K, Horn L. 2005. Gender Differences in Participation and Completion of Undergraduate Education and How They Have Changed Over Time. NCES 2005-169. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Porter AC, Garet MS, Desimone L, Yoon KS, Birman BF. 2000. Does Professional Development Change Teaching Practice? Results From a Three-Year Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Undersecretary, Planning and Evaluation Service.
Porter AC, Garet MS, Desimone L, Birman BF. 2003. Providing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program. Science Educator 12(1):23–40.
Potts A, Blank RK, Williams A. 2002. Key State Education Policies on PK–12 Education: 2002. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Rathbun A, West J. 2004. From Kindergarten Through Third Grade: Children's Beginning School Experiences. NCES 2004-007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Rice JK. 2003. Teacher Quality: Understanding the Effectiveness of Teacher Attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Ringstaff C, Kelley L. 2002. The Learning Return on Our Educational Technology Investment. San Francisco: WestEd.
Sandholtz JH. 2001. Learning to teach with technology: A comparison of teacher development programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 9(3):349–74.
Sandholtz JH, Ringstaff C, Dwyer DC. 1997. Teaching With Technology: Creating Student-Centered Classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
Schmidt WH, McKnight CC, Houang RT, Wang HC, Wiley DE, Cogan LS, Wolfe RG. 2001. Why Schools Matter: A Cross-National Comparison of Curriculum and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishing.
Scott C, Stone B, Dinham S. 2001. "I love teaching but …." International patterns of teacher discontent. Education Policy Analysis Archives 9(28)(August 1) http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n28.html. Accessed 21 December 2004.
Scott E. 2004. Comparing NAEP, TIMSS, and PISA in Mathematics and Science. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/timss/pdf/naep_timss_pisa_comp.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2005.
Seastrom MM, Gruber KJ, Henke R, McGrath DJ, Cohen BA. 2002. Qualifications of the Public School Teacher Workforce: Prevalence of Out-of-Field Teaching 1987–88 to 1999–2000. NCES 2002-603. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Shen J. 1997. Teacher retention and attrition in public schools: Evidence from SASS:91. The Journal of Educational Research 91(2):81–8.
Sherman JD, Honegger SD, McGivern JL. 2003. Comparative Indicators of Education in the United States and Other G-8 Countries: 2002. NCES 2003-026. Washington, DC: Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Silverstein G, Frechtling J, Miyoaka A. 2000. Evaluation of the Use of Technology in Illinois Public Schools: Final Report. Rockville, MD: Westat.
Sivin-Kachala J, Bialo E. 2000. 2000 Research Report on the Effectiveness of Technology in Schools. 7th ed. Washington, DC: Software and Information Industry Association.
Smerdon B, Cronen S, Lanahan L, Anderson J, Iannotti N, Angeles J. 2000. Teachers' Tools for the 21st Century: A Report on Teachers' Use of Technology. NCES 2000-102. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Smith TM, Desimone LM. 2003. Do changes in patterns of participation in teachers' professional development reflect the goals of standards-based reform? Educational Horizons 81(3):119–29.
Smylie MA, Allensworth E, Greenberg RC, Harris R, Luppescu S. 2001. Teacher Professional Development in Chicago: Supporting Effective Practice. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
Sprinthall NA, Reiman AJ, Thies-Sprinthall L. 1996. Teacher professional development. In: Sikula J, Buttery T, Guyton E, editors. Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Stone JE. 2003. Buyers and sellers of education research. The Chronicle of Higher Education 99(39):B12.
Supovitz JA, Turner HM. 2000. The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(9):963–80.
Sutton RE. 1991. Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research. Review of Educational Research 61:475–503.
Takahira S, Gonzales P, Frase M, Salganik LH. 1998. Pursuing Excellence: A Study of U.S. Twelfth-Grade Mathematics and Science Achievement in International Context. NCES 98-049. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Van Dusen LM, Worthen BR. 1994. The impact of integrated learning system implementation on student outcomes: Implications for research and evaluation. International Journal of Educational Research 21:13–24.
Vance VS, Schlechty PC. 1982. The distribution of academic ability in the teaching force: Policy implications. Phi Delta Kappan 64(1):22–7.
Vandevoort LG, Amrein-Beardsley A, Berliner DC. 2004. National board certified teachers and their students' achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives 12(46):1–117.
Wang AH, Coleman AB, Coley RJ, Phelps RP. 2003. Preparing Teachers Around the World. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Watson J, West J. 2004. Full-Day and Half-Day Kindergarten in the United States: Findings From the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998–1999. NCES 2004-078. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Weaver WT. 1983. America's Quality Teacher Problem: Alternatives for Reform. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Weiss IR, Banilower ER, Shimkus ES. 2004. Local systemic change through teacher enhancement: Year nine crosssite report. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc. http://www.horizon-research.com/LSC/news/cross_site/03cross_site/cross-site03.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2005.
Wenglinsky H. 1998. Does It Compute? The Relationship Between Educational Technology and Student Achievement in Mathematics. Princeton, NJ: The Educational Testing Service.
Wenglinsky H. 2002. How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives 10(12)(February 13). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/. Accessed 2 June 2004.
West J, Denton K, Germino-Hausken E. 2000. America's Kindergartners. NCES 2000-070. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
West J, Denton K, Reaney L. 2000. The Kindergarten Year. NCES 2001-023. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
WestED. 2000. Teachers Who Learn, Kids Who Achieve: A Look at Schools With Model Professional Development. San Francisco: Author.
Willis J, Mehlinger H. 1996. Information technology and teacher education. In: Sikula J, editor. Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.
Wilson SM, Floden RE, Ferrini-Mundy J. 2001. Teacher Preparation Research: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Recommendations. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
Wright P, Horn S, Sanders W. 1997. Teachers and classroom heterogeneity: Their effects on educational outcomes. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11(1): 57–67.
