skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Photos representing the workforce - Digital Imagery© copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.
www.dol.gov
November 6, 2008    DOL Home > No Crumb Trail

Appendix B.

Details of FY 2001 Performance Goals, Indicators & Baselines


Outcome Goal 1.1 - Increase Employment, Earnings and Assistance -- Performance Goals

1.1A Performance Goal FY 2001: Of those Welfare-to-Work (WtW) participants placed in unsubsidized employment, 66% will remain in the workforce for six months with 6% average earnings increase by the second consecutive quarter following placement.

FY 2000: Of those Welfare-to-Work (WtW) participants placed in unsubsidized employment, 60% will remain in the workforce for six months with 5% average earnings increase by the second consecutive quarter following placement.

FY1999: N/A*

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Employment retention after six months; average earnings change after six months
Data Source • WtW Formula Grant Cumulative Quarterly Financial Status Report (FSR)

• WtW Competitive Grant Cumulative Quarterly Financial Status Report (FSR)

Baseline • WtW FSR unsubsidized employment retention data as of 9/30/99 (10%)

• FY 1999 TANF high performance bonus retention data (80%)

• PY 1997 and PY 1998 JTPA Title IIA welfare follow-up (14 weeks after termination) employment rate data (64%)

Comment The WtW FY 1999 performance goal read "56% of Welfare-to-Work (WtW) program terminees will be placed in unsubsidized employment." The FY 2000 goal was revised to eliminate measuring placement of those terminated, as the concept of termination was not compatible with the WtW focus on providing services to individuals who are working to keep them in the job and help them advance in earnings. As a result, the goal is formulated to measure retention in the workforce and increased earnings at two quarters after placement.

* N/A denotes a performance goal or performance result is not applicable for a given year.

1.1B Performance Goal FY 2001: Of those registered under the WIA adult program, 76% will be employed in the third quarter after program exit, with increased average earnings of $3,600.

FY 2000: Of those registered under the WIA adult program, 75% will be employed in the third quarter after program exit, with increased average earnings of $3,500



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Employment retention after six months; average earnings change after six months
Data Source State WIA reports, (UI wage records will be primary source)
Baseline There is no prior experience with this WIA indicator which is based on the use of UI wage records. An approximation of the goal was derived by analysis of the JTPA program experience of eight states using WIA indicator specifications which yielded a range of from 72% to 84% for employment and from $2602 to $5488 for earnings gain.
Comment The goal for this indicator is preliminary and based upon the limited experiences of 8 States. The goal may be revised based upon the Department reaching agreement with all States on WIA adjusted levels of performance for Program Year 2000. Employment retention includes exiters employed upon registration and in the first quarter after exit. Earnings gain is based upon a comparison of earnings in the second and third quarters after exit with earnings in the second and third quarters prior to registration.

1.1C Performance Goal FY 2001: 76% of job seekers registered by the Wagner-Peyser Act funding stream will have unsubsidized jobs six months after initial entry into employment (Six Month Retention Rate).

FY 2000: N/A



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Percent of individuals registered who received some reportable service, remaining in unsubsidized jobs six months after entry into employment
Data Source Sample of job seekers registered by the Wagner-Peyser Act funding stream who have entered unsubsidized employment and who received some reportable service as reported on the ETA 9002
Baseline New Goal. FY 2001 will become the baseline.
Comment: This goal is related to the implementation of WIA in PY 2000 and the new WIA performance accountability system since local ES offices are mandatory partners in One-Stop Career Centers established by WIA. The goal may be revised based upon implementation of WIA in PY 2000. An instrument to obtain the data for this measure must be developed.

1.1D Performance Goal FY 2001: Increase by 10 percent, the total number of job openings listed with the public employment service, including both those listed with State Employment Security Agencies (SESAs) and those listed directly with America's Job Bank (AJB) via the Internet.

FY 2000: Increase by 15 percent, the total number of job openings listed with the public employment service, including both those listed with State Employment Security Agencies (SESAs) and those listed directly with America's Job Bank (AJB) via the Internet.



FY 1999: Increase by 20 percent, the total number of job openings listed with the public employment service, including both those listed with State Employment Security Agencies (SESAs) and those listed directly with America's Job Bank (AJB) via the Internet.

FY 1999 Performance Results The total number of job openings listed with the public employment service increased by 16.1 percent to 8.5 million. The number of job openings listed with the SESAs increased by 11.9 percent to 7.3 million, while the number of job openings listed directly with AJB increased by 51.8 percent to 1.2 million
Indicator Number of job openings listed with SESAs plus the number of job openings listed directly with AJB
Data Source State Reports
Baseline Baseline will be FY 2000 data. 8.5 million total number of job openings were listed with the public employment service in 1999 (PY 1998). 7.3 million job openings were listed with the SESAs, while 1.2 million job openings were listed directly with AJB.
Comment An increasing proportion of job openings now are being listed on AJB. This goal is subject to fluctuations in the business cycle. If the business cycle turns downward, the goal may be adjusted accordingly.

1.1E Performance Goal FY 2001: Increase by 5% the number of people with disabilities served and increase by 2 percentage points the rate of unsubsidized employment (entered employment rate) in the local Workforce Investment Area.

FY 2000: The new Work Incentive Grant program will be implemented by September 30, 2000, with plans for 40 to 60 awards in State and local areas to enhance services for people with disabilities in the One-Stop Center environment.



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Number of people with disabilities registered under Title I of WIA program; percent of people with disabilities in unsubsidized employment under Title I of WIA
Data Source A grant program reporting system to be established.
Baseline Baseline to be established in FY 2000 using WIA data.
Comment

1.1F Performance Goal FY 2001: During the initial year of funding, at least 100 grants will be awarded and 40,000 non-custodial fathers and 40,000 working poor families enrolled in the Fathers Work Families Win initiative.

FY 2000: N/A
FY 1999: N/A
FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Grants awarded and Persons Enrolled
Data Source Grantee reporting.
Baseline There is no baseline since this is a new initiative for which funding is being requested in the FY 2001 budget.
Comment This output goal is for the FY 2001, the initial year of operation. Outcome goals will be proposed in subsequent years.

1.1G Performance Goal FY 2001: By 2001, increase by 6% the number of newly registered female apprentices over the end of the FY 1999 baseline.

FY 2000: N/A
FY 1999: N/A
FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Percent increase of newly registered female apprentices over the end of the FY 1999 baseline.
Data Source Apprenticeship Information Management System (AIMS)
Baseline In FY 1999, there were 7,551 newly registered female apprentices.
Comment

1.1H Performance Goal FY 2001: 66% of participants will be satisfied with services received from workforce investment activities.

FY 2000: N/A
FY 1999: N/A
FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Participant customer satisfaction.
Data Source WIA state reports
Baseline The goal was based upon limited grantee experience gathering participant customer satisfaction information, including pilot projects.
Comment The indicator is an index of participant customer satisfaction based upon three questions that will be asked of a sample of WIA program exiters. The index is based upon the American Customer Satisfaction Index.

1.1I Performance Goal FY 2001: 61% of employers will be satisfied with services received from workforce investment activities.

FY 2000: N/A
FY 1999: N/A
FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Employer customer satisfaction.
Data Source WIA state reports.
Baseline The goal was based upon limited grantee experience gathering participant customer satisfaction information including pilot projects.
Comment The indicator is an index of employer customer satisfaction based upon three questions that will be asked of a sample of employers using WIA program exiters. The index is based upon the American Customer Satisfaction Index.

1.1J

Performance Goal FY2001: Increase by 10% the number of women prepared for the labor force by providing them with tools and education on equal pay, occupational segregation, pension benefits, dependent care, diverse nontraditional occupations, safe and healthy workplaces, and their rights in the workplace. (From 25,000 to 27,500)
FY 2000: Prepare 25,000 for the labor force by providing them with tools and education on equal pay, etc.
FY 1999: N/A
FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Percent increase of women prepared for the labor force over the number prepared at the end of FY2000.
Data Source The Women's Bureau tracking system ; including quarterly reports, customer comment cards, evaluation forms, sampling of constituents served
Baseline 25,000 women prepared in FY2000
Comment Strategies to achieve the goal will be assessed continuously and revised as deemed necessary

1.1K Performance Goal FY 2001: 27% of those veterans and other eligible persons registering for public labor exchange services will enter employment each year through assistance provided by VETS' funded staff and the Wagner-Peyser funded systems.
FY 2000: Of those veterans and other eligible persons registering for public labor exchange services, 27% will enter employment each year through assistance provided by VETS' funded staff and the Wagner-Peyser funded systems.
FY 1999:N/A
FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Percent of veterans and other eligible persons served by DVOP and LVER specialists who enter employment
Data Source Reports submitted by State Employment Security Agencies
Baseline FY 1999- 27%
Comment This goal will be discussed with stakeholders during the year, to consider adjustments to the minimum standard for future years.

1.1L Performance Goal FY 2001: At least 50% of those veterans and other elegible persons enrolled in homeless veterans reintegration project enter employment.

FY 2000: 50% (estimate)

FY 1999: N/A
FY 1999

Performance

Results

50%
Indicator Number of those veterans and other eligible persons enrolled in HVRP who enter employment.
Data Source Reports submitted by VETS grantees
Baseline FY 1999-50%
Comment

Outcome Goal 1.2 - Increase the Number of Youth Making A Successful Transition to Work -- Performance Goals

1.2A Performance Goal FY 2001: Of the 14-18 year-old youth registered under the WIA youth program, 50% will be either employed, in advanced training, post-secondary education, military service or apprenticeships in the third quarter after program exit.

FY 2000: Of the 14-18 year-old youth registered under the WIA youth program, **% will be either employed, in advanced training, post-secondary education, military service or apprenticeships in the third quarter after program exit.



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Percent of youth in either employment, advanced training, post-secondary education, military service, or apprenticeship six month after exit from program.
Data Source State WIA reports; UI wage records
Baseline There is no prior experience with this indicator and no basis for approximating a baseline from current JTPA reports.
Comment Quantified levels for performance measures under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) will be developed through cooperative negotiation between DOL, its partners, and stakeholders. A small number of States have begun early implementation of WIA for PY 1999, however, data has not previously been collected on this measure which would assist in the development of a baseline. The Department believes this measure will serve as a valid measurement of program performance. The results achieved by the early implementing States will form the basis for the establishment of a baseline for this measure. As data becomes available from the remaining States, a revised baseline level will be established or revised as necessary.

1.2B Performance Goal: FY 2001: Of the 19-21 year-old youth registered under the WIA youth program, 70% will be employed in the third quarter after program exit.

FY 2000: Of the 19-21 year-old youth served under the WIA youth program, 70% will be employed in the third quarter after program exit.



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Percent of youth employed six months after program exit.
Data Source State WIA reports, (UI wage )records will be primary source
Baseline There is no prior experience with this WIA indicator which is based on the use of UI wage records. An approximation of the goal was derived by analysis of the JTPA program experience of eight states using WIA indicator specifications which yielded a range of from 69% to 81% for employment.
Comment Quantified levels for performance measures under WIA will be developed through cooperative negotiation between DOL, its partners, and stakeholders. A small number of States have begun early implementation of WIA for PY 1999, and this limited performance will form the basis of baseline data and negotiation of goals for PY 2000 - the period which all States will begin to operate under WIA. The above goal serves as a proxy measure for the expected level of performance based upon levels negotiated with a limited number of early implementing States. The proxy measure will be revised and a baseline level established as performance data is available from the remaining States. Note: the goal excludes youth who go on to post secondary education or advanced training.

1.2C Performance Goal FY 2001: 85% of Job Corps graduates will get jobs with entry average hourly wages of $7.25 or be enrolled in education ; 70% will continue to be employed or enrolled in education six months after their initial placement date. (Placement and Retention).

FY 2000: Increase the percent of Job Corps graduates who get jobs or pursue education to 85%; those who get jobs will have an average entry wage increase from the previous year and 70% will still have a job or will be pursuing education after 90 days.



FY 1999: 75% of Job Corps trainees will get jobs or pursue further education, with those obtaining jobs having an average starting wage of $6.50 per hour.

FY 1999 Performance Results The goal was exceeded: 82.4% of Job Corps trainees were placed in jobs, the military, or pursued further education. For those placed in jobs, the average wage was $6.87 per hour.
Indicator Percentages of Job Corps graduates who obtain jobs, average hourly entry wages, percent who continue employment or education for the following six months..
Data Source Job Corps Management Information System.

*Six month job retention goal derived at by projecting from existing thirteen week job placement data collection.

Baseline 75% of Job Corps trainees got jobs or pursued education and, for those with jobs, the average wage was $5.98 per hour (FY 1995).
Comment Job Corps targets severely disadvantaged youth with a variety of barriers to self-sufficiency, including deficiencies in education and job skills. To provide enhanced quality placement services required by the WIA, in FY 2001 Job Corps will focus resources on program improvements informed by employer feedback to increase job retention for graduates.

1.2D Performance Goal FY 2001: By 2001, 70% of Youth Opportunity Grant participants placed in employment, the military, advanced training, post-secondary education, or apprenticeships will be retained at six-months.

FY 2000: At least 25 communities will be awarded Youth Opportunity Grants and be operational to collectively enroll 3000 youth by the end of FY 2000



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Youth retained for six months in employment, military, advanced training, post-secondary education, or apprenticeships
Data Source Grantee reports.
Baseline Baseline will be established first full year of the program.
Comment The Youth Opportunity initiative is authorized under the new Workforce Investment Act. It is aimed at increasing the long-term employment of youth living in high-poverty communities. Following the establishment of the baseline data in PY 2000, ETA will develop an outcome-oriented measure focusing on employment of out-of-school youth in the Youth Opportunity grant areas.

1.2E Performance Goal: FY 2001: In 25 communities, Youth Councils will build local partnerships with business, community organizations, and schools to improve opportunities for at-risk youth.

FY 2000: N/A



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Number of partnerships created.
Data Source Project reports and documentation from local grantees.
Baseline The Department of Labor's involvement in this initiative is new.
Comment This is a system-building initiative. Currently administered by the Departments of Justice, Education, and HHS, the Department of Labor will join this multi-agency initiative.

1.2F Performance Goal: FY 2001: 65% of Responsible Reintegration for Young Offender program graduates will get jobs, re-enroll in high school, or be enrolled in post-secondary education or training.

FY 2000: N/A



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator: Percentages of program graduates who obtain placement in employment or enrollment in high school or postsecondary education or training.
Data Source: Youthful Offender program Management Information System.
Baseline: This is a new initiative.
Comment: Youthful offenders are a particularly difficult population to serve. Also, most employers do not readily hire individuals with criminal records

Outcome Goal 1.3 - Improve the Effectiveness of Information and Analysis on the U.S. Economy -- Performance Goals

1.3A

Performance Goal FY 2001: Produce and disseminate timely, accurate, and relevant economic information.

FY 2000: Produce and disseminate timely, accurate, and relevant economic information.



FY 1999: Produce and disseminate timely, accurate, and relevant economic information.

FY 1999 Performance Results The timeliness measure targets of 100 percent released on schedule for the Consumer Prices and Price Indexes and Employment Cost index were met. The National Labor Force and Employment, Hours, and Earnings statistics results of 91.7 percent reflected the premature release of a supplemental data series through the BLS public access web site for the November 1998 Employment Situation Release. The Producer Price Index (PPI) result of 91.7 percent was due to the premature release of December 1998 data from the web site.

Quality measures for all programs were met except for that of the PPI. The result for the PPI (41.2 percent of services produced and 54.3 percent of total production) was due to a publication delay of Retail Food Stores. The index is expected to be published in July 2000. The targets for FY 1999 were 43.2 percent for services produced and 55.7 percent for total production.

Indicator Percentage of releases of National Labor Force; Employment, Hours, and Earnings; Consumer Prices and Price Indexes; Producer Prices and Price Indexes; and Employment Cost Index statistics that are prepared on time; measures of quality for each Principal Federal Economic Indicator; average number of Internet site user sessions each month
Data Source Office Publications and Special Studies report of release dates against release schedule of BLS Principal Federal Economic Indicators; Press releases for each Economic Indicator; Internet site analysis software
Baseline Timeliness measures for FY 1997:

National Labor Force (100 percent); Employment, Hours, and Earnings (100 percent); Consumer Prices and Price Indexes (100 percent); Producer Prices and Price Indexes (100 percent); and Employment Cost Index statistics (100 percent).



Quality measures:



National Labor Force: Number of months that a change of at least 0.25 percentage point in the monthly national unemployment rate will be statistically significant at the 90 percent confidence level = 12. (Baseline is FY 1997.)



Employment, Hours, and Earnings: Root mean square error of non-farm employment (a measure of the amount of revision). (Baseline is FY 2000 and is still to be determined.)



Consumer Prices and Price Indexes: Number of months that the standard error on the 12-month change in the U.S. City Average All Items CPI-U Index was 0.25 percentage point or less = 12. (Baseline is FY 1999.)



Producer Prices and Price Indexes: Percent of domestic output, within the scope of the PPI, which is covered by the PPI: goods produced = 85.1 percent; services produced = 38.8 percent; total production = 52.6 percent. (Baseline is FY 1997.)



Employment Cost Index Statistics: Number of quarters the change in the Civilian Compensation Less Sales Workers index was within plus/minus 0.5 percent at the 90 percent confidence level = 4. (Baseline is FY 1998.)



Internet Usage for FY 1999:

Average number of user sessions each month = 707,347

Comment

1.3B

Performance Goal FY 2001: Improve the accuracy, efficiency, and relevancy of economic measures.

FY 2000: Improve the accuracy, efficiency, and relevancy of economic measures.



FY 1999: Improve the accuracy, efficiency, and relevancy of economic measures.

FY 1999

Performance

Results

The performance indicators are milestones to be reached in each year. Therefore, the indicators are different for FY 1999, FY 2000, and FY 2001. There are no FY 1999 results that correspond to the FY 2001 indicators.
Indicator
  • Research and select sample frames and develop pricing methodologies for the warehouse construction industry.
  • Conduct cognitive testing, finalize core questionnaire, and obtain OMB clearance for the new time-use survey.
  • Direct the technical components of a program to prepare State employment projections, including projections methodology development, computer system development and maintenance, technical assistance and training for State analysts, and research.
  • Implement item outlet rotation in all geographic areas of the Consumer Price Index.
Data Source BLS Quarterly Review and Analysis System
Baseline Since activities described are new activities, there are no baseline measures.
Comment Since activities described in all indicators are new activities, there are no

FY 1999 results, FY 2000 measures, or baseline measures.

Outcome Goal 2.1 - Increase Compliance with Worker Protection Laws - Performance Goals

2.1A

Performance Goal FY 2001: Increase compliance with labor standards laws and regulations including young workers by 5% in the San Francisco and New York City garment industry; by 10% in the agricultural commodities of cucumber, onion, tomato, and lettuce; and by 5% in the residential health care industry (assisted living facilities). Establish baseline in meatpacking.

FY 2000: Garment: 45% in Los Angeles (6% increase over FY1998 performance)

Agricultural Commodities: establish baseline for garlic

Poultry Processing: 5% increase

Forestry: establish baseline

Health Care: 5% increase in nursing homes


FY 1999: Increase compliance with labor standards laws and regulations by 5% in the San Francisco and New York City garment industries; in the agricultural industry - establish baselines for the commodities of onions, lettuce and cucumbers; and establish baseline for residential health care (assisted living facilities)

FY 1999

Performance

Results

Goal was not met. To assure goal will be met in the future, developed compliance education and strike forces. Also, cases will continue to be developed for criminal prosecution and a new office will be opened in Brooklyn. Established compliance baseline of 65% for lettuce, 49% for cucumbers, and 42% for onions. A compliance baseline of 57% for residential health care (assisted living facilities) was also established during FY1999.
Indicator Trends in compliance/violation rates by industry (NAIC Code);

changes in results of compliance surveys in targeted industries

Data Source Wage Hour Investigator Support and Reporting Database (WHISARD); results of compliance surveys
Baseline 79% compliance in the San Francisco garment industry (FY 1997).

37% compliance in the New York City garment industry (FY 1997).

22% compliance in the Los Angeles garment industry (FY 1994).

75% compliance in tomato commodities (FY 1996).

70% compliance in the nursing home industry (FY 1997).

57% compliance in residential health care (assisted living facilities) (1999).

40% compliance in the poultry processing industry ( FY 1998).

49% compliance in cucumber commodities (1999)

42% compliance in onion commodities (1999)

65% compliance in lettuce commodities (1999)

Comment Because there is no unbiased industry-wide database on labor standards violations or compliance, the Wage and Hour Division faces a challenge in determining industry-wide levels of compliance, measuring changes in compliance and attributing causality for any changes. To determine the impact of Wage and Hour efforts, a statistically sound method for establishing baselines and measuring compliance was developed using investigation-based compliance surveys of targeted industries and areas.

Based on results, specific industries and/or industry sectors will be re-surveyed every 2 to 3 years.


2.1B

Performance Goal FY2001: Increase child labor compliance (by___% over the FY 2000 baselines) in the restaurant and grocery industries where data indicate that the risk of serious injury of young workers is greatest.

FY 2000: Establish baselines



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999

Performance

Results

N/A
Indicator Trends in compliance rates in those selected industries (NAIC code) where data indicate risk of serious injury to young workers is greatest

Specific program interventions to be completed during FY 2001 will be determined based on assessment of the results of the FY 2000 compliance survey.



Targeted percentage of program improvement will be set following assessment of the results of the FY 2000 compliance survey. Accomplishment of targeted improvement will be measured by the FY 2002 compliance survey.

Data Source Wage Hour Investigator Support and Reporting Database (WHISARD); results of compliance surveys; industry data indicating serious injuries of young workers
Baseline Baselines for restaurant and grocery industries to be established in FY 2000.
Comment Because there is no unbiased industry-wide database on labor standards violations or compliance, Wage and Hour faces a challenge in determining industry-wide levels of compliance, measuring changes in compliance and attributing causality for any changes. To determine the impact of Wage and Hour efforts, a statistically sound method for establishing baselines and measuring compliance was developed using investigation-based compliance surveys of targeted industries and areas.

Based on results, specific industries and/or industry sectors will be resurveyed every 2 to 3 years.


2.1C

Performance Goal FY 2001: Increase child labor compliance (by ____% over the FY 2000 baselines) among FY 2000 employers previously investigated in the restaurant and grocery industries where data indicates that the risk of serious injury of young workers is greatest.

FY 2000: Establish baselines



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999

Performance

Results

N/A
Indicator Trends in compliance rates in those selected industries (NAIC code) where data indicate risk of serious injury to young workers is greatest

Specific program interventions to be completed during FY 2001 will be determined based on assessment of the results of the FY 2000 compliance survey.



Targeted percentage of program improvement will be set following assessment of the results of the FY 2000 compliance survey. Accomplishment of targeted improvement will be measured by the FY 2002 compliance survey.

Data Source Wage and Hour Investigator Support and Reporting Database (WHISARD); results of compliance surveys; industry data indicating serious injuries of young workers
Baseline Baselines for restaurant and grocery industries to be established in FY 2000
Comment This goal is to increase the level of compliance as a result of a Wage and Hour enforcement intervention. Data on entities covered in an investigation-based compliance survey that have previously been investigated by Wage and Hour, will be analyzed to compare those entities' compliance to the rest of the survey universe and to the entities prior compliance history. Data on the outcomes or repeat investigations will also be used to evaluate the relative effectiveness, or return on investment, of the various types of interventions.

Based on results, specific industries and/or industry sectors will be resurveyed every 2 to 3 years.


2.1D

Performance Goal FY 2001: Increase compliance by 5% among employers, which were previous violators, and the subject of repeat investigations in the New York City garment industry; the agricultural commodities of tomato, lettuce, cucumber, and onion; and in the residential health care industry (assisted living facilities). Establish baseline in meatpacking and maintain a 90% compliance rate in the San Francisco garment industry.

FY 2000: Garment: 5% increase in Los Angeles

Agriculture Commodities: establish baseline for garlic

Health Care: 5% increase in nursing homes

Forestry: establish baseline

Poultry: 5% increase



FY 1999: To increase compliance among employers, which were previous violators and the subject of repeat investigations, establish baselines in the San Francisco and New York City garment industries; in the agricultural commodities of lettuce, cucumbers, and onions; and in the residential health care industry (assisted living facilities).

FY 1999

Performance

Results

Goal was met. Compliance baselines of 86% and 52%, respectively, were established for the San Francisco and New York City garment industries. Established compliance baseline of 43% for lettuce, 42% for onions and 37% for cucumbers. Established baseline of 55% in residential health care (assisted living facilities)
Indicator Trends in compliance/violation rates by industry (NAIC code); changes in results in compliance surveys in targeted industries.
Data Source Wage Hour Investigator Support and Reporting Database (WHISARD); results of compliance surveys.
Baseline Industry/sector-specific baseline data:

25% compliance in reinvestigated Los Angeles garment industry (1998)

86% compliance in reinvestigated San Francisco garment industry (1999)

52% compliance in reinvestigated New York City garment industry (1999)

76% compliance in reinvestigated nursing home industry (1997)

59% compliance in reinvestigated tomato commodity (1998)

55% compliance in reinvestigated residential health care (assisted living facilities) (1999)

40% compliance in reinvestigated poultry processing (1998)

43% compliance in reinvestigated lettuce commodity (1999)

42% compliance in reinvestigated onion commodity (1999)

37% compliance in reinvestigated cucumber commodity (1999)

Comment This goal is to increase the level of compliance as a result of a Wage and Hour enforcement intervention. Data on entities covered in an investigation-based compliance survey that have previously been investigated by Wage and Hour, will be analyzed to compare those entities' compliance to the rest of the survey universe and to the entities' prior compliance history. Data on the outcomes or repeat investigations will also be used to evaluate the relative effectiveness, or return on investment, of the various types of interventions.

Based on results, specific industries and/or industry sectors will be re-surveyed every 2 to 3 years.


2.1E

Performance Goal FY 2001: Achieve timely union reporting such that a minimum of 88% of unions with annual receipts greater than $200,000 timely file union annual financial reports for public disclosure access.

FY 2000: Minimum of 87% of unions with annual receipts greater than $200,000 timely file union annual financial reports for public disclosure.



FY 1999: Increase by 6% (to 85%) the number of unions with annual receipts greater than $200,000 that timely file union annual financial reports for public disclosure access.

FY 1999 Performance Results 89.8% of unions with annual receipts greater than $200,000 timely filed union annual financial reports for public disclosure access.
Indicator Percentage of financial reports timely filed for public disclosure availability
Data Source Labor Organization Reporting System
Baseline Timely filing of annual financial reports required of unions with annual receipts over $200,000: 79% in FY 1997.
Comment The indicators reflect union compliance with laws established to ensure democratic practices and financial integrity in unions in the American workforce.

2.1F

Performance Goal FY 2001: Increase by 2.5% per year the number of closed fiduciary investigations of employee pension plans where assets are restored, prohibited transactions are corrected, participant benefits are recovered, or plan assets are protected from mismanagement and risk of future loss is reduced.

FY 2000: N/A



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999

Performance

Results

N/A
Indicator Number of closed fiduciary investigations of employees' pension plans where assets are restored, prohibited transactions are corrected, participant benefits are recovered, or plan assets are protected
Data Source Enforcement Management Systems
Baseline The average number of closed fiduciary investigations of employee pension plans where assets are restored, prohibited transactions are corrected, participant benefits are recovered, or plan assets are protected for FY 1998- 1999 (799).
Comment The protection of plan assets is the primary investigative purpose. When plan assets have been potentially endangered by an imprudent act on the part of a plan fiduciary or have otherwise been misused, DOL seeks to have the plan made whole through the restoration of assets.

2.1G Performance Goal FY 2001: Increase by 2.5% per year the number of closed fiduciary investigations of employee health and welfare plans where assets are restored, prohibited transactions are corrected, participant benefits are recovered, or plan assets are protected from mismanagement and risk of future loss is reduced.

FY 2000: N/A



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999

Performance

Results

N/A
Indicator Number of closed fiduciary investigations of employees' health and welfare plans where assets are restored, prohibited transactions are corrected, participant benefits are recovered, or plan assets are protected
Data Source Enforcement Management Systems
Baseline The average number of closed fiduciary investigations of employee pension plans where prohibited transactions are corrected, assets are restored, participant benefits are recovered, or plan assets are protected for fiscal years 1998 and 1999 (294).
Comment The protection of plan assets is the primary investigative purpose. When plan assets have been potentially endangered by an imprudent act on the part of a plan fiduciary or have otherwise been misused, DOL seeks to have the transaction corrected to minimize potential loss.

Outcome Goal 2.2 - Protect Worker Benefits -- Performance Goals

2.2A Performance Goal: FY 2001: Unemployed workers receive fair UI benefit eligibility determinations and timely benefit payments:

Increase to 26 the number of States meeting or exceeding the minimum performance criterion for benefit adjudication quality

Increase to 48 the number of States meeting or exceeding the Secretary's Standard (minimum performance criterion) for intrastate payment timeliness.



FY 2000: Unemployed workers receive fair UI benefit eligibility determinations and timely benefit payments:

Increase to 24 the number of States meeting or exceeding the minimum performance criterion for benefit adjudication quality.

Increase to 47 States the number of States meeting or exceeding the Secretary's Standard (minimum performance criterion) for intrastate payment timeliness.



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator: 1. Benefit adjudication quality: # of States meeting or exceeding the minimum criterion that 75% of non-monetary eligibility determinations have an adequate quality score (>80 points using standard review instrument)

2. Payment timeliness: # of States meeting or exceeding the Secretary Standard that 87% of intrastate 1st Payments be made within 14 days of the first compensable week- ending date if the state has a waiting week and within 21 days if it does not have a waiting week.

Data Source: ETA 9056 Report (non-monetary determinations quality); ETA 9050 Report (initial payment promptness)
Baseline: FY 1999:

1. Benefit adjudication quality: 20 States met the minimum criterion for adequate non-monetary determinations quality (nationwide, 70.7% of all non-monetary determinations were adequate);

2. Payment timeliness: 46 States met the Secretary's Standard for timely first payments; (nationally, 89.6% of all intrastate first payments were made within 14/21 days)

Comment: The current UI validation program validates non-monetary quality measures and the numbers of first payments but not payment time lapse. All facets of key performance measures are scheduled to be validated through the UI Data Validation program starting in 2000.

The Department will work through technical assistance and other means within the UI PERFORMS system to raise the number of States attaining all minimum performance criteria. These efforts, plus encouraging continuous improvement at all levels, will also raise national averages.


2.2B

Performance Goal FY 2001: Increase by 2% benefit recoveries achieved through the assistance of Pension Benefit Advisors.

FY 2000: N/A



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999

Performance

Results

N/A
Indicator The dollar value of benefit recoveries achieved through the assistance of technical assistance staff.
Data Source The Technical Assistance and Inquiries System
Baseline Average of the benefit recoveries achieved in Fiscal Years 1998 and 1999. ($52 million)
Comment

2.2C

Performance Goal FY 2001: Increase by 1% the number of workers who are covered by a pension plan sponsored by their employer, particularly women, minorities and workers in small businesses.

FY 2000: Increase by 1% the number of workers who are covered by a pension plan sponsored by their employer, particularly women, minorities and workers in small businesses.



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999

Performance

Results

N/A
Indicator The number of active workers within the categories that report participation in a proper pension plan sponsored by their current employer
Data Source Income Supplement of the Current Population Survey,

U.S. Bureau of Census

Baseline Estimated covered population derived from 1998 pension topical module - 45.1 million
Comment The expansion of coverage within the private employer-sponsored pension system is one of the primary results goals toward which PWBA's programs and policy initiatives are directed. Providing access to populations that have historically shown a lower coverage rate is a high priority within this large goal. Coverage rates for specific populations can be tracked through specific sets of questions periodically included in surveys conducted by the Census Bureau. The Bureau provides statistically reliable data on pension coverage rates.

2.2D

Performance Goal FY 2001: Return Federal employees to work following an injury as early as appropriate indicated by a 2% reduction from the FY 2000 baseline in the average number of productions days lost due to disability for all cases.

FY 2000: Reduce to 173 days (QCM cases only). Establish baseline for all cases.



FY 1999: Return Federal employees to work following an injury as early as appropriate, as indicated by a 6% reduction from the baseline in production days lost due to disability for cases in the Quality Case Management (QCM) program.

FY 1999

Performance

Results

This goal has been exceeded. Average LPD for cases measured in FY 1999 was 173 days against a target of 178 days. This is nearly a 9% reduction compared to the FY 1997 baseline. The 16-day reduction compared to the FY 1997 baseline represents a savings in compensation benefits of $9.6 million for the cases measured.
Indicator Average number of days lost due to disability for all cases.
Data Source Federal Employees' Compensation Act (FECA) data systems
Baseline Interim baseline for Quality Case Management (QCM) cases only is the FY 1997 actual - 189 workdays. The baseline for all cases will be established in FY 2000
Comment In FY 2000 DOL is establishing a new baseline covering all federal employee injuries. Data for this much larger cohort will require federal agency capture and reporting of "Continuation of Pay" data not currently available. The recently signed Presidential Initiative "Federal Worker 2000" sets a goal for agencies to reduce disability days, and will give impetus to data collection.

2.2E

Performance Goal FY 2001: Produce $95 million in cumulative first-year savings (FY 1999-2001) through Periodic Roll Management.

FY 2000: Produce $66 million in first year savings through Periodic Roll Management



FY 1999: Produce $19 million in first year savings through Periodic Roll Management

FY 1999

Performance

Results

This goal has been exceeded. PRM case review actions produced an additional $20.8 million in FECA compensation benefit savings.
Indicator The fiscal year amount of total periodic payment (compensation benefit) reductions in PRM universe cases.
Data Source Periodic Roll Management System; Automated Compensation Payment System
Baseline For all cases with benefit actions in the measurement year, the periodic payment amount paid at time of their entry into the PRM universe, compared to the periodic payment amount after benefit reduction.

The methodology for measuring savings from compensation benefit adjustments and terminations was revised to coincide with PRM's integration into permanent operations.



PRM savings for performance reporting were previously derived by comparing total FECA program benefit reductions in all cases, including PRM cases, in the measurement year, to total reductions produced in the baseline year but not counting PRM case reductions.

Comment Periodic Roll Management has proven highly successful in identifying potential for return to work and resolving cases leading to greater savings in benefit compensation (an additional $317 between 1992 and 1998). In FY 1999, Congress appropriated resources to fully staff all offices and integrate PRM into FECA program operations. This is accelerating savings in Federal workers' compensation costs, and increasing the potential for returning workers to employment after recovery from an injury.

Note: Decisions on cases under PRM review often result in adjustment or termination of benefits. On a case-by-case basis, and beginning with the first payment cycle after the benefit action, savings are scored for the remainder of the measurement (fiscal) year, producing the "first-year" savings for the case. First-year savings for all cases in the measurement year are then combined producing the total first-year savings. The cumulative sum of first-year savings is matched against the goal as stated for each measurement year.


2.2F

Performance Goal FY 2001: In the FECA program, reduce the overall average medical service cost per case (adjusted for inflation) by .5%. Reduce the average annual cost for (condition type) cases by x% (to be determined in FY 2000) through focus reviews of services charged.

FY 2000: In the FECA program, save an additional $5 million over FY 1999 compared to amounts charged through full-year implementation of fee schedules for inpatient hospital and pharmacy services; save $1.5 million compared to amounts charged for physician services through the Correct Coding Initiative.



FY 1999: Save 19% annually versus amounts billed for FECA medical services.

FY 1999

Performance

Results

Both the original and revised goals have been exceeded.

The original goal was to save $10.67 million against amounts billed for inpatient hospital and pharmacy services subject to new fee schedules, and through specialized review for improper billings for physician/professional services.



The new fee schedules (which became effective January 1999) alone exceeded the target by 54%, produced $16.5 million in savings.



Implementation of medical bill review was delayed and the full complement of Medical Coding Specialists was not brought on board and trained until September 1999. No savings resulted from bill review.



As a result of its growing experience with cost control, OWCP revised the original savings goal by broadening it to include the results of physician/professional fee schedules which have been in effect for several years. This revision more fully reflects the impact of cost control on medical charges



The revised goal was to reduce total amounts billed for medical services by 19%. Application of all fee schedules in FY 1999 reduced billings by $122.9 million or 22%.

Indicator Amounts paid versus amounts billed for drugs, hospital and physician services.

Average case costs for services paid for selected medical conditions adjusted for inflation and changes in industry practices.



Average cases costs for all cases receiving medical services after adjustment for inflation.

Data Source FECA Bill Pay System
Baseline Overall Average Medical Cost Baseline: Average cost per case for cases receiving medical services in FY 1999.

Fee Schedule Baseline: Amounts billed for drugs, hospital, and physician services in the measurement year.



Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) Baseline: Amounts billed for physician and other professional services.



Focus Review Baseline: Average annual cost per case per selected medical condition in FY 1998/FY 1999.

Comment The FECA program uses Fee Schedules to set payment levels for standard categories of billed medical services. Special automated bill review (Corrective Coding Initiative (CCI)) identifies medical providers' duplicate and abusive billing practices, and facilitates evaluation and resolution of questionable bills before payment is authorized. Focus Reviews look at utilization of services by medical condition. These mechanisms, along with procedural changes and other quality controls, will reduce overall medical costs.

Note: In FY 2000, FECA will pilot Focus Reviews of a selected few types of medical conditions. The pilot will enable FECA to perfect the review technique and determine individual performance year targets beginning in FY 2001.


2.2G Performance Goal FY 2001: Each area of the country will be surveyed for all four types of construction at least every three years, and the resulting wage determinations validly represent locally prevailing wages/benefits. In FY2001, if a Davis-Bacon reengineering approach is pursued, complete development of all aspects of a reengineered system. If a Davis-Bacon reinvention approach is pursued, implement all necessary changes.

FY 2000: Each area of the country will be surveyed for all four types of construction at least every three years, and the resulting wage determinations validly represent locally prevailing wages/benefits. In FY 2000, implement scanning technology and develop knowledge management technology; and complete analysis of BLS data and decide whether a reengineering or reinvention approach will be pursued in FY 2001.



FY 1999: Each area of the country will be surveyed for all four types of construction at least every three years, and the resulting wage determinations validly represent locally prevailing wages/benefits. In FY 1999, implement new data collection form and automated printing and mailing process and test whether automation can increase the accuracy and timeliness of the survey process and wage determinations.

FY 1999

Performance

Results

Target activities for FY 1999 were accomplished. Wage and Hour Division completed reengineering objectives:
  • •BLS completed two fringe benefit pilot surveys (Jacksonville, FL and Tucson, AZ) in FY 1998. Two additional fringe benefit pilots surveys (Salt Lake City, UT and Toledo, OH) were conducted in FY 1999. BLS published the results of the Salt Lake City survey in the third quarter, and they expect to publish the results of the Toledo survey in the first quarter of FY 2000.
  • •During the second quarter, BLS calculated Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) survey results for the construction industry in selected MSAs. These OES data are based on two-thirds of the full OES sample. Results from the full OES sample will not be available until the beginning of the third quarter of FY 2000.
  • •A preliminary evaluation of the first three fringe benefit pilots and the two-thirds OES sample has been conducted. Although both surveys produced results by occupation for the construction industry as a whole, the surveys produced only a small amount of data broken down by type of construction. A more detailed final analysis of the BLS data will be conducted in FY 2000, after data from the full OES sample are available.


Also, Wage and Hour Division completed Davis-Bacon reengineering implementation objectives to:

  • •Implement the new WD-10 and have the electronic version prepared for clearance OMB cleared the new aper WH-10 form during the fourth quarter, and the new form will be used for all future Davis-Bacon wage surveys. An electronic version of the WD-10 form has been drafted and will be submitted to OMB for clearance during FY 2000.
  • •Test the efficiency and effectiveness of the new automated printing and mailing process using the Census Bureau. The new processes will be used for all future Davis-Bacon wage surveys.
  • •Test a computer application which provides for the display of automated contractor information and associated WD-10s at the beginning of the business process to help analysts manage WD-10s during the entire cycle of collection, analysis and follow-up.
  • •Test the imaging process. An imaging program has been developed to facilitate data entry from the imaged document. The program was tested with sample data and pilot tested with actual data during the fourth quarter as part of the Statewide survey of Colorado.
  • •Implement a field test of the Computer Assisted Telephone Inquiry (CATI) system. A preliminary review of the hardware and telephony capabilities of the Wage and Hour regional offices has been conducted. A prototype CATI system, applying screen-based telephony technology utilizing the analysts's computer terminal to facilitate the processing to both incoming and outgoing calls, was successfully tested ruing the fourth quarter as part of the Colorado survey.
Indicator Survey Planning Data Base maintained by Construction Resource Analysis (CRA) measures the length of time since the last survey in every county
Data Source Survey Planning Data Base (CRA)
Baseline Baseline to be determined and goal achieved in FY 2002
Comment Although some incremental improvements may be realized and conceptual changes validated, almost all of the improvement will be accomplished at the end of the process when either a reengineered system is fully implemented or a BLS approach is adopted.

2.2H Performance Goal FY 2001: Reduce by 1 year the average time frame to send final, accurate benefit determinations to participants in defined benefit pension plans taken over by PBGC.

FY 2000: N/A



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Timeliness of final accurate benefit determinations to participants in trusteed plans
Data Source Participant Record Information Management System
Baseline FY 1997: 7 to 8 years
Comment This measure addresses PBGC's largest operating functions which are processing terminated plans and paying benefits. Termination activities involve an intricate series of complex actions, from reviewing plan assets and participant data, to completing financial and control group analysis. Sponsor bankruptcies and legal disputes over plan assets also complicate and stretch out the trusteeship process. Total participant count in PBGC-trusteed plans will have increased to 500,000 in FY 2001 while trusteed plans will have increased to 2,900. To keep up with these increases, PBGC must find ways to streamline processing and measure the results. PBGC will lower the time frame to 3-4 years in FY 2001.

Outcome Goal 2.3 - Provide Worker Retraining -- Performance Goals

2.3A Performance Goal FY 2001: By 2001, of those registered under the WIA dislocated worker program, 76% will be employed in the first quarter after program exit, and 81% will be employed in the third quarter after program exit with 100% of pre-dislocation earnings.

FY 2000: Of those registered under the WIA dislocated worker program, 75% will be employed in the first quarter after program exit and 80% will be employed in the third quarter after program exit with 98% of pre-dislocation earnings.



FY 1999: Under JTPA Title III for dislocated workers, 74% of program terminees will be employed at an average wage replacement rate (compared to their wage at dislocation) of 93% at termination; 76% will be employed one quarter after program exit at an average wage replacement rate of 97%.

FY 1999 Performance Results The wage replacement goal for dislocated workers was exceeded, and significant results were achieved in job placement and retention. Based on preliminary data for PY 1998, under JTPA Title III for dislocated workers, 73% of program terminees were employed at an average wage replacement rate of 100% at termination, and 76% were employed one quarter after program exit at an average wage replacement rate of 102%
Indicato r Dislocated worker employment, employment retention, and earnings replacement
Data Source State WIA reports, (UI wage records will be the primary source)
Baseline There is no prior experience with this WIA indicator which is based on the use of UI wage records. An approximation of the goal was derived by analysis of the JTPA program experience of three states using WIA indicator specifications which yielded a range of from 72% to 80% for employment in the first quarter after program exit, from 82% to 91% for employment in the third quarter after program exit, and a range of from 85% to 97% pre-dislocation earnings in the third quarter after program exit.
Comment : Quantifiable levels for performance measures under WIA will be developed through a cooperative negotiation between DOL, its partners, and stakeholders. A small number of states have begun early implementation of WIA for PY 99, and this limited performance will form the basis of baseline data and negotiation of goals for PY 2000 -2001, the period in which all states will operate under WIA

2.3B Performance Goal FY 2001: Upon exit from the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) or NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance (NAFTA-TAA) programs, 73% will be employed in the third quarter after exit with 82% of the total pre-dislocation earnings.

FY 2000: N/A



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Employment retention after six months; post-program earnings change after six months.
Data Source TAPR (Trade Adjustment Performance Report)
Baseline Incomplete as of this date.
Comment During FY 2001, TAA/NAFTA-TAA will be using a new performance measures data system that is directly comparable to the system being developed for the dislocated worker program under WIA. FY 2001 will be the first year of operation for the new system. This may require revision of the goals stated above.

2.3C

Performance Goal FY 2001: During the initial year of funding, an estimated 30 grants serving an estimated 20,000 participants will be awarded for the incumbent workers initiative.

FY 2000: N/A



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Grants awarded and participants served
Data Source Grantee records
Baseline There is no baseline since this is a new initiative for which funding is being requested in the FY 2001 budget.
Comment This goal is for the first year of operation, when the initiative will be implemented. Indicators under consideration for FY 2002 include maintaining or increasing earnings, promoting retention at the employer of record, and upgrading skills.

Outcome Goal 3.1 - Reduce Workplace Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities -- Performance Goals

3.1A

Performance Goal FY 2001: Reduce the number of mine fatalities and non-fatal injuries to below the average for the previous five years.

FY 2000: Reduce the number of mine fatalities and non-fatal injury rate to below the average for the previous five years.



FY 1999: Reduce the number of coal mine and metal and nonmetal mine fatalities and non-fatal injuries (nonfatal-days-lost incidence rate) to below the average number recorded for the previous five years.

FY 1999

Performance

Results

Fatalities - FY 94-98 Average = 92.2; Actual FY99 = 79

Nonfatal-days-lost incidence rate - FY94-98 Average = 4.07; FY 99 = 3.47

Indicator Coal and metal/nonmetal mine fatalities and nonfatal-days-lost incident rate
Data Source Mine Accident, Injury, Illness, Employment, and Coal Production System (30 Code of Federal Regulations Part 50 System)
Baseline 92 average fatalities for FY 1994-1998 (five-year average); 4.07 average nonfatal-days-lost incidence rate for FY 1994-1998
Comment A five-year moving average is used to reduce irregular fluctuations in order to highlight trends in the performance measure .

3.1B

Performance Goal FY 2001: Reduce by 5% the percentage of coal dust and silica dust samples that are out of compliance for coal mines and metal and nonmetal high risk mining occupations, respectively.

FY 2000: Reduce by 5% the percentage of coal dust and silica dust samples that are out of compliance for coal mines and metal and nonmetal high risk mining occupations, respectively.



FY 1999: Reduce by 5% the percentage of samples out of compliance with the respirable Coal Mine dust standard and reduce by 5%, the percentage of samples taken among the highest risk occupations, that are out of compliance with Metal and Nonmetal Mine dust standard.

FY 1999 Performance Results Coal dust goal: 5% reduction; actual: 11.6% reduction

Silica dust goal: 90 index; actual: 75.1 index - a 24.9 point reduction in the weighted ratio of citable samples to all samples collected compared to the baseline.

(This is the second year of silica measurement; FY 1998 goal index was 95.)

Indicator Percent of samples out of compliance with the respirable Coal Mine dust standard and the percent of high-risk occupation silica dust samples that are out of compliance with the Metal and Nonmetal Mine standard.
Data Source Coal Mine Safety and Health Management Information System and Metal and Nonmetal Mine Safety and Health Management Information System
Baseline Coal dust baseline: FY 1998: 3,773 coal dust samples taken by MSHA inspectors; 489 not in compliance.

Silica dust baseline: 1997-1998 baseline data given GPRA index of 100-based on weighted number of citable samples out of samples taken for the high-risk occupations. MSHA uses an index measurement to provide an accurate dust measure that accounts for changes in the types of mines, commodities, and jobs sampled to prevent bias across the occupational category sample distribution.

Comment Respirable dust is one of the 3 major health hazards to miners and is a priority health initiative.

3.1C

Performance Goal FY 2001: Reduce three of the most significant types of workplace injuries and causes of illnesses by 11% [from baseline].

FY 2000: Reduce three of the most prevalent types of workplace injuries and causes of illnesses by 7% in selected industries and occupations.



FY 1999: Reduce three of the most prevalent types of workplace injuries and causes of illnesses by 3% in selected industries and occupations.

FY 1999

Performance

Results

Silica: - 38.9%

Lead: - 16.7%

Amputations: - 11% (CY 1995-1997)*

Indicator Silica: Percent change in average silica exposure severity

Lead: Percent change in average lead exposure severity

Amputations: Percent change in rate of amputations

Data Source OSHA Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) (Silica and Lead)

NIOSH study (Silica)

Bureau of Labor Statistics Annual Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (Amputations)

Baseline Silica: 3.6 average silica exposure severity FY 1996

Lead: 3.0 average lead exposure severity FY 1995

Amputations: 1.45 per 10,000 employees for CY 1993-1995

Comment Silica: OSHA will measure average silica exposure severity in establishments where OSHA has silica-related interventions.

Lead: OSHA will measure average lead exposure severity in establishments where OSHA has lead-related interventions

Amputation: A three-year moving average is used to reduce fluctuations in order to highlight trends in the performance measures.

*1999 BLS amputation rate data will be available in April 2001. 1998 BLS amputation rate data will be available in April 2000.


3.1D

Performance Goal FY 2001: Reduce injuries/illnesses by 11% [from baseline] in 5 industries characterized by high-hazard workplaces.

FY 2000: Reduce injuries/illnesses by 7% in 5 industries characterized by high-hazard workplaces.



FY 1999: Reduce injuries/illnesses by 3% in 5 industries characterized by high-hazard workplaces.

FY 1999

Performance

Results

Shipyard industry: - 22% (CY 1996 - 1998)*

Food processing industry: - 12% (CY 1996 - 1998)*

Nursing home industry: - 3% (CY 1996 - 1998)*

Logging industry: - 28% (CY 1996 - 1998)*

Construction industry: - 18% (CY 1996 - 1998)*

Indicator Shipyard, food processing, nursing homes and logging: Percent change in lost workday injury/illness rates in industries per 100 full-time workers

Construction: Percent change in lost workday injury rate per 100 full-time workers in the construction industry .

Data Source Bureau of Labor Statistics Annual Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses
Baseline Shipyard: 13.4 average lost workday injury and illness rate per 100 full-time workers for CY 1993-1995

Nursing homes: 8.7 average lost workday injury and illness rate per 100 full-time workers for CY 1993-1995

Food processing: 8.9 average lost workday injury and illness rate per 100 full-time workers for CY 1993-1995

Logging: 7.2 average lost workday injury and illness rate per 100 full-time workers for CY 1993-1995

Construction: 5.2 average lost workday injury rate per 100 full-time workers for CY 1993-1995

Comment A three-year moving average is used to reduce fluctuations in order to highlight trends in the performance measures.

*1999 BLS lost workday injury and illness rate data will be available in December 2000.


3.1E

Performance Goal FY 2001: Reduce injuries and illnesses (LWDII) by 20% in at least 75,000 workplaces where an intervention is initiated.

FY 2000: Reduce injuries and illnesses (LWDII) by 20% in at least 50,000 workplaces where the Agency initiates an intervention.



FY 1999: Reduce injuries and illnesses (LWDII) by 20% in at least 25,000 workplaces where the Agency initiates an intervention.

FY 1999

Performance

Results

50,100 workplaces*
Indicator The number of workplaces where DOL had an intervention and injury/illness rates have been reduced by 20%
Data Source OSHA Data Initiative (ODI)

OSHA Integrated Management Information System (IMIS)

Bureau of Labor Statistics Annual Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses

Baseline Will vary depending on when the intervention occurs; tracking began with FY 1995 interventions
Comment * Results based on an analysis conducted by researchers from the University of Pittsburgh and Clark University, consultants to the Lexington Group Contract No. J-9-F-7-0043.

3.1F

Performance Goal FY 2001: Decrease fatalities in the construction industry by 11% [from baseline], by focusing on the four leading causes of fatalities (falls, struck-by, crushed-by, and electrocutions and electrical injuries).

FY 2000: Decrease fatalities in the construction industry by 7%, by focusing on the four leading causes of fatalities (falls, struck-by, crushed-by, and electrocutions and electrical injuries).



FY 1999: Decrease fatalities in the construction industry by 3%, by focusing on the four leading causes of fatalities (falls, struck-by, crushed-by, and electrocutions and electrical injuries).

FY 1999

Performance

Results

-2%* (CY 1996-1998)
Indicator Percent change in the rate of fatalities
Data Source Bureau of Labor Statistics Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries
Baseline Rate of fatal occupational injuries: 14.5 per 100,000 workers for CY 1993-1995
Comment A three-year moving average is used to reduce fluctuations in order to highlight trends in the performance measures.

*1999 BLS fatality data will be available in August 2000.


