Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

The management of depression in cancer patients: a clinical practice guideline.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Rodin G, Katz M, Lloyd N, Green E, Mackay JA, Wong R, Supportive Care Guidelines Group. The management of depression in cancer patients: a clinical practice guideline. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2006 Oct 17. 39 p. (Evidence-based series; no. 13-6). [78 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory and/or warning information has been released.

  • May 2, 2007, Antidepressant drugs: Update to the existing black box warning on the prescribing information on all antidepressant medications to include warnings about the increased risks of suicidal thinking and behavior in young adults ages 18 to 24 years old during the first one to two months of treatment.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

There is an absence of clear evidence derived from randomized controlled trials in cancer patients on which to inform the conclusions; therefore, the following recommendations reflect the expert consensus of the guideline panel members (which comprises nurses, palliative care physicians, medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists, an anesthetist, radiation therapists, methodologists, administrators, two psychiatrists and one psychologist) informed by the evidence reviewed and feedback from Ontario health care providers.

  • Treatment of pain and other reversible physical symptoms should be instituted prior to the initiation of specific antidepressant treatment.
  • Antidepressant medications should be considered to treat moderate to severe major depression in cancer patients. Current evidence, however, does not support the relative superiority of one pharmacological modality of treatment over another nor the superiority of pharmacological versus psychosocial interventions. The choice of an antidepressant should be informed by the side effect profiles of medication, tolerability of treatment including the potential for interaction with other current medications, response to prior treatment, and patient preference.
  • Cancer patients diagnosed with major depression may benefit from a combined modality approach that includes both psychosocial and pharmacological interventions. Psychosocial treatment approaches that may be of value include those that provide information and support and which address emotional, cognitive, and/or behavioural factors.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations are supported by randomized trials, a systematic review, and a comparative cohort study.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Rodin G, Katz M, Lloyd N, Green E, Mackay JA, Wong R, Supportive Care Guidelines Group. The management of depression in cancer patients: a clinical practice guideline. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2006 Oct 17. 39 p. (Evidence-based series; no. 13-6). [78 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Oct

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Program in Evidence-based Care - State/Local Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER COMMENT

The Program in Evidence-based Care (PEBC) is a Province of Ontario initiative sponsored by Cancer Care Ontario and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Cancer Care Ontario
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Supportive Care Guidelines Group

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Dr. Katz has acted as a consultant or received honoraria from Wyeth, a manufacturer of venlafaxine; Lundbeck, a manufacturer of escitalopram and citalopram; and Organon, a maker of mirtazapine. No other potential conflicts of interest were declared by the authors of this Evidence-Based Series report.

GUIDELINE STATUS

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on March 27, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo