Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

HIV prophylaxis following occupational exposure.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • New York State Department of Health. HIV prophylaxis following occupational exposure. New York (NY): New York State Department of Health; 2008 Jan. 22 p. [17 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: New York State Department of Health. HIV prophylaxis following occupational exposure. New York (NY): New York State Department of Health; 2004 Jun. 41 p.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Rationale for Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP)

The Committee recommends the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens for all significant-risk occupational exposures when the health care worker (HCW) is evaluated within 36 hours of exposure.

Recording Information Following Occupational Exposure

When an occupational exposure occurs, the following information should be recorded in the HCW's confidential medical record:

  • Date and time of the exposure
  • Details of the procedure being performed and the use of protective equipment at the time of the exposure
  • The type, severity, and amount of fluid to which the HCW was exposed
  • Details about the exposure source
  • Medical documentation that provides details about post-exposure management

General Management Considerations

Wound and skin sites should be cleansed with soap and water immediately. Exposed mucous membranes should be flushed with water.

PEP is recommended for exposure to blood or visibly bloody fluid or other potentially infectious material (e.g., semen; vaginal secretions; and cerebrospinal, synovial, pleural, peritoneal, pericardial, and amniotic fluids) associated with potential human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission and in any of the following exposure situations:

  • Break in the skin by a sharp object (including both hollow-bore and cutting needles or broken glassware) that is contaminated with blood, visibly bloody fluid, or other potentially infectious material, or that has been in the source patient's blood vessel
  • Bite from an HIV-infected patient with visible bleeding in the mouth that causes bleeding in the HCW
  • Splash of blood, visibly bloody fluid, or other potentially infectious material to a mucosal surface (mouth, nose, or eyes)
  • A non-intact skin (e.g., dermatitis, chapped skin, abrasion, or open wound) exposure to blood, visibly bloody fluid, or other potentially infectious material

If HIV serostatus of the source is unknown, voluntary HIV testing of the source should be sought. In New York State, specific informed consent for HIV testing is required.

If rapid blood testing is available on site, it should be used to determine the HIV status of the source patient. Results are usually available within 30 minutes of testing. Rules regarding confidentiality and consent for this testing are identical to those for other HIV tests.

If the preliminary rapid test result is positive, the result should be given to the source patient. To establish a diagnosis of HIV infection, the test must be confirmed by a Western blot assay, which should be performed as soon as possible.

If the result from testing the source patient is not immediately available and PEP is indicated based on assessment, the initiation of PEP should not be delayed pending the test result.

The New York State Department of Health/AIDS Institute (NYSDOH AI) Medical Care Criteria Committee believes that the critical decision point should be to determine whether the HCW has had a percutaneous, mucocutaneous, or non-intact skin exposure to potentially HIV-infected blood, visibly bloody fluid, or other potentially infectious material. For these exposures, prompt initiation of PEP followed by telephone or in-person consultation with a clinician experienced in HIV PEP is recommended.

Implementing PEP

PEP should be initiated as soon as possible, ideally within 2 hours and no later than 36 hours post-exposure. The prescribing provider should ensure that the HCW has access to the full course of antiretroviral (ARV) medications.

HAART is always recommended for at-risk exposures. Any variance from the recommended regimens should be made in consultation with an HIV Specialist or an occupational health clinician experienced in providing PEP (see HIV Specialist Policy in Appendix I of the original guideline document).

ARV medications for PEP should be readily available to HCWs who sustain a known or highly suspect occupational exposure to HIV. In establishing plans for providing PEP, employers should determine the following:

  • How PEP will be made available within 1 to 2 hours of an exposure
  • How a 24- to 48-hour supply of PEP will be made available for urgent use
  • Who will be given authority for releasing drugs for this purpose
  • How the HCW will obtain PEP drugs to complete the 4-week regimen (some individuals may be reluctant to go to their local pharmacy)

Confidential baseline HIV antibody testing of the HCW should be obtained at the time the occupational exposure is reported or within 72 hours of initiating PEP.

Confidential HIV testing of the source should be obtained as soon as possible after the exposure. A special consent form for testing the source patient is available and must be used (see Appendix C in the original guideline document).

If the source patient's HIV test result is negative, the HCW should be informed of the small chance that it could be a false-negative result if the source patient has been recently infected. PEP should be recommended in situations when a significant risk exposure has occurred and the clinician suspects that the source patient has a strong likelihood of having recently acquired HIV infection.

If a recommendation to begin PEP is declined, this decision should be documented in the medical record of the HCW.

All patients placed on PEP should be re-evaluated within 72 hours of their exposure. This allows for further clarification of the nature of the exposure, review of available source patient serologies, and evaluation of adherence to and toxicities associated with the PEP regimen.

