Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of perform.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USASpending.gov Last Updated
August 25, 2008

Contracts data was updated for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was updated for 15 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DOD, DOT, DHS, GSA, HHS, NRC, OPM, SBA and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Massachusetts 6 (John F. Tierney)
(FY 2007)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2007
Total dollars: $3,006,853,025
The amount for this search is 0.7% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This Congressional District is ranked 29 among districts for this year.
Total number of contractors: 558
Total number of transactions: 11,765
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$246,957,200
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$406,559,771
Competition within a limited pool$486,227,434
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$1,681,378
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$31,940,931
Not competed for an allowable reason$1,805,779,114
Not identified, soon to be addressed$27,707,196

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Massachusetts 6 (John F. Tierney)$2,013,800,751
Massachusetts 7 (Edward J. Markey)$462,070,155
Alabama 5 (Robert E. (Bud) Cramer Jr.)$193,806,665
Ohio 1 (Steve Chabot)$83,716,670
Virginia 8 (James P. Moran)$31,957,989

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Gas Turbines and Jet Engines, Aircraft; Prime Moving, and Components$853,320,235
Defense Missile and Space Systems -- Engineering Development (R&D)$406,832,864
Other Research and Development -- Engineering Development (R&D)$299,386,067
Gas Turbines and Jet Engines, Non-Aircraft; and Components$209,901,308
Defense Missile and Space Systems -- Advanced Development (R&D)$200,594,466

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

NAVY, Department of the$854,691,364
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$715,778,225
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$563,503,579
Missile Defense Agency$414,498,155
Defense Logistics Agency$190,372,310

Top 10 Contractors

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY$1,160,575,021
RAYTHEON COMPANY$600,783,640
THE MITRE CORPORATION$297,562,450
RAYTHEON COMPANY (unknown parent company, no D & B number)$193,663,000
TEXTRON INC.$178,872,270
CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.$44,597,669
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (unknown parent company, no D & B number)$32,508,293
PATRIOT PETROLEUM INC$27,353,881
ODYSSEY SYSTEMS CONSULTING GROUP, LTD.$26,735,362
SUMARIA SYSTEMS, INC.$23,500,932

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$0
2001$0
2002$0
2003$0
2004$2,156,278,916
2005$2,741,997,021
2006$2,656,636,423
2007$3,006,853,025
2008 3Q * Partial year help link$1,301,299,546
*Note: FY 2008 only includes data up to second and part of third quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on September 21, 2008.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.