References
Alberts B. 2005. The evolution controversy in our schools. http://www.nasonline.org/site/PageServer?pagename= NEWS_letter_president_03042005_BA_evolution. Accessed 4 June 2007.
Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton-Smith I. 2008. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science. Forthcoming.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2007. AAAS honors defenders of evolution with Scientific Freedom and Responsibility Award. EurekAlert: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-02/aaft-ahd020807.php. Accessed 4 June 2007.
Bann CM, Schwerin MJ. 2004. Public knowledge and attitudes scale construction: Development of short forms. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics.
Bayer. 2007. Bayer facts of science education IV—by gender. http://www.bayerus.com/msms/news/facts. cfm?mode=detail&id=summary98 Accessed 17 April 2007.
Bauerlein M. 2006. A very long disengagement. Chronicle of Higher Education 52(18):B6.
Bumiller E. 2005. Bush remarks roil debate on teaching of evolution. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/03/politics/03bush.html?ex=1181102400 &en=c05617bb5a86470e&ei=5070. Accessed 4 June 2007.
Canadian Biotechnology Secretariat. 2005. Canada-U.S. Survey on Biotechnology. Ottawa, Ontario.
Carroll J. 2006. Water pollution tops Americans’ environmental concerns. The Gallup Poll. http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=22492&pg=1. Accessed 4 March 2007.
Carroll J. 2007. Polluted drinking water is public’s top environmental concern. The Gallup Poll. http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=27274. Accessed 20 April 2007.
Center for Genetics and Society. 2006. Summary of survey results. http://www.genetics-and-society.org/analysis/opinion/summary.html. Accessed 5 January 2007.
Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology. 2002. Public scientific literacy and attitudes towards S&T. In China Science and Technology Indicators 2002. Beijing, China.
Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research (CAMR). 2006. Nearly three-quarters of America supports embryonic stem cell research. http://www.stemcellfunding.org/camr_news.aspx?rid=051606B. Accessed 18 June 2007.
Cobb MD, Macoubrie J. 2004. Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research6:395–405.
Cole J. 2005. Fifth study of the Internet by the digital future project finds major new trends in online use for political campaigns. University of Southern California Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future. http://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/Center-for-the-Digital-Future-2005-Highlights.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2007.
Cole J. 2006. Online world as important to Internet users as real world? University of Southern California Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future. http://www.digitalcenter.org/pages/news_content.asp?intGlobalId=212&intTypeId=1. Accessed 12 April 2007.
Cunningham CM, Lachapelle C, Lindgren-Streicher A. 2005. Assessing elementary school students’ conceptions of engineering and technology. Presented to the American Society for Engineering Education; Portland, OR.
Dean C. 2005. Evolution takes a back seat in U.S. classes. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/01/science/01evo.html?ex=1265086800&en=6a4ca1d7981b4e55&ei=5088
&partner=rssnyt. Accessed 4 June 2007.
Decima Research. 2006. Emerging technologies tracking research. Industry Canada. http://www.bioportal.gc.ca/CMFiles/Decima_IC_Bitech_Spring_2006_Final_Report49LYL-9262006-2940.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2007.
Delli Carpini MX, Keeter S. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Discovery Institute. 2007. Top questions. http://www.discovery.org/csc/topQuestions.php. Accessed 20 March 2007.
European Commission 2005a. Europeans, Science and Technology. http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/ ebs/ebs_224_report_en.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2007.
European Commission 2005b. Social Values, Science and Technology. http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2007.
Falk JH, Storksdieck M, Dierking LD. Forthcoming. Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science.
The Gallup Organization. 2007a. Environment. http://brain.gallup.com/content/?ci=1615. Accessed 5 May 2007.
The Gallup Organization. 2007b. Stem Cell Research. http://brain.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=21676. Accessed 23 February 2007.
Gamson WA, Modigliani A. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95(1):1–37.
Gaskell G, Stares S, Allansdottir A, Allum A, Corchero C, Fischler C, Hampel J, Jackson J, Kronberger N, Mejlgaard N, Revuelta G, Schreiner C, Torgerson H, Wagner W. 2006. Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and trends. http://ec.europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/eb_64_3_final_report_second_edition_july_06.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2007.
Gieryn TF. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gokhberg L, Shuvalova O. 2004. Russian Public Opinion of the Knowledge Economy: Science, Innovation, Information Technology and Education as Drivers of Economic Growth and Quality of Life. Moscow, Russia: The British Council Russia.
Gravois J. 2006. Condemned to repeat it. Chronicle of Higher Education 53(14):A21.
Griffiths JM, King DW. 2007. InterConnections: the IMLS national study on the use of libraries, museums, and the Internet. Draft report to the Institute of Museum and Library Services. Washington, DC.
Harris Interactive. 2004. Doctors, scientists, firemen, teachers and military officers top list as "most prestigious occupations." The Harris Poll. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=494. Accessed 18 June 2007.
Harris Interactive. 2006a. Doctors and teachers most trusted among 22 occupations and professions: fewer adults trust the President to tell the truth. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=688. Accessed 18 June 2007.
Harris Interactive. 2006b. Firefighters, doctors and nurses top list as "most prestigious occupations," according to latest Harris poll. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=685. Accessed 18 June 2007.
Harris Interactive. 2006c. Over three-quarters of all U.S. adults—an estimated 172 million—now go online. The Harris Poll. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=668. Accessed 18 June 2007.
Hirsch Jr. ED. 2006. The Knowledge Deficit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Holden C. 2006. Darwin’s place on campus is secure—but not supreme. Science 311: 769–771.
Horrigan J. 2006. The Internet as a resource for news and information about science. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Exploratorium_Science.pdf and http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Exploratorium_Science Topline.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2007.
Jasanoff S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District et al. 400 F.Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005).
Knauper B. 1998. Filter questions and question interpretation. Public Opinion Quarterly 62:70–8.
Korea Science Foundation. 2004. Survey on Public Attitudes of Science and Technology 2004. Seoul, Korea.
Korea Gallup. 2007. Survey of Public Attitudes Toward and Understanding of Science and Technology. http://www.ksf.or.kr. Accessed 13 April 2007.
Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Lowe L, Visser, PS. 2006. The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: a study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change 77(July):7–43.
Levin Y. 2006. The wedge issue that wasn’t. http://www.eppc.org/publications/pubID.2760/pub_detail.asp. Accessed 4 June 2007.
Lupia A. 2006. How elitism undermines the study of voter competence. Critical Review 18(1–3):217–32.
Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre (MASTIC), Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment. 2004. Public Awareness of Science and Technology Malaysia 2004. http://www.mastic.gov.my. Accessed 16 April 2007.
Mellman Group, Inc. 2005. Recent Findings. http//pewagbiotech.org/research/2005update/2005summary.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2007.
Mellman Group, Inc. 2006. Review of public opinion research. http//pewagbiotech.org/research/2006update/2006summary.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2007.
Miller JD, Scott EC, Okamoto S. 2006. Public acceptance of evolution. Science 313(11):765–66.
Monastersky R. 2006. On the front lines in the war over evolution. Chronicle of Higher Education 52(27):A14.
Monastersky R. 2007. Prominent scholar of evolution creates new journal to reinforce teaching of the subject. Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/daily/2007/03/2007030203n.htm. Accessed 2 March 2007.
National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. 2002. The 2001 Survey of Public Attitudes Toward and Understanding of Science & Technology in Japan. Tokyo, Japan.
National Science Board (NSB). 2002. Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. NSB-02-01A. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
National Science Board (NSB). 2006. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. NSB 06-01; NSB 06-01A. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Nature. 2006. Anti-evolutionists raise their profile in Europe. 444:406–7.
Newport F. 2004. Third of Americans say evidence has supported Darwin’s evolution theory. Gallup Poll News Service. http://www.galluppoll.com/content/ ?ci=14107&pg=1. Accessed 18 June 2007.
Newport F. 2006. Almost half of Americans believe humans did not evolve. The Gallup Poll. http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=23200&pg=1. Accessed 18 June 2007.
Nisbet MC. 2003. Who’s getting it right and who’s getting it wrong in the debate about science literacy. http://www.csicop.org/scienceandmedia/literacy. Accessed 4 June 2007.
Nisbet MC. 2004. The Polls—Trends: Public opinion about stem cell research and human cloning. Public Opinion Quarterly 68(1):132–55.
Nisbet MC, Lewenstein BV. 2002. Biotechnology and the American media—The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication 23(4):359–91.
Nisbet MC, Mooney C. 2007. Framing science. Science 316:56.
Nisbet MC, Myers T. 2007. The Polls—Trends. Twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly 71(3):444–70.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2003. The PISA 2003 assessment framework—mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris.
Perse E. 2001. Media Effects and Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pew Research Center. 2005. Trends 2005. Washington, DC.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2004. News audiences increasingly polarized. Online news audiences larger, more diverse. http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=215. Accessed 12 April 2007.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2006a. Online papers modestly boost newspaper readership. Maturing internet news audience—broader than deep. Biennial News Consumption Survey. http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=282. Accessed 12 April 2007.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2006b. Pragmatic Americans liberal and conservative on social issues. Most want middle ground on abortion. http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=283. Accessed 7 March 2007.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2007a. Public attentiveness to news stories: 1986–2006. http://people-press.org/nii/. Accessed 11 January 2007.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2007b. Public knowledge of current affairs little changed by news and information revolutions. What Americans know: 1989-2007. http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=319. Accessed 16 April 2007.
Project for Excellence in Journalism. 2005. The state of the news media. An annual report on American journalism. http://www.stateorthemedia.org/2005/narratice_newspapers_contentanalysis.asp?cat=2&. Accessed 23 January 2007.
Public Agenda. 2006. Reality check 2006: Are parents and students ready for more math and science? http://www.publicagenda.org/research/research_reports_details.cfm?list=96. Accessed 18 June 2007.
Research!America. 2006. America Speaks: Poll Data Booklet. Vol. 7. Alexandria, VA.
Rose L, Dugger Jr. WE. 2002. ITEA/Gallup Poll Reveals What Americans Think About Technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
Roth W-M, Lee S. 2002. Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science 11:33–56.
Saad L. 2006a. Americans see environment as getting worse. The Gallup Poll. http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=22471. Accessed 4 March 2007.
Saad. L. 2006b. Americans still not highly concerned about global warming. The Gallup Poll. http://www.galluppoll.com/content/default.aspx?ci=22291&pg=1&t=61LpOiFCuex.LA. Accessed 4 March 2007.
Saad. L. 2007. Environmental concern holds firm during past year. The Gallup Poll. http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=26971. Accessed 30 March 2007.
Schaeffer NC, Presser S. 2003. The science of asking questions. Annual Review of Sociology 29:65–88.
Scheufele DA. 2006. Messages and heuristics: how audiences form attitudes about emerging technologies. In: Turney J, editor. Engaging Science: Thoughts, deeds, analysis and action. London: The Wellcome Trust. p 20–5.
Scheufele DA, Tewksbury D. 2007. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication 57:9–20.
Schuman H , Presser S. 1996. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Shukla R. 2005. India Science Report: Science Education, Human Resources, and Public Attitude toward Science and Technology. New Delhi, India: National Council of Applied Economic Research.
Sterngold A, Warland RH, Herrmann RO. 1994. Do surveys overstate public concerns? Public Opinion Quarterly 58(Summer):255–63.
Toumey C. 2006. National discourses on democratizing nanotechnology. Quaderni 61:81–101.
Tyndall Report. 2007. Tyndallreport.com. Accessed 18 June 2007.
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). 2006. New poll: Americans continue to oppose funding stem cell research that destroys human embryos. http://www.nccbuscc.org/comm/archives/2006/06-109.shtml. Accessed 18 June 2007.
Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Center for Public Policy. 2006. Opinions shifting on stem cell research; opposition to cloning continues. VCU Life Sciences Survey. http://www.vcu.edu/lifesci/images2/ls_survey_2006 _report.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2007.
