Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: a clinical practice guideline.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Ung YC, Maziak DE, Vanderveen JA, Smith CA, Gulenchyn K, Evans WK, Lung Cancer Disease Site Group. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: a clinical practice guideline. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2007 Apr 27. 54 p. (Evidence-based series; no. 7-20). [135 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

There is limited randomized controlled trial evidence related to the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) on the clinical management of the lung cancer patient. In addition, PET technology has evolved significantly over time making it difficult to make recommendations based on studies using out-of-date imaging technologies. However, based on the interpretation of available evidence and expert consensus opinion, the Lung Cancer Disease Site Group (DSG) recommends the following:

Diagnosis of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules (SPN)

  • Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is recommended as the first-line diagnostic approach in the workup of solitary pulmonary nodules. PET should be reserved for those situations in which a biopsy is inconclusive or contraindicated
    • PET appears to have a high sensitivity and specificity to differentiate benign from malignant lesions as small as 1 cm in size. Lesions less than 1 cm are difficult to categorize as they lack a sufficient mass of metabolically active cells. False-negative results can occur with low-grade malignant tumours due to their lower metabolic activity or with ground-glass opacities as may be seen in bronchoalveolar carcinomas.

Staging of Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

  • In the opinion of the Lung Disease Site Group, the evidence on whether the addition of PET to conventional staging or the up-front use of PET in mediastinal and extrathoracic staging changes clinical management in patients with non-small cell lung cancer is conflicting.
  • Prospective studies have found that PET detects unexpected distant metastases in up to 15% of patients, which may lead to changes in patient management.
  • For potential surgical candidates, mediastinoscopy is recommended to verify that PET positive mediastinal lesions are due to cancer in view of the potential for false positive results. Mediastinoscopy is necessary to ensure that a patient is not denied potentially curative surgery. A solitary extrathoracic site should also be confirmed to be metastatic, if possible, in order that a patient not be denied the chance of curative therapy.

Staging of Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

There is limited evidence on the use of PET in the staging of small cell lung cancer but three prospective trials showed good accuracy in differentiating limited from extensive stage disease.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

A clinical algorithm is provided in the original guideline document for the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations are supported by systematic reviews, meta-analyses, heath technology assessments, practice guidelines, and prospective studies (including randomized controlled trials).

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Ung YC, Maziak DE, Vanderveen JA, Smith CA, Gulenchyn K, Evans WK, Lung Cancer Disease Site Group. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: a clinical practice guideline. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2007 Apr 27. 54 p. (Evidence-based series; no. 7-20). [135 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2007 Apr

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Program in Evidence-based Care - State/Local Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER COMMENT

The Program in Evidence-based Care (PEBC) is a Province of Ontario initiative sponsored by Cancer Care Ontario and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Cancer Care Ontario
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Lung Cancer Disease Site Group

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The members of the Lung Disease Site Group (DSG) disclosed potential conflict of interest relating to this practice guideline. Two of the guideline lead authors are primary investigators for the Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG) positron emission tomography imaging in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (PET-START) and PET imaging in potentially surgically resectable non-small cell lung cancers (ELPET) trials.

GUIDELINE STATUS

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following is available:

  • Browman GP, Levine MN, Mohide EA, Hayward RSA, Pritchard KI, Gafni A, et al. The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation. J Clin Oncol 1995;13(2):502-12.

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI Institute on April 8, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo