Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of perform.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USASpending.gov Last Updated
August 25, 2008

Contracts data was updated for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was updated for 15 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DOD, DOT, DHS, GSA, HHS, NRC, OPM, SBA and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in New Mexico (unknown districts)
(FY 2006)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2006
Total dollars: $4,121,046,207
The amount for this search is 1.0% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This Congressional District is ranked 16 among districts for this year.
Total number of contractors: 202
Total number of transactions: 902
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$2,148,804,483
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$3,088,215
Competition within a limited pool$16,244,256
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$52,186
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$2,194,001
Not competed for an allowable reason$1,946,530,981
Not identified, soon to be addressed$4,132,086

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

New Mexico (unknown districts)$4,070,105,824
New Mexico 2 (Stevan Pearce)$17,808,898
New Mexico 1 (Heather Wilson)$13,331,220
Texas (unknown districts)$2,726,767
Florida 9 (Michael Bilirakis)$2,294,578

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Operation of Government-Owned Facilities -- Government-Owned Contractor-Operated (GOCO) R&D Facilities$4,052,735,639
Defense Missile and Space Systems -- Operational Systems Development (R&D)$9,999,980
Operation of Government-Owned Facilities -- Other Airfield Structures$9,548,360
Physical Sciences -- Applied Research and Exploratory Development (R&D)$7,447,966
A&E Production Engineering Services (including Design and Control, and Building Programming)$5,553,000

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

ENERGY, Department of$4,066,217,562
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$14,242,664
National Institutes of Health$11,542,480
Bureau of Reclamation$5,997,829
Public Buildings Service$5,650,623

Top 10 Contractors

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$2,122,407,528
CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF (unknown parent company, no D & B number)$1,930,328,111
NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY$10,022,705
PIERCE ENTERPRISES INC$9,548,360
LOVELACE RESPIRATORY RESEARCH INSTITUTE$8,125,255
CSI AVIATION SERVICES, INC.$6,593,895
PUEBLO LAGUNA$5,637,530
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO$4,458,271
SEGO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$1,999,722
QUALITY MAINTENANCE INC.$1,860,629

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$5,508,065,322
2001$7,071,352,563
2002$7,211,823,047
2003$7,438,703,809
2004$4,201,117,580
2005$4,465,148,210
2006$4,121,046,207
2007$2,540,896,591
2008 3Q * Partial year help link$1,973,767,866
*Note: FY 2008 only includes data up to second and part of third quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on September 21, 2008.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.