A total of 4 weeks of treatment is recommended. This treatment duration is based on animal data and is generally recommended by HIV Specialists.

If an HCW presents for evaluation of a high-risk exposure at a time >36 hours after the incident, rather than late initiation of PEP, close monitoring of the HCW for signs and symptoms of acute HIV infection is generally recommended with subsequent introduction of HAART if acute seroconversion occurs (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document, which provides a clinical algorithm for "PEP Following Occupational Exposure").

Recommended PEP Regimens

Clinicians should initiate three-drug ARV therapy for significant occupational exposures to HIV. The preferred PEP regimen is zidovudine 300 mg orally (po) twice a day (bid) + lamivudine 150 mg po bid (or Combivir 1 po bid) plus tenofovir 300 mg po once per day (qd), or Zidovudine300 mg po bid plus Emtricitabine 200 mg po qd + Tenofovir 300 mg po qd (or Truvada 1 po qd). Alternative agents may be used in the setting of drug intolerance or toxicity (see Table 3 and Appendix A in the original guideline document).

The PEP regimen should be continued for 4 weeks.

When the source is known to be HIV infected and information regarding previous ARV therapy, current level of viral suppression, or genotypic/phenotypic resistance profile is available, the clinician, in consultation with an HIV Specialist, should individualize the regimen to more effectively suppress viral replication.

Monitoring the HCW Following Occupational Exposure

Clinicians should closely monitor people receiving PEP to detect ARV-induced toxicities (See the National Guideline Clearinghouse [NGC] summary of the New York State Department of Health [NYSDOH] guideline Antiretroviral Therapy for monitoring recommendations).

Because of the complexity and potential adverse effects of the treatment regimens, longitudinal care of the exposed HCW should be provided either directly by or in consultation with an HIV Specialist or an experienced occupational health clinician who is familiar with the most current PEP guidelines.

Sequential confidential HIV testing should be obtained at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post-exposure even if PEP is declined (see Table 4, "Monitoring Recommendations after Initiation of PEP Regimen Following Occupational Exposure Among HCWs" in the original guideline document). In New York State, if the test result is positive, a Western blot assay must be performed to confirm the diagnosis of HIV infection. See Appendices D and E of the original guideline document for specific counseling recommendations.

If the HCW presents with signs or symptoms of acute HIV seroconversion, immediate consultation with an HIV Specialist should be sought for optimal diagnostic testing and treatment options.

The HCW should be evaluated weekly over the first month to assess PEP adherence, adverse effects of the ARV therapy, interval physical complaints, and emotional status. (See the NGC summaries of the NYSDOH guidelines Antiretroviral Therapy, Long-Term Complications of Antiretroviral Therapy, and HIV Drug-Drug Interactions for monitoring recommendations, adverse drug effects, and important drug interactions, respectively).

PEP for the Pregnant HCW

Before administering PEP to a pregnant woman, the clinician should discuss the potential benefits and risks to her and to the fetus. Drugs to avoid during pregnancy include the following:

  • Efavirenz
  • Combination of stavudine and didanosine
  • Unboosted indinavir in the second and third trimester

Based on increasing clinical experience with HAART, PEP is indicated at any time during pregnancy when a significant exposure has occurred, despite possible risk to the woman and the fetus. Expert consultation should be sought. When PEP is indicated, it should be initiated ideally within 2 hours and generally no later than 36 hours post-exposure.

Efavirenz, which has been associated with teratogenicity in monkeys, should not be used in pregnant women.

The combination of didanosine and stavudine should be avoided due to an increased risk of mitochondrial toxicity in pregnant women.

Unboosted indinavir should not be used in pregnant women in the second or third trimester due to a substantial decrease in antepartum indinavir plasma concentrations.

Clinicians should advise women who may have been exposed to HIV through occupational exposure to avoid breastfeeding for 6 months after the exposure.

Occupational PEP for Hepatitis B and C

The hepatitis B vaccine series should be initiated in non-hepatitis B virus (HBV)-immune HCWs who sustain a blood or body fluid exposure.

Administration of prophylactic hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and the initiation of the hepatitis B vaccine series (at different sites) are recommended when the non-HBV-immune HCW sustains a blood or body fluid exposure to a source with known acute or active HBV (see Table below).

Following an occupational exposure, the source patient's HBV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) serologic status should be determined.

If the source patient is known to be HCV-antibody positive or if the serostatus is unknown, baseline HCV serology and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) should be obtained from the exposed HCW and should be repeated at 4 to 6 months post-exposure.