3.1G

Performance Goal FY 2001: Reduce injuries and illnesses by 15% at work sites engaged in voluntary, cooperative relationships with DOL.

FY 2000: N/A



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator The average percent change in injury and illness rates at worksites engaged in voluntary, cooperative relationships with DOL
Data Source [Under development]
Baseline The year prior to the voluntary cooperative relationship with DOL
Comment * This is a new performance goal (FY 1999/2000 Strategic Plan revision)

Outcome Goal 3.2 - Foster Equal Opportunity Workplaces -- Performance Goals

3.2A

Performance Goal
FY 2001: Increase by 5% (over the FY 2000 performance) the number of federal contractors brought into compliance with the EEO provisions of federal contracts via OFCCP's compliance evaluation procedures.

FY 2000: Increase by 5% over the FY 1999 baseline the number of Federal contractors brought into compliance with the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) provisions of Federal contracts via OFCCP's compliance evaluation procedures.



FY 1999: Establish new baseline the number of Federal contractors brought into compliance with the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) provisions of Federal contracts via OFCCP's compliance evaluation procedures.

FY 1999

Performance

Results

Ninety-three percent of the goal was met. In FY 1999, OFCCP brought fewer Federal contractors into compliance because it was found that more Federal contractors were already in compliance for various reasons. OFFCP brought 2,648 contractors into compliance.
Indicator Number of Federal contractors brought into compliance following a compliance evaluation, a compliance check, or a complaint investigation conducted by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs.
Data Source Case Management System
Baseline FY 1999 actual: 2,648
Comment This goal is to increase the level of compliance as a result of OFCCP intervention through enforcement and compliance assistance efforts.

3.2B

Performance Goal FY 2001: To increase compliance with the equal employment opportunity requirements among Federal contractors, establish a baseline by the end of FY 2001 to measure the effectiveness of OFCCP's education, technical assistance and outreach efforts.

FY 2000: To increase compliance with the equal employment opportunity requirements among Federal contractors, establish a methodology by the end of FY 2000 to measure the effectiveness of OFCCP's education, technical assistance and outreach efforts.



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999

Performance

Results

N/A
Indicator Number of Federal contractors brought into compliance following education, technical assistance, and outreach efforts by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP)
Data Source Case file information; weekly reports; Case Management System
Baseline To be established in FY 2001.
Comment Based upon the changes in program effectiveness in FY 1998 and FY 1999, OFCCP has determined that its presence may have a preventative affect upon the universe of Federal contractors. Therefore, OFCCP will increase compliance through our technical assistance, education, outreach, and voluntary compliance efforts to assist Federal contractors in understanding the regulatory requirements for providing equal employment and affirmative action.

3.2C

Performance Goal
FY 2001: To narrow the wage gap for protected groups within the Federal contractor reporting community, establish a baseline by the end of FY2001 to identify wage disparities.

FY 2000: To narrow the wage gap for protected groups within the Federal contractor reporting community, establish a methodology by the end of FY 2000 to identify wage disparities.



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999

Performance

Results

N/A
Indicator Narrow the wage gap between men and women within the federal contractor reporting community
Data Source To be determined. Probable sources will be data from EO Survey, case file information, and BLS data.
Baseline To be established in FY 2001
Comment

3.2D Performance Goal FY 2001: All DOL national and state level programs financially assisted under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) are in compliance with all applicable civil rights laws and regulations.

FY 2000: Within 180 days of submission of state Methods of Administration (MOAs), states are in compliance with the non-discrimination provisions of Section 188 of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) and 29 CFR Part 37.



FY 1999: Issue final regulations implementing the nondiscrimination provisions of Section 188 of WIA by August 7, 1999. (This goal was added subsequent to the publication and submission to Congress of the final version of the FY 1999 Annual Performance Plan dated February 2, 1998.)

FY 1999 Performance Results FACE="Times" Interim final regulations were published in accordance with OMB guidance; effective November 12, 1999. The interim final rule was submitted to OMB on June 16, well in advance of the date needed to ensure publication of the rule by the August 7, 1999 deadline. However, during the regulatory final clearance process, OMB determined that it was necessary to have other Federal agencies, who were outside of the required coordinating agencies listed in the implementing Executive Order (EEOC, HHS, and OMB), also comment on the regulations. Inasmuch as OASAM is required to follow OMB's guidance, including amendments to that guidance, delay in issuing the regulations was beyond DOL's control. FACE="Times" It has been determined that the delay will not have a substantial adverse impact on program implementation.
Indicator
  • • Number of state administered programs financially assisted under WIA within 180 days of submission of state Methods of Administration (MOA's) that are in compliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of Section 188 of the WIA and 29 CFR Part 37
  • • Number of national programs funded under WIA that are in compliance with Section 188 of the WIA and 29 CFR Part 37
Data Source
  • •Methods of administration agreement signed by states

  • • National programs' procedures
Baseline
  • •FY 2000 Statistics (53 state administered programs)
  • •FY 2000 Statistics (4 national programs)
Comment Receipt of DOL Federal financial assistance dollars under WIA are contingent upon compliance with the nondiscrimination provisions in Section 188 of the Act. Each MOA agreement describes how the state will assure that the grant funds will be administered in accordance with the requirements contained under Section 188 and 20 CFR Part 37. Noncompliance can result in the withdrawal of grant funds.

Outcome Goal 3.3 - Support a Greater Balance Between Work and Family -- Performance Goals

3.3A Performance Goal FY 2001: The number of states with registered child care apprenticeship programs will increase to 49 and the number of new child care apprentices will increase by 20% over FY 2000.

FY 2000: By replicating the West Virginia and other successful child care models, increase the number of States with child care apprenticeship programs from 29 to 39 and increase the number of new child care apprentices by 15% over the FY 1999 resuls.



FY 1999: By replicating the West Virginia and other successful child care models, increase the number of States with child care apprenticeship programs to 29 and increase the number of child care apprentices by 10% (to at least 2,114).

FY 1999 Performance Results At the end of FY1999 there were 29 States with child care apprenticeship programs and 2,216 child care apprentices registered. BAT will continue to work with States that received child care grants in an effort to build child care infrastructures, train professional child care workers, and identify best practice initiatives that serve as model for future replication.
Indicator The number of States with registered child care apprenticeship programs
Data Source Apprenticeship Information Management System (AIMS)
Baseline At the end of FY 1997, nineteen states had childcare apprenticeship programs with 1,914 apprentices enrolled.
Comment

3.3B

Performance Goal FY 2001: Increase by 50% the number of small and mid-sized employers who made their work places family-friendly.

FY 2000: N/A



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator Number of small and mid-sized employers who pledge to implement new policies to help women balance their work and family needs
Data Source Work and Family Honor Roll Program Report
Baseline FY 1997: 840 employers
Comment This is a voluntary program which relies on information provided by the employers. Impact will be measured through a follow-up OMB approved form specifically geared to employers who in turn can provide information on the number of employees impacted.

Outcome Goal 3.4 - Reduce Exploitation of Child Labor and Address Core International Labor Standards Issues -- Performance Goals

3.4A

Performance Goal FY 2001: Progressively reduce exploitative child labor worldwide by increasing international support and funding the most promising programs and projects in targeted countries.

FY 2000: Progressively reduce exploitative child labor worldwide by increasing international support and funding the most promising programs and projects in targeted countries.



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator(s)
  • Increase number of countries ratifying International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 182 on the Worst Forms of Child Labor;
  • Increase number of IPEC National Action Plans;
  • Increase awareness through reports, other publications, and web site on exploitative child labor disseminated by ILAB;
  • 100,000 children targeted for prevention and removal from exploitative work.
Data Source ILO-IPEC and DOL/ILAB
Baseline In 1998, ILAB published its fifth child labor report in the By the Sweat & Toil of Children series. This report focuses on efforts to reduce child labor in 16 countries.

The ILO's Statistical Information and Monitoring Program (SIMPOC) is currently assisting countries in generating statistical data on child labor at the national level that would more accurately assess the extent and nature of the global child labor problem. More than 40 SIMPOC surveys are scheduled to be conducted through 2000 and 2001. In the meantime, baseline information collected through the IPEC projects will be used to establish target populations and measure future progress.

Comment Throughout the 1990s, increased international recognition of the child labor problem and action to address it have been increasing. While there is still a high incidence of child labor in many developing countries, many governmental and non-governmental organizations are taking steps to remove children from exploitative work. This increased commitment to the eradication of child labor is evident by the unanimous adoption of the ILO Convention on the Worst Forms of Child Labor in Geneva in June 1999.

ILAB is working to establish better survey data and to document the extent and nature of child labor through the ILO's SIMPOC program. Achievement of this performance goal depends upon other countries agreeing to establish and implement IPEC projects to be funded by ILAB. Projects funded in FY 2000 in some instances may not have impact until FY 2001.


3.4B

Performance Goal FY 2001: Raise workers' protection and the safety of work places in selected countries by improving core labor standards and social safety net programs.

FY 2000: Raise workers' protection and the safety of work places in selected countries by improving core labor standards and social safety net programs.



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicator
  • Ten (10) DOL project countries commit to undertake improvements in assuring compliance and implementation of core labor standards in DOL project countries which have accepted financial support from U.S.A./DOL.
  • Six (6) project countries commit to undertake improvements in social safety nets funded by U.S.A./DOL, which may include labor market information systems; unemployment insurance/social security systems; employment creation, training/retraining and placement programs; occupational safety and health including the mining sector; workforce development initiatives for vulnerable groups.
  • Number of countries that improve social safety programs that protect workers and develop labor markets
  • Number of judicial and legal decisions which improve core labor standards and workplace safety standards.
Data Source ILO Reports; reports by government and nongovernmental organizations
Baseline Current level of implementation
Comment Multilateral and Bilateral technical assistance Programs are being launched in FY 2000 with new funds. Consequently, outcomes are not anticipated to be realized until FY 2001, following a number of key project interventions. Other countries may not share U.S. priorities in determining agendas.

Outcome Goal FM - Maintain the Integrity and Stewardship of the Department's Financial Resources -- Performance Goals

FM1

Performance Goal FY 2001: All DOL financial systems meet the standards set in the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act (FFMIA) and the Government Management Reform Act (GMRA).

FY 2000: All of DOL financial systems meet the standards or have prepared corrective action plans to meet the standard by FY 2000.



FY 1999: DOL financial systems and procedures either meet the "substantial compliance" standard as prescribed in the Federal Financial management Improvement Act (FFMIA) or corrective actions are scheduled to promptly correct material weaknesses identified.

FY 1999

Performance

Results

Cost Accounting applications have been implemented at summary levels in each agency to measure costs in achieving Secretary's goals and other broad organizational goals for the FY 2000 Performance Plan. (Development of cost accounting applications for detailed program levels in the FY 2001 Performance Plan will extend into FY 2000.) We will not have confirmation of compliance with the GPRA Cost Accounting Standard until the audit has been completed.

Of the five financial systems identified in the FY 1998 audit as not being in compliance with FFMIA, corrective action schedules and related project plans have been established for four of the systems-Wage and Hour's civil monetary penalties system, MSHA's penalty tracking system, and Job Corps real and personal property systems.



One system-ESA's Back Wage Collection and Disbursement System-still requires the agency's commitment to prepare and effect a corrective action schedule. ESA is looking into the possibility of establishing a cross-servicing agreement with the Department of the Treasury to manage the financial operations in support of the program in lieu of ESA maintaining a financial system to account for the collection and payout of back wage settlements.

Indicator Percentage of the 14 financial systems compliant with the Acts
Data Source OIG audit opinion in Accountability Report to be issued in March 2001
Baseline FY 1998: 64% - nine of fourteen systems in compliance

FY 1997: 57% -- eight of fourteen systems in compliance

Comment It is anticipated that all 5 remaining systems will be in compliant by FY 2000.

FM2

Performance Goal FY 2001: DOL meets all new accounting standards issued by the Federal Accounting Systems Advisory Board (FASAB) including the Managerial Cost Accounting Standard.

FY 2000: DOL meets all eight current FASAB standards



FY 1999: N/A

FY 1999

Performance

Results

N/A
Indicator Percentage of FASAB standards met
Data Source OIG audit opinion in Accountability Report to be issued in March 2001
Baseline FY 1997: DOL meets all current FASAB accounting standards
Comment The Cost Accounting Standards will require additional effort to maintain.

Outcome Goal IT - Improve Organizational Performance and Communication through Effective Deployment of IT Resources -- Performance Goals

IT



Performance Goals FY 2001: Increase integration of DOL IT systems and extend access to automated services.

FY 2000: Increase integration of DOL IT systems and extend access to automated services.



FY1999: N/A

FY 1999 Performance Results N/A
Indicators a) Implement a common office automation suite of software DOL-wide.

b) Percent of DOL employee-initiated training requests processed electronically (target is 80%)

c) Percent of DOL manager-initiated personnel actions processed electronically (target is 80%)

d) Percent of DOL-wide distributed documents available through LaborNet (target is 80%)

e) LaborNet usage and customer feedback (target is TBD)

Data Sources
  • Agency IT systems
  • Personnel Action Reports

  • Personnel Action Reports

  • Web trends and LaborNet

  • Web trends and LaborNet
Baseline
  • Currently, DOL does not have a common office automation suite of software DOL-wide.
  • FY 2000
  • FY 2000
  • FY 2000
  • FY 2000
Comment

Outcome Goal HR: Establish DOL as a Model Workplace -- Performance Goals

HR1 Performance Goal FY 2001: Recruit, develop, and retain a highly competent and diverse workforce to support the accomplishment of the DOL mission by:

a) Attract a diverse, highly competent applicant pool of candidates

b) Provide lifelong learning programs and services to support mission accomplishment

c) Implement and expand model workplace initiatives to enhance morale and retention rates.



FY 2000: (a) Increase usage of career assistance and continuous learning programs and services by 20% over FY 1999. (b) Increase participation in "family-friendly" programs by 10% from FY 1999 utilization.



FY 1999: Goals for the human resources area were: (a) increase by 10% the number of employees utilizing continuous learning/development and career management programs and services ; and (b) increase participation in "employee-friendly" programs by 10%.

FY 1999 Performance Results (a) 3,943 DOL employees received continuous learning/development and career management programs and services. This is an increase of 42% over FY 1998;

(b) Average overall increase for leave programs: 64%

Leave Bank Membership: 707 employees -18% Increase

Leave Donations: 3,004 employees - 80% Increase

Leave Recipients: 130 employees - 86% Increase

Resource and Referral Services: 9,122 employees (Baseline Established)

Indicator a) 85% of managers will indicate satisfaction with the diversity and quality of applicants referred for their vacancies

b) Increase utilization of career assistance and continuous learning opportunities by 20% over FY 2000 data

c1) Reduce third party litigation by 2% via use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) approaches and partnership activities

c2) Increase participation in family friendly programs by 10% over FY 2000 data.

Data Source a1) Applicant background questionnaire-tracking system and relevant civilian labor force data

a2) Managerial feedback obtained by survey and focus groups

b) Utilization and participation data in continuous learning programs and services

c1) Labor-Management Relations tracking system

c2) Program participation tracking systems and DCC quarterly reports

Baseline a) FY 2000 applicants' profile data and representation rates

b) FY 2000 participation and usage data

c) FY 2000 data from LMR and Worklife Center tracking systems

Comment The following factors may affect the ability to attain the above goals: DOL's budget; changes in recruitment and hiring procedures; introduction of new recruitment flexibilities; computer access to programs and services to all DOL employees; and the unions' and management's willingness to instill partnership principles at the working level and adopt the use of ADR techniques.

HR2 Performance Goal FY 2001: Maintain organizational commitment and pro-active effort to improving health and safety in the workplace.

FY 2000: Maintain organizational commitment and proactive effort to improve the health and safety in the DOL workplace



FY 1999: Increase the number of employees returning to work, thereby reducing charge back compensation costs by 3%

FY 1999 Performance Results Employees Returned to Work: 19

Chargeback cost reduced by $560,225 - 2.95% Reduction

Indicator
  • Percent decrease in injuries (target is 3%)
  • Percent decrease in days to report injuries (target is 5%)
  • Percent decrease in lost production days (target is 2%)
Data Source
  • OSHA injury reports
  • OWCP time-lag reports for federal agencies for submission of claims forms CA-1 and CA-2 within 10 working days or 14 calendar days
  • OWCP reports
Baseline
  • Lost time injuries reported by DOL agencies in FY 2000
  • OWCP baseline data for FY 2000
  • OWCP baseline data for FY 2000
Comment

HR3 Performance Goal

(internal)

FY 2001: All DOL agencies are in compliance with applicable Civil Rights laws and regulations

FY 2000: Two of the ten major DOL agencies are reviewed and their EEO programs are found to be in compliance with the applicable civil rights laws and equal opportunity regulations.



FY 1999: Complete a review of one of the ten major DOL agencies to verify that all DOL agencies have procedures in place to meet the requirements of applicable civil rights laws .

FY 1999 Performance Results An extensive review of the Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration's EEO program revealed an effective program to ensure nondiscrimination at the workplace . Data indicates: (a) 80% of the employees think they are treated in a fair, equitable, and nondiscriminatory manner; (b) 92% of all accommodation requests are approved; and (c) at the GS-13 level, 53% are representation of women and minorities. The final report, along with comments from the Assistant Secretary of PWBA, were issued September 28, 1999.
Indicator Number of agencies reviewed and that have in place all requirements outlined under 29 CFR 1614, Secretary Order 3-96, and related statutes
Data Source Civil Rights Center Methods of Administration Evaluation Instrument
Baseline Ten DOL major agencies
Comment One review was completed in FY 1999. Two reviews are scheduled for FY 2000.



Phone Numbers