Home > Environment > Emission of Greenhouse Gases > Land Use

Emissions of Greenhouse Gases Report
  Full Printer-Friendly Version


Land Use
  Overview | Forest Lands and Harvested Wood Pools | Croplands and Grasslands |
  Urban Trees, Yard Trimmings, and Food Scraps | Tree Planting and Surface Albedo
Report Chapters

Overview
Carbon Dioxide Emissions
Methane Emissions
Nitrous Oxide Emissions
High-GWP Gases
Land-Use Emissions
New in This Report   

Latest Documentation
Overview    

Land use, land-use change, and forestry activities in 2005 resulted in net sequestration of 828.5 million metric tons CO2 equivalent (see Table 28 below), equal to 11.5 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in 2005, which totaled 7,181.4 MMTCO2e.

Net carbon sequestration from land use, land-use change, and forestry activities in 2005 was 16 percent greater than in 1990 (see Figure 26 on right). The increase resulted primarily from a higher rate of net carbon accumulation in forest carbon stocks.

Net carbon accumulation in Cropland Remaining Cropland, Land Converted to Grassland, and Settlements Remaining Settlements increased from 1990 to 2005.

Net carbon accumulation in landfilled yard trimmings and food scraps decreased from 1990 to 2005. Grassland Remaining Grassland had net carbon emissions in 1990 and 1991, became a net carbon sink from 1992 to 1994, and since then has remained a fairly constant emissions source.

Emissions from Land Converted to Cropland declined from 1990 to 2005.


Table 28. Net Carbon Dioxide Sequestration from U.S. Land-Use Change and Forestry, 1990, 1995, and 2000-2005 (million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
   


 
Figure 26. Carbon Sequestration from Land Use and Land-Use Change, 1990, 1995, and 2000-2005 (million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
figure data
Total U.S. Carbon Sequestration from Land-Use change and Forests, 1990, 2004, and 2005 Table.  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

Forest Lands and Harvested Wood Pools    

Carbon sequestration attributed to forest land remaining forest land in 2005 totaled 698.7 million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent (see Figure 27 on right and Table 29 below).

The calculation methods for this year’s annualized estimates of forest ecosystem carbon stocks differ from those used in previous inventories, as a result of efforts to improve the consistency of national, State, and sub-State data sets. The new estimate of carbon stocks sequestered in forest land in 1990 is 23 percent lower, and the estimate for 2004 is 9 percent higher, than the values in last year’s inventory.

The chaparral ecosystem fails to meet the definition of forest, and more current forest data omit this vegetation type; however, it has been discovered that older forest survey data included it. To ensure consistency, chaparral has been removed from the older estimates in this year’s inventory, resulting in lower estimates of carbon stocks for California, especially in the earlier years.

The sequestration estimates for harvested wood products have also been revised, based on more detailed product and trade data and updated parameters for discard and decay. As a result, the estimates for average annual sequestration for harvested wood products from 1990 through 2004 are about 47 percent less than in last year’s inventory. Virtually all of the decrease is in the estimates of annual additions to landfills and dumps.


Table 29. Net Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in U.S. Forests and Harvested Wood Pools, 1990, 1995, and 1999-2006 (million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
 
Figure 27. Carbon Sequestration from Forest Lands and Harvested Wood Pools, 2005 (million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent).  Need help, contact the Naational Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

Carbon Sequestration from Forest Lands and Harvested Wood Pools, 1990, 2004, and 2005 Table.  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
Croplands and Grasslands    

Annual carbon dioxide emissions from organic cropland soils are subdivided between Cropland Remaining Cropland and Land Converted to Cropland (see Table 30 below); in last year’s inventory they were reported only for Cropland Remaining Cropland. The reapportionment resulted in an average annual increase in emissions of 71.4 percent for soil carbon stock changes in Land Converted to Cropland from 1990 to 2004 and a shift of this category to an overall source (Figure 28) from an overall sink in the previous report.

The adjustments for Cropland and Grassland categories, applied to Grassland Remaining Grassland, resulted in an average annual increase in emissions of 46.2 percent for soil carbon stock changes from 1990 to 2004. Applied to Land Converted to Grassland, the adjustments resulted in an average annual decrease in sinks of 21.1 percent from 1990 to 2004.

Table 30. Net Carbon Dioxide Sequestration from Croplands and Grasslands, 1990, 1995, and 2000-2005 (million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

Urban Trees, Yard Trimmings, and Food Scraps    

Urban trees accounted for nearly all (91 percent) of the carbon sequestration attributed to urban trees, yard trimmings, and food scraps in 2005 (see Figure 29 on right and Table 31 below).

For yard trimmings and food scrap carbon stocks in landfills, the value for the initial carbon content of leaves was updated for the current inventory based on updated experimental results. This recalculation had the effect of reducing both the stocks of carbon from leaves and the annual flux for yard trimmings and food scraps.