If the source patient is known to be HCV-antibody positive, an HCV antibody and qualitative HCV viral load (HCV ribonucleic acid polymerase chain reaction [RNA PCR]) should be obtained from the exposed HCW 4 weeks after exposure.

In the setting of an acute elevation of ALT in the exposed HCW in the first 24 weeks post-exposure, a qualitative HCV RNA PCR should be obtained.

When HCV infection is identified early, the HCW should be referred for medical management to a clinician with experience in treating HCV.

Table
Recommended Post-Exposure Prophylaxis for Occupational Exposure to Hepatitis B Virus
Vaccination and/or Antibody Response Status of Exposed Patient* Treatment when Source Is:
HBsAg Positive HBsAg Negative Source Unknown or not Available for Testing
Unvaccinated/ non-immune HBIG (dose 0.06 mL/kg intramuscularly) x 1; initiate HB vaccine series Initiate HB vaccine series Initiate HB vaccine series
Previously vaccinated, known responder** No treatment No treatment No treatment
Previously vaccinated, known non-responder** HBIG (dose 0.06 mL/kg intramuscularly) x 2 or HBIG (dose 0.06 mL/kg intramuscularly) x 1 and initiate revaccination*** No treatment If known high-risk source, treat as if source were HBsAg positive
Previously vaccinated, antibody response unknown Test exposed person for anti-HBs:
  • If adequate**, no treatment
  • If inadequate**, HBIG x1 and vaccine booster
No treatment Test exposed person for anti-HBs:
  • If adequate**, no treatment
  • If inadequate**, initiate revaccination

Reprinted from the Updated US Public Health Service Guidelines for the Management of Occupational Exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and Recommendations for Post-Exposure Prophylaxis. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001;50(RR-11):1-42. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5011a1.htm.

HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBIG, hepatitis B immune globulin; anti-HBs, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen.

*Persons who have previously been infected with HBV are immune to re-infection and do not require PEP.
** Responder is defined as person with adequate levels of serum antibody to HBsAg (serum anti-HBs >10mIU/mL); non-responder is a person with inadequate response to vaccination (serum anti HBs <10mIU/mL).
*** The option of giving one dose HBIG and re-initiating the vaccine series is preferred for non-responders who have not completed a second 3-dose vaccine series. For persons who previously completed a second vaccine series but failed to respond, two doses of HBIG are preferred.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

An algorithm is provided in the original guideline document for "Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) Following Occupational Exposure."

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of evidence supporting the recommendations is not specifically stated.

Because there are no clinical trials on which to definitively base recommendations, the New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute (NYSDOH AI) guidelines are based on best practice evidence and constitute the considered opinion of a group of expert clinicians in the field of adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) medicine.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • New York State Department of Health. HIV prophylaxis following occupational exposure. New York (NY): New York State Department of Health; 2008 Jan. 22 p. [17 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2003 Mar (revised 2008 Jan)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

New York State Department of Health - State/Local Government Agency [U.S.]

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

New York State Department of Health

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Medical Care Criteria Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Committee Chair: Jessica E Justman, MD, Columbia University, New York, New York

Vice-Chair: Barry S Zingman, MD, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York

Members: Judith A Aberg, MD, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Bruce D Agins, MD, MPH, New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute, New York, New York; Barbara H Chaffee, MD, MPH, Binghamton Family Care Center, Binghamton, New York; Steven M Fine, MD, PhD, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Barbara E Johnston, MD, Saint Vincent's-Manhattan Comprehensive HIV Center, New York, New York; Jason M Leider, MD, PhD, North Bronx Healthcare Network of Jacobi and North Central Bronx Hospitals, Bronx, New York; Joseph P McGowan, MD, FACP, Center for AIDS Research & Treatment, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York; Samuel T Merrick, MD, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York; Rona M Vail, MD, Callen-Lorde Community Health Center, New York, New York

Liaisons: Sheldon T Brown, MD, Liaison to the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, New York; Douglas G Fish, MD, Liaison to the New York State Department of Corrections, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York; Peter G Gordon, MD, Liaison to the HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York; Fabienne Laraque, MD, MPH, Liaison to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Treatment and Housing Bureau of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control, New York, New York; Joseph R Masci, MD, Liaison to New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Elmhurst Hospital Center, Elmhurst, New York

AIDS Institute Staff Physician: Charles J Gonzalez, MD, New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute, New York, New York

Principal Investigator: John G Bartlett, MD, the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: New York State Department of Health. HIV prophylaxis following occupational exposure. New York (NY): New York State Department of Health; 2004 Jun. 41 p.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

This guideline is also available as a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) download from the New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute Web site.

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on March 18, 2004. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI on January 11, 2005. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on September 19, 2007. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on June 27, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo