References
Adamic L. 2000. Zipf, Power-laws, and Pareto—A Ranking Tutorial. Palo Alto: Information Dynamics Lab, HP Labs. http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/ranking/ranking.html. Accessed 27 April 2007.
Adams J, Black G, Clemmons R, Stephan P. 2005. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999. Research Policy 34:259–85.
Association of American Universities. 2006. University research: Understanding its role. Updated May 2006. http://www.aau.edu/resuniv/UResFS.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2007.
Bell R. 2007. The changing research and publication environment in American research universities. SRS 07-204. Working paper. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Bordons M, Gómez I. 2000. Collaboration networks in science. In: Cronin B, Atkins HB, editors. The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. p 197–213.
Branstetter L, Ogura Y. 2005. Is academic science driving a surge in industrial innovation? Evidence from patent citations. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper 11561. www.nber.org/papers/w11561. Accessed 4 September 2007.
Cummings JN, Kiesler S. 2005. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science 35(5):703–22.
Cummings JN, Kiesler S. 2007. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy 36(10):138–152.
de Solla Price D. 1978. Toward a model for science indicators. In: Elkana Y, Lederberg J, Merton R, Thackray A, Zuckerman H, editors. Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators. New York: John Wiley and Sons. p 69–95.
Gauffriau M, Larsen P. 2005. Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies. Scientometrics 64(1):85–93.
Glänzel W. 2001. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics 51(1):69–115.
Glänzel W, Schubert A. 2004. Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: Moed HFM, Glänzel W, Schmoch U, editors. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies on S&T Systems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 257–76.
Glänzel W, Schubert A. 2005. Domesticity and internationality in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics 65(3):323–42.
Gómez I, Fernández MT, Sebastián J. 1999. Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 44(3):441–57.
Hill D, Rapoport A, Lehming R, Bell R. 2007. Changing U.S. Output of Scientific Articles: 1988–2003. NSF 07-320. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Javitz H, Hill D, Rapoport A, Bell R, Lehming R, Fecso R. 2007. U.S. academic scientific publishing. Working paper. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Forthcoming.
Kaiser, J. 2006. NIH gives young investigators a lift. ScienceNOW Daily News. January 27. http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2006/127/3. Accessed 8 June 2007.
Katz J, Martin B. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26:1–18.
Kim M-J. 2005. Korean science and international collaboration, 1995–2000. Scientometrics 63(2):321–39.
Lundberg J, Tomson G, Lundkvist I, Skår J, Brommels M. 2006. Collaboration uncovered: Exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics 69(3):575–89.
Merton RK. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Storer NW, editor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mowery D. 2002. The changing role of universities in the 21st century U.S. R&D system. In: Teich A, Nelson D, Lita S, editors. AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2002. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. p 253–71.
Narin F, Stevens K, Whitlow E. 1991. Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics 21(3):313–23.
National Research Council (NRC). 1991. Ending Mandatory Retirement for Tenured Faculty: The Consequences for Higher Education. Hammond PB, Morgan HP, editors. Washington, DC.
National Research Council (NRC). 2005. Bridges to Independence: Fostering the Independence of New Investigators in Biomedical Research. Washington, DC.
National Science Board (NSB). 2006. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Two volumes. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (volume 1, NSB 06-01; volume 2, NSB 06-01A).
National Science Foundation (NSF). 2003. Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 1995a. Guide to NSF Science/Engineering Resources Data. NSF 95-318. Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 1995b. NSF Survey Instruments Used in Collecting Science and Engineering Resources Data. NSF 95-317. Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation (NSF/SRS). 2006. Academic Institutions of Minority Faculty with S&E Doctorates. NSF InfoBrief 06-318. Washington, DC.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2007a. Asia’s Rising Science and Technology Strength: Comparative Indicators for Asia, the European Union, and the United States. NSF 07-319. Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2007b. Master Government List of Federally Funded R&D Centers. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf06316/. Accessed 21 August 2007.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2007c. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering 2007. NSF 07-315. Arlington, VA. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2008. Retirement Among Doctoral Scientists and Engineers Working in Education. Washington, DC. Forthcoming.
Owen-Smith J, Powell W. 2001. To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer 26:99–114.
Owen-Smith J, Powell W. 2003. The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Research Policy 32:1695–1711.
Schubert A, Glänzel W. 2006. Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics 69(2):409–28.
Steelman JR.1947. Science and Public Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Reprinted 1980. New York: Arno Press.
Stephan P, Gurmu S, Sumell A, Black G. 2007. Who’s patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of earned doctorates. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16(2):71–99.
Thursby J, Jensen R, Thursby M. 2001. Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 26:59–72.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). 2006. Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2006. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/annual/2006/50301_table1.html. Accessed 2 September 2007.
Uzun A. 2006. Science and technology policy in Turkey: National strategies for innovation and change during the 1983–2003 period and beyond. Scientometrics 66(3):551–59.
Wuchty S, Jones B, Uzzi B. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316:1036–39.
Zhou P, Leydesdorff L. 2006. The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy 35:83–104.
Zitt M, Bassecoulard E, Okubo Y. 2000. Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics 47(3):627–57.
