[NIFL-POVRACELIT:496] X-posted from the Nifl-Homeless list

From: Mary Ann Corley (macorley1@earthlink.net)
Date: Wed May 30 2001 - 17:06:16 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f4UL6Gf16460; Wed, 30 May 2001 17:06:16 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 17:06:16 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <003001c0e94c$2d7e1d80$23bffea9@hppav>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Mary Ann Corley" <macorley1@earthlink.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-POVRACELIT:496] X-posted from the Nifl-Homeless list
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Status: O
Content-Length: 1752
Lines: 40

Dear Subscribers:
The following link will lead you to a New York Times review on "Nickel and
Dimed," a book written by Barbara Ehrenreich. Ms. Ehrenreich decided to do
personal research on what it means to live on a minimum wage salary in the
U.S., and she spent a year living for three months in different regions,
working low-wage jobs and trying to keep afloat.

What she writes is interesting in two ways:

Firstly, it sheds a personal and anecdotal light on the current issues faced
by people working in the U.S. without education or specific skill training.
I'm not sure whether this is a common thread among the people you serve, but
it certainly is at Homes for the Homeless, and it might be a useful place to
begin a conversation with clients to assess what skills they may need to
avoid that situation when they leave a shelter.

Secondly, (and a slightly more theoretical analysis) Ms. Ehrenreich's
methods raise the question of whether this investigation, or this method of
research in general, is appropriate. Given that Ms. Ehrenrich was writing
from a position of privilege (she could always go back to her profession,
return to her home to write up her research results, etc.), is her research
as valid. And just as important - what impact does her stepping into the
world of low-wage jobs and then stepping out of it for the purposes of her
book have on the people who don't have that luxury, who have to continue on
in low-wage professions long-term? Just throwing this out as a possible
topic for discussion, and wondering what your ideas are.

The review was written by Dorothy Gallagher, and can be found at:

http://www.nytimes.com/books/01/05/13/reviews/010513.13gallagt.html

Read on!

Jocelyn Gottlieb
hn4061@handsnet.org



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:33:05 EST