In last year's inventory, changes in yard trimming and food scrap carbon stocks in landfills were included under Settlements Remaining Settlements. Although carbon stock changes in yard trimmings and food scraps are associated with settlements, removals do not occur within settlements. Therefore, yard trimming and food scrap carbon storage is now reported under "Other."

Table 31. Net Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in U.S. Urban Trees, Yard Trimmings, and Food Scraps, 1990, 1995, and 2000-2005 (million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.

 
Figure 29. Carbon Sequestration from Urban Trees, Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps, 1990, 1995, and 2000-2005 (million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
figure data
Total U.S. Carbon Sequestration from Urban Trees, Yard Trimmings, and Food Scraps, 1990, 2004, and 2005.  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
Tree Planting and Surface Albedo    

Surface albedo is a measure of the extent to which the Earth’s surface reflects or absorbs sunlight. Lighter surfaces, such as bare ground covered with snow, have a relatively high albedo and reflect almost all the energy (heat) of incoming solar radiation. Darker surfaces, such as deep oceans and dense forests, have a relatively low albedo and absorb almost all the heat of incoming solar radiation. Consequently, when changing conditions cause a decrease in surface albedo—for example, when trees are planted on lands that receive substantial winter snowfall—they can increase the capacity of the affected area to absorb heat from the sun, with an overall warming effect.

Afforestation and reforestation to increase carbon sequestration are permitted activities under the Clean Development Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol and other climate change mitigation programs. Project developers can earn carbon credits or offsets for the amounts of carbon sequestered by the trees they plant. Recent research, however, has shown the importance of changes in surface albedo caused by tree planting, which should be considered in tandem with the increases in carbon sequestration achieved by such projects 20,21,22,23,24 Tree planting increases carbon sequestration; but, depending on local and regional conditions, it can also decrease surface albedo.25

The recent scientific studies cited above have shown that, in the Earth’s middle and high latitudes, the warming effect of lower surface albedo that results from afforestation or reforestation can have an unintended net warming effect. Before the advent of industrialization, humans were already affecting the climate by clearing forests to plant crops, an activity that increased surface albedo.26 Thus, the net result of preindustrial changes in land use was negative climate forcing (cooling). According to one recent study,27 the rate of cooling induced by preindustrial deforestation was similar in magnitude to the current rate of positive climate forcing (warming) caused by anthropogenic emissions of ozone (O3), nitrous oxide (N2O), and halocarbons.

Researchers have also compared the magnitude of the positive climate forcing caused by modern-day tree planting (as a result of lowered albedo) with the negative forcing that results from increased carbon sequestration by newly planted trees. Their results indicate that, in the middle and high latitudes, the warming effects of afforestation and reforestation activities could partially or completely offset the cooling effects—especially in snow-covered areas, where the difference in albedo between snow-covered bare ground and partially snow-covered forested areas is greatest. This finding has policy implications in general for climate change mitigation efforts and specifically for the valuation of carbon credits earned through reforestation and afforestation activities.

The albedo effect is less significant in tropical zones, where research models indicate that deforestation causes warming.28 In tropical forest areas, loss of tree cover reduces leafy surface area and, as a result, slows the release of water vapor into the atmosphere. Slower evaporation rates, in turn, have a negative effect on cloud formation above tropical rain forests. Because the clouds reflect incoming solar radiation, they lower surface temperatures. With less cloud cover, more incoming solar radiation reaches the Earth’s surface, and temperatures rise.

At the National Center for Atmospheric Research, researchers using the Parallel Climate Model (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy) have modeled climate change for three future periods— 2000-2033, 2033-2066, and 2066-2100—considering in one case only the effects of atmospheric forcing and in another case the combined effects of atmospheric forcing and changes in land cover.29 They found that forest-to-agriculture conversion in the Amazon rain forest causes significant warming, although the effects are not uniform across all tropical forests. (For example, in Indonesia, temperature changes from forest loss are minor in future scenarios, because the Asian monsoon compensates for the decrease in cloud formation relative to that over undisturbed forests.)

In the middle and, especially, high latitudes, there is increasing evidence that the radiative cooling effect derived from carbon sequestration by newly planted trees could be partially or completely offset by the radiative warming effect of reduced albedo. For example, the IPCC in its latest assessment notes that replacement of tundra vegetation by coniferous evergreen trees is likely to reduce regional albedo significantly and lead to a warming effect greater than the cooling effect of increased carbon sequestration.30 In contrast, tree planting in tropical latitudes, where vegetation and cloud formation are linked, can double the radiative cooling benefit by reducing incoming solar radiation while also increasing carbon sequestration.

 
   
Report Chapters

Overview
Carbon Dioxide Emissions
Methane Emissions
Nitrous Oxide Emissions
High-GWP Gases
Land-Use Emissions
New in This Report   

Latest Documentation